1 Green River Utah Area Transmission and Distribution System – January 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southwest Rhode Island Transmission Supply Study Long Term Needs and Solutions.
Advertisements

March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
EMC in Electrical Power Systems Frithiof Jensen Power System Engineer November 12, 2013.
The Power Grid ELEC 403 The Citadel Mark McKinney.
1 Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (North) Proposed Transmission Reliability Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Lecture 26 Distribution Systems Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Arrowhead  Weston Transmission Line Project Dave Van House Minnesota Power.
The Bottom Line In Energy Cost Reduction Energy Automation Systems, Inc. EASI.
KURTEN SWITCH PROJECT (BRYAN/ COLLEGE STATION AREA UPGRADES) Technical Advisory Committee December 1, 2005 Transmission Services.
1 1 Substation Asset Strategy Kevin Dasso, Senior Director Engineering and Operations IEEE/PES Annual Substations Committee Meeting April 7, 2008.
January 5, 2012 TAC Cross Valley 345 kV Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
IMPACTS OF LARGE DISTRIBUTED GENERATORS ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1 Presented by Ed Briggs, P.E. Manager of Electric Distribution Planning.
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com Challenges and Solutions for Large-Scale PV Integration on RPU’s Distribution.
Interconnection of Distributed Generation
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210)
Disconnect Switches There are many purposes for disconnect switches in substations and power lines. They are used to isolate or deenergize equipment for.
1 Local Area Planning Update to TRANSAC – July 29, 2015 Mitigation Update, Uncertainty Scenarios, and Next Steps.
© 2000 PACIFICORP | PAGE 1 WYOMING WEST AREA STUDY DECEMBER 2013 Seongtae Kim/Jeremy Viula.
Jan 13, 2012 RPG Meeting El Campo – Vanderbilt 69 kV Project – Status report Ehsan Ur Rehman Planning Engineer ERCOT.
1 Power Quality Mary Santori, P.E. Senior Engineer September 12, 2013.
Report on the NCTPC 2006 Collaborative Transmission Plan Mark Byrd, Manager – Transmission Planning Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc January 25, 2007.
APPA Engineering and Operations Technical Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 13-18, 2007 “Nailing the Basics” Earns Princeton, IL RP3 Diamond Award.
ELG4125 Transmission and Distribution Systems
Harmonics Problems in Distribution Systems Case Study AEP Texas Central Company Scott Lee, Reliability Engineer.
Rocky Mountain Power Sub Transmission Five Year Study Findings and Kick Off Attachment K Meeting September 10, 2015.
2. Terms and definitions1 # Terms and Definitions # Voltage Sags and Interruptions.
Plans to bring Out-of-Compliance UES Measures back into Compliance: 1. Agricultural Irrigation Hardware UES 2. Agricultural Motors UES Regional Technical.
Turkish Power System Overview March 2012
1 The following are the planned transmission project at SCL for the next ten year. All the projects has no major impact to the bulk transmission system.
Summary Overview: MADRI Model Small Generator Interconnection Procedures Prepared by Brad Johnson* June 15, 2006 ACN Energy Ventures
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
AFREPREN/FWD Cogen Centre Training Workshop on Cogeneration in Africa
Small Generation Interconnection Standards - IOU Dennis Reed Westar Energy Topeka, KS September 26, 2007.
Rocky Mountain Power Five Year Study Findings and Kick Off Meeting December 2013.
Texas Wind Energy American Meteorological Society Summer Community Meeting – Norman Oklahoma Henry Durrwachter, P.E. August 12, 2009.
Energy Storage Applications at AEP Emeka Okafor American Electric Power Presentation to SouthWest Electric Distribution Exchange May 7, 2009.
1 Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (Louisiana) Proposed Transmission Reliability Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 10, 2003.
1 Distributive Generation Wind Landfill Solar Fuel CellMicro-Turbine.
April 21, 2015 Presented by: Heidi Springer, P.E. Brian Ginter, P.E.
1 Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (South) Proposed Transmission Reliability Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 10, 2003.
1 Power Quality EKT 451 CHAPTER 8. 2 Introduction Utilities transmit electricity over power lines into home as an alternating current (AC) wave. This.
Public Service Commission of Utah Workshop 12/4/2007 Generation Interconnection Utility perspective Rocky Mountain Power Les Bahls, director transmission.
Utility Engineers, PC.  Generation  Transmission  Distribution.
EECE 887 Distribution System Engineering CHAPTER 1 Power Delivery Systems.
Jesus A. Guerra, P.E. Distribution System Reliability CenterPoint Energy SWEDE 2011.
Introduction  Utilities transmit electricity over power lines into home as an alternating current (AC) wave.  This is how power travels through wiring.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
Distribution Systems-General
© 2000 PACIFICORP | PAGE 1 SOUTHWEST UTAH AREA STUDY SEPTEMBER 2014 Nathan Wilson/Talmage Daley Need to review the LOADS before Friday.
Experiences in Managing Settings Bryan J Gwyn National Grid USA.
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — Current Projects — The Center for the New West “ The Sun Valley Energy Roundtables 2006” November 30 – December.
September 1, 2011 TAC Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Planning Group Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
Dated: 17 February 2016 Instructor :Kashif Mehmood.
Connecting Low Carbon Generation Clive Goodman Primary System Design Engineer.
Interconnected Generation Preliminary Engineering Work Related to Fees.
Summary Overview: Maryland Straw Man Interconnection Rule Prepared by Brad Johnson* January 11, 2007 ACN Energy Ventures *National.
STUDY OF ELEMENTS OF A 220/132/33KV SUBSTATION
Power Quality at Solar Distributed Generation Facilities
Rocky Mountain Power Five Year Study Findings & Kick Off Meeting
Subteam 1a Competitive Solicitations Framework Working Group Meeting
Transmission and Distribution Loss Study
Design of Electric Power Systems and Utilities
Distributed Generation (DG) Modeling Criteria
Protective Relaying Conference
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering - Slovenia
Nathan Kassees, P.E. Sr. Engineer Oncor Electric Delivery
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
EET 323 – Electrical System Design Lecture 3: Load Characteristics
Presentation transcript:

1 Green River Utah Area Transmission and Distribution System – January 16, 2009

2 Discussion Items  Commission Questions  Commission Rules  Existing System  Capacity  Alternatives

3 Q: Determine whether its facility records are correct. A: Rocky Mountain Power inspected the electrical distribution system in the Green River area in 2007 and verified that the system is correctly mapped and recorded. Commission Questions

4 Q: How does Rocky Mountain Power assess the need for new or upgraded plant? A: Rocky Mountain Power performs distribution and transmission planning studies to assess the need for new or upgraded plant. These studies assure the company that the existing customer base is adequately served and that the known projected loads are planned for. Last distribution study was completed in Last transmission study was completed in Commission Questions

5 A:  From the engineering studies, discussed on the previous slide, new plant projects are developed and scoped.  Projects are then prioritized and submitted for approval.  After approval projects are given to project management for design and construction. Q: How are the engineering studies used to plan for plant construction? Commission Questions

6  Line extensions for new customer load requests are covered under Rocky Mountain Power’s Electric Service Regulation No. 12, Line Extensions. New Customer Load Requests Commission Questions

7 Commission Planning Rules

8  “1. Unless otherwise directed by the Commission, the requirements contained in the 2006 edition of the American National Standard for Electrical Power Systems and Equipment- Voltage Ratings (60 Hz), ANSI C , incorporated by this reference, shall be the minimum requirements relative to utility voltages.” The steady state minimum is 95 percent of nominal service voltage. UTAH COMMISSION RULE B(1)

9 ANSI C edition

10 Utility Power Quality Standards

11  Harmonic distortion: IEEE 519 is the national standard that sets limits for the distortion allowed in the power system. We suggest adding 519 language in the Utah rules. Idaho’s rules can be used as a template.  Fluctuating loads and voltages: Voltage fluctuations are already covered by existing Utah rule 5.2(e). No change is needed.  Balanced loads and voltages: Voltage imbalances are already covered by existing Utah rule 5.2(f) and ANSI C84.1, Annex D. No change is needed.  Disturbances: When an unplanned upset occurs on the power system such as lightning hitting, a large generator unexpectedly tripping, or load-carrying equipment suddenly failing, we call this a disturbance. Where and when these occur are largely beyond the utility’s control— and are usually caused by others—hence no proscriptive standards are appropriate. Many documents characterize them and address their mitigation. Other power quality standards that might be considered for adoption by the commission

12 Green River 12 – City Customer Voltage During Week in mid July 2008 Three voltages are shown: min, max, and average. Min includes sags due to transmission faults (shown in the middle) and motor starts. Average voltage (light green) is to be compared with ANSI C84.1 because that is the regulated voltage that doesn’t change with disturbances.

13 Green River 46/12 kV #2 Substation Peak Load Data SUMMER MVA PercentActual YearLoadCapacity PF Straight Line R2 = Ave. Hist. Ld. Growth % Exponential R2 = Ave. Hist. Ld. Growth % The closer R2 is to 1.00 the better the curve fit – 9 Spot Load Addition for irrigation pumping

14 Transmission System as of September kV 46 kV 345 kV Green River Sub

15 Transmission & Distribution System as of September kV 46 kV 345 kV 12 kV Circuit 12

16 Distribution System (Existing) as of September 2008 Green River 12 Circuit Green River Substation 46/12.47 kV Green River Ranches Added 250 HP 2008 Added 750 HP 2008 Voltage Regulator Station Added in Summer 2007

17 Distribution System Existing Conductors as of September 2008 #4 Copper 135 amps #2 ACSR 145 amps #4 Amerductor 100 amps 1/0 ACSR 210 amps Green River 12 Circuit Map based on Field Check 05/01/07 Green River Substation 46/12.47 kV GRR 12 Circuit #4 Copper – 5.34 miles #2 ACSR -.30 Miles 1/0 ACSR – 0.2 miles #4 Amerductor -.54 Miles #1/0 ACSR Miles #1/0 ACSR -.22 Miles 1/0 ACSR – 1.5 miles #2 ACSR miles

Aluminum Wire kV #2 Aluminum Wire kV #4 Copper Wire kV 1/0 Aluminum Wire kV 1.026” 0.398” 0.316” 0.254” Conductor Characteristics

19 Transmission & Distribution uncommitted System Capacity Remaining as of September kV 46 kV 345 kV 0 kW 12 kV 0 kW 138 kV 46 kV 345 kV 12 kV

20 New Customer Requests as of November 2008 Green River Substation 46/12.47 kV New Load Request (10 Mi. South) 600 HP New Load Request 600 HP

Planned Capacity Increase 138 kV 46 kV 12 kV Estimated Construction Costs For Replacing Existing 46/12 kV Substation with a new 138/12 kV Substation. (PLANNED FOR 2010) Substation Cost$3,800,000 New Distribution Circuits Cost$ 800,000 Total $4,600, MW new transformer capacity New Green River 11 Circuit 345 kV

22 Distribution System Upgrades Option 1: Re-conductor Existing Feeder New Green River 11 Circuit New Green River Substation 138/12.47 kV Green River Ranches Pumps Voltage Regulator Station FP Estimated Construction Costs For Replacing Existing Small Three Phase Conductors with 795 AAC Conductor 8.0 miles 795 AAC three phase $2,000,000 Total $2,000, kV 46 kV 345 kV 12 kV 1400 KW Additional Capacity Available

23 Distribution System Upgrades Option 2: Extend Existing Feeder 138 kV 46 kV 345 kV 12 kV New Green River 11 Circuit New Green River Substation 138/12.47 kV Voltage Regulator Station FP KW Additional Capacity Available Estimated Construction Costs For Adding 4.0 Miles three phase 795 AAC Conductor 6.0 miles 795 AAC three phase $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000

24 Distribution System Upgrades Option 3: Re-conductor Existing Feeder + Extension 138 kV 46 kV 345 kV 12 kV New Green River 11 Circuit 4800 KW Additional Capacity Available New Green River Substation 138/12.47 kV Voltage Regulator Station FP Estimated Construction Costs For Replacing 2.0 Miles 1/0 ACSR with 795 AAC Conductor and Adding 4.0 Miles three phase 795 AAC Conductor 6.0 miles 795 AAC three phase $1,700,000 Total $1,700,000