The impact of computers on the achievement of special needs students By: Jessica Krauss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
FirstSchool : Improving the PreK-3 rd Grade School Experience of African-American, Latino, and Low Income Children Looking Back and Looking Ahead: Developing.
A Guide to Implementation
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Lisa Marvel EDD: 7100 December, 2009.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
THE IMPACT OF THE INTEL TEACH TO THE FUTURE PRESERVICE PROGRAM ON SELECTED BEED STUDENTS’ LEARNING Melissa Alma R. Orencia College of Education Philippine.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
PECAT Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool Lessons for Physical Education Teacher Preparation Programs National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention.
A STEPS TO LEADERSHIP PROGRAM FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS First Year Participant Orientation.
Price Middle School – Needs Improvement List State Officials are closely monitoring our progress Focus on SWD Population have are not meeting expectations.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Freedom to Learn Michigan’s One-to-One Teaching & Learning Initiative Michigan Technology Directors’ Conference October 6, 2006 Leslie Wilson & Scott Wooster.
The Pershing/Rice University Math Partnership: PUMPing Up Math Achievement Caren Grant Pershing MS, Houston ISD
Technology Leadership
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
RESEARCH QUESTION EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. Role of the Research Question Ê Attempts to focus on a stated goal Ë Gives direction to research process Ì Suggests.
Assisting Students with Disabilities
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
 Relationships  Classroom management  Teaching styles › Visual › Auditory › Kinesthetic.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
1 Emerging Disability Policy Framework: A Guidepost for Analyzing Public Policy Iowa Law Review August 2000, Vol. 85/No. 5.
PROPONENTS: Isabelita R. Hizon, Ed. D. Susan O. Habacon INQUIRY-BASED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM (ICLP) FOR MANAGING LARGE CLASSES AND ITS EFFECT ON.
Improving the Use of Technology in Education through Action Research ATE 2004 Susan Arisman Marcia B. Cushall Frostburg State University.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Assuring Gifted Program Quality Through Self-Study. Gail Hanninen, Ed. D.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.” Albert Einstein.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Comments on the Washington Group Position Paper Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General Disability Measure Alicia Bercovich IBGE Brazil.
TigerLIFE Behavioral Unit J. Brian Smith, Ed.D., BCBA Marissa Harris, M.S., Ed.D. Graduate Student.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
Method Survey conducted at the academic year and developed with the support of the Telefónica Foundation (Spain). Sample of 356 educational centres,
SOUTH CHICAGO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Chicago, Illinois Superintendent - Dr. James Brown Tech Coordinator – Dr. Amanda Ross Technology Integration Plan.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
KIDS GRANT. The Grant Department of Education Technology Innovation Challenge Grant Classroom technology integration Key Instructional Design Strategies.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Rethink Rebuild Focus Move Forward Professional Learning
Presentation to the Faculty of North Surry High School September 11, 2014 Mark Fuhrmann North Surry High School, Mount Airy, NC Participant in the
By William Gray Rinehart and Kristi Ley
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Field placements for students of social policy and social work at the UB-FPS Natalija Perisic University of Belgrade Faculty of Political Sciences Department.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Running Head: Impacts of the Tech Act Annette Jones EDU 620 Meeting Individual Needs With Technology Instructor David Quinn March 23, 2015.
Johnson Middle School Johnson Middle School SCHOOL PROFILE 700 Student Population Virginia Public Schools Grades Number of Classrooms:28.
1 IT/Cybersecurity - ICRDCE Conference Day Aligning Program, Course, and Class Objectives / Outcomes.
LEARNING FROM STUDENT WORK ON PERFORMANCE TASKS Molly McCabe, Ed.D.
ILS Report By: Landon Welsh.
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
Presentation transcript:

The impact of computers on the achievement of special needs students By: Jessica Krauss

Research Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how academic achievement may be effected among special needs students who have computers integrated into their curriculum and those who do not have computers integrated into their curriculum.

Sub-Problems: What is meant by “special needs students”? How much computer time is needed? Is assistive technology included in this study?

Hypothesis: There will be a significant difference in academic achievement among special need children who have computers integrated into their daily curriculum and those who do not have computers integrated into their daily curriculum.

Relevance to Education: This study is relevant to education because of the current movement in computers today. More and more students with special needs are using computers. Computer instruction should focus on meaningful comprehension. Computer use should foster active involvement and stimulate thinking (Bowe, 1994). It is important to know and analyze student progress in relation to computer use. Technology refers to instructional approaches that are very well defined objectives, precise instructional procedures based upon the tasks that the students are required to learn and careful monitoring of students performance (Blackhurst, 1997). This study is also relevant to help determine some positive and negative aspects of computer use with special needs students.

Hypothesis: Research Hypothesis:Research Hypothesis: There will be an impact on special needs student’s achievement due to computer usage. Operational Hypothesis:Operational Hypothesis: There will be an impact on the achievement of special needs students due to computer use according to various classroom assessments. Null Hypothesis:Null Hypothesis: There will not be a significant impact on achievement due to computer usage.

Significance of Study: Many schools have several ways of assessing students with special needs. To many people, the term “technology” conjures up visions of computer and other related “high-tech” devices that are viewed as being very expensive and very complicated to use. Often, such perspectives focus solely on hardware and equipment and overlook the role of procedures that relate to the delivery of technology services but do not involve the use of equipment or devices. Throughout this study, the delivery of special education services and the use of technology in supporting special education will be observed and described. During this study, special needs students who use technology in their daily curriculum and those who do not will be observed and tested on their academic achievement. This study will determine the effect of computers on the academic achievement of special needs students.

Review of Literature: I.Effects of technology on student achievement I. Effects of technology on student achievement The level of effectiveness of education is influenced by: A. Specific student population B. Software design C. Educator’s Role D. How students are grouped E. Level of student access to technology II. Effects of Technology on student-concept and attitude about learning A. Recent Studies B. Self-concept III. Benefits of computer-based instruction A. Standardized test scores B. Instant feedback

Variables: Independent Variable:Independent Variable: Special Needs Students Dependent Variables:Dependent Variables: Computers Academic Achievement Confounding Variables:Confounding Variables: Teacher training Age of students What grades will be compared Location of study Length of study Sample size Academic standing of each student

Ethical Concerns: This study will take place in education classrooms, which means the following ethnical concerns must be addressed: Guarantee of the subjects individual privacy Informed consent of subject’s parents/guardians Providing participants with information about the study Minimizing interferes with the students daily routine will be kept to a minimum Reporting of results

Funding: The Spencer Foundation 875 North Michigan Ave. Suite 3930 Chicago, IL Education-Research Grants Program U.S. Dept. Of Ed 555 New Jersey Ave. Suite 627 Washington, DC 20208

References: Berman, B. (1997). The Effectiveness of Using Technology on k-12 Education: A Preliminary Framework and Review. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research Blackhurst, E. (1997). Perspectives about technology in Special Education. University of Kentucky Assistive Technology Project Bowe, F.C. (1994). Personal Computers and Special Needs. Berkely, CA: Sybex Sherry, L. (2001). Assessing the impact of Instructional Technology on Student Achievement. Council Bluffs, IA: Council Bluffs Community Schools Website