Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Wireless Bridge Common Practices Notice: This document has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission February 2007 A. Centonza, D. StephensonSlide 1 Limitations on the Use of EBR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 Submission March 2005 Tatsuji Munaka, Mitsubishi Electric Corp.Slide 1 User Scenario example; Sensor Overlay Network Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0121r0 Submission January 2006 S. Bezzateev, A. Fomin, M. WongSlide 1 Broadcast Management Frame Protection Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 Submission January 2009 Slide 1 Proxy ARP Issue for Direct Link Setup Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /1606r0 Submission January 2005 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 AP Functions Diagram Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /0041r1 AP Location Capability January 2007 Donghee Shim et alSlide 1 AP Location Capability Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /86r2 Submission March, 2010 Gabor BajkoSlide 1 Location Proxy Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0136r0 Submission January 2007 Dave Stephenson, Cisco Systems, Inc.Slide 1 Input to Information Model Date: Notice:
Beacon Measurement on Pilot Frames
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
Lightweight Mesh Point – A confusing term
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
3GPP Extended Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Lightweight Mesh Point – A confusing term
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
DLS Link Timeout Date: Eunkyo Kim
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Lightweight Mesh Point – A confusing term
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Location Capability Negotiation
Method for geting Link RCPI
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Reserve Option Contradiction
Lightweight Mesh Point – A confusing term
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Wireless Bridge Common Practices Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 2 Abstract The submission describes how to properly use existing mechanisms within to implement devices that include bridging capability (both within the wireless network and between the wireless network and a non- wireless network).

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 3 Introduction includes a four-address frame format (4AFF) that can be used for indirect, or relayed, communications. 4AFF is also intended for use in devices that include bridging capability. However, descriptions and definitions of exactly how to use 4AFF to perform these functions were not allowed to be included in the Std. The implementation scheme is fairly straightforward and this paper seeks to document those procedures in order to ease development of such devices and perhaps support improved interoperability.

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 4 Specific Actions Needed Actions required in bridges Actions required in APs Actions required in STA that include bridging capability

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 5 Terminology Reference See slide 9 from [1] Title = “Large scale access LAN with 4A mode STA with bridging” Establishes the term “station with bridging capability”

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 6 Large scale access LAN with 4A mode STA with bridging DS non LAN Infra mode STA AP ACM_STA B/C Infra mode STA AP ACM_STA B/C 4A STA 4A mode STA with bridging D Portal Bridge non STA Slide 9 from

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 7 Challenge refer to slide 9 in [2] [2] ponders how to deal with link change for the TV device As noted, an unacceptable solution is to send Topology Change Notification (TCN) packets, which causes massive unlearning and subsequent flooding Alternately (as cited on [2] slide 14) sending bcsts or mcsts is also problematic an hence ineffective.

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 8 Slide 9 from avb-nfinn-wireless-bridges pdf

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 9 Instead the solution lies elsewhere First let’s look at how the STAs got connected in the first place and what data paths exist between the STAs.

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 10 Initial Link Establishment When SR initially associates to AP A it uses a normal association process. When DVD1 is attached to the SR, the SR associates the DVD1 with AP A using an indirect association process, i.e. an associate request constructed using the 4AFF, indicating to AP A that STA SR is the relay point for packets destined for DVD1. AP A also now knows that STA SR is a bridging STA and so all future bcst/ mcst packets are delivered from AP A to STA SR as unicast packets using the 4AFF. A similar process is used to indirectly associate the TV with AP A. So AP A now knows the path to STAs SR, DVD1 and TV. AP A uses the “infrastructure update packet” to inform bridge B of the presence of STAs SR, DVD1 and TV.

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 11 Link Re-establishment When the TV disconnects from DVD1 and establishes a direct link with bridge B then Bridge B sends to bridge A an “infrastructure update packet” (for example as defined in F). Bridge A updates its memory of the location of the TV and in turn forwards the “infrastructure update packet” to other devices to which it is connected (but not the source port). In particular the update packet is sent to “station bridge SR”. Since station SR is known to be a STA with bridging capability all packets are sent using the 4AFF. STA SR now learns the new location in the network of the TV. Since STA SR also includes a bridge it forwards the “infrastructure update packet” to DVD1 and DVD1 learns the new path to the TV. Result = instantly all devices in the local area network learn the new location of the relinked device (the TV in this case).

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 12 Summary Actions required in bridges –send out “infrastructure update packet” when a new device is detected, or a known device is detected on a different port. Actions required in APs –detect indirect associations forwarded by associated STAs –mark those STAs as being of type “STA with bridging” –thereafter apply 4AFF for all frame exchanges with those STAs Actions required in STA that include bridging capability –use 4AFF for all frame exchanges with the AP –send out “infrastructure update packet” when a new device is detected, or a known device is detected on a different port.

doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 13 References m-wds-clarifications.doc 2. nfinn-wireless-bridges pdf 3. IEEE F-2003.pdf