Exploring the Factors Influencing Family Members’ Connections to Incarcerated Individuals Johnna Christian, Ph.D. Rutgers School of Criminal Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plan elements Co-location of juvenile and adult facilities Change in number of adult and juvenile beds Services Diversion programs Racial disparities Visitation.
Advertisements

Mass Incarceration Meets the Information Age Vanessa Torres Hernandez Equal Justice Works Fellow
Mentoring Prisoner's Children: A Prevention & Intervention Strategy That Works Kristy A. Stender-Bratcher, M.Ed Mentoring.
Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
The Demography of Early Parenthood Kathryn Edin Harvard University Laura Tach University of Pennsylvania Northeastern University January 16, 2011.
702: Leading Those Who Engage Incarcerated Parents.
Sponsored by: CCSU’s Women’s Center; Center for Public Policy & Social Research and the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice.
Carl E. Bentelspacher, Ph.D., Department of Social Work Lori Ann Campbell, Ph.D., Department of Sociology Michael Leber Department of Sociology Southern.
Incarceration and Fragile Families Bruce Western, Princeton University Leonard M. Lopoo, Syracuse University Sara McLanahan, Princeton University May 2004.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
History Living Hope International Ministry Rev. Caretha Brown left a career with the Federal Government to fulfill her vision. In 1978, Caretha began visiting.
Research Problem: Father involvement plays important role in development of a child; for fathers who are incarcerated; presents challenges that seem insurmountable.
ENROLLING JUSTICE INVOLVED POPULATIONS: POLICY IMPLICATIONS LINDSAY NELSON KENTUCKY PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION.
Jasmine Hedge.  Why do we need research with children of incarcerated parents? What makes this study important?  What is the study methodology and what.
 Dramatic increases in women in prison between 1986 and 2002  More and crimes, rather than violence ◦  Women may have more to commit crimes  Shorter.
Population Growth and Economic Development
Understanding Families
We Can Parent Together Tools for engaging fathers, mothers and others in co-parenting.
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI The University of Mississippi Institute for Advanced Education in Geospatial Science Census to American Community Survey.
Educational Characteristics of Prisoners: Data from the ACS Stephanie Ewert & Tara Wildhagen U.S. Census Bureau Population Association of America Washington,
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
FAMILY….WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Presented by: Mary N. Ward, ACBSW, CSW Family Services Administrator NC Department of Correction, Division of Prisons.
Understanding Families
When Prisoners Come Home: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges Joan Petersilia, Ph.D. Department of Criminology, Law & Society University of California,
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
The Positive Involvement of Fathers: What families need from practitioners.
URBAN MEN IN POVERTY: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS Michael Massoglia Professor of Sociology & Director of Center for Law, Society and Justice University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The influence of community factors on intimate partner abuse of African American mothers Dr. Thema Bryant-Davis Pepperdine University Summit on Interpersonal.
Amethyst, Inc. Amethyst exists to nurture and sustain healthy women and families. We have been providing gender specific and trauma informed alcohol, tobacco.
Child Care and Children with Special Needs Challenges for Low-income Families.
1 U.S. PIAAC National Supplement: Prison Study Overview Association of State Correctional Administrators Research and Best Practices Committee Gaylord.
The Vow Factor: Marriage, Divorce, and Family Formation and their Impact on Health and Well-being Andrew J. Cherlin, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
Incarcerated Family Members Presented By: Sarah Grey, Kristen Gilmeister, & Ashley Landek.
Incarcerated Mothers: Their Histories of Victimization and the Consequences for Their Children Toni Johnson, Associate Professor
Joseph J. McDowall © 2014 ACWA 2014: Children in a Changing World, Sydney, August 18 – 20, 2014 Contact between, and Placement of Siblings in Out-of-Home.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
Every student. every classroom. every day. Creating the Conditions for Learning: Transforming School Culture & Climate Jody London, Director, Board of.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Work, Families and Wellbeing: Insights and Implications of AIFS Research Professor Alan Hayes Presentation to the Work, Families & Wellbeing Forum 4 May.
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks and the Racial Hiring Preferences of Employers Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University Steven Raphael UC.
Incarceration, Reentry and Disparities in Health: What are the connections? Nicholas Freudenberg Hunter College, May 5, 2006 Presented at the Prisoner.
Judi Goozh and Sue Jeweler. STATISTICS According to a Department of Justice report from the year 2007, 2.3 percent of children in the United States (nearly.
AMOS, Inc. Advocating, Mobilizing, Organizing in Solidarity.
YOUNG PEOPLE AND MOTHER’S TALKING CIRCLE Phil Dodds and Vicki Hill.
The Health Consequences of Incarceration Michael Massoglia Penn State University.
Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary education policy Wendy Erisman Institute for Higher Education Policy Washington, DC.
THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.
Holly Thompson, Kids First Mary Dennis, Kids Peace Marie Kalinyak, PFCS.
Designs of Quasi-Experiments Studies for Assessing the Transport Enhancements and Physical Activity.
Who’s Minding the Kids in the Summer? Child Care Arrangements for Summer 2006 Lynda Laughlin - U.S. Census Bureau Joseph Rukus - Cornell University Annual.
Research Proposal PAD 689 Research Methods in Public Administration Presented by: Herbert Schmidt.
Safe Ground Charlotte Weinberg & Adam Moll Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion 9 th December
A Case For Adventist Involvement In Prison Ministry By J. Alfred Johnson II, Director North American Division Adult Ministries.
Substance Abuse Treatment: An Alternative to Prison By Heather Apo-Ewers Communications 1010 November 10, 2013.
Better Outcomes for Young People January 28, 2016 Allegheny County.
2014 Child Support Policy Symposium March 18, 2014.
BJS Reports - Parents 1997 Survey - State and Federal Prisons (BJS has stopped doing this survey - last one done in 1999 – problem has grown since then)
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Family and Fatherhood Program McNeil Island Corrections Center “Keeping Communities Safe” Presenters: Rick Jordan, MICC Representative Sylvia Peterson,
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice What is an appropriate punishment or response? What do you expect your response to do for the offender, potential.
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice Research Questions To what extent is family support related to reoffending for individuals recently released.
The Impact of CPS and Special Education on Adjustment for Male Inmates Sara Jane Blessington Advised by Kayleen Islam-Zwart, Ph.D Eastern Washington University.
Socialization.
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
The association between a biological parent spending time in jail/prison and the child ending up in jail/prison later in life. Kathleen Johnson *Department.
Effects of Children with incarcerated parents
Presentation transcript:

Exploring the Factors Influencing Family Members’ Connections to Incarcerated Individuals Johnna Christian, Ph.D. Rutgers School of Criminal Justice

Prison Population Nationwide 2,131,180 people incarcerated in prisons and jails in 2004 Nationwide 2,131,180 people incarcerated in prisons and jails in 2004 New Jersey adult prison population 26,239 in 2004 New Jersey adult prison population 26,239 in 2004 In New Jersey 63% of adult, male inmates are African American and 17% Hispanic In New Jersey 63% of adult, male inmates are African American and 17% Hispanic Bureau of Justice Statistics survey of prison inmates found 55% of State and 63% of Federal inmates have children under age 18 Bureau of Justice Statistics survey of prison inmates found 55% of State and 63% of Federal inmates have children under age 18 Nationwide, 7% of black children have an incarcerated parent Nationwide, 7% of black children have an incarcerated parent

Systems Approach to Studying Incarceration Expands focus to family and other individuals in the prisoner’s network as well as the larger community Expands focus to family and other individuals in the prisoner’s network as well as the larger community Explores the unintended consequences, hidden costs, or collateral damages of incarceration Explores the unintended consequences, hidden costs, or collateral damages of incarceration Incarceration geographically concentrated in a small number of communities Incarceration geographically concentrated in a small number of communities

Policy Considerations Prisoner Reentry Prisoner Reentry 600,000 individuals per year returning to communities 600,000 individuals per year returning to communities Families viewed as a primary means of successful reentry Families viewed as a primary means of successful reentry We know little about the nature of families’ attachments to prisoners during incarceration or in the pre-incarceration phase. This may have implications for the reentry period. We know little about the nature of families’ attachments to prisoners during incarceration or in the pre-incarceration phase. This may have implications for the reentry period. We know little about how family connections to prisoners impacts their ability to connect to social capital in their neighborhoods. We know little about how family connections to prisoners impacts their ability to connect to social capital in their neighborhoods.

What do we know about prisoner connections to family? Bureau of Justice Statistics Report Bureau of Justice Statistics Report 57% of fathers never had a personal visit with their children since admission to prison 57% of fathers never had a personal visit with their children since admission to prison 62% have had contact of some sort (42% phone, 50% mail, 21% visits) 62% have had contact of some sort (42% phone, 50% mail, 21% visits) Surveys of prisoners in specific facilities Surveys of prisoners in specific facilities Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (Western, Lopoo, and McLanahan, 2004) Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (Western, Lopoo, and McLanahan, 2004)

Approaches to Studying Connections Typically use cross sectional data to determine the connection/nature of the relationship at one point in time Typically use cross sectional data to determine the connection/nature of the relationship at one point in time Relationships are complex, fluid, and dynamic Relationships are complex, fluid, and dynamic Life history approach needed Life history approach needed

Data Sources Observation on five bus rides taking families from Columbus Circle to upstate New York prisons Observation on five bus rides taking families from Columbus Circle to upstate New York prisons Attendance at family support group meetings for Prison Families of New York Attendance at family support group meetings for Prison Families of New York Open ended, in-depth interviews with 18 family members of prisoners Open ended, in-depth interviews with 18 family members of prisoners

Family Interview Sample Characteristics 17 women, 1 man 17 women, 1 man 14 African American, 4 Hispanic 14 African American, 4 Hispanic 7 wives, 4 mothers, 5 girlfriends, 1 sister, 1 brother 7 wives, 4 mothers, 5 girlfriends, 1 sister, 1 brother Visiting frequency ranged from weekly to every six months Visiting frequency ranged from weekly to every six months 7 families have multiple incarcerated individuals in their lives 7 families have multiple incarcerated individuals in their lives

Maintaining Connections With Prisoners Resources Resources Tradeoffs with other areas of life Tradeoffs with other areas of life Setting boundaries with the prisoner Setting boundaries with the prisoner

Resources Time Time For families traveling from New York to upstate prisons, the process takes 24 hours For families traveling from New York to upstate prisons, the process takes 24 hours Routines of preparation before the ride Routines of preparation before the ride Navigating prison bureaucracy Navigating prison bureaucracy Money Money Average $100 for one family member to visit (bus ticket, food while traveling and in the facility, packages) Average $100 for one family member to visit (bus ticket, food while traveling and in the facility, packages) Providing goods for the inmate Providing goods for the inmate Energy Energy Exhaustion from the ride affects the quality of the visit Exhaustion from the ride affects the quality of the visit

Tradeoffs Resources are diverted from other needs and areas of life Resources are diverted from other needs and areas of life Time spent with children/supervising children Time spent with children/supervising children Generation of social network/connections to neighborhood institutions Generation of social network/connections to neighborhood institutions Free time/relaxation Free time/relaxation Family’s material needs Family’s material needs

Setting Boundaries Families learn to protect their resources/social capital from the prisoner Families learn to protect their resources/social capital from the prisoner Restrict calling frequency, block calls, limit visits, take a break from visiting Restrict calling frequency, block calls, limit visits, take a break from visiting Failure to do this could lead to short or long term severed ties Failure to do this could lead to short or long term severed ties

Potential Benefits of Connection Social bonding for family and children Social bonding for family and children Fewer disciplinary infractions for inmates Fewer disciplinary infractions for inmates Decreased likelihood of recidivism Decreased likelihood of recidivism Easier transition into the family upon release Easier transition into the family upon release

Potential Costs to Families Demands of visiting at prison Demands of visiting at prison Monitoring the prison system Monitoring the prison system Helping children understand incarceration Helping children understand incarceration Multiple incarcerated family members Multiple incarcerated family members Isolation from social networks Isolation from social networks Maintaining family emotionally Maintaining family emotionally Maintaining family financially Maintaining family financially

Elements of Life Course Approach Relationship prior to incarceration Relationship prior to incarceration Prisoner’s efforts at rehabilitation and repairing harm to family Prisoner’s efforts at rehabilitation and repairing harm to family Incarceration’s impact on family’s economic resources Incarceration’s impact on family’s economic resources Incarceration’s impact on social resources Incarceration’s impact on social resources Family’s social support network Family’s social support network

Policy Considerations Identify critical points in the life course of the family relationship Identify critical points in the life course of the family relationship Provide extra resources or intervention at these points Provide extra resources or intervention at these points Increase attention to options for maintaining contact. (internet, video conferencing, transportation, reasonably priced phone calls) Increase attention to options for maintaining contact. (internet, video conferencing, transportation, reasonably priced phone calls)