Ending institutionalisation Ensuring better outcomes for children.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community based services for children at risk in Albania dAdA.
Advertisements

How were the de- institutionalization targets and activities defined in planning and strategic documents in 4 countries? How were they applied, monitored.
Child Welfare Reform in Albania Marieta Zaçe Deputy Minister of Labor, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Albania Sofia 3-6 July 2007.
DENSTITUTIONALISATION OF CHILDREN IN BUGARIA – REAL AND IRREVERSIBLE Darinka Yankova Deputy Chairperson of the State Agency for Child Protection.
International Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children Policy orientations for children aged 0-3 Nigel Cantwell International Consultant on Child.
Reflections by the actors supporting the reform - NGOs Sofia, 6 July 2007.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
EU Structural Funds as an instrument for social innovation: Closing down Bulgarian orphanages with ERDF and ESF support EU Structural Funds as an instrument.
What have we learned about reforms in child protection? Vesna Bosnjak.
Why we need to act? Recommendations to provide children in Europe with access to services and opportunities Françoise Pissart Director King Baudouin Foundation.
WHO Europe Initiative on Health of Children and Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and their Families Dr Roger Banks Consultant in the Psychiatry.
Support for care-leaving young people having grown up in residential care – investment of high return Donika Koleva head of the Programmes Development.
Social Care and Health working together 00A – 31 Jan Care at Home in England 4 th February 2010, Edinburgh Janet Crampton DH National Programme Manager,
Deinstitutionalization perspective EU Structural Funds as an instrument for social innovation: Bulgaria in action Zagreb, 24 October 2013.
Mansell 2 Services for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour presents a challenge Jim Mansell.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor, Employment, Veterans and Social Affairs Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor,
Human Resources Development OP MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL POLICY REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Opportunities for investment in children's future Gergana.
Social Inclusion of Children with Disabilities – Russian Federation Joanna Rogers, UNICEF September 2011.
I NVESTING IN CHILDREN - EU INSTRUMENTS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Policy responses and reforms in Bulgaria to support children and families 31 October.
RE-DIRECTING RESOURCES AND STIMULATING DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES – THE CASE OF SERBIA.
TOWARDS SUSTAINED ERADICATION OF EXTREME POVERTY IN BANGLADESH Dr Shamsul Alam Member (Senior Secretary) GED, Planning Commission NEC Conference Room,
How can we get better services for children and adults who present challenges? Liz Bruce Strategic Director Adults, Manchester City Council. ADASS NW lead.
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia Why we need to focus on children below three years Sofia conference November 2012 Jean-Claude.
HOW SOCIAL CHANGES AFFECT THE SOCIAL WORK IN BULGARIA National Development Agency, Berlin, International Conference, 15th May 2014 With financial support.
Key priorities, challenges and opportunities to advance the agenda for children in middle income countries of CIS, Eastern and Southern Europe Yuri Oksamitniy.
SEND Strategy Adrian Loades Executive Director, Children and Young People’s Services and Adult Social Care.
Legal solutions on alternative care in Poland and how to advocate for better ones Beata Kulig Belgrade, 17th of Dec., 2013.
Jelena Pešić The Republic Institute for Social Protection Belgrade, 2013.
Presentation to Inclusion Ireland Conference & AGM Pat Healy – National Director Social Care 10 th May, 2014.
Child Care Systems Reforms In Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Why we need to focus on children below three years October 2012 Jean-Claude Legrand Regional.
Supporting Schools : New ways of working Allen Baynes - C4EO Sector Specialist.
Listening to you, working for you LOCAL COLLEGE FIRST Transforming the lives of young adult learners in Bexley.
It is;  A 2 year programme, DCSF funded, hosted by L.G.A., supported by IDeA.  Focussing on ‘3-13’ population.  Having 5 themes (key lines of enquiry).
Hope and Homes for Children Working group 5 - Targeting, forecasting and planning the establishment of continuum of services.
Financing and planning of resources in the best interest of the child in the child care system Zhumazhan Zhukenov Chairperson of the Child Rights Protection.
Children’s palliative care From independent enquiry to effective sustainable services Alan Craft Liverpool Jan 2009.
Integrated approach towards Roma complex families Nieuwegein Visit delegation Karvina 17 October 2013.
‘Beyond Winterbourne View’ An ADASS Perspective Challenging Behaviour National Strategy Group 5 th October 2012 Andrea Pope-Smith.
Joint Reviews of Local Authority Social Services JOINT REVIEW OF SALFORD COUNCIL 17 th June 2003.
INTERMEDIATE BODY: AGENCY FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.
De-institutionalization & social inclusion Lessons learned, remaining challenges and steps to accelerate the reform in CEE/CIS.
North West Youth Employment Convention Wednesday, 23 November 2011 Nick Page.
Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on the use of European Union Funds for the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Ines Bulic, UN.
De-institutionalisation in the EU context DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission Egbert Holthuis, Head of Unit, Finland, Latvia,
  Poverty is a situation or way of life that arises as a result of the inability to access or lack of resources to meet basic human needs physical and.
Search wearelumos.org. Lumos model for deinstitutionalisation: improving the lives of marginalised children Forum on Investing in Young.
DEINSTITUTIONALISATION IN LATVIA EXPERIENCES AND NATIONAL STRATEGY Tallin
Scale of the challenge: thirty in every hundred children are living in poverty National average More than 7,000 families and over 14,500 children are.
Assessment & Planning for children In Hertfordshire Margaret Doe External Support Team.
Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009.
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
Innovative Financing of Out-of-Home Placements July 24, 2002 Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group #3.
The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.
Alternatives to care Adolescent support Unit and beyond.
Reform example: Micro- or mezzo level planning for de- institutionalization Viktor Yakzhik Head of the Department of Social and Educational Work of the.
The right of the child to a family in the context of the UN and EU policies Dr (habil) Maria Herczog, Ph.D. Senior Technical Advisor, BCN President of.
Comparing Costs and Benefits of different models of Child Care Approach, results and lessons learnt.
Assessing the impacts of policies on children
Children’s Policy Conference Keeping Kids Closer to Home Peter Selby, PhD -- February 24, 2016.
1 Ministry of Social Protection, Family and Child 27 th September 2007.
THE CRISIS CHARACTERIZES THE CONTOURS OF POVERTY 12 APRIL 2016 BRUSSELS MARIA HERCZOG PRESIDENT OF EUROCHILD BCN SENIOR TECHNICAL ADVISOR The impact of.
Nolan Quigley Advocacy & Campaigns Manager Irina Papancheva EU Policy and Advocacy Adviser Lumos Brussels 20 January 2016 Supporting Families Globally.
CCT Dilemmas and options for the Western Balkan region Gordana Matković.
Lumos in Haiti From Institutions to Families Presented by Amanda Cox
Deinstitutionalization – “Still muddling, not yet through” Goals, Pitfalls, Learning, Challenges Radostina Paneva Andro Dadiani SOS Children`s Villages.
Getting it wrong – the example of children in residential care
At the crossroads: deinstitutionalization in Bulgaria
Common European Guidelines on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care and Toolkit on the use of European Union funding Ines Bulic, Researcher.
About CBM One billion people (1 in 7 / 15%) of the world’s population have a disability million people experience significant barriers in functioning.
PATH OF DEINSTITUTIONALISATION ASOCIATIA ALTERNATIVA
Presentation transcript:

Ending institutionalisation Ensuring better outcomes for children

A European problem One million children in institutions in the European region due to poverty, ethnicity, disability Institutionalisation causes severe harm to the health and development of children Outcomes are extremely poor – 10 times more likely to be trafficked; high levels of suicide, criminality, involvement in prostitution

The Solution Strengthened/more accessible universal services (community health and education) A range of targeted community based services that support the family A continuum of substitute family care Specialist residential care in small group homes for minority of children with complex needs Changes in attitudes – society, politicians, professionals Reinvestment of resources

Changes in development when moved from institutions to foster care

Changes in behaviour on moving from institution to foster care

Challenges and pitfalls Getting from where we are now to where we want to be – negative unintended consequences Setting target for 50% reduction - easy to place children (cheaper services) - reduce staffing and budget - amalgamate institutions - inappropriate placements and trauma - reduced overall budget spent on children - insufficient funding available for children with disabilities

Challenges and pitfalls Limited placement options - continued reliance on too much residential care (expensive services, poorer outcomes) - insufficient focus on family support - reform considered too expensive

Challenges and pitfalls Focus on buildings - inappropriate use of buildings for new services - costly investment in such buildings - poor outcomes for children

Challenges and pitfalls Insufficient funding for the whole reform process - results in partial reform – usually the most vulnerable children are left behind - running two parallel systems – reform is seen as too expensive - overall numbers in care rise - need for proper costing of reform and understanding of cost benefit

Challenges and pitfalls Statistics disguising the real situation - some children not included in statistics on institutionalisation – therefore no plans for them - over-estimation or under-estimation – a challenge for planning for future need - numbers in institutions do not show the dynamic flow through the system

Challenges and pitfalls Different message and priorities from international donors and policy makers - conflicting reform programmes - inefficient use of funding - increases resistance to reform

Lumos’ approach

International level Spidla report on transition from institutional to community based care – endorsed by EC Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on deinstitutionalisation – endorsed by two General Directors of EC

10 elements of deinstitutionalisation

Admissions/year per 10,000 of child population

Number of children in residential care/10,000

GDP per capita (USD)

Cost per child per year of different forms of care

Contacts