2 Approved by the Board of Regents in 2006 to support rising energy prices due to double digit increases in utility rates and in lieu of an increase in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy Conservation Energy Management.
Advertisements

Bond Construction Update Citizen’s Oversight Committee Long Beach Community College District January 31, 2011 EDUCATE  ENGAGE  EMPOWER 1.
Purchased Utilities and OMP Roundtable UC Budget Conference October 22-23, 2007 Clif Bowen, Moderator.
NJ SmartStart Buildings New Jersey Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS) January 20, 2012 Presenter: BPU President Robert Hanna.
North American Operations Kalamazoo Plant Welcome to Kalamazoo.
UTPA Energy Conservation Initiatives Oscar Villarreal Director, Facilities Management David Ortega Assistant Director, Energy Manager.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Denver Place North & South Towers Case Study Matt Urquhart Amerimar Realty Management Company Jack Wolpert E-Cube, Incorporated.
Energy Grant Program. Program Overview ARRA Funds - $20 Million Solar Projects - 30% Energy Efficiency Upgrades - 70% “The projects shall meet the requirements.
Guilford County Schools ENERGY MASTER PLAN for School Facilities July 25, 2008 Facilities Planning and Construction Department Maintenance Department.
Leadership in Environmental Stewardship in a Fiscally Prudent Manner WAUKESHA COUNTY SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS.
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR END-USERS.  CSU Chancellors office coordinates the efforts to accomplish the goals established by Assembly Bill 32 for green house.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.
Department of Facilities Management Maintenance & Operations.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE.
© 2008 REGEN Energy Inc. What is Demand Response? Management of electrical consumption Active alleviation of grid stress Load Shedding during peak demand.
ENERGY CONSERVATION & BUILDING STANDARDS Brian Deal, Fred Hahn, Karl Helmink, Claire McConnell, Dhara Patel, Claudia Szczepaniak, Scott Willenbrock.
Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008.
Energy Management 101 Lance Stewart Facilities Maintenance Manager/Energy Manager City of Charlottesville, Virginia.
Budget Update November 7, DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Auraria Higher Education Center Case Study John Ismert & Frank Ellis Auraria Higher Education Center Facilities Management.
You can achieve 100% Energy Saving WHEN YOU TURN OFF THE LIGHTS.
Woodland District 50: Operations and Facilities Report Energy Update 2012 Summer Work Five-Year Facility Plan Service Maintenance Agreement Night Time.
STAFFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2009 UPDATE Bob Randall CEM,,BEP, CBCP Energy Manager Energy Manager.
Energy Conservation Western North Carolina Recycler’s Networking Council Black Mountain, North Carolina December 9, 2004 Keyes McGee, E.I. North Carolina.
Energy Trends. 2 Trift bridge 560’ long 333’ high.
Developing a Comprehensive Energy Plan for Your Facility.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Oakland Schools 2010/2011 Energy Report October 28, 2011.
Foothill College & Space Science Center Bill Kelly Viron Energy Services (510) ext 13,
Shape up in 2008 Join the Fort Collins Green Team.
1 Energy Prices Presentation to Joint Committee on Transport and Communications 25 th February 2015.
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Facility Improvement Program Town of Shirley June 17, 2013 Robert Reddish ABM Building Solutions.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Meeting the 10% Conservation Goal Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) April 11, 2008.
Energy Conservation Initiatives Joan Kowal Energy Manager, UMCP May 1, 2008.
Carbon Emissions from the University of Minnesota Buildings & Facilities Andrew Edwins David Grandall Luke Hollenkamp Patrick Santelli Amy Scheller.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Energy and Air Quality Conference April 5, 2004 Innovative financing, support, and solutions for Implementing Energy Projects.
Nicholas J. Hennessy, Ph.D Sustainability Coordinator Bowling Green State University Energy Conservation Measures: It Takes a Community.
Demand Side Energy Management & Conservation Lighting Retrofits The University of Texas at Austin.
How Facilities Can Help Commitment by facilities director Facilities energy committee Energy officer position Include conservation commitment in: Strategic.
1 Oconomowoc Area School District Energy Update 6-Month Status Report December 2005 – May 2006.
Energy UHN. 2 Background –welcome to the University Health Network –UHN’s utility budget Energy UHN –strategy –procurement –conservation.
Utah State University Logan Utah. Founded 1888 as a Land Grant Institution Host City – Logan, Utah (48,ooo+ population) ~ 15,000 Students (~ 28,700 students.
01/15/16Prop 39 Update - Maintenance & Operations - Sustainability Initiatives Unit1 CALIFORNIA CLEAN ENERGY JOBS ACT LAUSD PROPOSITION 39 ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
Bond Construction Update Facilities Advisory Committee Long Beach Community College District April 6, 2011 EDUCATE  ENGAGE  EMPOWER 1.
Goal 4: Environmental To blend our residential and commercial properties with our “City of Parks and Trails” image to create sustainable framework of.
Lack of dedicated building meter – Solution: Estimate square footage of Herberger in relation to total area serviced by meter – Estimate 12% of total.
Energy Conservation Building Upgrades Alma School District.
Commercial Energy Assessments City of Ames Emily Rice The Energy Group.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
Oakland Schools 2014/2015 Energy Report January 31, 2016.
Presented to The Raymore Peculiar Schools Board of Education Van McLain Energy Educator/Manager February 26 th, 2007Energy Management Conservation Program.
DRAFT Status Report: Five-Year Energy Plan Town of Athol January 2013.
Energy Solutions for Business Owners Presented by: [Put your name here] Welcome to... Your Logo Here.
North Penn School District
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
EnMS Management Review
2013/2014 Energy Report January 5, 2015
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
Pepsi Beverages Company
Pepsi Beverages Company
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Division of Business & Finance Accounting Services Information Technology and Plant Operations 2017 Budget Hearing April 22, 2016.
Presentation transcript:

2 Approved by the Board of Regents in 2006 to support rising energy prices due to double digit increases in utility rates and in lieu of an increase in designated tuition. Utility % Rate Change Yr Average Natural Gas 43.95%8.11%16.11%30.70%24.72% Electricity21.9%-8.37%0.36%9.57%5.87% Water12.29%8.67%17.14%11.62%12.43%

3 Fee Rate was set at $45 for Lowered to $35 in No rate changes since Fall Energy rates are tied to commodity market with wide price swings in times of shortage or over supply - volatile and somewhat unpredictable. Also affected by energy policy changes. Fee Rate was set at $45 for Lowered to $35 in No rate changes since Fall Energy rates are tied to commodity market with wide price swings in times of shortage or over supply - volatile and somewhat unpredictable. Also affected by energy policy changes.

4 Energy Fee RAC = Refiners’ Acquisition Cost

5 Utility Rates Average FY09 Thermal Energy Rates: Steam/Hot Water = $13.82/MMBTU, Chillwater = $0.10/Ton-Hour FY08 Purchased Utilities. Electricity 63% $ 6,116,130 Natural Gas 27% $ 2,557,800 Water 10% $ 961,430

6 Going forward utility costs for new facilities should be covered by designated tuition. If continuation of the fee is requested, can the fee be downward adjusted? Going forward utility costs for new facilities should be covered by designated tuition. If continuation of the fee is requested, can the fee be downward adjusted?

7 FY 2006FY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010 Designated Tuition $7,531,668$6,743,343 $8,234,500 Energy Fee02,874,1322,259,3002,234,9022,234,000 F&A (Overhead from Grants & Contracts) ,000 TOTAL$7,531,668$9,617,4759,002,6438,978,24510,768,500 Actual Expenditures Prior Year Carryforward 583,888 Cumulative Variance 583,888 4,740

8 Square Footage and Energy Use Square Footage and Energy Use (E&G and Non-E&G)

9 E&G Cost and Square Feet

10 Cost Reduction / Avoidance Measures RecurringAmount 1604 Energy Performance Contract$ 346,500 Large Volume Natural Gas Discount225,700 ITC Energy Performance Contract192,600 New Utility Rate Structure30,200 Variable Frequency Drive Retrofits – JPL14,400 Lighting Retrofits – Student Housing 4,000 TOTAL$ 813,400 One-TimeAmount Peak Demand Limiting – North Thermal Energy Plant$ 74,000 HVAC Setback Thermostats48,000 Utility Billing Audits – Rates, Meter Readings, Faulty Meters43,300 TOTAL$ 165,300

11 Potential Future Cost Reduction Initiatives – Under Evaluation   Retrofit Campus Buildings with HVAC and Lighting Motion Sensor Technology   Implement Monterey Building Energy Audit Project recommendations, including but not limited to:   Lighting efficiency upgrades   Occupancy sensors   Removal of overhead doors   Temperature Setbacks   Variable Frequency Drives   Reclaim blowdown water for irrigation at North and South Thermal Energy Plants   Retrofit Campus Buildings with HVAC and Lighting Motion Sensor Technology   Implement Monterey Building Energy Audit Project recommendations, including but not limited to:   Lighting efficiency upgrades   Occupancy sensors   Removal of overhead doors   Temperature Setbacks   Variable Frequency Drives   Reclaim blowdown water for irrigation at North and South Thermal Energy Plants

12 Potential Cost Reduction Initiatives, Continued   Optimize energy efficiency through:   Retro-commissioning of tri-Campus buildings   Implement Campus-Wide Energy Awareness Program   Implement HVAC temperature set point policy (Summer: 78 ; Winter: 72)   Implement Preventative Maintenance Program (Thermography to Identify Inefficiency, Temperature Sensor Calibration, Ensure Efficient Operations)   Implement Energy Audit Program   Install Complete Utility Metering to Identify Consumption and Correct Inefficiency   Optimize energy efficiency through:   Retro-commissioning of tri-Campus buildings   Implement Campus-Wide Energy Awareness Program   Implement HVAC temperature set point policy (Summer: 78 ; Winter: 72)   Implement Preventative Maintenance Program (Thermography to Identify Inefficiency, Temperature Sensor Calibration, Ensure Efficient Operations)   Implement Energy Audit Program   Install Complete Utility Metering to Identify Consumption and Correct Inefficiency

13 Analysis conducted to determine the appropriate Energy fee rate based on: Utility consumption of baseline facilities   Baseline facilities = those online in FY 2006 (when the fee was first assessed) Estimated utility rate increases; and Recommendation - fee should be reduced by to $28.50 effective Fall 2010 Analysis conducted to determine the appropriate Energy fee rate based on: Utility consumption of baseline facilities   Baseline facilities = those online in FY 2006 (when the fee was first assessed) Estimated utility rate increases; and Recommendation - fee should be reduced by to $28.50 effective Fall 2010

14 FY 2010Proposed FY 2011 Proposed FY 2012 Designated Tuition$8,234,500$9,215,000 (+980,500) $9,615,000 (+400,000) Energy Fee2,234,0001,835,000 (-399,000) 1,835,000 F&A (Overhead from Grants & Contracts) 300,000400,000 (+100,000) 400,000 TOTAL BUDGET10,768,50011,450,00011,850,000 Actual / Projected Expenditures Projected (+20% inc) Projected (+8% inc) Projected (+3.5% inc)