Econometric Methodology. The Sample and Measurement Population Measurement Theory Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Advertisements

Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 17: Nonlinear Regression 17-1/26 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
3. Binary Choice – Inference. Hypothesis Testing in Binary Choice Models.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Part 12: Random Parameters [ 1/46] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Statistical Inference and Regression Analysis: GB Professor William Greene Stern School of Business IOMS Department Department of Economics.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Part 4: Partial Regression and Correlation 4-1/24 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Part 20: Sample Selection 20-1/38 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
The Paradigm of Econometrics Based on Greene’s Note 1.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
2. Binary Choice Estimation. Modeling Binary Choice.
1. Descriptive Tools, Regression, Panel Data. Model Building in Econometrics Parameterizing the model Nonparametric analysis Semiparametric analysis Parametric.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Topic 6-Nonlinear Models] 1/87 Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach William Greene Stern School of Business World Bank, May 23, 2005.
Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Spatial Discrete Choice Models Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University.
Topics in Microeconometrics William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 4] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Bivariate & Multivariate Probit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 9: Hypothesis Testing /29 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Spatial Discrete Choice Models Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Topic 2-Endogeneity] 1/33 Topics in Microeconometrics William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
1/69: Topic Descriptive Statistics and Linear Regression Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
[Topic 1-Regression] 1/37 1. Descriptive Tools, Regression, Panel Data.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 2] 1/86 Discrete Choice Modeling Binary Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
6. Ordered Choice Models. Ordered Choices Ordered Discrete Outcomes E.g.: Taste test, credit rating, course grade, preference scale Underlying random.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
5. Extensions of Binary Choice Models
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Discrete Choice Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics Analysis
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Microeconometric Modeling
Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2019 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business
Presentation transcript:

Econometric Methodology

The Sample and Measurement Population Measurement Theory Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices

Inference Population Measurement Econometric Methods Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices

Classical Inference Population Measurement Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices Imprecise inference about the entire population – sampling theory and asymptotics Econometric Methods

Bayesian Inference Population Measurement Characteristics Behavior Patterns Choices Sharp, ‘exact’ inference about only the sample – the ‘posterior’ (to the data) density. Econometric Methods

 Nonparametric  Semiparametric  Parametric Classical (Sampling Theory) Bayesian Econometric Frameworks We will focus mainly on classical, parametric ethods

Objectives in Model Building  Specification: guided by underlying theory Modeling framework Functional forms  Estimation: coefficients, partial effects, model implications  Statistical inference: hypothesis testing  Prediction: individual and aggregate  Model assessment (fit, adequacy) and evaluation  Model extensions Interdependencies, multiple part models Heterogeneity Endogeneity  Exploration: Estimation and inference methods

Regression Basics The “MODEL” Modeling the conditional mean – Regression Other features of interest Modeling quantiles Conditional variances or covariances Modeling probabilities for discrete choice Modeling other features of the population

Application: Health Care Usage German Health Care Usage Data, 7,293 Individuals, Varying Numbers of Periods Data downloaded from Journal of Applied Econometrics Archive. This is an unbalanced panel with 7,293 individuals. They can be used for regression, count models, binary choice, ordered choice, and bivariate binary choice. This is a large data set. There are altogether 27,326 observations. The number of observations ranges from 1 to 7. (Frequencies are: 1=1525, 2=2158, 3=825, 4=926, 5=1051, 6=1000, 7=987). (Downloaded from the JAE Archive) Variables in the file are DOCTOR = 1(Number of doctor visits > 0) HOSPITAL= 1(Number of hospital visits > 0) HSAT = health satisfaction, coded 0 (low) - 10 (high) DOCVIS = number of doctor visits in last three months HOSPVIS = number of hospital visits in last calendar year PUBLIC = insured in public health insurance = 1; otherwise = 0 ADDON = insured by add-on insurance = 1; otherswise = 0 HHNINC = household nominal monthly net income in German marks / (4 observations with income=0 were dropped) HHKIDS = children under age 16 in the household = 1; otherwise = 0 EDUC = years of schooling AGE = age in years MARRIED = marital status

Household Income Kernel Density Estimator Histogram

Regression – Income on Education Ordinary least squares regression LHS=LOGINC Mean = Standard deviation = Number of observs. = 887 Model size Parameters = 2 Degrees of freedom = 885 Residuals Sum of squares = Standard error of e = Fit R-squared = Adjusted R-squared = Model test F[ 1, 885] (prob) = 99.0(.0000) Diagnostic Log likelihood = Restricted(b=0) = Chi-sq [ 1] (prob) = 94.1(.0000) Info criter. LogAmemiya Prd. Crt. = Variable| Coefficient Standard Error b/St.Er. P[|Z|>z] Mean of X Constant| *** EDUC|.07176*** Note: ***, **, * = Significance at 1%, 5%, 10% level

Specification and Functional Form Ordinary least squares regression LHS=LOGINC Mean = Standard deviation = Number of observs. = 887 Model size Parameters = 3 Degrees of freedom = 884 Residuals Sum of squares = Standard error of e = Fit R-squared = Adjusted R-squared = Model test F[ 2, 884] (prob) = 50.0(.0000) Diagnostic Log likelihood = Restricted(b=0) = Chi-sq [ 2] (prob) = 95.0(.0000) Info criter. LogAmemiya Prd. Crt. = Variable| Coefficient Standard Error b/St.Er. P[|Z|>z] Mean of X Constant| *** EDUC|.06993*** FEMALE|

Interesting Partial Effects Ordinary least squares regression LHS=LOGINC Mean = Standard deviation = Number of observs. = 887 Model size Parameters = 5 Degrees of freedom = 882 Residuals Sum of squares = Standard error of e = Fit R-squared = Adjusted R-squared = Model test F[ 4, 882] (prob) = 40.8(.0000) Diagnostic Log likelihood = Restricted(b=0) = Chi-sq [ 4] (prob) = 150.6(.0000) Info criter. LogAmemiya Prd. Crt. = Variable| Coefficient Standard Error b/St.Er. P[|Z|>z] Mean of X Constant| *** EDUC|.06469*** FEMALE| AGE|.15567*** AGE2| ***

Impact of Age on Income

Inference: Does the same model apply to men and women? *Subsample analyzed for this command is FEMALE = 0 Residuals Sum of squares = Number of observs. = 512 Fit R-squared = Variable| Coefficient Standard Error b/St.Er. P[|Z|>z] Mean of X Constant| *** EDUC|.06626*** AGE|.15894*** AGE2| *** *Subsample analyzed for this command is FEMALE = 1 Residuals Sum of squares = Number of observs. = 375 Fit R-squared = Constant| *** EDUC|.05850*** AGE|.11707*** AGE2| *** Residuals Sum of squares = Number of observs. = 887 Fit R-squared = Constant| *** EDUC|.06676*** AGE|.15342*** AGE2| *** F={[ ( )]/4} /{( )/( (4)} = 2.43, F* = 2.38