Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Advertisements

Division of Mining and Reclamation Kenneth Politan (304) , ext
Strengthening the State- Tribal-Federal Partnership to Assess the Condition of Nations Waters.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia. Background Mountaintop coal mining is a surface mining practice used in the Appalachian states involving.
AUTAUGA CREEK BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT, 2009 Will S. Mooty USGS.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
20 th Annual Student GREEN Congress “Counting Critters” Workshop.
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS Utah Division of Water Quality Snake Creek, Heber Valley, 2014.
Ionic Stress in Appalachian Headwater Streams Are Total Dissolved Solids Toxic? 10 th percentile=impairment threshold Kentucky Indicator Taxa Low Conductivity.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Chris Nagai Nick Foster Christen Dschankilic Streams of Science.
Revisiting The Analysis of the Condition Of Streams In The Primary Region Of Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fill (MTM/VF) Coal Mining G. Pond and M. Passmore.
The Use of Benthic Macroinvertebrates to Assess Water Quality in an Urban WV Stream Laura Canton and Thomas Ford, PhD Concord University Brush Creek ~Originates.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
StudyArea: The study area (Figure 1) encompasses 11,726 km2 (4527 mi2) within the Appalachian coalfields of southern est Virginia. The dominant land cover.
Detection and Monitoring
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Headwater Stream Restoration in Mined Watersheds of the MAH Todd Petty, Mike Strager WVU Division of Forestry and Natural Resources Paul Ziemkiewicz WV.
Levels of Dissolved Solids Associated With Aquatic Life Effects in Virginia’s Central Appalachian Coalfield Streams Tony Timpano Stephen Schoenholtz, David.
An Assessment of the Benthic Community Structure: Implications on the Water Quality of Lake Palacpaquen, San Pablo City, Philippines Perez, Terresita.,
US EPA Region IV Surface Coal Mining Field Activities Adventures in Mountain Top Mining / Valley Fill Chris Decker.
Should There Be An Aquatic Life Water Quality Criterion for Conductivity? WV Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium Morgantown, WV March 29, 2011 Presented.
Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control
Improvement of Meadow Stream Health due to Livestock Distribution Efforts K.W. Tate, T.A. Becchetii, C. Battaglia, N.K. McDougald, D.F. Lile, H.A. George,
Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Tools Aquatic Life/Nutrient Workgroup August 11, 2008.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Aquatic Science Lotic Ecosystems.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
THE EFFECTS OF SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE OF WATER ON THE BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY DOWNSTREAM OF COAL MINING ACTIVITIES __________________________________.
Summary Overview Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
OLC-OST Environmental Protection Program Research and Educational Collaboration Charles Jason Tinant, OLC Robert Pille, OLC Delinda Simmons, OST EPP Hannan.
CWWUC Presentation April 8, 2009 Application of the Integrated Impact Analysis Tool.
Identifying Changes to Stream Condition caused by Urbanization How understanding the responses can improve ecological risk characterization
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
Ecology of Mined WV Watersheds: Monongahela River to Tug Fork J. Todd Petty, PhD Division of Forestry & Natural Resources Surface Mine Drainage Task Force.
1 Defining Least-Impacted Reference Condition for the National Wadeable Streams Assessment Alan Alan Herlihy (Oregon State University), John Stoddard (U.S.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Multimetric Concepts Index 101 Michael Paul; Jeroen Gerritsen Tetra Tech, Inc.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn Fork Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
National Water Quality Monitoring Conference Session E4 April 29, 2014 Jonathan Witt & Britta Bierwagen, ORD/USEPA Jen Stamp & Anna Hamilton, Tetra Tech,
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Bioassessment in the lower Mekong River: technology transfer to a developing region Ian Campbell 1 and Bruce Chessman 2 1 Rhithroecology, Blackburn South,
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia
Watershed Health Indicators
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Discover Life in West Virginia ( )
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90 % Chironomidae % 2 Dominant HBI2.910 A Survey Of The Condition Of Streams In The Primary Region Of Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fill (MTM/VF) Coal Mining J.H. Green (USEPA Region 3), M.E. Passmore (USEPA Region 3), and H.M. Childers (Signal Corporation) ABSTRACT Typical MTM/VF mining operations in the Appalachian coal fields remove overburden and interburden material to facilitate the extraction of coal. Excess spoils are often placed in adjacent valleys containing headwater streams. Although the direct effects of the valley fills on streams are obvious, limited documentation on the indirect, downstream effects of valley fills was available. The biological, physical and chemical condition of streams downstream of a variety of MTM/VF activities was investigated in five watersheds in southern West Virginia, over five seasons. We used a multi-metric benthic index and a regional reference condition to determine the condition of streams in four classes: unmined, mined (some mining activity but no valley fills), filled (valley fills but no residences), and filled/residential (both valley fills and residences). The filled class was impaired relative to the regional reference condition and the local unmined sites, but this class represented a wide range of conditions from poor to very good. The filled/residential class was the most impaired class and the majority of the sites in this class were in poor or fair condition. Further analyses revealed that total dissolved solids strongly influenced the benthic assemblages, while physical habitat parameters were only weakly correlated with benthic condition. ABSTRACT Typical MTM/VF mining operations in the Appalachian coal fields remove overburden and interburden material to facilitate the extraction of coal. Excess spoils are often placed in adjacent valleys containing headwater streams. Although the direct effects of the valley fills on streams are obvious, limited documentation on the indirect, downstream effects of valley fills was available. The biological, physical and chemical condition of streams downstream of a variety of MTM/VF activities was investigated in five watersheds in southern West Virginia, over five seasons. We used a multi-metric benthic index and a regional reference condition to determine the condition of streams in four classes: unmined, mined (some mining activity but no valley fills), filled (valley fills but no residences), and filled/residential (both valley fills and residences). The filled class was impaired relative to the regional reference condition and the local unmined sites, but this class represented a wide range of conditions from poor to very good. The filled/residential class was the most impaired class and the majority of the sites in this class were in poor or fair condition. Further analyses revealed that total dissolved solids strongly influenced the benthic assemblages, while physical habitat parameters were only weakly correlated with benthic condition. OBJECTIVE Characterize and compare conditions in four classes of streams: 1) streams that are not mined (“unmined”). 2) streams in mined areas with valley fills (“filled”). 3) streams in mined areas without valley fills (“mined”). 4) streams in mined areas with both valley fills and residences (“filled/residential”). MONITORING DESIGN AND RATIONALE Five watersheds across MTR/VF region described by the WVGES (Fedorko & Blake 1998). Candidate sites (127 total) were selected by WVDEP Inspectors & PEIS Streams Workgroup. Field reconnaissance and site characterization occurred simultaneously with first sampling event (Spring 1999). Thirty-seven (37) benthic sampling sites were chosen from original pool of 127 sites. WV STREAM CONDITION INDEX (WVSCI) Multi-metric Index. Metric values were standardized to a common 100-point scale. SAMPLING WITHIN THE MTM/VF REGION IN WV Very Good (>78 – 100) Good(>70 – 78) Fair(>46 – 70) Poor(>23 – 46) Very Poor ( 0 – 23) WVSCI Thresholds Developed using 107 reference samples (Gerritsen et al 2000). Increasingly different from reference condition & are impaired. BIOLOGICAL CONDITION RESULTS Unmined sites were comparable to WVDEP reference conditions and scored in good or very good condition 91% of the time over the course of the study. Mined sites were generally comparable to unmined sites (good or very good 86% of the time). Most mined sites had small amounts of historical mining in their watersheds. Filled sites represented a wide gradient of conditions from very poor to very good. Filled sites scored in the impaired range 66% of the time. Filled/residential class was the most impaired and sites ranged from poor to fair conditions. These sites scored in the impaired range 100% of the time. Diversity and abundance of sensitive mayfly fauna were severely impaired at filled and filled/residential sites. Several unmined sites could not be sampled in summer and fall 1999 due to drought. However, by Spring 2000 all unmined sites could be sampled and were in very good condition. Our data and the scientific literature indicate the ability of invertebrate assemblages to withstand periods of drought. Perennial flows are not required to support a diverse and abundant invertebrate assemblage. PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CONDITION RESULTS No violation of pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen criteria within the four classes. Elevated conductivity in filled and filled/residential classes. RBP habitat assessments indicated slight impairment in the filled and filled/residential classes. Quantitative substrate size data did not indicate excessive fines in filled class, but results should not be extrapolated to downstream reaches. Correlations indicate that the strongest associations were between biological condition and water quality (conductivity). Spring 1999Summer 1999Fall 1999Winter 2000Spring 2000 WV SCI EPT Taxa (Family Level) % Mayflies EPA R3 GIS TEAM PROJECT SIG 933 HCHILDERS 05/04/01 SEASONAL COMPARISON OF BIOLOGICAL METRICS