EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Origin of gain offsets: new insights from eROSITA calibration Mallorca,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Update of EPIC pn noise suppression K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Mallorca, Spain, 2009 March 31 – April 1 EPIC Calibration.
Advertisements

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Update of EPIC pn long-term monitoring K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Update of EPIC pn long-term monitoring Mallorca, Spain,
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR Mallorca,
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl VILSPA/Spain, 2003 Mar Temporal variation of the energy response determined with the internal calibration source.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC Calibration Meeting Mallorca, Spain 01/02/05 What can we do with Pattern 31s? - Central pixel (red) has.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal April ACIS Calibration: Recent Updates, Planned Updates, & Future Issues 2.E0102: Joint.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2005 February 1 CTI.. update for EPIC pn Long-term behaviour of the CTI.. for EPIC pn.
XMM 1 EPIC MOS Monitoring CAL/OPS Meeting MPE
Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM MODEL PSF EFFECTS OF PILE-UP Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM Tutor: Martin Stuhlinger.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, MPE K. Dennerl, 2006 May 04 CTI.. update for EPIC pn Long-term behaviour of the CTI.. for EPIC pn.
XMM-Newton 1 Michael Smith, ESAC PN Monitoring MPE, May 2006.
XMM-Newton 1 Michael Smith, ESAC PN Monitoring Palermo, April 2007.
XMM-Newton 1 M.Stuhlinger/M.Smith, ESAC PN Monitoring Mallorca, November 2007.
Experience with combined Fe55/Vela SNR calibration - MOS Andrea Tiengo INAF, IASF-Milano In collaboration with: Mariachiara Rossetti (IASF-Milano) Martin.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl Saclay/France, 2003 Sept Temporal variation of the energy response determined with the internal calibration.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, MPE K. Dennerl, 2006 May 04 EPIC pn at low energies: LW mode Properties of EPIC pn at low energies: LW mode.
6 November 2007Cal-Ops Meeting Mallorca Recent Results from EPIC MOS Life Test Facility Tony Abbey and Craig Brown University of Leicester Space Research.
Marcus Kirsch Science Operations & Data Systems Division Research & Scientific Support Department Page 1 XMM-Newton MOS Timing Mode calibration Marcus.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl Saclay/France, 2003 Sept offset map correction Spatial variation of the energy scale Energy correction for pixels.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, ESAC K. Dennerl, 2005 October 04 CTI.. update for EPIC pn Long-term behaviour of the CTI.. for EPIC pn.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 EPIC pn: Jumps in the energy scale Sudden jumps in the absolute energy scale and their origin.
XMM 1 MOS2 CCD5 anomaly Status of the investigations.
Mallorca EPIC Cal Meeting - February 2005 Darren Baskill: XMM project: MOS monitoring.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl Saclay/France, 2003 Sept Spatial variation of the energy scale Energy correction for pixels with an incorrect.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2005 February 1 Adjustment of spatial gain variations Adjustment of spatial gain variations of EPIC pn.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, ESAC K. Dennerl, 2005 October 04 Adjustment of spatial gain variations Adjustment of spatial gain variations of EPIC pn.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Nov ACIS Calibration: Planned Updates & Future Issues 2.ACIS Operations: Controlling the.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 CTI.. update for EPIC pn EPIC pn: Update on the CTI, the absolute energy scale and the energy.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2005 February 1 Properties of double event patterns.
MPE EPIC Cal Meeting – May 2006 Darren Baskill: XMM project: MOS gain monitoring MOS.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 Suppression of the low-energy noise Suppression of the low-energy noise: an improved approach.
XMM-Newton 1 Michael Smith, ESAC PN Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006.
Marcus Kirsch, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Center Page 1 EPIC ESAC XMM-Newton Instrument Anomaly Tool & Cross-Calibration Tool Marcus G. F. Kirsch.
XMM 1Michael Smith, ESAC EPIC PN Monitoring Provided by Michael Smith.
Capture of electrons in traps photon pixel time = trap = occupied trap.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl VILSPA/Spain, 2004 March Detector noise & Vela observations application to Vela observations EPIC pn detector.
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay Mallorca 02/02/05 Temporal and spatial variability of the MOS RMF 1.Introduction and brief history of the.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Correcting spatial inhomogeneities of the absolute energy scale K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Correcting spatial inhomogeneities.
Different sources of noise in EM-CCD cameras
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
AST3 detector properties
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
XIS FM sensors cal. report Hiroshi Nakajima XIS
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
SAG+SASWG Meeting Potsdam /15 PN Tasks – Status Report (update since Leicester) Hermann Brunner - MPE  epframes:  The dark quadrant problem.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
X-rays from Mars K. Dennerl, C. Lisse, A. Bhardwaj, V. Burwitz, J. Englhauser, H. Gunell, M. Holstrom, F. Jansen, V. Kharchenko, and P. Rodriguez-Pascual.
3/16/04mwb, sek, MIT/CSR MIT XIS Status 16 March 2004 Overview: TCE board rebuild status Back-illuminated CCD performance & status (Slightly) improved.
PSF in-flight calibration - PN IFC/CNRRingberg, April 2-4, 2002 PSF in-flight calibration for PN camera Simona Ghizzardi Silvano Molendi.
Are the relativistic Fe lines really relativistic? A systematic analysis of the Fe K line from inner region of accretion disk of Neutron star LMXB with.
3 May 2007 Suzaku Users mwb MIT/MKI XIS Update Mark Bautz, MIT Kavli Institute XIS-2 Anomaly Contamination.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Experience with combined Fe 55 /Vela SNR calibration K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Experience with combined Fe 55 / Vela SNR.
Application of a Charge Transfer Model to Space Telescope Data Paul Bristow Dec’03
XMM-Newton 1 Michael Smith, ESAC PN Monitoring Mallorca, April 2008.
Charge transport model for Swept Charge Devices (SCD) P. S. Athiray Post Doctoral Research Fellow, Manipal Centre for Natural Sciences, Manipal University,
Swift-XRT Team Meeting – Clemson, October 23 rd, 2011 ( Page 1 ) Andy Beardmore and the Leicester Swift-XRT calibration team CCD22 Simulator Mk II.
Experience with combined Fe55 / Tycho SNR calibration
Investigation into the strong residuals seen
X-ray CCD with low noise charge injection.
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting
Energy Response of the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) on Suzaku
Temporal &Spatial Dependency of the MOS RMF
Update of EPIC pn long-term monitoring
Long-term trends in EPIC pn energy response
Presentation transcript:

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Origin of gain offsets: new insights from eROSITA calibration Mallorca, Spain, 2008 April EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Gain/temperature correlation: earlier investigations

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Mn-K α position vs. temperature: CCD 3 & 4

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Deviations of the Al-K and Mn-K α positions

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Mn-K α position vs. Al-K position

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 “CCD offsets”

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 ART-XC (Ru) eROSITA (D) Calorimeter (NL,US,J) LWFT (UK) "LOBSTER" Spacecraft "Navigator" (Ru) Spektr-Rentgen-Gamma (SRG) to be launched in 2011 from Baikonur into 600 km / 30° orbit with Soyuz-Fregat Спектр-рентген-гамма

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration Energy [keV] x = x = Energy [keV] adu

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration Energy [keV] peak position: deviation from nominal value [adu] x = x = Energy [keV]

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Deviations of the Al-K and Mn-K α positions

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration “charge loss” independent of energy simulation Energy [keV] peak position: deviation from nominal value [adu] Energy [keV] - 25 adu- 35 adu

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration “charge loss” dependent on energy simulation Energy [keV] peak position: deviation from nominal value [adu] Energy [keV] - 25 adu · exp(-E/keV)- 35 adu · exp(-E/keV)

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 “Gain offsets” are observed at EPIC pn and eROSITA Due to the enhanced spectral capabilities towards lower energies, they can be better studied with eROSITA..

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC input: 6 long flatfield exposures at B-K, C-K, Cu-L, Al-K, Cr-K, Cu-K selection of all singles in the 20 CCD rows closest to the CAMEX no corrections applied peak positions determined separately for CAMEX-1 and CAMEX- 2

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 offset: ~ eV 0 ~ 14 eV

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC Application of the cti and gain correction derived for singles

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 HK Al-K monochromator (1.486 keV), NLL=0A00 (10s), SPLT=0028 (40a)

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Cu-K (8.040 keV) high threshold (~130 adu)  overcorrection of doubles not due to noise collection

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Cr-K (5.410 keV)

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 B-K Cr-K Cu-K Al-K

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8  Patterns cannot be corrected by any gain(E) function which is applied to their components individually, even if this function is made dependend on (x,y) and the pattern type.  If correction for singles is applied, then patterns become overcorrected, with the amount of overcorrection monotonically increasing with pattern size What is the reason ? why offset ? why overcorrection for patterns ? eROSITA/TRoPIC Gain Correction

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 nonlinear amplification ? offset calculation ? common mode ? pileup with noise ? frame store ? partial events ? why offset ? why overcorrection for patterns ? eROSITA/TRoPIC Gain Correction

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 E = 0.1 keV E < 0.1 keV E = 6.0 keV 5.9 keV E = 5.9 keV 0.1 keV E = 0.1 keV Charge Loss due to Partial Events

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 nonlinear amplification ? offset calculation ? common mode ? pileup with noise ? frame store ? partial events ? why offset ? why overcorrection for patterns ? threshold ! eROSITA/TRoPIC Gain Correction

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 General consequences Low Energy Threshold 6.1 million events data corrected with gain derived from singles data set: HK Macor, 15 kV, 4.2 V, EPIC-Filter, 5 Sigma, 20 adu

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Dependence of the peak position derived from singles on the low energy threshold Low Energy Threshold 6.1 million events data corrected with gain derived from singles data set: HK Macor, 15 kV, 4.2 V, EPIC-Filter, 5 Sigma, 20 adu

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 20 adu 30 adu 40 adu 50 adu 60 adu 70 adu 80 adu 90 adu 100 adu 110 adu 120 adu 130 adu 140 adu 150 adu 160 adu 170 adu 180 adu 190 adu

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 HK

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Threshold Induced Charge Loss zero level threshold

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Threshold Induced Charge Loss zero level threshold

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 offset: ~ eV 0 ~ 14 eV eROSITA/TRoPIC Gain Correction

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration Energy [keV] peak position: deviation from nominal value [adu] x = x = Energy [keV]

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 deviations of the Al-K and Mn-K α positions XMM-Newton / EPIC pn

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Single: 4 borders Double: 6 borders 2 singles: 8 borders  border filling factor: 6/8 Triple: 8 borders 3 singles: 12 borders  border filling factor: 8/12 Quadruple: 8 borders 4 singles: 16 borders  border filling factor: 8/16 Patterns, Borders, and Threshold Induced Charge Loss

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Single: 4 borders correction for 4 borders  predicted overcorrections: d : t : q = 3 : 4 : 6 Double: 6 borders but: correction for 8 borders  overcorrection: -6/8 + 8/8 = +2/8 = Triple: 8 borders but: correction for 12 borders  overcorrection: -8/ /12 = +4/12 = Quadruple: 8 borders but: correction for 16 borders  overcorrection: -8/ /16 = +8/16 = Patterns, Borders, and Threshold Induced Charge Loss

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Cu-K: doubles: +67 eV triples: +95 eV quadruples: +157 eV measured: d : t : q = 2.6 : 3.6 : 6.0 predicted: d : t : q = 3 : 4 : 6 ratios somewhat different for lower energies: partial event effect ?

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 eROSITA / TRoPIC calibration “cutoff” gain “cutoff” gain + “electronic” gain nonlinear “electronic” gain

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Implications for the gain correction algorithm for pn CCDs: 1.apply first the “electronic” gain correction to all events (i.e., singles and pattern components) 2.recombine the events to photons 3.apply then the “cutoff” gain correction (depending on energy and pattern size) to all photons in order to recover the lost charge and to linearize/adjust the energy scale  first results: eROSITA/TRoPIC Gain Correction

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Macor B-K (0.183 keV) keV keV keV keV singles doubles triples quadruples

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Al-K (1.486 keV)Cu-K (8.040 keV) keV keV keV keV keV keV keV keV singles doubles triples quadruples singles doubles triples quadruples

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 The situation for EPIC pn While there is clear evidence for an offset in the gain, there is no overcorrection of the energy for patterns observed

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 EPIC pn

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 EPIC pn

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8... EPIC pn

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Implications for the gain correction algorithm for pn CCDs: 1.apply first the “electronic” gain correction to all events (i.e., singles and pattern components) 2.recombine the events to photons 3.apply then the “cutoff” gain correction (depending on energy and pattern size) to all photons in order to recover the lost charge and to linearize/adjust the energy scale For EPIC pn, this is important because it can be considered as a justification for introducing an additive term in the gain correction. It is less important for patterns, because no overcorrection of the pattern energy is observed.

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8 Comparison: eROSITA  EPIC pn Specific properties of eROSITA compared to EPIC pn: CTI correction less important non-linearities of the gain more important lower energies accessible smaller pixels  edge effects more important smaller pixels  increased number of patterns improved charge transport  artificial pattern creation during readout (‘vertical doubles’) suppressed threshold induced gain changes easier detectable Specific properties of eROSITA compared to EPIC pn: CTI correction less important non-linearities of the gain more important lower energies accessible smaller pixels  edge effects more important smaller pixels  increased number of patterns improved charge transport  artificial pattern creation during readout (‘vertical doubles’) suppressed threshold induced gain changes easier detectable

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Origin of gain offsets K. Dennerl, 2008 April 8