1 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES Presentation by The University of Arizona, May 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovate Now: Overview and Next Steps February 2007.
Advertisements

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
June Strategic Questions Where can we lead the world? Can we define the Engineering College of the 21 st Century? Positioning the College to leverage.
Powering Maryland Forward USM's 2020 Plan for More Degrees, a Stronger Innovation Economy, and a Higher Quality of Life USM Strategic Plan Presentation.
Steve Griffitts, President Joe Dunlap, Ed.D., President.
University of VirginiaVirginia Tech Collaborative Educational and Research Activities to Support the Needs of Rolls-Royce (Presentation to VEDP Board)
1 CLEVELAND The Nation’s New Healthcare Innovation Destination 2011.
1 PRESENTATION TO OHIO SSI STUDY GROUP OVERVIEW OF FUNDING PRACTICES AND STATE EXAMPLES Brenda N. Albright September 29, 2005.
Carnegie Report 2009 “The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy”
©2006 Ann Arbor SPARK 2010 Successes 2011 Opportunities Washtenaw Workforce Investment Board July 8, 2011.
1 Focus on Economic Growth. Topics Connecticut’s economic development strategy Key areas of focus DECD tools and their impact Q&A 2.
BY THE NUMBERS Pennsylvania in FY 2012 $261 Million: NSF funds awarded 7 th : National ranking in NSF funds 82: NSF-funded institutions 1,137: NSF grants.
High Impact Implementation for an Innovation-Driven Economy The Texas Industry Cluster Initiative.
Just Think State of the University Address Presented by Chancellor Thomas F. George September 17, 2003.
Driving the Next Generation of Economic Development Research Education Outreach Economic Engagement.
The Statewide Economic Impacts of the University of Missouri Tom Johnson August 2007.
Innovation, Colleges and Applied Research ACCC College and Institute Applied Research Symposium (February 12-13, 2004)
Securing Tomorrow’s Prosperity University of Calgary – Faculty of Engineering Planning Workshop May 10, 2005 Rick Sloan Assistant Deputy Minister Industry.
Insurance & Financial Services Cluster Shared Action for Growth Economic Summit & Outlook 2004 January 21, 2004.
N O R T H C A R O L I N A B I O T E C H N O L O G Y C E N T E R North Carolina – Leading Global Hub for Agricultural Biotechnology NCBiotech - AgBiotech.
Independent Higher Education as an Economic Engine: The Latest Action Research Commission on Independent Colleges and Universities Terri Standish-Kuon.
Economic Impact of Medical Education Expansion in Nevada & Recommended Approach FUTURE 1.
1 The Wellington Group July 16-18, 2007 Chicago, Illinois Addressing Economic Needs Through National, Regional and Community-Based Strategies Tad Perry.
North Carolina Vision 2030 > A Plan for Accelerating Job Growth and Securing North Carolina’s Future.
Role of Advanced Manufacturing in the Future U.S. Economy Yung C. Shin Donald A. & Nancy G. Roach Professor of Advanced Manufacturing Purdue University.
John McDougall, President 10 th Annual Re$earch Money Conference, 11 May 2011.
STAR Park – STAR One Science, Technology and Advanced Research A member of The Texas State University System.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
June 29, 2005 Successful Research Parks Patricia H.C. Ardigo Director, Life Sciences Group CB Richard Ellis.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
I D A H O T E C H N O L O G Y C O U N C I L 0 WELCOME from the Idaho Technology Council.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
National Fund 2.0: Vision Across America, communities are thriving because local leaders are working in partnership so that employers have the skilled.
Global Leadership in Medical Innovation: “Ours to Lose”
Americas Top States for Business 2012 Montana and surrounding states.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
Technology Based Economic Development in West Virginia Gaps, Strengths and Recommendations 2008 Create WV Conference.
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND FY 2009 BUDGET William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor February 1, 2008.
Colorado State University System: Investing in Economic Prosperity for Colorado Presentation to the Joint Budget Committee Patrick Grant, Chair, Board.
April, The Governor's Information Technology Initiative Presentation for the Appropriations Committee, Louisiana House of Representatives.
A Businessman’s View of Tier 1 from the President’s Office at UNLV Donald D. Snyder President.
The Value of Investment in University Research and Innovation Arizona’s Research Universities Drive State Economic Growth 1.Workforce development - provide.
Bio in Arizona Joe Caspermeyer Laura Gladney PAF 591 Policy Briefing April 1, 2003.
1 Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor Wednesday September 24, 2008.
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education Improving Our Future by Degrees The Funding Picture: 2011 Dr. Linda Mason.
Building Partnerships to Enhance the Colorado Nursing Workforce.
Tomorrow is a new day. You shall begin it serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense. Emerson.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
The University of Memphis Administrative Retreat Academic Planning and Priorities Ralph Faudree September 20, 2004.
Accelerating Adoption of Sector Strategies A State Policy Development Assistance Project Funded by The Ford and C. S. Mott Foundations February 24, 2006.
Science & Technology-Based Recommendations to Further Economic Development Goals Presented by Keith Aspinall.
N O R T H C A R O L I N A B I O T E C H N O L O G Y C E N T E R North Carolina – State Initiatives Supporting the Bioenergy Industry Jacob Traverse NCBiotech.
PRESENTATION TITLE | DATE Moving the Life Science Industry Forward.
Your University. Missouri’s Future. Speaker’s Name Here Date.
Freshman Faculty Welcome August 22, Mission The University of Missouri-Rolla, UMR, has a major responsibility for meeting Missouri’s needs for engineering.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
Prepared by Collaborative Economics. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  San Diego is participating in a new global innovation economy  San Diego’s global reach has.
April 29, 2014 Which Way is Up? Mapping the Incentives Landscape Patrick McHugh, Ph.D. Fiscal Analyst, Fiscal Research Division North Carolina General.
SMALL PRESENTATION ON THREE BIG IDEAS Strategic Planning Retreat 6/2011.
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
Washington THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) is the only federal agency whose mission includes support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
Iyad Alzaharnah, PhD – Director Innovation Center
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
Oregon THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) is the only federal agency whose mission includes support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
CSE Strategic Planning Background
Donald D. Snyder President UNLV
Louisiana’s colleges and universities operate at the lowest unit cost in the country. The challenge: those “units” are students, and the “cost” is our.
Mark B. Rosenberg, Chancellor
Achieving The Dream Oklahoma Higher Education
Presentation transcript:

1 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES Presentation by The University of Arizona, May 5, 2008

2 Investments by other States: Missouri: Life Science Missions Enhancement 15M new, recurring dollars from state legislature 100 new faculty were added in selected disciplines MU’s new federal research awards increased by 132% Royalties and patent applications doubled Iowa: Grow Iowa Values Fund: 50M Battelle Platform Investment - Private-University-Government partnerships

3 Iowa Institute for Biomedical Discovery 70 New Scientists and Clinicians Each employing average of 6 approx $52,000/year Assuming a State income tax rate of 5%, in 10 years, employees of the Iowa Life Sciences Center would contribute a return of approximately $211 million in State income taxes. $30 M State Appropriations for Iowa Life Sciences Center $210 M State income tax generated from Iowa Life Sciences Center employees in 10 years One of the state’s best investments

4 Competing State investments in biomedical research infrastructure: Arizona has fallen behind – Other State Investments Totaling Several Billion: Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, California, New York, Pennsylvania-Georgia –Wisconsin--$1 Billion Infrastructure/$750 Million for Research Program –Indiana $500 Million Arizona Must Compete

5 Increase access to specialized facilities and labs at U of A Address space needs of firms Insure supportive tax and regulatory policy Selective recruitment of bioscience firms Address shortage of risk capital Form executive in residence program Increase industry partnerships with U of A, C-Path and others Build and invest in C-Path Amend state constitution to allow universities to take equity positions in companies Expand technology commercialization at U of A Build and invest in C- Path Secure resources to retain faculty and build U of A’s research excellence Build stronger clinical research base Key Actions 10 Year Vision: Southern Arizona is one of the nation’s recognized bioscience centers, driven by its strengths of a talented workforce, a cutting edge research university, and a global center for bioscience innovation. Its civic leaders help drive the bioscience economy, mobilizing leadership committed to collaboration, results and economic growth. Southern Arizona Bioscience Roadmap BioFirm Formation Firm Expansion/ Attraction Technology Development Research

6 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES FRAMING THE ISSUE How the State allocates its investment in Arizona’s Universities reflects Arizona’s values

7 FOUR CORE COMPONENTS OF THE STATE’S INVESTMENT ENROLLMENT INVESTMENT DEGREE INVESTMENT RESEARCH INVESTMENT SERVICE INVESTMENT INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES

8 HOW COULD STATE INVESTMENT BE ALLOCATED ACROSS THE FOUR CORE COMPONENTS? ENROLLMENT INVESTMENT: Target range 35-40% DEGREE INVESTMENT: Target range 35-40% RESEARCH INVESTMENT: Target range 21-26% SERVICE INVESTMENT: Target range 2-5% INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES

9 HOW COULD STATE INVESTMENT BE ALLOCATED ACROSS THE FOUR CORE COMPONENTS?

10 WHAT VALUES ARE EXPRESSED IN THIS ALLOCATION MIX? 1. CREATE ACCESS TO DEGREES: ENROLLMENT INVESTMENT VALUES ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION Target range 35-40% 2. ASSURE A PATHWAY TO DEGREE SUCCESS: DEGREE INVESTMENT VALUES DEGREE COMPLETION Target range 35-40% INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES

11 WHAT VALUES ARE EXPRESSED IN THIS ALLOCATION MIX? 3. EXPAND THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION: RESEARCH INVESTMENT VALUES HOW UNIVERSITIES STIMULATE THE STATE’S ECONOMY WHETHER BY INDUSTRY (New companies created, attracted or advanced by University graduates) OR BY AN INDIVIDUAL (University-educated workforce) Target range 21-26% 4. DISSEMINATE KNOWLEDGE TO ADVANCE ARIZONA’S COMMUNITIES: SERVICE INVESTMENT VALUES HOW UNIVERSITIES CONTRIBUTE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO THE COMMUNITY Target range 2-5% INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES

12 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES