Homework 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry Logic.
Advertisements

TRUTH TABLES Section 1.3.
TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Constructing a Truth Table
Truth-Tables. Recap Deductive Validity We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the argument.
Logic & Critical Reasoning
Truth Tables Presented by: Tutorial Services The Math Center.
Sentential Logic 2. REVIEW Deductive Validity We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the.
Sentential Logic. One of our main critical thinking questions was: Does the evidence support the conclusion? How do we evaluate whether specific evidence.
Logic ChAPTER 3 1. Truth Tables and Validity of Arguments
Philosophy 148 Chapter 6. Truth-Functional Logic Chapter 6 introduces a formal means to determine whether arguments are valid, so that there is never.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING: PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Purposes: To analyze complex claims and deductive argument forms To determine what arguments are valid or not.
TF truth, falsity, and indeterminacy P is truth-functionally true iff it has the value T for any truth-value assignment. P is truth-functionally false.
2/17/2008Sultan Almuhammadi1 ICS Logic & Sets (An Overview) Week 1.
Today’s Topics n Review Logical Implication & Truth Table Tests for Validity n Truth Value Analysis n Short Form Validity Tests n Consistency and validity.
1 Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Math 306 Foundations of Mathematics I Goals of this class Introduction to important mathematical concepts Development.
Phil 120 week 1 About this course. Introducing the language SL. Basic syntax. Semantic definitions of the connectives in terms of their truth conditions.
3.2 – Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction Statements have truth values They are either true or false but not both Statements may be simple or compound Compound statements.
Logic ChAPTER 3.
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
Elementary Logic PHIL Intersession 2013 MTWHF 10:00 – 12:00 ASA0118C Steven A. Miller Day 4.
Chapter 1 Section 1.4 More on Conditionals. There are three statements that are related to a conditional statement. They are called the converse, inverse.
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Prof. Shachar Lovett Clicker frequency: CA.
Truth-Tables. Midterm Grades Grade Distribution.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
BY: MISS FARAH ADIBAH ADNAN IMK. CHAPTER OUTLINE: PART III 1.3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC INTRODUCTION PROPOSITION COMPOUND STATEMENTS LOGICAL.
Valid and Invalid Arguments
1 Propositional Logic Proposition 2 Propositions can be divided into simple propositions and compound propositions. A simple (or basic) proposition is.
CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Prof. Shachar Lovett.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 2 Section 1.1 Fri, Jan 19, 2007.
Predicate Logic. TRUTH-TABLE REMINDERS The problem people had the most trouble with was 1e: construct a truth-table for: (P & (~Q & R)) Many of you only.
Logic Review. FORMAT Format Part I 30 questions 2.5 marks each Total 30 x 2.5 = 75 marks Part II 10 questions Answer only 5 of them! Total 5 x 5 marks.
The Foundations Logic and Proofs by raedRASHEED 2014.
CSNB143 – Discrete Structure LOGIC. Learning Outcomes Student should be able to know what is it means by statement. Students should be able to identify.
3.3: Truth Tables. Types of Statements Negation: ~p Conjunction: p ˄ q (p and q) Disjunction: p V q (p or q, or both) Conditional: p → q (if p, then q)
Boolean Logic. Boolean Operators (T/F) xyx AND y FFF FTF TFF TTT xyx OR y FFF FTT TFT TTT xNOT x FT TF.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting
Chapter 3: Semantics PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning March 13, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Conditional Statements
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: "Natural Deduction – Introduction“ Bring this book to lecture.
CS1022 Computer Programming & Principles Lecture 1 Logic and Proof.
PHIL 120: Third meeting I. I. What to know for Test 1 (in general terms). II. II. Symbolizing compound sentences (cont’d) a. a. Paying attention to English.
Warmup Answer the following True/False questions in your head: I have brown hair AND I am wearing glasses I am male OR I am wearing sneakers I am NOT male.
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
Review Given p: Today is Thursday q: Tomorrow is Friday
Truth Tables Geometry Unit 11, Lesson 6 Mrs. King.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting Section 1 Logic.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 1 §3.4, Truth Tables for the Conditional and the Biconditional.
LOGIC.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: "Truth Tables – Validity vs. Soundness" This PowerPoint Presentation contains a large number of slides, a good.
Lesson 20 INTERPRETING TRUTH TABLES. Review Conditional Statements (Less. 17) Original If p, then q. Converse If q, then p. Inverse If ~p, then ~q. Contrapositive.
Formal Test for Validity. EVALUATIONS Evaluations An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example: A = T B = T C = F.
Boolean Logic.
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction The truth value of a statement is the classification as true or false which denoted by T or F. A truth table is a listing of.
Notes - Truth Tables fun, fun, and more fun!!!!. A compound statement is created by combining two or more statements, p and q.
Metalogic. TWO CONCEPTIONS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE.
Sentential Logic.
Conditional Statements Lecture 2 Section 1.2 Fri, Jan 20, 2006.
Mathematics for Computing Lecture 2: Computer Logic and Truth Tables Dr Andrew Purkiss-Trew Cancer Research UK
TRUTH TABLES Edited from the original by: Mimi Opkins CECS 100 Fall 2011 Thanks for the ppt.
Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard Glencoe Geometry Interactive Chalkboard Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Developed by FSCreations, Inc.,
Assign Yourself and Do Now Thursday, January 10, 2013.
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
TF truth, falsity, and indeterminacy P is truth-functionally true iff it has the value T for any truth-value assignment. P is truth-functionally false.
Test #2 Practice MGF 1106 Summer 2011.
Logical functors and connectives. Negation: ¬ The function of the negation is to reverse the truth value of a given propositions (sentence). If A is true,
LOGICAL EQUIVALENCES - DISCRETE MATHEMATICS.
Presentation transcript:

Homework 3

True or False? True or false? For each of the following WFFs, determine whether it is true or false on the given evaluation. Evaluation: P = T, Q = T, R = T 1. ~(P ↔ Q) 2. ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

True or False? True or false? For each of the following WFFs, determine whether it is true or false on the given evaluation. Evaluation: P = T, Q = T, R = T 1. ~(P ↔ Q) 2. ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Write Down the Evaluation P Q ~ (P ↔ Q) T

Copy the Evaluations beneath the Sentence Letters Q ~ (P ↔ Q) T

Consult Biconditional Truth-Table φ ψ (φ ↔ ψ) T F

Consult Biconditional Truth-Table φ ψ (φ ↔ ψ) T F

Copy Down the Answer P Q ~ (P ↔ Q) T

Consult the Negation Truth-Table φ ~φ T F

Consult the Negation Truth-Table φ ~φ T F

Copy Down the Answer P Q ~ (P ↔ Q) T F

The Answer is “False” P Q ~ (P ↔ Q) T F

True or False? True or false? For each of the following WFFs, determine whether it is true or false on the given evaluation. Evaluation: P = T, Q = T, R = T 1. ~(P ↔ Q) 2. ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

From My Inbox Dear Michael, Are there too many or too little parentheses in this formula: ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P) Thanks, --Concerned Student

Nope! ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Set #1 ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Set #2 ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Set #3 ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Definition of WFF All sentence letters are WFFs. If φ is a WFF, then ~φ is a WFF. If φ and ψ are WFFs, then (φ & ψ), (φ v ψ), (φ → ψ), (φ ↔ ψ) are also WFFs. Nothing else is a WFF.

Demonstration Using the definition we can show that certain sequences of symbols are WFFs. For example ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P) is a WFF.

All Sentence Letters Are WFFs By (i), all sentence letters are WFFs. So: P is a WFF Q is a WFF R is a WFF

All Sentence Letters Are WFFs By (i), all sentence letters are WFFs. So: P is a WFF Q is a WFF R is a WFF

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

By (iii) if φ and ψ are WFFs, then (φ → ψ) is a WFF.

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

All Sentence Letters Are WFFs By (i), all sentence letters are WFFs. So: P is a WFF Q is a WFF R is a WFF

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

By (iii) if φ and ψ are WFFs, then (φ v ψ) is a WFF.

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

All Sentence Letters Are WFFs By (i), all sentence letters are WFFs. So: P is a WFF Q is a WFF R is a WFF

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

By (ii) if φ is a WFF, then ~φ is a WFF.

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

By (iii) if φ and ψ are WFFs, then (φ & ψ) is a WFF.

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

By (ii) if φ is a WFF, then ~φ is a WFF.

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Scope Every occurrence of a connective in a WFF has a scope. The scope of that occurrence is the smallest WFF that contains it. For example The scope of “&” in “(~(~P&Q)→P)” is (~P&Q) (~(~P & Q) → P) is not a WFF. (~(~P & Q) → P) is a WFF, but is bigger than (~P&Q)

Occurrences Notice that the same symbol can occur different times in the same formula, and that its different occurrences can have different scopes. ~((~P & Q) & (R ↔ Q))

Scope of → ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Scope of v ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Scope of & ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Scope of Main Connective ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Main Connective The main connective in a formula is the occurrence of the connective whose scope is widest (the scope of the occurrence of the connective = the formula). A formula is a conditional if its main connective is →, a conjunction if it’s &, a negation if it’s ~, etc.

The Answer The answer of an evaluation or truth-table is always located under the main connective.

True or False? True or false? For each of the following WFFs, determine whether it is true or false on the given evaluation. Evaluation: P = T, Q = T, R = T 1. ~(P ↔ Q) 2. ~((P v (Q → R)) & ~P)

Copy Down Evaluation P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T

Copy beneath Sentence Letters Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T

Consult the Negation Truth-Table φ ~φ T F

Consult the Negation Truth-Table φ ~φ T F

Copy Value from Truth-Table Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F

Consult Truth-Table for Arrow φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Consult Truth-Table for Arrow φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Copy Down Value P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F

Consult Truth-Table for Wedge φ ψ (φ v ψ) T F

Copy Down Value P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F

Consult Truth-Table for & φ ψ (φ & ψ) T F

Consult Truth-Table for & φ ψ (φ & ψ) T F

Copy Down Value P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F

The Answer is “True” P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F

The Answer is “True” P Q R ((P v (Q → R)) & ~ P) T F *Note: This is because I forgot the ~.

Part 2: Full Truth-Tables For each of the following WFFs, write out their full truth-table. 3. ~(P v Q) 4. (((P → Q) → P) → P)

Part 2: Full Truth-Tables For each of the following WFFs, write out their full truth-table. 3. ~(P v Q) 4. (((P → Q) → P) → P)

Write Down ALL POSSIBLE Evaluations Q ~ (P v Q) T F

Copy Values beneath Sentence Letters Q ~ (P v Q) T F

Consult Truth Table for Wedge φ ψ (φ v ψ) T F

Insert Values Appropriately Q ~ (P v Q) T F

Consult Truth-Table for Negation φ ~φ T F

Insert Values Appropriately Q ~ (P v Q) T F

Michael’s Favorite Logic Formula For each of the following WFFs, write out their full truth-table. 3. ~(P v Q) 4. (((P → Q) → P) → P)

Write Down All Possible Evaluations Q (((P → Q) P) T F

Copy beneath Sentence Letters Q (((P → Q) P) T F

Consult Truth-Table for Arrow φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Insert Appropriate Values Q (((P → Q) P) T F

Insert Appropriate Values Q (((P → Q) P) T F

Insert Appropriate Values Q (((P → Q) P) T F

Valid or Fails the Test? Valid or invalid? For each of the following arguments, use the truth- table test for validity to determine whether it’s valid or invalid. 5. P Ⱶ (Q → P) 6. Q Ⱶ (Q → P) 7. ~P Ⱶ (P → Q) 8. ~Q Ⱶ (P → Q)

Valid or Fails the Test? Valid or invalid? For each of the following arguments, use the truth- table test for validity to determine whether it’s valid or invalid. 5. P Ⱶ (Q → P) 6. Q Ⱶ (Q → P) 7. ~P Ⱶ (P → Q) 8. ~Q Ⱶ (P → Q)

Write Down All Evaluations P Q (Q → P) T F

Write Down Truth Table For Premises Q (Q → P) T F

Write Down Truth Table For Conclusion P Q (Q → P) T F

Ignore Lines Where Premises Are False Q (Q → P) T F

Make Sure Conclusion is True on the Other Lines P Q (Q → P) T F

Always True with True Conclusion φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Valid or Fails the Test? Valid or invalid? For each of the following arguments, use the truth- table test for validity to determine whether it’s valid or invalid. 5. P Ⱶ (Q → P) 6. Q Ⱶ (Q → P) 7. ~P Ⱶ (P → Q) 8. ~Q Ⱶ (P → Q)

Write Down All Evaluations P Q (Q → P) T F

Write Down Truth Table For Premises Q (Q → P) T F

Write Down Truth Table For Conclusion P Q (Q → P) T F

Ignore Lines with False Premises Q (Q → P) T F

Make Sure Conclusion is All T on Other Lines P Q (Q → P) T F

Sometimes False with True Premise φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Valid or Fails the Test? Valid or invalid? For each of the following arguments, use the truth- table test for validity to determine whether it’s valid or invalid. 5. P Ⱶ (Q → P) 6. Q Ⱶ (Q → P) 7. ~P Ⱶ (P → Q) 8. ~Q Ⱶ (P → Q)

Write Down All Evaluations P Q ~P (P → Q) T F

Write Down Truth-Tables P Q ~P (P → Q) T F

Ignore Lines with False Premises Q ~P (P → Q) T F

Make Sure Conclusion is T if Premises are T Q ~P (P → Q) T F

Always True with False Antecedent φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F

Valid or Fails the Test? Valid or invalid? For each of the following arguments, use the truth- table test for validity to determine whether it’s valid or invalid. 5. P Ⱶ (Q → P) 6. Q Ⱶ (Q → P) 7. ~P Ⱶ (P → Q) 8. ~Q Ⱶ (P → Q)

Write Down Evaluations, Truth-Tables P Q ~Q (P → Q) T F

Ignore Lines with False Premises Q ~Q (P → Q) T F

Ignore Lines with False Premises Q ~Q (P → Q) T F

Sometimes False with False Consequent φ ψ (φ → ψ) T F