Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 29, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; Temperature Simulation DCCT at PETRA III D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg.
Advertisements

RF aspects of module vacuum system Riccardo Zennaro CERN.
CALCULATIONS OF THE LCLS INJECTOR USING ASTRA Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations.
1 Simulations of Tuneshifts for Electron Beams M. Venturini (LBNL) Jan 26, 2009.
01/07/2005 SN 1 of 16 Esti mation of HOM Power in the Interaction Region of ILC Sasha Novokhatski Session “Beam RF Effects” ILC MDI Workshop SLAC January.
Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz) A. Grudiev, E. Métral, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, B. Spataro Acknowledgments: Erk Jensen, Eric Montesinos,
The Physics and Applications of High Brightness Electron Beams - Erice, October 9-14, 2005 Simulations of coherent synchrotron radiation effects on beam.
Wakefield Damping Effects in the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Wakefield Simulation of CLIC PETS Structure Using Parallel 3D Finite.
Update on SPS BPM impedance B. Salvant for the 2008 impedance team.
M1M2M3M4M5M6 M10 M20 M30 M40 M50 M M1M2M3M4M5M6.
From Bunch Wakes to Delta Wakes Adriana Bungau / Roger Barlow COLSIM meeting CERN, 1 st March 2007.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
1 Trying to understand the routine that Bruno is using to get the impedance from the wake Many thanks for their help to: Bruno S. (of course), Alexej,
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
IMPEDANCE OF Y-CHAMBER FOR SPS CRAB CAVITY By Phoevos Kardasopoulos Thanks to Benoit Salvant, Pei Zhang, Fred Galleazzi, Roberto Torres-Sanchez and Alick.
Accelerator Laboratory of Tsinghua University Research on deflecting cavities for SPX project in APS Yawei Yang Tsinghua University, Argonne National Lab.
Status of PSB Impedance calculations: Inconel undulated chambers C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Thanks to: E. Benedetto, J. Borburgh.
Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 8,
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
FETS RFQ Beam Dynamics Simulations for RFQSIM, CST and Comsol Field Maps Simon Jolly 2 nd June 2010.
CST Particle studio. Analysis of “STEP-OUT” Olav Berrig Thanks to Benoit Salvant.
Outline: Motivation Comparisons with: > Thick wall formula > CST Thin inserts models Tests on the Mode Matching Method Webmeeting N.Biancacci,
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
First results of calculation of wakefields for the LHCb experimental chamber. Rainer Wanzenberg, Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg February 2, 2015.
Collimation Wakefield Simulations Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Resistive Effects in XFEL Kicker Andranik Tsakanian XFEL Beam Dynamic Meeting 17 Dec 2007.
Example: Longitudinal single bunch effects Synchrotron tune spread Synchrotron phase shift Potential well distortion Energy spread widening (microwave.
Impedance Budget Database Olga Zagorodnova BD meeting, DESY.
Coupler Short-Range Wakefield Kicks Karl Bane and Igor Zagorodnov Wake Fest 07, 11 December 2007 Thanks to M. Dohlus; and to Z. Li, and other participants.
Long Range Wake Potential of BPM in Undulator Section Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Group Meeting
August 21st 2013 BE-ABP Bérengère Lüthi – Summer Student 2013
Longitudinal impedance of new RF fingers O. Berrig, C. Garion, B. Salvant.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
Impedance & Instabilities
F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Métral, B. Salvant
Experience with CST Eigenmode Solver for the LHCb Velo Upgrade Project
Coupler RF kick simulations.
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Finemet cavity impedance studies
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
Numerical Studies of Resistive Wall Effects
N.Biancacci, E.Métral, B.Salvant
Wakefield simulations for ILC cavity
Status and details of coupler kick and wake simulations
Coupler kick and wake simulations upgrade
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
CERN – GSI – TUD WEBMEETING
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus
Wakefield Simulation of CLIC PETS Structure Using Parallel 3D Finite Element Time-Domain Solver T3P* Arno Candel, Andreas Kabel, Zenghai Li, Cho Ng, Liequan.
E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini (CERN – BE-ABP-LIS)
Status with Particle Studio simulations
Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows
Area of a Composite Calculate the area of this shape Total Area =
Simulations and RF Measurements of SPS Beam Position Monitors (BPV and BPH) G. Arduini, C. Boccard, R. Calaga, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, F. Roncarolo,
Beamline Absorber Study Using T3P
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
Simulation with Particle Studio
Separating dipolar and quadrupolar wakes with Mafia
CMS vacuum chamber. Geometry for wakefield calculations
HBP impedance calculations
Simulation of Emittance
Status of the EM simulations and modeling of ferrite loaded kickers
EM Simulation of wakes in BSRT beampipe with extraction mirror
Impedance of Different Kicker Options
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Short-Range Wakes in Elliptical Pipe Geometry
Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus
Presentation transcript:

Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 29,

3D-calculations of wake fields for the LHCb VeLo were done using of the Wakefield Solver of CST The first step of the calculations – calculations for the original CATIA structure. The accuracy of the calculations was insufficient. The second step – calculations for the simplified model. 2

Different sets of the meshes. Δ xΔ z Mesh 1 1mm 2mm Mesh 20.5mm 2mm Mesh 30.5mm 1mm Mesh 40.2mm0.5mm1mm Mesh 50.5mm0.2mm1mm Mesh 60.2mm0.5mm Mesh 70.4mm 0.5mm impossibly The calculations were performed for different beam positions: 1. x=0, y=0; 2. x=1.5mm, y=0; 3. x=0, y=1.5mm 3

Longitudinal wake potential was calculated for 10m and for different mesh properties – Mesh2, Mesh3. Calculations have been done for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). 4

Longitudinal wake potential for Mesh3, Mesh4. Calculations have been done for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). 5

X-component and Y-component of the transverse wake potential for different mesh properties. Beam position – on axis. Calculations have been done for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh4 6

Longitudinal wake potentials for different mesh properties and for different beam positions: 1. x = 1.5mm, y=0 and 2. x=0, y=1,5mm. Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). 1 2 Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh4 Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh5 7

X – components of the transverse wake potentials for different mesh properties and for different beam positions: 1. x = 1.5mm, y=0 and 2. x=0, y=1,5mm. Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh4 Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh5 8

Y – components of the transverse wake potentials for different mesh properties and for different beam positions: 1. x = 1.5mm, y=0 and 2. x=0, y=1,5mm. Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh4 Mesh1, Mesh3, Mesh5 9

Real and imaginary parts of the longitudinal wake impedance. The impedance was calculated with help of CST Studio for the wake potential (75m). Wake potential was calculated for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). with following mesh set: dx=0.5mm, dy=0.5mm, dz=1mm. 10

Real and imaginary parts of the longitudinal wake impedance. The impedance was calculated with help of CST Studio for the wake potential(10m). Wake potential was calculated for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 1cm) with following mesh set: dx=0.2mm, dy=0.5mm, dz=1mm. 11

Comparison of 10-m longitudinal wake potentials, presented for the region until 5m. Wake potentials were calculated for Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 1cm) with following mesh sets: dx=0.5mm, dy=0.5mm, dz=1mm; dx=0.2mm, dy=0.5mm, dz=1mm; 12

Δ xΔ z Mesh 1 1mm 2mm Mesh 20.5mm 1mm Δ r Mesh 1 1mm2mm Mesh 20.5mm1mm Mesh 30.2mm0.5mm Symmetric 2D model for ECHO2D. The third step of calculations – calculations for the simplified model. Symmetric 3D model for CST 13

Longitudinal monopole wake potential – 2D and 3D calculations. For Gaussian bunch shape σ = 7.5cm 14

Longitudinal dipole and transverse dipole wake potential – 2D calculations. For Gaussian bunch shape σ = 7.5cm Longitudinal dipole wake potential Transverse dipole wake potential 15

Comparison of 10-m longitudinal wake potentials, presented for the region until 2m. Wake potentials were calculated for Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 1cm) with different mesh sets. 16

17

Real and imaginary parts of the longitudinal wake impedance for the rotationally symmetric structure. The impedance was calculated with help of CST Studio for the wake potential obtained for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 7.5cm). 18

Real and imaginary parts of the longitudinal wake impedance for the rotationally symmetric structure. The impedance was calculated with help of CST Studio for the wake potential obtained for the Gaussian bunch shape (σ = 1cm). 19