Quality Assurance for Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SURVEY QUALITY CONTROL
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Survey Quality Control.
Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Overview of USDA HVI Cotton Classification Standards and Qualification Materials.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
OVERVIEW TEAM5 SOFTWARE The TEAM5 software manages personnel and test data for personal ESD grounding devices. Test and personnel data may be viewed/reported.
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
HVI Data Management.
Introducing Quality Management Drew Judkins, inContact Larry Fur, inContact Jonathan Judd, RxAmerica.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop
MODULE FIVE Monitoring/Reviews/Record Keeping/Forms and Documents School and Community Nutrition 2013.
CSU Customer Service Directorate 2004 Survey Update CAPT Larry Kirwan 16 August 2004.
Corrective & Preventive Action Programme l Corrective and preventive action managed by one programme l Closely linked to the internal audit programme l.
Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
Incident Command System Basic Course
Statistical Process Control
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
Section 4 – Supplement Maintenance Management System (MMS) (WAC 136 – 11) Larry Pearson, Maintenance Programs Manager.
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Sarbanes-Oxley Project Summary of COSO Framework Presented by Larry Dillehay & Scott Reitan Parkfield Group LLC.
Technical requirements  Sampling  Analysis  Reporting of the results.
Quality Assurance in the clinical laboratory
CIQ Workshop November 30 th – December 1 st 2010.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
Training Requirements Virginia Department of Health Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) 2014.
Unit #7 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
Certification of Market Values STEB PROGRAM Briefing Points 2011 Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Thomas E. Marks, CPA Deputy Auditor General.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Sub-session 1B: General Overview of CRVS systems.
2006 Palisade User ConferenceNovember 14 th, 2006 Inventory Optimization of Seasonal Products with.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Field Operations Distribution and Return of Material Angela Me, Chief Social and Demographic.
Cotton Testing Procedures. Production & Modules Cotton Testing Procedures Production & Modules.
AMC Time Charging Time Charging Basics The new AMC Overhead Rate.
Occurrence Reports. An occurrence report is a document used to record an event when it occurs Occurrences are reported each time an occurrence occurs.
1 Your skills and experience are a valuable resource to your department and to the City of Houston. The purpose of this presentation is to refresh your.
Optimizing Marketing Spend Through Multi-Source Conversion Attribution David Jenkins.
Supervising with the CANS: Integrating the CANS into the Fabric of Your Supervisory Processes Nancy L. Moore, LISW Ann Klein, MA Hamilton Choices, LLC;
Guest Cycle A division of the flow of business through a hotel that identifies the physical contacts and financial exchanges between guests and hotel employees.
Household Surveying Traci Watts State of Louisiana Office of Community Development.
Fee For Service Program Alabama Medicaid Program Changes.
Quality Control Lecture 5
P1 External Quality Assessment (EQA) Proficiency Testing.
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
“To provide respectful, prompt, and accurate services for our clients.”
Office of Test Security Rina Davis office fax.
Supplier Up to Schedule Plan  Supplier receives releases from Lear on a weekly basis via EDI or Fax.  If the supplier does not receive a release on a.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Pat T. Flora, Education Associate Office of Career and Technology Education October 21, 2015.
Overview of the Elevator Division and Its Quality Assurance Program January 2006.
Unit #6 - Basic Quality Control for the Clinical Laboratory
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
Accident and Incident Investigation
Working Title Guidelines
Auditor Report Card Effective January 2018, PRI Registrar started gathering data to help evaluate the risk and performance of our auditors. The criteria.
USDA, AMS, Cotton Program
Formative Assessments Director, Assessment and Accountability
The Quality Control Function
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Optimizing Revenue Through Defoliation Timing
National Visitor Use Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance for Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Branch Primary Functions:  Monitor Cotton Program Quality Assurance Activities  Management of Quality Assurance Checklot Program

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Approximately 1% of all samples classed each day at each classing office are randomly selected as a checklot for retest by the Quality Assurance Branch  Checklot samples are selected at the classer station by the Non-stop computer after the classification process is complete  The classification data assigned by the HVI or classer can not be changed after the sample is selected as a checklot

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Checklot samples are shipped to the Quality Assurance Branch via overnight delivery for next day classification  All checklot samples submitted to the Quality Assurance Branch are tested on two separate HVI systems  The test results of the two Quality Assurance HVI systems are compared to ensure the results are within established tolerances

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Checklot samples with results for any quality measurement that are outside the established tolerances based on the comparison of the two Quality Assurance HVI systems are deleted and not included in the data provided to the classing offices  The results from the two Quality Assurance HVI systems that are within the established tolerances are averaged and used for comparisons to the classing office results

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Repeatability (reproducibility) and bias are calculated for all HVI factors, classer leaf grade and extraneous matter by comparing the classing office results to the Quality Assurance Branch results  Test results are telecommunicated to each respective office immediately after classification is complete at Quality Assurance  Checklot data is utilized by USDA to ensure all offices provide accurate data to customers

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Quality Assurance follows the same type calibration and In-house procedures as the Classing Offices to ensure consistency  Quality Assurance also maintains an internal checklot program to ensure that all QA HVI’s and classers are on the same and correct level

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program CropUpland ChecklotsPima checklots ,2515, *99,914*1,988* Checklot Samples Classed 2010 Through 11/18/10 Classification of Upland crop 59% complete Classification of Pima crop 26% complete

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  The goal of Quality Assurance is to provide classification results back to the offices the same day the checklot samples are received  During the “peak” of the season, Quality Assurance will operate multiple shifts and work weekends to provide timely data to the offices

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Quality Assurance classification results are returned to the respective offices immediately after the QA classification is completed  All checklot results from the Quality Assurance Branch are tracked back to the Classing Office, shift of operation, classification date, classification time, classing supervisor, classer, HVI, HVI supervisor, and HVI operator

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Reports are generated and data are analyzed throughout the day to detect any potential problems or level shifts  If the Quality Assurance staff detects any actual or potential problem, immediate interaction occurs with the office to ensure correction

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program Leaf Grade Extraneous Matter Micronaire: Strength: Length: Length Uniformity: Trash % Area Color Rd Color +b Particle Count No Tolerance ± 0.13 unit ± 1.6 grams/tex ± inches ± 1.2 unit ± Equation Based ± 0.8 unit ± 0.3 unit ± Equation Based Reproducibility tolerances

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Results Through 11/18/10

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Results Through 11/18/10

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Data Analysis

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Data Analysis

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Data Analysis

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Data Analysis

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations

Quality Assurance Checklot Program  Quality Meetings are conducted each week to evaluate office performance and identify quality problems or potential problems  The quality meetings include the Deputy Administrator, if available, the Associate Deputy Administrator, and representatives from the Grading Branch, S&E Branch and the Quality Assurance Branch

Quality Assurance For Multiple Lab/Instrument Operations Quality Assurance Checklot Program  During the active classing season, the Associate Deputy Administrator, Grading Branch Chief, Quality Assurance Branch Chief and/or other supervisory personnel visit classing offices to ensure proper operational procedures