Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014 Chandrama Acharya Strategic Planning and Information Division Macquarie University July.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.

Advertisements

Conducting an Employability Audit Sharon Gedye & Brian Chalkley LTSN-GEES.

Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.

The Student Experience at Risk: Government Policy in the Measurement and Enhancement of Student Experience Dr Laura Hougaz Study Connections, ACPET Assoc.

Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office.

The Workplace Relevance Scale in the UES

SURVEY MANAGER INFORMATION FORUM 2014 THURSDAY 17 TH JULY AUSTRALIAN GRADUATE SURVEY.

The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education The National Authority for Quality Assurance.

Offices of the Provost & Deputy Vice-Chancellor (S&E) Introduction New policies, procedures and guidelines Key drivers OADRI Cycle Quality Management.

Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.

1:30 – 2:30. TEQSA: A New Regulatory Agency for Australian Higher Education Marian Thakur Regulatory Risk and Information.

DEEWR – current and future use of the AGS Budget Move to a higher education system that responds to student demand. $1.2 billion over the next.

Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.

Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.

CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.

Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching 2014 Survey Managers’ Information Forum 18 July 2014 Dr Andrew Taylor Branch Manager, Higher Education Data.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.

National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.

Professor Dolina Dowling

Institutional Assessment Day: Program-Level Alumni Survey Data August 19, 2014 Pat Hulsebosch Associate Provost – Office of Academic Quality Rosanne Bangura.

Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.

Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.

Department Name and School or Service Division Example Department of History School of Liberal Arts Example Office/department of Student Development Division.

Evaluation and revalidation briefing seminar 1 October 2014.

June 7,  After the year and review, the FOE committee made multiple recommendations for work.  These activities have begun and we intend.

Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.

9:00 – 9:45.  Careers advisers are a key user group of GDS data  Labour market information is used in advice for current and prospective students ◦

 Advancing Quality in Higher Education  DEEWR web site  PDF – ‘A strengthened Australian Graduate Survey’

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

Jun 2012 Phil Aungles Director, Performance and Analysis Unit Higher Education Group DIISRTE Department perspective on the AQHE initiative and the AGS.

UK Quality Code for Higher Education

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.

Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.

Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.

CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.

Quality and Relevance in Graduate Studies: Canada-China Academic Forum August 25 – 27, 2010 Enhancing the Quality and Standard of Graduate Education Barbara.

King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.

Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.

Noel Edge Executive Director AGS Review – a brief history so far …

ACADEMIC AUDITS Robert L. Moskowitz, Ed. D. Program Evaluation at Community College of Philadelphia Office of Curriculum Development Services.

VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,

March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.

QA - F UTURE L ANDSCAPE IN HE Getting the data right for review.

Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.

Just before we get started… Who am I? How questions will be handled Resources available after the webinar What does QILT mean for you? 2.

Just before we get started… Who are we? How questions will be handled Resources available after the webinar Key QILT Dates & the AGS Item Review 2.

Jean Monnet Activities in Erasmus+ Programme - Information on Jean Monnet Activities - Next Call for proposals Selection results Call 2015 (EAC/A04/2014)

QILT May Webinar1. Just before we get started… Who are we? How questions will be handled Resources available after the webinar QILT May Webinar 2.

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11 “POA 9: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY”

Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.

TEQSA The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.

 Complete GDS in-house and an online link to complete the CEQ  Complete the GDS in-house and mail a hardcopy CEQ form  Reminder calls to complete.

League tables as policy instruments: the political economy of accountability in tertiary education Jamil Salmi and Alenoush Saroyan 2 nd IREG Meeting Berlin,

Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.

Deanne Gannaway BA Scoping Project The ADLTN and future directions of the BA Scoping Project: open discussion.

Let Quality Guide Quality Evaluation Recent Trends Implemented in the Middle East.

QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.

TEQSA’s Evidence-based approach to regulation | Slide 1 ALIA National 2014 Conference Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Thursday 18 September.

Life circumstances and service delivery Community survey Finalise pilot survey (June 2006) List of dwellings completed (September 2006) Processes, systems.

DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs

SOL Innovation Committee

Academic Promotion Information session, 22 March 2018.

Academic Relations Chapter Outreach Toolkit

ALIA National 2014 Conference

2017 GOS Preliminary Analysis

Aim of the institutional evaluation

Beyond Graduate Survey 2015 Summary Analysis

Presented by Planning & Research

GDS – What Does It Tell Us? Presented by Planning & Research

Presentation transcript:

Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014 Chandrama Acharya Strategic Planning and Information Division Macquarie University July 2014 Usage of AGS data and the future

AGS Code of Practice and Usage of Data The data should be – used with impartiality, objectivity and integrity. – analysed using methodologically sound and transparent methods. – used and presented in ways that assure the privacy of respondents and confidentiality of their responses. Source: Code of Practice Universities of Australia v8, GCA

Response rate and use of data Raw GDS, CEQ or PREQ data with, or results based on, institutional response rate below 50.0% should not be disclosed or published external to institution. Exceptions (with note on response rate ): Federal and State Govt departments and any statutory bodies Professional bodies External auditing bodies Academic researchers GCA

Usage of AGS data Federal Government – MyUniversity website (public) – Institutional Performance Portfolio (IPP) – Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) Others – Good University Guide – QS Stars Rating – Universities Australia – University groups – Researchers – Professional bodies (accreditation purposes)

Institutional Use of AGS data Institutional quality assurance and improvement plan to the Commonwealth (Compact) Understanding student experience Teaching Performance Indicator Curriculum enhancement (course performance report, faculty or academic discipline report etc.) Information on Employability Career advice Further study activities (UG/PG conversion, program development ) Marketing

Proposed changes in government surveys CEQ and GDS will be continued till CEQ will cease PREQ ? Graduate Outcome Survey (GOS) - from Employer Satisfaction Survey (ESS) – fourth quarter of 2014 ―pilot result is out. Main recommendations : o further research on developing methodology, items and clusters o future ESS be conducted in conjunction with AGS or BGS o full census of AGS respondents Source :

What is ahead.. Changes in Methodology Centralised administration o Reliable o Cost effective to institution Sample survey, rather than population Effective response rate

Implications for Institutional Reporting Break in the trend due to change in methodology Number of responses by narrow FOE Sub-group analysis by different dimension may not be meaningful, eg ―Equity group ―Course level analysis ―Citizenship Methodology for benchmarking (eg, weighted or ‘adjusted’ score rather simple score ) Implication for employment outcome data Timely return of raw data sets to institutions

Contact Chandrama Acharya Manager, Surveys