Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Advertisements

ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Water Quality Standards Program Status of Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Alabama’s Water Quality Assessment and Listing Methodology ADEM QA Workshop February 13, 2006.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
 To conserve our remaining natural resources for future generations  To protect a valuable economic revenue stream  To organize management efforts.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Joe North Environmental Manager Geographic Information Systems Watershed Data Services Section Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair.
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Protecting the Quality of Our Water Resources: A presentation to the 2009 Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Presented by Jennifer Hecker, Natural.
EPA and Ecosystem-Based Management: Success of the Watershed Approach Michael H. Shapiro Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, US EPA Capitol Hill.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Upper Ocklawaha River DRAFT Basin Management Action Plan For the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Adopted by the Florida Department.
Indiana’s Draft (d) List of Impaired Waters Jody Arthur Integrated Report Coordinator Office of Water Quality, IDEM.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations? Mark W. Clark and Thomas Obreza.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Watershed Management in New Jersey Upper Navesink Water Qualtiy Meeting Robert A. Mancini, Section Chief Division of Watershed Management Bureau of Watershed.
Watershed and water quality assessment of the Allen’s Creek watershed David A. Tomasko, Ph.D. Cheryl Propst, M.S. May 16, 2012.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Water Monitoring Programs of EPA and its Clean Water Act Partners.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Water Quality Restoration Challenges
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Marco island water quality monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program South Regional Operation Center (ROC)

Watershed Management Approach DEP implements TMDL Program as part of Watershed Management Approach Started in July, 2000 Assessment TMDL Development Implementation - BMAP Watershed Restoration Watershed Approach established five-phase cycle that rotates through all basins in the state over five-year period Divided state’s basins into groups

303(d) Listing Requirements Section 303(d) of the Federal CWA requires states to: Submit lists of waters that do not meet applicable water quality standards, including designated uses “impaired waters” Identify pollutant causing or expected to cause impairment Establish/implement TMDLs for these waters on a prioritized schedule

South District Basins Fisheating Creek Charlotte Harbor Sarasota-Peace-Myakka Caloosahatchee Everglades West Coast Florida Keys

Uses Addressed by Assessment Methods Aquatic Life Metals, Turbidity, Pesticides, Biological assessment Primary Contact and Recreation Bacteria, Beach advisories Fish and Shellfish Consumption Pathogenic bacteria, Mercury, Shellfish Classification Drinking Water Metals, Pesticides, Bacteria Water Quality Standards F.A.C. Impaired Waters Rule F.A.C

Watershed Management Cycle Phase 1 - Preliminary Assessment Produce Planning List, Study List Phase 2 - Targeted Monitoring and Listing Monitor, Verify impairment, and Adopt Verified List by Secretarial Order Phase 3 - Develop and Adopt TMDLs Phase 4 – Implement TMDLs Basin Management Action Plan or Other Implementation Option Phase 5 – TMDL/BMAP Implementation

Watershed Management Cycle Each basin group is assessed every 5 years Cycle 1 = 2002 for Group 1 w/ revisions adopted in 2003 Cycle 2 = 2009 Cycle 3 = 2013 Cycle Rotation Basin GroupPlanning PeriodVerified Period /1/ /30/ /1/ /30/ /1/ /30/ /1/ /30/ /1/ /30/ – 20041/1/ /30/ – 20051/1/ /30/ – 20061/1/ /30/ – 20071/1/ /30/ – 20081/1/ /30/ – 20091/1/ /30/ – 20111/1/ /30/ – 20121/1/ /30/ – 20131/1/ /30/ /1/ /30/2017

Assessment Units aka WBIDs WBID = Waterbody Identification WBID boundaries change based on local stakeholders who are most knowledgeable about their local watersheds Other reasons for WBID changes include delineation of freshwater & salt water and control structures, delineation of nutrient criteria boundaries We may reassign stations to other WBIDs if the Lat/Long is incorrect or the station is not representative of the WBID

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Strategic Monitoring Plan Development

Coordination with other data providers WBID-parameters needing additional data to allow assessment for attainment of the numeric nutrient criteria Any areas we can remove sampling duplication, collaborate Areas we shouldn’t be monitoring; Areas we should

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Monitoring and Assessment Considerations

Representative Stations Data are collected for a variety of reasons Ambient monitoring Effects studies Waterbodies can be inappropriately classified (gradients between wetlands, lakes, streams, tidal creeks and estuary) Evaluate site information

Spatial Considerations Sampling site location is critical in determining what the water quality data actually represent Proper system type (wetland vs. stream, etc.) Channelization, obstructions (improperly placed culvert, bridges), canopy cover, etc. can influence water quality results Focus on pollutant loading

2015 Strategic Monitoring Plans: Florida Keys

March, 11, 2015| 18 Contacts Julie Espy Program Administrator Water Quality Assessment Program Watershed Assessment Section Erin Rasnake Environmental Manager Water Quality Assessment Program So and Southwest Districts Kevin O’Donnell Environmental Administrator Water Quality Assessment Program Watershed Assessment Section Alan Punshon Environmental Manager Watershed Assessment Section Strategic Monitoring - Statewide FDEP Websites: WAS Program: Basins 411: FTP site: