Plains Justice Environmental Justice for the Great Plains Paul Blackburn, J.D. Staff Attorney, Plains Justice 100 East Main Street Vermillion, SD 57069.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subdivision Development and Water Right Transfers Dealing with the Conflict between Historic and New Land Use March 6, 2012.
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
I NDIANA S A GING AND P OTENTIALLY H AZARDOUS P IPELINE S AFETY I NFRASTRUCTURE M EDIA C ONFERENCE C ALL P RESENTED B Y : T HE H OOSIER E NVIRONMENTAL.
The State of Natural Gas Pipelines in Fort Worth.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Paul Blackburn, J.D. Blackcreek Environmental Consulting Keystone XL: Opportunities for State Regulation.
August 2014 Southeast Reliability Project. 2 Dominion Profile: Power and Natural Gas Infrastructure Leading provider of energy and energy services in.
The BC Oil & Gas Commission Proactively Participating in Project Decision Making Processes James O’Hanley Deputy Commissioner.
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)
Pipelines and Risk Management How Safe is Safe? Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Denise Hamsher Enbridge Energy Company November 2006.
Chapter 15: The Bureaucracy p Definition: Bureaucracy A large, complex organization composed of appointed officials. Authority is divided so no.
Choosing the Best Business Structure. Choosing the Legal Structure of Your Business Sole Proprietorship Partnership Limited Liability Company Corporation.
Model Urban Pipeline Initiative Panel Discussion Karen Edelstein Eastern Program Coordinator FracTracker Alliance Mayor’s Council.
Choosing the Best Business Structure
Increasing Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans, Louisiana 9:30 a.m. Session, November 16, 2007.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Wind Energy Leasing Issues for Agricultural Landowners Photo source: Stephanie Buway Dr. Shannon L. Ferrell Assistant Professor – Agricultural Law OSU.
Wind Turbine Lease Considerations for Landowners Dwight Aakre Ron Haugen February 2010.
December 9, 2014 Overseeing Natural Gas & Other Private Sector Projects Philip Saucier, Esq. Maine Rural Water Association.
Regulation of Pipelines
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Douglas A. Sipe Outreach Manager Outreach Manager Division of Gas-Environment and Engineering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
Risks and realities of a project and why we must stop it!
Challenges in Transmission. 2 Environmental and Public Affairs Consulting for the Energy Industry Energy Sectors  Oil & Gas  Pipeline  Storage  LNG.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Glenn Archambault INTERSTATE GAS PIPELINE/ LANDOWNER/ 15 YEARS PIPELINES INFORMED PLANNING ALLIANCE BOARD MEMBER PIPELINE SAFETY TRUST MY FAVORITE HOBBY?
Types and Sources of Law Chapter 1. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify –Primary sources of law in the United States. –Three.
Working Lands Preservation: Tools and Incentives Gerry Cohn Southeast Regional Office Graham, NC.
Electric Transmission Siting, Permitting and Land Acquisition Energy and the Economy Summit June 26, 2013.
How 1041 Regulations are Impacting Geothermal Development A discussion of how counties are applying 1041 regulations to geothermal development and the.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
Dr. Shannon L. Ferrell Assistant Professor Oklahoma State University Department of Agricultural Economics Oil, Gas, Wind and Agriculture: Can’t We All.
Risks and realities of a project. Impacted GA Counties: - Stewart (Lumpkin), Webster (Preston)StewartWebster - Terrell (Dawson), Lee (Leesburg)Terrell.
The President’s Cabinet Who are they? How are they selected? What do they do?
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
NATURAL GAS LEASES Understanding Your Rights Protecting Your Interests Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center Ross H. Pifer, J.D., LL.M., Director.
Informed Planning Near Pipelines Brought to you by a Community Technical Assistance Grant from the U.S. Dept of Transportation.
Participation and Intervention before the FERC October 2007.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
Collaborating with Counties Can’t We All Just Get Along? John (Chip) Taylor, Executive Director, Colorado Counties, Inc.
Public communication before and during new pipeline construction? No single answer to how, when and what information is available. Denise Hamsher.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Chairman David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick Commissioner Ryan Sitton September 15-17, 2015.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
The President’s Cabinet © 2012, TESCCC Who are they? How are they selected? What do they do? U.S. Government, Unit: 05 Lesson: 03.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Section 24 Pipeline Safety Standards Incorporated Into the Federal.
Overview of Legal Issues in Marcellus Shale Development Penn State Ag Council Membership Meeting October 12, 2009 Agricultural Law Resource and Reference.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Katie Hansen, Board of Directors Pipeline Safety Trust.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
INTERSTATE PIPELINE FORUM Presented by: Rebecca F. Zachas, Esq.
September 2014 Atlantic Coast Pipeline. 2 Dominion’s Core Values Safety Ethics Excellence One Dominion.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
ABANDONMENT OF DAGGETT ROAD & FYFFE AVENUE Rough & Ready Island January 11, 2005.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Bradford Glen HOA Lisa Van Houten - Board Member
ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RANCHO SAN MIGUEL MARKET June 21, 2005 Agenda Item 9.01.
Independent Agencies & Cabinet Departments
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
The Floodplain Management Challenge
Special Exception to Reduce the Required Front Yard Setback for
PLANNING DOCUMENTS 2018 New Mexico infrastructure finance conference
Presidential Permits Implementing EO 13337
Pipeline Safety Coalition (PSC)

Presentation transcript:

Plains Justice Environmental Justice for the Great Plains Paul Blackburn, J.D. Staff Attorney, Plains Justice 100 East Main Street Vermillion, SD Tel Keystone XL: Local Concerns

Landowner Background Client: Dakota Rural Action Members are mostly farmers and ranchers Primarily concerned about agricultural issues Members run cow calf, row crop, other Members generally not philosophically opposed to oil development They do not run pipeline companies or regulate pipelines

State Regulatory Setting South Dakota Public Utility Commission (SDPUC) Does not have routing authority No delegation to state of liquid pipelines safety regulation

Pipeline Safety Concerns Setbacks Special Permit Impacts on groundwater Routing Reclamation after construction and abandonment Right of way maintenance Identification of HCAs Pressure study Notification of incidents and safety conditions Pipeline construction standards / use of substandard materials Training/coordination with first responders Participation in ERP development Distribution of as- constructed maps to landowners

By the Way, Other Concerns Road issues Liability for damages Perpetual easements Confidentiality clauses Future easement use Survey access Easement payments Devaluation of property Need for pipeline Impacts on soils Paleontological resources Appropriate replanting Environmental review Review of tax estimates Use of American steel Impact on local electrical power costs

An Enormous Burden for Everyday People Complex regulatory structure Complex public/private hearing rights and opportunities Large number of impacts and issues Tremendous learning curve Diverse and complex technical issues Distant agencies Impossible time requirements Significant financial impacts

State Action on Pipeline Safety Issues Due to federal preemption the SDPUC cannot grant any safety-related relief Regardless, the SDPUC took evidence on compliance with federal law, but refused to allow discovery The result is that landowners see state review of federal pipeline safety issues, but are upset when the state refuses to take action on pipeline safety In addition, some landowner concerns can be addressed through easement negotiations

Department of State NEPA Lead? EO 13337: national interest determination is limited to foreign affair issues, such as importation capacity and border crossing location DOS has NO special capacity or authority to regulate pipelines other than the location and capacity of the border crossing

PHMSA Role PHMSA has more authority to regulate pipelines than any federal or state agency PHMSA had no formal role in the Keystone 1 NEPA process Now that TransCanada has withdrawn its special permit application, the DEIS does not identify any PHMSA action subject to NEPA PHMSA has NO public hearing process for any of its pipeline safety actions, other than special permits

Routing PHMSA does not have routing authority DOS does not have routing authority (except for location of border crossing) No other federal agency has routing authority Many states do not have routing authority; Montana does No counties have routing authority AND YET, the DOS DEIS considers alternative interstate routes

Nearly Unlimited Waiver Discretion Limited only be the phrase “not inconsistent with pipeline safety” Remarkably broad waiver authority to waive safety standards

No Formal Public Participation in PHMSA Project Actions PHMSA regulations provide no formal public hearing opportunities, except special permits (for now), even though there is no legal bar Informal conversations (not trusted) After the fact review is difficult and may come too late PHMSA’s project-specific regulatory actions are secret while they are happening

TRUST Complex regulatory process that only an industry lawyer could love Very broad agency discretion No formal public participation on agency project- specific work, except for special permits Close working relationship between PHMSA and regulated community And you have to ask why the public doesn’t trust you?

Plains Justice Paul Blackburn 100 First Street Southwest Cedar Rapids, IA Tel