National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Electrical Safety William Joel Sánchez.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAE J1772™ Gery J. Kissel Engineering Specialist General Motors
Advertisements

Design for Prius C Plug-In Conversion
NHTSA Research update EVS-GTR National Highway Traffic Safety Administration April 16-18, /15/2013 EVS
BIOPOTENTIAL AMPLIFIERS
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 12/05/
Draft Deliberative Document1 of 15 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Safety Research to Support Rulemaking/GTR Objectives September 2008 SGS
An illustration of EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to Commercial Vehicles Peter Wu, BYD.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary December NERC lessons learned published in December 2014 Three NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in December.
Safety design parameters for Li-ion propulsion batteries and interaction with vehicle manufacturers to achieve EV safety Electric Vehicle Safety Technical.
NHTSA Office of Applied Vehicle Safety Research Crashworthiness Division Li-ion Based Rechargeable Energy Storage System (RESS) Safety Research Programs.
Lecture 1: Safety and Protection. 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey.
EE 136 Power Electronics Class Project Power Supply Handbook Chapter 11and 12 Over voltage and Under voltage Protection By Gordon Wong.
Informal document GRPE-70-14
Task Force 9: Communication and Messaging
TF8: Research IF EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to heavy /commercial Vehicles.
NEW ARRIVAL POWER ELEKTRO MEGIC BOX POWER ELEKTRO ENGINEERING COMPANY (PVT) LIMITED.
During a mains supply interruption the entire protected network is dependent on the integrity of the UPS battery as a secondary source of energy. A potential.
NFPA ELECTRIC VEHICLE SAFETY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Module III : Vehicle Systems and Safety Features Module III : Vehicle Systems and Safety Features.
8th RESS IG IMMA contribution RESS-8-9. IMMA L6/L7 contribution IMMA has decided to provide the global expertise on L6/L7-vehicles at WP29 to address.
The SCSI Interface Objectives In this chapter, you will: -Understand the different SCSI standards and confusing naming schemes -Identify cables and connectors.
Proposal for Management of gas emitted from REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC 1.
TCCA Aircraft Certification
Purpose Power lines Equipment Assured Grounding GFCI Conclusion.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration U.S. Proposal on BMS Functionality-In Use Brian T. Park Safety Engineer.
 An electric field is a region in space where a force is exerted on a positive charge.  The electric field is radially outward from a positive charge.
Volker Rothe, OICA October 23, 2012 Draft Global Technical Regulation Electric Vehicle Safety Outline of the OICA proposal.
Status of SAE FCV Safety Working Group Activities Developing Systems-level Performance- based Standards for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCVs) Presented.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Shock/Vibration/ Thermal Cycling Nha Nguyen NHTSA 1.
Peter Brackett- Canadian Pacific Railway Robert MacMillan- CSX Railroad Earl Chapman – Railway Consultant, (previously CN) Keeping Signals Working What.
for Thermal Propagation
Draft Proposal ECE-R 100 protection against electric shock
Background information on GRE/2012/44 (EMC) Proposal for the 05 series of amendments of Regulation No. 10 October 2012 Informal document GRE (68th.
9 th EVS GTR Meeting Task Force #9 Status Report Changchun, September 17th 2015.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Research Phillip Gorney.
Chapter 20 Study Guide Wednesday, January 27, 2010.
Page June 2015 OICA position on venting EVSTF-04-11e.
TF8 work report for 9 th EVS-GTR conference Changchun.
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 01/06/
Progress report about RESS activities Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6–9 December 2011, agenda item 15)
1 Warning requirement for the management system of the REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC.
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 19/03/
NFPA ELECTRIC VEHICLE SAFETY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Module V : Emergency Operations Module V : Emergency Operations 5-1.
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 14/09/
Rechargeable Energy Storage systems (REESS) requirements Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012,
Purpose of Water Test Purpose of Water Test is to evaluate protection performance against the electric shock of vehicle in normal operation. Requirements.
For Electric Vehicle Team Members Pramit Tamrakar- Electrical Engineering Jimmy Skadal- Electrical Engineering Hao Wang- Electrical Engineering Matthew.
Survey of Smart Grid concepts and demonstrations Smart substation Ari Nikander.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Li-ion Battery Safety NHTSA Research Update GTR (June 2016) Stephen Summers Chief Crashworthiness Research EVS-11-18e.
A+ Computer Repair Lesson 9 Problems Causing Power Events.
1  Position of China and Japan  The water test should be included in EVS-GTR Phase 1.  Test exemption for vehicles with isolation monitoring system.
OICA input on TF1 discussions for GTR-EVS
Steve Griffith February 28th, 2017
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation Phase 1
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
INDUCTION MOTOR PROTECTION FOR SINGLE PHASING, OVERVOLTAGE AND OVER TEMPERATURE Submitted by:
AGENDA INTRODUCTION CELLS AND COMPONENTS PV PERFORMANCE
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
OICA Feedback on Proposed Test Procedure
Transmitted by the expert from ISO
Submitted by the experts of OICA
AGENDA INTRODUCTION CELLS AND COMPONENTS PV PERFORMANCE
EVS-06-10e Progress Report on TF5 Nov. 3rd, 2014.
SAE battery safety standards committee UPDATE January 23, 2019
PSS verification and validation
Why J3068? – Issues in the field
Why J3068? – Issues in the field
Presentation transcript:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Electrical Safety William Joel Sánchez

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. Electrical Safety BMS Operations In-Use Over-voltage Over-current Over/under temperature Over discharge Charging AC Charging DC Charging Short CircuitPost-Crash FMVSS #305

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Short Circuit Protection William Joel Sánchez

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. The objective is to assure failsafe REESS response to short circuit exposure and resulting failure modes during all conditions (normal operation, charging, crash, and post-crash) Objective

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. Broad Impedance Short Circuit Protection NHTSA recognizes the need for failsafe response to all unanticipated short circuit exposure in a REESS. In prior GTR updates, this topic was identified as part of a prior project, however, the results of that project were inadequate in producing the necessary procedure and measurement criteria. Therefore, this topic will be discussed further as one of the ongoing research items. Procedure

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration BMS Safety Functionality during Charging William Joel Sánchez

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. The objective is to evaluate the Battery Management System (BMS) response to safety relevant failure modes and conditions during charging. Objective

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. The test procedure focuses on the failure modes associated with BMS interfaces to the DC charging system for a variety of battery/charging system conditions. The SAE J1772 Combo connector variant was used to develop the procedure. Equivalent test procedures will be developed for other BMS interfaces and with hybrid system controller. ICE SAE J1772GB AC Type 1AC Charging connectorAC Charging Connector AC Type 2 ** DC Combo connectorDC Vehicle Coupler DC Combo CHAdeMOWireless Charging Procedure Development

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. Electrical shock, unintentional system behavior, and thermal event initiations are the potential risks areas associated with these tests. Twenty four REESS Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) were reviewed and analyzed to generate a list of safety risk areas that the BMS might experience during charging. This analysis identified 5 general areas to which safety risks can occur before, and during DC charging. These 5 areas include: System Grounding, 12V BMS Network Control, High Voltage, Environmental Effects, and Operational Disturbances. Eighteen specific test procedures were developed to test fault conditions in these 5 areas. Risk areas and Safety needs:

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. As many of the fault conditions are in the vehicle to charger interface, a Breakout Box was designed to introduce the faults. This device allows the technician to introduce fault conditions between the vehicle charge coupler and the DC charger. Each procedure, in these areas, will require a specific settings of the input controls on the breakout box. The pass/fail performance criterion under a simulated fault condition is for the vehicle to transition to a safe system state so as to reduce risk of harm to occupants in and around the vehicle and to the vehicle system. Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. DC Fast Charge Breakout Box Connection

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. DC Fast Charge Breakout Box Connection

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – Charge Port Inspection: The purpose of this inspection is to detect any incompatibility or unintended issues between the charge plug and the vehicle receptacle. Though this inspection is presently described as a separate procedure in the “Draft” document provided to GTR at meeting #6 (Seoul), it will be moved to section 5 of the procedure as a “preliminary test set-up”. This will allow safe and accurate procedure completion. Visual Inspection of Charge Port

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – Ground Fault: This procedure determines the response of the BMS to a loss of or a fault on the ground connection between the vehicle charge port and the charger. – Chassis Ground Offset : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and charger system to an offset on the ground connection between the vehicle charge port and the charger. System Grounding

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – 12V System Over-voltage : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and charger system to an overvoltage of the 12V system on the vehicle. – 12V System Under-voltage : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and charger system to under voltage of the 12V system on the vehicle. – 12V System Disturbance : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and charger system to switching load disturbance of the 12V network during DC fast charging. – BMS Internal Fault Detection : This procedure determines if a BMS is able to detect safety relevant internal BMS faults. Battery Management System (BMS) and 12V Network Control

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – EMI/EMC : This procedure is to determine if electromagnetic disturbances can affect the DC charging system As sufficient procedures and acceptance criteria have been described in separate documents (i.e., ISO ) and can be referenced, a separate procedure was not developed for this area. Battery Management System (BMS) and 12V Network Control

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – DC Bus Short: This procedure determines the response of the BMS and vehicle to a DC bus short in the vehicle charge coupler. – DC Bus Held High: This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and DC charging system to a vehicle DC bus being held high during disconnect, which means that a potential high voltage is still present at the two charge connector pins. High Voltage

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – Vehicle Movement : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle and charger system to vehicle attempted movement during DC fast charging and if the drive away interlocks of the vehicle system are effective during a DC fast charge. – Vehicle Crash or Bump: This procedure determines the response of the BMS to a slow speed (low energy) collision during a DC fast charge. – Cooling/Heating System: The purpose of this procedure is to determine the reaction of degraded or failed thermal management system in the vehicle/charger system. This procedure can only be described in general terms as design specific processes which would be necessary for each OEM vehicle configuration Unforeseen Environmental Effects

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. BMS Functionally System Grounding Battery Management System and 12V Network Control High Voltage Unforeseen Environmental Effects Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. – Charge Operation Disturbance : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle/charger system to a series of unexpected inputs during a DC fast charge. – Charge Connector Control Signal Disturbance: This procedure determines the response of the vehicle/charge system to control signal disturbances between the vehicle and the fast charger. – Charge Connector Field Ground Connection Disturbance : This procedure determines the response of the vehicle/charger system to a disturbance between the vehicle field ground and the charger field ground connection. – Charge Connector HV Connection Disturbance: This procedure determines the response of the vehicle/charger system to disturbances in the HV connection between the vehicle and the DC fast charger. – Overcharge: This procedure determines the response of the vehicle/charger system to a simulated overcharge condition. Operational Disturbance – Failsafe Performance

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads. The process of charging an Electric Vehicle exposes hazards and risks that are unique to this technology and differ from an ICE vehicle; these risks must be mitigated through proper designs and verified through performance testing. The U.S. proposes this procedure as a template for all charging configurations and conditions (DC and AC). The current GTR draft proposes the external short circuit test, overcharge protection test, over-discharge protection test, and over temperature protection test, which are relatable, but do not address the BMS functionality during charging. Conclusion

Safer cars. Safer Drivers. Safer roads Questions?