Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida 2012 4-H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
Advertisements

Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Selection and Judging of Beef
Feeder Cattle Market Grades
Feeder Calf Grades: Do Better Grades Really Pay? David Gonsoulin USDA.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Judging Market Steers Principals of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Made By: Michael Baca Edited By: Charolette Atkinson.
1 GRADING FEEDER CATTLE The process of grading feeder cattle is a projection of maturity based on frame size, muscling, and the sex of the calf.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Marketing and Evaluating Beef Cattle
+ Market Swine & Grades of Swine Megan Kay. + Objectives Identify swine classes. Define swine grades. List characteristics of ideal swine.
Meat Goat Carcass Merit Dr. Dwight Loveday University of Tennessee-Knoxville Department of Food Science & Technology.
Livestock & Poultry Evaluation & Showmanship
Selecting Swine 3121 Adam Nash. The Incredible Pig Did you know? Fat from the pig was used to make nitroglycerine for War explosives After war, consumers.
Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
Ag Fact! 4/23.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
F30 Beef Cattle Evaluation Some of the pictures and text contained in this material have copyright restrictions limiting their use. Use of this information.
KIPP BROWN Extension Livestock Coordinator Department of Animal and Dairy Science Mississippi State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Grading Slaughter Cattle. Quality Grades: Prime (highest) Choice (most desirable today) Select (good) Standard Determined by the amount of fat.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Beef Cattle Production
Feeder Cattle Value Determining Factors
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
USDA/MRP/AMS. Feeder Cattle Grading USDA/MRP/AMS.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Youth Livestock Specialist
Judging Market Steers Developed by: Richard Coffey, Extension Swine Specialist, University of Kentucky Kevin Laurent, Extension Associate, University of.
Enterprise: Animal Science Unit:Livestock selection Factor Information needed I. Intro.A. High quality livestock programs must have the ability to select.
Livestock Judging.
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Beef & Swine Selection. Traits used by Livestock Producers in the selection of animals  Visual Observations  Anatomy  Conformation  Breed Character.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
EVALUATING AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS Objective 4.0 CLASSIFY TRAITS FOR SELECTION OF ANIMALS Objective: 4.01.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Beef Cattle Evaluation. Back to Basics  Why?  Livestock Improvement  Find functional and useful cattle  3 Areas  Breeding Heifers  Breeding Bulls.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Understand agriculture animals. Essential Standard 4.00.
Classify traits for selection of animals Objective 4.01.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Livestock Judging CDE Market Steers
Livestock Evaluation And Selection
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
4.01 SELECTION OF LIVESTOCK.  Livestock producers use visual observations to:  Select breeding cattle or swine based on conformation, breed character,
Selecting Swine Plant & Animal Science. Bell Work The Incredible Pig Did you Know? The pig was among the first animals domesticated Introduced to North.
Selecting Swine From foukeffa.org Written by Ivy DeSimone
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Sustainable Agriculture
Quality Standards for Beef, Pork, & Poultry
Market Steers A.
Common livestock breeds and characteristics
Common livestock breeds and characteristics
Introduction to Beef Cattle
Selecting Swine   Ag 102.
EVALUATING AgriculturAL Animals
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Market Swine Evaluation
Animal Selection and Evaluation
Feeder Cattle Grading GRADING FEEDER CATTLE
Presentation transcript:

Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at

Breeding Cattle Growth Structural Correctness Muscle Balance Volume Sexual Characteristics Maturity/ Body Condition

Breeding Hogs Growth Structural Soundness Muscle Volume Sexual Characteristics Maturity/ Leanness

Breeding Sheep Growth Structural Correctness Muscle Balance Volume Sexual Characteristics Maturity/ Body Condition

Market Cattle Muscle Correctness of Finish/ Maturity Balance Production Traits

Market Hogs Muscle Growth Leanness/ Maturity Production Traits

Market Lambs Muscle Correctness of Finish/ Maturity Balance Production Traits

USDA Feeder Calf Grading Frame Muscling The two most important factors affecting merit (value) in feeder cattle.

Frame Size At a given age, frame size is highly correlated with mature size. The larger the frame size: –Higher rate of gain –Longer the period required to fatten –The greater the slaughter weight necessary to attain a given slaughter grade

Muscle Thickness Muscle thickness at a given fatness is highly correlated with muscle to bone ratio. The greater the muscle thickness: –The larger the ribeye area –The more desirable the yield grade –The higher the muscle to bone ratio

USDA Feeder Calf Grades Apply to cattle less than 36 months of age. Generally: lbs Determined by: –Frame Size –Muscle thickness –Fleshiness Scores

USDA Feeder Calf Grades Frame size refers to an animal’s skeletal size; Its height and body length in relation to its age. Muscle thickness refers to the development of the muscle system in relation to skeletal size (varies with bone structure, muscling and degree of fatness)

Frame Size Relates to finished weight - given degree of fatness to grade USDA Choice Ideal frame score: From Medium 50 to Large 50 Large Steer- > 1250 Small Steer- < 1100 Large Heifer- > 1150 Small Heifer- < 1000

Frame Size Large- Generally: Extended Long & Flat Boned (Breeds) Medium Intermediate (Breeds) Small- Generally: Conventional & Compact Short, Round, & Frail Boned (Breeds)

Frame Size relative to Maturity Generally- Long bone growth slows substantially past 14 months Thus, for growing calves/ Older = Smaller Mature Size Indicators –Length of tail &/or horns –Coarseness of hair in switch –Width of muzzle –Coarseness of hair on poll –Size of feet, ears, base of horns, etc

Muscle Thickness Score Relates to M:B ratio at a given degree of fatness (0.5 inch) – hence, Yield Grade –No. 1 (moderately thick) –No. 2 (TTB slightly thick) –No. 3 (Thin) –No. 4

Muscle Thickness No. 1- Moderately thick throughout- Predominate beef breeding No. 2- Slightly thick throughout- High proportion beef breeding No. 3- Thin throughout Legs are close together- Some dairy breeding No. 4- Less thickness than No. 3

USDA Feeder Grades Condition/Flesh –Why Important? Thriftiness -A pparent health of an animal and its ability to grow and fatten normally Thin conditioned healthy animal- Compensatory Gain Heavier conditioned light wt animals- Negative energy balance

Expected Progeny Differences and Indexes A genetic tool used in combination with phenotypic evaluation to improve livestock selection Prediction of how offspring of each animal are expected to perform relative to the progeny of other animals listed in the database Genetic merit EXCLUDING environment

Expected Progeny Differences and Indexes EPDs are expressed in units of measure for the trait, plus or minus –Therefore- Larger values not always better Indexes- are based on EPD’s and are formatted for $$ Can only be used to compare animals within a breed

Beef Cattle EPDS Common traits –BW=Birth Weight –WW=Weaning Weight –YW=Yearling Weight –MM = Maternal Milk –TM=Total Maternal –SC=Scrotal Circumference Others –CE=Calving ease –STAY=Stayability –DOC=Docility –REA=Ribeye area –%IMF=Intramuscular fat –BF=Backfat –HCW=Hot carcass weight A. Angus Assn. –$F= $Feedlot –$G= $Grid –$B= $Beef

Swine EPDS Common traits –NBA=Number Born Alive –LWT=21 Day Litter Weight –DAYS=Days to 250 –BF=Backfat –SPI=Sow Productivity Index –MLI=Maternal Line Index –TSI=Terminal Line Index