2013 AGU Fall Meeting – 9 December 2013 – San Francisco, CA – Poster #G13B-0933 Status of IGS Core Products J. Griffiths NOAA,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006 AGU Fall Meeting. 14 Dec. 2006, San Francisco – Poster #G43A-0985 Jim Ray (NOAA/NGS), Tonie van Dam (U. Luxembourg), Zuheir Altamimi (IGN), Xavier.
Advertisements

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
High Precision Applications of Global Navigation Satellite Systems
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Accurate reference frame access at arbitrary points on Earth GPS Dancer project Henno Boomkamp Dancer algorithms, JAVA programming, JXTA, P2P & internet,
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Jim Ray & Jake Griffiths, NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Xavier Collilieux & Paul Rebischung, IGN/LAREG S UBSEASONAL GNSS P OSITIONING E RRORS Linear rate.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
ESOC Navigation Support Office ILRS Workshop 2008 Poznan, Poland ESOC IGS, IDS, ILRS (Re-) processing T. Springer, M. Otten, I. Romero, J. Dow.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Zuheir Altamimi, Xavier Collilieux 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, 28 June.
Carey E. Noll CDDIS Manager NASA GSFC USA IGS Data Centers and Data Access.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
Jim Ray & Jake Griffiths, NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Xavier Collilieux & Paul Rebischung, IGN/LAREG S UBSEASONAL GNSS P OSITIONING E RRORS Linear rate.
Jim Ray & Jake Griffiths NOAA/National Geodetic Survey STATUS OF IGS ORBIT MODELING & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Earth radiation pressure (albedo) accelerations.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.
GNSS Observations of Earth Orientation Jim Ray, NOAA/NGS 1. Polar motion observability using GNSS – concepts, complications, & error sources – subdaily.
RFWG report ______________________ IGS 39th Governing Board Meeting San Francisco, 3 December
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC New Developments and Innovations T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, M. Otten, I. Romero,
1 First Results of the CMONOC GNSS Network Junping Chen Bin Wu, Shuhua Ye, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
EPN Central Bureau IGS Analysis Workshop 2008, Miami Royal Observatory of Belgium C. Bruyninx, J. Legrand, F. Roosbeek EPN Central Bureau Royal Observatory.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
SPACE GEODESY NETWORK & ITRF Z Minchul LEE 1.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey GPS Products & Services.
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
RECENT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE CDDIS IGS Network Systems Workshop November 2-5, 1998 Annapolis, MD Carey E. Noll Manager, CDDIS NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC IGS Reprocessing T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, I. Romero, J. Tegedor, F. Pereira,
Geocenter motion estimates from the IGS Analysis Center solutions P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi IGN/LAREG & GRGS 1 EGU General Assembly, Vienna,
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
IGS Workshop 2008, June 2-6, Miami Beach First activities of the IGS Antenna Working Group — Comparison of ground- and space-based satellite antenna maps.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Current Status of the IGS Reprocessing Peter Steigenberger Technische Universität München Gerd.
Do Annual Geopotential Variations Affect IGS Products ? J. Ray NOAA/NGS with major help from S. Bettadpur, J. Ries U. Texas/CSR T.-S. Bae Sejong U. X.
Presented by: Technical contributions from: THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEODESY AND PRECISE POINT POSITIONING.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
SHA: the GNSS Analysis Center at SHAO Junping Chen, Bin Wu, Xiaogong Hu Haojun Li, Xiao Pei, Yize Zhang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHAO)
A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
Kenneth Johnston US Naval Observatory Presented by Jules McNeff International Committee on GNSS Provider’s Forum Bangalore, India 4 September 2007 GPS.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Rotational Errors in IGS Orbit & ERP Products Jim Ray, Jake Griffiths NOAA/NGS P. Rebischung IGN/LAREG J. Kouba NRCanada W. Chen Shanghai Astronomical.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami IGS Real Time Pilot Project: Analysis Centre Activities Loukis Agrotis 4 June 2008.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Reference Frame Working Group
Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Agenda Background and Motivation
Reference Frame Working Group Report
CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

2013 AGU Fall Meeting – 9 December 2013 – San Francisco, CA – Poster #G13B-0933 Status of IGS Core Products J. Griffiths NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA Abstract The International GNSS Service (IGS) generally aims to provide ~1 cm satellite orbits and ~1 mm terrestrial frame products to meet the most demanding user needs. While the goal has not yet been met, the IGS has made good progress. The current Global Positioning System (GPS) Final orbits have accuracies better than 2.5 cm; the Rapids are of similar quality; and the near real-time parts of the Ultra-rapids have an accuracy of ~3.0 cm, while the real-time parts have an accuracy of about 5 cm. About half of the total error in the GPS orbits can be attributed to systematic time-varying rotational misalignment of the orbital frames; the other half is dominated by errors in the model for sub-daily tidal variations in Earth orientation. Near-field multi-path errors, anthropogenic changes at tracking stations, and the presence of uncalibrated GNSS antenna radomes at multi-technique sites continue to be a significant source of error. While recent model and analysis changes have reduced some errors, others will remain for the foreseeable future. This paper summarizes the quality state of the IGS core products since the switch to daily terrestrial reference frame integrations (Aug. 2012), and as preparations for the next reprocessing campaign continue. IGS Core Product Series SeriesIDLatency Issue times (UTC) Data spans (UTC) Remarks Ultra-Rapid (predicted half) 03:00, 09:00, 15:00, 21: :00, 06:00, 12:00, 18:00 ● for real-time apps ● GPS & GLONASS ● issued with prior IGA Ultra-Rapid (observed half) IGA hr (near real- 03:00, 09:00, 15:00, 21: :00, 06:00, 12:00, 18:00 ● for near real-time apps ● GPS & GLONASS ● issued with following IGU Rapid IGR :00 daily ±12 12:00 ● for near-definitive, rapid apps ● GPS only Final IGS d weekly each Thursday ±12 12:00 for 7 d ● for definitive apps ● GPS & GLONASS Analysis Center Contributions SeriesProduct TypesAccuraciesOutput Intervals Ultra-Rapid (predicted half) GPS orbits~ 5 cm (1D) 15 min GLONASS orbits~10 cm (1D) 15 min GPS SV clocks~3 ns RMS / ~1.5 ns Sdev 15 min ERPs: PM + dLOD~250 µas / ~50 µs 6 hr Ultra-Rapid (observed half) GPS orbits~ 3 cm (1D) 15 min GLONASS orbits~5 cm (1D) 15 min GPS SV clocks~150 ps RMS / ~50 ps Sdev 15 min ERPs: PM + dLOD<50 µas / ~10 µs 6 hr Rapid GPS orbits~2.5 cm (1D) 15 min GPS SV & station clocks~75 ps RMS / ~25 ps Sdev 5 min ERPs: PM + dLOD<40 µas / ~10 µs daily Final GPS orbits<2.5 cm (1D) 15 min GLONASS orbits<5 cm (1D) 15 min GPS SV & station clocks~75 ps RMS / ~20 ps SDev 30 s (SVs) + 5 min ERPs: PM + dLOD<30 µas / ~10 µs daily Terrestrial frames~2.5 mm N&E / ~6 mm U daily Accuracy of Core IGS Products ProductGNSSTotal Hits SP3 (%) ERP (%) CLK (%) SNX (%) SUM (%) Ultra-rapid GPS 11,711,506 (  4 * 2,927,877 daily) Final (IGS) GPS1,359, Rapid GPS887, Final (IGL) GLO225, Ultra-rapid (IGV) GPS & GLO 223, Popularity of Core IGS Products FTP download logs courtesy of C. Noll (NASA/CDDIS) Based on FTP download statistics for 1/2012 thru 6/2012 >3.6 million file downloads per month 5 biggest users of CDDIS/IGS files: U.S. 64.3%, Indonesia 19.3%, Canada 1.64%, Sweden 1.57%, Belgium 1.16% Preparations for 2 nd Reprocessing (Repro2) Cen Name Final (IGS)Rapid (IGR)Ultra (IGU) SP3ERPSNXCLKSP3ERPCLKSP3ERPCLK cod* Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe, Bern, CHE brd emr*Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, CAN esa*European Space Agency, Darmstadt, DEU gfz*GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, DEU brd gopGeodetic Observatory Pecny, CZE brd grg* CNES Groupe de Recherche de Geodesie Spatiale, Toulouse, FRA iac + Information and Analysis Center of Navigation, Korolyov, RUS jplJet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA mit Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, USA ngs National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, USA brd brd brd sio Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, USA usnU.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, USA whu*Wuhan University, Wuhan, CHN = AC included = AC partially included = AC excluded brd = excl. brdc clock empty = none Performance of Latest Products Using PPP SeriesNorth (mm)East (mm)Up (mm) Final IGS4.1 ± ± ±0.7 Final IGR3.8 ± ± ±0.7 Rapid IGR3.8 ± ± ±0.6 Rapid IGA4.3 ± ±0.610 ±0.8 SeriesMean RX (µas)Mean RY (µas)Mean RZ (µas) Final IGS-11 ±22-8 ±26-28 ±44 Final IGR-24 ±2626 ±29-9 ±34 Rapid IGR-24 ±2427 ±25-6 ±35 Rapid IGA-32 ±503 ±42-3 ±50 ~180d RZ feature (IGR & IGS) predominantly from EMR, JPL & MIT Mean RX, RY, RZ offsets (below) due to misalignment of orbital frame The table below was presented at the EGU General Assembly in 2012 [Ray and Griffiths, 2012]. It represents a best effort to quantify the accuracy of IGS products from: combination statistics and PPP analysis results ( spectral analyses of station position time series [Ray, 2006; Collilieux et al., 2007; Ray et al., 2008; Ray et al., 2013]; spectral analyses of midnight GPS orbit jumps [Griffiths and Ray, 2009; Griffiths and Ray, 2013 ] and midnight discontinuities in ERPs [Ray and Griffiths, 2011]; along with comparisons to loading models [Ray et al., 2011]. Very little has changed since EGU 2012, with exception for improvements in the rotational alignment of Final GPS orbits to the IGS terrestrial frame (IGb08) due to refined combination procedures. 1 µas = ~0.03 mm Earth surface Large majority (>80%) of users rely on combined satellite orbits and clocks. To monitor the quality of these products, a PPP analysis is performed as part of the routine Final and Rapid combinations for the IGS, IGR and IGA series ( Similarity comparisons between each series’ network of PPP-derived station positions and IGb08 give important insight into the quality of the combined products. Latest Results from the Orbit Combinations RX [(IGS-IGR)/  2] = -9.2 (± 62.2) μas, or -1.2 (± 8.1) mm GPS RY [(IGS-IGR)/  2] = (± 73.5) μas, or -2.7 (± 9.5) mm GPS RZ [(IGS-IGR)/  2] = 14.8 (± 55.9) μas, or -1.9 (± 7.3) mm GPS Preparations are underway to reanalyze the full-history of GPS (and maybe GLONASS) data using the latest analysis models and methodologies. The expected outcome is a set of homogeneous reprocessed IGS solutions for: daily GPS & GLO orbits & GPS satellite clocks in SP3 format daily GPS satellite & tracking station clocks (5m & 30s) in CLK RINEX format daily ERPs from SINEX (official product) & classic orbit combinations (for comparison only) terrestrial coordinate frames with ERPs, with  full variance-covariance matrix and Z-offset parameters for satellite antennas Repro2 results are intended for inclusion in ITRF2013, and to support advancements in Earth science research and other applications of high-precision GNSS. Details about repro2 analysis standards are available at: Weighted RMS (WRMS) of residuals from comparisons of AC GPS orbits to the IGS Finals measure inter-AC agreement and provide an internal estimate of IGS precision (1D) IGS precision ranges from 11 mm (= 16 mm/√2) given by EMR, to 4.5 mm (= 6.4 mm/√2) given by ESA, and possibly down to 3.5 mm (= 5 mm/√2) given by IGR Time-varying rotations (see plot to the right) of orbit frames are small, but significant—dominated by ESA issues before Wk 1730 Differences in Mean RMS of daily residuals (below) is probably dominated by differences in satellite clock errors between products. IGS Tracking Stations Used in Latest Products IGS network currently consists of ~430 GNSS stations distributed globally, with relatively dense coverage in Europe 92 IGS stations (current & former) are co-located with VLBI, SLR and/or DORIS, which is an important contribution to ITRF Antennas at 30.4% of co-located stations are covered with uncalibrated radomes— see poster G13B-0946 for efforts to mitigate effects at some stations ACs use data from ~326 IGS stations—as shown in plot to right—for their GPS and GLONASS contributions to Finals combinations (Wk 1765) The other ~145 stations used by the ACs (again, Finals GPS Wk 1765) are from regional networks (not shown) Table focuses on GPS; all GLO-only ( + ) and GNSS AC (*) products are included in GLO combinations.