Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Kinship Care Services Melissa Deletetsky Standards Development & Performance Measurement September 2006.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Kinship Care – Client Complexity Preliminary Research Findings ACWA Presenters: Marita Scott & Lynne McCrae.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
1. Kinship Breakdowns: Causes and Prevention ACWA Conference 2-5 August 2010, Sydney Lynne McCrae Wendy Frayne 2.
1 Community Assessment Chapter 13 28/4/2007 Ahmad Adeeb.
University of Hawai’i Integrated Pediatric Residency Program Continuity Care Program Medical Home Module Case 3.
Comprehensive Children’s Mental Health Act
Chapter 13: Descriptive and Exploratory Research
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #3 The Foster Care Process. FOSTER PARENTING  They are licensed and receive specialized training.  Work collaboratively as a member.
TERMINATION OF LONG-TERM MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT WITH FOSTER YOUTH Kimberlin Borca, Foster Care Research Group University of San Francisco April 29, 2012.
Child and Adolescent Task Force Report Charlotte V. McNulty, Vice Chair Presentation to House Health, Welfare and Institutions General Assembly Building.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Assessment with Children Chapter 1. Overview of Assessment with Children Multiple Informants – Child, parents, other family, teachers – Necessary for.
Abstract Background Significance Proposed Methods Research Trajectory Aims Children with Complex Chronic Conditions: A Formative Study to Support Development.
Maria R. Zuniga California State University Long Beach May, 2012.
Evidence-based policymaking: Seeking to do more good than harm Helen Jones Professional Adviser.
GEORGIA CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEM- DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Charles Ringling DBHDD Region 5 Coordinator/ RC Team Leader.
Ready communities... Ready communities... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Virginia’s Definition of School Readiness.
Integrated Specialized Services 2005 Inclusion Institute Chapel Hill, NC Peggy Freund, Ph.D. National Individualizing Preschool Inclusion Project Center.
Transformational Service Delivery in Kinship Foster Care: Influence of Casey’s Breakthrough Series Priscilla A. Gibson, PhD, LICSW Michaela Rinkel, LICSW.
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #4 Meeting the Needs of Children and Families.
Informational Interview by Lorena M. Bess Steve Duvall Social Worker Children Welfare and Family Service –DSHS-
Edward F. Garrido, Ph.D. and Heather N. Taussig, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
New Mexico Family Infant Toddler Program CAPTA and referrals of children at risk.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Jorge F. del Valle ( A monitoring system for program evaluation in family foster care CHALLENGES OF FOSTER CARE AT THE BEGINNIG OF THE 21st.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
The Problem: Trauma Exposure  More than two thirds of Americans have experienced a significant traumatic event by age 16  More than one third have been.
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Working with Children of Parents with Mental Ilnesses WALTER BENEDICT SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY.
Early & Appropriate Interventions for Child Abuse Prevention Nicole Huff, LCSW Chief Programs Officer ESCAPE Family Resource Center.
Twelve Month Follow-Up of Mothers from the ‘Child Protection and Mothers in Substance Abuse Treatment Study’ Stephanie Taplin PhD, Rachel Grove & Richard.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © There are approximately 500,000 foster youth in care at any given time in the United.
Being a GAL in Tribal Court NAILS Pre-NLADA Indian Law Training Paul Stenzel – Stenzel Law Office LLC November 6, 2007.
Child protection in rural areas – home based measurements NFBO 2014 Nuuk 26. august.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Vulnerable Children Legislation Changes
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children with Autism and School-Matched Control Subjects William W. Thompson, PhD Presented at the.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
What Makes the Right Mental Health Consultant
HIV+ children and young people have complex family and health contexts: results from a case note review in a London treatment centre. Tomás Campbell, Hannah.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Family Preservation Services
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Reframing Leaving Care as Family Support: Implications for Practice
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Presentation transcript:

Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh School of Social Work, University of Minnesota 1

Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D. Katie Haas Shweta Singh School of Social Work University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN

Research Study A qualitative research project reviewing kinship care practices at Ramsey County Human Services from September, 2008 to May, Elements of practice examined include: Father involvement Cultural issues Kinship search process 3

Purpose of Study To examine components of direct service practice with kinship families, seeking themes since the Breakthrough Series Collaborative implemented in 2004 and The qualitative findings reported here were part of a larger mixed-method designed that was conducted to further explore previous findings regarding the kinship search. The original research project was an evaluation of the Casey’s Foundation BSC conducted from October 2006 to May,

Measurement Tool Case reviews were analyzed using a questionnaire 30 items long covering: Demographic information Four areas of exploration: Father involvement Cultural issues Kinship search process History of the case Notable practices used by workers 5

Eligibility Criteria Case eligibility was determined if the following criteria was met: Child Protection or Adoption/Guardianship case Kinship caregiving relationship(s) Received services during the BSC of 2004, 2005 Sought cases that were active before and/or after the BSC as well. Case closed and all information documented: Only one case was open at the time of review 6

Data Collection Data collected through: Extensive reviews of 36 kinship cases Personal interviews with Child Protection workers Findings discussed here are from case reviews only. 7

Emerging Themes Four themes emerged as pervasive with kinship families: Placement disruptions Children needing special services Characteristics of biological parents Supportive services to caregivers Note that many cases experienced several themes simultaneously, as well as subsets of the themes within the same kinship families. 8

Placement Disruptions Frequent placement disruptions including: Sequential kin placements with multiple relatives (26) Sequential stranger foster care (10) Residential treatment facilities (15) Incarceration for criminal acts (6) Return to a former foster care placement (2) Disruptions were largely preceded by escalating behavioral problems in the child(ren). 9

Children Needing Special Services RC workers documented five types of problems children were experiencing, which typically led to referrals for services: (a) Mental health diagnoses (24) (b) Learning disabilities (6) (c) Physical health concerns (2) (d) Running away or other behavioral issues (26) (e) Prenatal exposure alcohol or drugs (10) 10

Characteristics of Biological Parents Workers inclusively documented characteristics of both mothers and fathers of children in kinship care. Both parents experienced similar problems, including: a) Incarcerations: fathers (12), mothers (6) b) Chemical abuse: mothers (19), fathers (5) c) Homelessness/highly mobile: fathers (9), mothers (7) d) Mental illness diagnoses: mothers (8), fathers (0) e) Lack of paternity information: fathers (6) f) History of CPS involvement: mothers (9) 11

Supportive Services to Caregivers In addition to regular visits with County case managers, RC workers recorded three types of services caregivers were referred to: a) Counseling (specifically directed at caregivers of the kin family unit) (12) b) Training for caregivers as parents (4) c) Financial services beyond the normal subsidies (9) 12

Correlates in Existing Literature Placement disruptions: Kinship care is less likely to disrupt than stranger foster care placement, but research about the extent of this is inconclusive. Children needing special services: Strong presence of special needs in areas of behavioral and mental health. Potentially linked to prior trauma High rates of referrals for counseling services, but few were in-home or serving the whole kin family unit. 13

Correlates in Existing Literature Characteristics of biological parents: Evidence of workers including fathers and fathers’ kin corresponds to best practices in BSC and other literature of inclusive kinship caregiving. Support services to caregivers: Disparity between formalized supports for kin vs. stranger foster caregivers Sparse research about best practices in supporting kinship care families. The kinship family unit was viewed as the support service, rather than in need of supportive services. 14

Implications for practice Pre-placement interventions (occurs before child is living with caregiver): 1. Provide psycho-educational information about the possible reactions of children in kinship care arrangements. 2. Provide structured pre-placement visits. 3. Incorporate problem-solving strategies between caregiver and child(ren). Direct practice approach for CPS workers to intervene with families in formal kinship care 15

Implications for practice Post-placement interventions (occurs once child is living with the caregiver): 1. Inform of challenges. 2. Normalize challenges. 3. Develop a plan to deal with common challenging situations that might develop. Direct practice approach for CPS workers to intervene with families in formal kinship care 16