Milestone #1: Specifications and Requirements. Overview of Design Team Goals Education Design and construction process Competition Teamwork Communication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechatronics Design Association EngSoc Budget Presentation 2012.
Advertisements

MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2011: 6-8p BA3008 Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2011.
Robot competitions By: Johnny Ngo Kiet Tuan Vuong.
Setup/Installation/Operation of an Environmental Control Unit (ECU)
1 Full Body Harness (course #989). 2 Course Orientation Registration Smoking Area Restrooms Fire Escape Breaks Measurement Review & Critique.
Engineering Roles We will be forming groups of 3 students
Final Presentation Group 18 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Sponsor: NAVSEA Keyport Mentor: Mike Kapus Ben Brand, Kendra Brower, Joe Langevin, Jeffrey Le To power our vehicle, we have.
Team #2 Solar Car Project Senior Design
 Autonomous Surface Vehicle Team Leader: Stanton Coffey Team Members: Pat Gray, Jack Nagle, Sam Riahi, Matt Cline Faculty Adviser: Dr. Gene Hou ME Graduate.
RED SAUC’ISSE SAUC’ Interval Super Submarine of ENSIETA The submarine robot of the ENSIETA.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
1 Engine Protector Safe Rider Vehicle Technologies (Pty) Ltd PO Box 11376, Rynfield South Africa Tel./ fax Cell:
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
M & M EE 296 Final Presentation Spring 2004 Presentation Overview Team Member Introduction Project Overview Overall Design Description Final Project.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
A.R.M.S. Automated Robotic Messaging System William Batts Chris Rericha.
Overview of Team Ford: Active Park Assist Software Engineering - CSE435 Michigan State University Fall 2014 Team members: Project Manager: Joe Reeder Facilitator:
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
David Talaiver Vince Adams Robb Morris. Misson 2010 AUVSI ASV Competition Develop interest in marine robotic systems Provide opportunities for student/industry.
Infosession UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MECHATRONICS DESIGN ASSOCIATION.
The CarBot Project Group Members: Chikaod Anyikire, Odi Agenmonmen, Robert Booth, Michael Smith, Reavis Somerville ECE 4006 November 29 th 2005.
SeaPerch Design Challenge and Construction Overview.
Group Members: Brad Cox Kevin Burkett Tera Cline Arthur Perkins CS10 Battery Management System.
Basic Information Description: Prior to the competition teams must design, build, document and test one robotic device to move scoreable items. How many.
NEEDS ANALYSIS & REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION Southeast Con 1B “Success” Senior Design Team Louis Cooper Evan Marshall Chelsea Ogle Lorenzo Smith Ivan Vargas.
Milestone #4 Test Plan & Conceptual Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
Milestone #2 Project Proposal Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
A.G.I.L.E Autonomously Guided Intelligent Lawn Equipment Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Advisors: Dr. Joel Schipper.
Why do robots need to move?
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2012: 7-8pm Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2012.
© 2008 Delmar, Cengage Learning Property Security, Emergency Response, and Fire Protection Systems Chapter 13.
Milestone #3 Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS Department of Engineering Design AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER ROBOTIC LABORATORY Researchers : Dr. Asokan Thondiyath, Mr.
UNDERWATER GLIDERS.
Kurran Kelly – Lead Designer Silas Van Natter – Team Lead Josh Van Patten – Team Budget Manager Brandt Pedrow – Team Liaison and Recorder Branden Bakken.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition Navigation Michael Lebson - James McLane - Image Processing Hamad Al Salem.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
University of Connecticut MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Project Statement.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
MSU ROV Team Final Presentation Senior Design 1 April 18, 2013.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
AUTOMATIC RAILWAY GATE CONTROLLING AND TRACK SWITCHING
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Dual-Use Wideband Microphone System
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
Mid-Semester Review Senior Design 2 October 8, 2013
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design II.
Shore Power System General Location. Shore Power Power comes on to the vessel in the form of 480 Volt, Three Phase, 60 Hz Alternating Current (A/C) electricity.
MSU ROV Team Final Review Senior Design 2 November 19, 2013.
For Electric Vehicle Team Members Pramit Tamrakar- Electrical Engineering Jimmy Skadal- Electrical Engineering Hao Wang- Electrical Engineering Matthew.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
Robotic Submarine (RoboSub) Information Session September 19, 2013.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
VEX IQ Curriculum Smart Machines Lesson 09 Lesson Materials:
September 9, 2013 Quiz summary Team Meetings Honors Course
Project Statement ..
Design and Development of an Autonomous Surface Watercraft
Introduction to Robots
Chapter 31 Battery Systems.
AUVs Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Automation Topics: Elements of an Automated System
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle ( )
Presentation transcript:

Milestone #1: Specifications and Requirements

Overview of Design Team Goals Education Design and construction process Competition Teamwork Communication Interdisciplinary Team Computer and Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Victoria Jefferson – Project Manager (PM) Andy Jeanthenor Software Technical Lead Kevin Miles Electrical Lead Reece Spencer– Mechanical Technical Lead Tad Byrne– Mechanical Design Lead Yanira Torres – Equipment/ Debug Technical Lead

Objective/Theme Design, construct, and program a functional Autonomous Underwater Vehicle capable of all operational parameters in 10 months to win the AUVSI RoboSub Competition. The theme of last year’s competition was “Underwater the 13 th ”. Expected Results Create a vehicle which not only meets the design requirements, but does so in a way which is more precise and efficient than our competitors.

Overview of the AUV Project The project is to design an autonomous "RoboSub" to be entered in the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Competition sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the AUVSI organization.

Existing Work/Prior Solutions University of Maryland: Tortuga III Cornell University: Tachyon : :

Statement of the Problem Required Capabilities Vehicle must operate autonomously, no communication is permitted General water maneuverability; controllable by ARM microprocessor Abort mission override control to float vessel to surface in case of mechanical failure Kill switch and prop shrouds

Obstacle Course (1 of 3) Buoy 1 (Green) Buoy 2 (Red) Buoy 3 (Yellow) Object 1: “Life Vest” Goal: Hit whichever two buoys are specified Object 2: “Hedge” Goal: Vehicle must pass between given risers. The lower it passes, the more points the team receives Given “PATH” created by 6” wide, 4’ long ORANGE PVC sheets Next Slide

Obstacle Course (2 of 3) Object 3: Weapons Goal: The vehicle must drop off two markers into two different specified bins. Each bin is “see through” and the top is open, each with a different weapon, which is how we will know which bin to drop the marker in. Each box is 24” x 12” x 6” Object 4: Window Pane Goal: Vehicle must “shoot” missile through correct window pane, specified by color. Each section is 24” x 24” Next Slide

Obstacle Course (3 of 3) Bottom of pool Acoustic “pinger” to give location in pool. 0.5 Hz, 0.9s duration. 2s between each pulse PVC Box (2 x 2 ft) holds “counselor”. Object must be hoisted out of box and rise to surface within octagon 9 ft diameter orange PVC octagon (at surface). Object 5: Counselor Rescue Goal: Locate counselor from pinger on ground floor. Hoist counselor out of box, to the surface, within octagon at surface

Statement of the Problem Desired Capabilities Ability to read latitude and longitude and “lock on” to a specific direction (compass) Accelerometer (for stability control) Remote control capabilities for trial and test run error debugging. Data recording for testing and debugging purposes (hard drive) Inflatable bladder to float vehicle to surface

Operational Description Inputs/Outputs Color Marker path Buoys Fire a torpedo Shape Deploy markers into a bin Maneuver Sound Acoustic Pinger Functions Capable of grasping a PVC structure Surface within a designated area with PVC load Release mechanism to drop PVC structure Sub should become buoyant in the event of a systems failure to ensure that the sub does not sink and become damaged

Environments Operating Environment Camp TRANSDEC, San Diego CA Salt water environment Maximum depth of 16 ft Maneuver through points of interest

Environments User Environment Bridge overlooking salt water operating environment User will not interact with product once product operation has begun

Requirements Functional Motors, Thrusters Makes the RoboSub mobile Electrical/Power System Connects software to hardware Powers onboard components Hardware Interfaces ARM Processors and/or Controllers Open circuit voltage of any battery must not exceed 60 VDC Kill Switch Software Interfaces Required to write to and read from shared memory (from all components) Control algorithms

Requirements Non-Functional Performance Operate autonomously Battery powered Safety Electrical components should be protected from water damage and properly covered to prevent electrical discharge. Vehicle must be slung on a harness or sling. Security Documents should be kept in a secure location Design should be kept in a secure location

Design Constraints Size6 ft x 3 ft x 3 ft WeightMax: 110 lbs Markers/Torpedo½ in x ½ in x 6 in Safe Speed Processors/ControllersARM Time10 Months BudgetCurrently: $9,500

Preliminary Test Plan Capabilities Test Plan Thrusters Sensors Buoyancy Automation Requirements Test Plan Firing Control Grasp/Release Control Constraints Test Plan Salinity of Water Weight of RoboSub

System Features Watertight Casing Battery Processor/Controllers Propulsion System Torpedo Launcher Grasping and dropping mechanism Buoyancy Control Emergency system

System Features: Sensors Light and Shape Detection Visible wavelength: nm Sound receiver Frequency: 0.5 Hz, 1 second separation, 187 dB Inertial guidance Detect changes in orientation or position Sonar or Ultrasonic

Methodology Mechanical Design Fall Performance specifications Generate potential designs and solutions to meet specifications Finalize vehicle design Analysis Purchase materials and necessary equipment Construction Spring Finish Construction Testing

Methodology Computer/Electrical Design Fall Define the problem Conduct research Narrow down options/pick equipment Start Programming/Electrical system Spring Finish up programming Test interfaces (software meets hardware) Analyze possible alternatives/solutions Present product

References ON/UploadedImages/AUV_Mission_Final_2010.pdf mpetitions/AUVCompetition/Default.aspx?C=