1 Hanford Transportation and Packing Overview Presented by: Jim Portsmouth and Marshall Myrick July 2015 CHPRC-02547.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on NRC Low-Level Waste Program – Major Activities Large Scale blending of LLRW -Issued guidance to agreement states for reviewing proposals for.
Advertisements

Universal Waste Management Training
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
Universal Waste Management Training. Introduction DEC and EPA have established standards for the handling of “Universal Wastes”. “Universal Wastes”, in.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.3. Waste management.
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) Update John Crawford, Chief Industrial Waste Compliance Section Office of Land Quality.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Progress on Cleanup of the INL Site for the INL Retired Employees Association Bob Iotti, President and CEO September 2008.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
1 Decontamination, Deactivation, and Demolition David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los.
LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC Process for Approved Supplier Selection and Evaluation ASME NQA (and Addenda through 2007), Part I.
U.S. DOE Preparation for Shipping of Transuranic Radioactive Waste Cross Country – The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) O.W. “Lynn” Eaton, Manager External.
Gerald Whitney Operating Experience Program Coordinator Presented May 5, 2010 DOE OEC Workshop - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory "Lessons from the.
Office of River Protection 2014 Hanford ORP Site Status Report Glen Clark, WRPS 2014 ASP Workshop September, 2014 Albuquerque, NM Glen Clark, WRPS.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
Storage and disposal of mercury and mercury waste in Asia - Conclusions Sven Hagemann GRS.
WELCOME: EPA PUBLIC MEETING
Waste sampling and verification
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
Capabilities & Competencies An Introduction to EnergySolutions September 19, 2007 Scott Baskett Erik Vogeley.
| [Contractor Safety Training] 1 Environmental Policy for Contractors.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
Where Complex Challenges Meet Smart Solutions  Technical Services  Packaging  Transload  Transportation  Disposition Rail Transportation of Radioactive,
Presentation for Semi-Annual National Spent Nuclear Fuel Meeting April 14, 2005 Sen Moy, DOE-RL Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel.
Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.
May Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Boyd D. Christensen Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory.
Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel and Cesium/Strontium Capsule Status Presented by Sen Moy - RL National SNF Meeting November 8, 2005.
1 Idaho Cleanup Project Extension Work Transportation Accomplishments M. Shawn Tigue July 2015.
Office of River Protection 2015 Hanford ORP Site Status Report
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Maintaining Department of Energy (DOE) Waste Disposition Pathways in Today’s Uncertain Budgetary Environment Presented by: Lori West July 2015.
Retrieval and Treatment of Problematic MLLW Streams Renee Echols Senior Vice President CTMA Partners in Progress, July 7, 2015.
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
Performing Hospital Waste Audits Presented by Peggy Harlow, WM Healthcare Solutions, Inc. April 2, 2012.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Program Status National Governors’ Association Meeting May 17, 2002 Alton D. Harris, III.
Phase I Decommissioning Project Update West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: Bryan Bower, Department of Energy November 14, 2012.
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Environmental Management May 23, Federal Facility Task Force Meeting Update.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006.
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management.
WIPP National TRU Program
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
An Overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act “In one hour or less”
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
Program Manager’s Review Joe Christy September 19, 2005.
Rail Shipments July 2004.Page number1 Rail Shipments of Radioactive Waste from Rocky Flats to Envirocare in Utah August 2004.
Westbrook Contractor Safety Training (March 31, 2016) Dana Beaulieu Sappi Westbrook Operations Environmental, Health, Safety and Security Manager Environmental.
Savannah River Site Watch Columbia, South Carolina
Waste Management Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Annual Meeting Sonny Goldston Atkins Global Working Group Chair June 7, 2016.
Savannah River Downblending Program for Surplus, Non-Pit Plutonium Unclassified Kenneth S. Fuller K-Area Complex Operations Support Manager 2016 INMM Annual.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposition at the
Sump Water Management and Disposal ASTSWMO UST Workshop
Remediated Nitrate Salt (RNS) Remediation and Other WIPP Activities
The Off-Site Source Recovery Program Capabilities in Recovering Sealed Sources – CTMA, May 23-26, 2017 James (Jim) Matzke.
Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
RETAP Retired Engineer Technical Assistance Program
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Waste Management’s Role in Safely Consolidating, Accelerating, and Delivering the Idaho Cleanup Project Core Mission Bruno Zovi, AMWTP LLW/MLLW Program.
Westbrook Contractor Safety Training April 5, 2018
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
LANL Onsite Transportation
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Shipping and Receiving Hazardous Materials
Presentation transcript:

1 Hanford Transportation and Packing Overview Presented by: Jim Portsmouth and Marshall Myrick July 2015 CHPRC-02547

2 Topics to be Covered CHPRC Shipping Process TRU Program Overview CH-TRU Waste Volumes Hanford Capabilities Hanford Waste Plan TRU Program Issues TRU Program Opportunities PFP Complex D4 Activities CHPRC-02547

3 Shipping Process Waste Management Representative identifies and characterizes Waste Stream DOT Classification (Shippers) If shipments comply with DOT regulations it is packaged and shipped in full compliance with the DOT regulations (Note the majority of CHPRC shipments are shipped DOT compliant) CHPRC-02547

4 Shipping Process If shipment can not be shipped DOT compliant and it is going to be shipped to an onsite location or Perma-Fix Northwest (PFNW) the DOE-RL Transportation Safety Document (TSD) is utilized and the shipper works with Transportation Safety to utilize a Special Packaging Authorization (SPA) or Package Specific Safety Document (PSSD) CHPRC-02547

5 Shipping Process SPA’s are DOE-RL “pre-approved” packaging solutions for routine on-site payloads Examples of SPA’s Dirt and Burial Ground Debris Contaminated Equipment (CE) SPA Retrieval SPA Fuel SPA Monolith SPA Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) CHPRC-02547

6 Shipping Volumes CHPRC `

7 TRU Program Overview ~10,900m 3 of CH and RH-TRU/M waste currently in above-ground storage ~2,830m 3 of CH and RH-TRU/M waste remains to be retrieved from the burial grounds ~7,860m 3 CH-TRU/M in above-ground storage requires repack prior to shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP); repack severely limited due to funding constraints Retrieval of remaining buried waste is not scheduled to resume until after FY 2018 CHPRC-02547

8 TRU Program Overview (cont.) Shipments of TRU waste to WIPP are unlikely to resume before 2018 Regulatory Status – Some Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) Milestones will be missed, others are at risk Waste containers are aging and degrading CHPRC-02547

9 CH-TRU Waste Volumes (Excluding Buried Waste) Central Waste Complex (CWC) as of 2/2015: –7,100 Drums and 725 Standard Waste Boxes (SWBs) (3,013m 3 ) –17 Standard Large Boxes(SLB2s) (124m 3 ) –498 other containers including Large Boxes (7,173m 3 ) Projected Waste from Generators –Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) (2,205m 3 ); Waste expected by 2017 –Tank Farms (1,200m 3 ); Waste packaging to commence 2020 CHPRC-02547

10 CH-TRU Waste Volumes (cont.) Large Boxes Stored Outside Drums Stored in CWC CHPRC-02547

11 Hanford Capabilities Operational: –SuperHENC in Waste Receiving and Processing (WRAP) Facility “Courtyard” (Drums and SWBs) –High Energy Real Time Radiography (HERTR) in WRAP “Courtyard” (Drums and SWBs) –WRAP TRUPACT II loading facilities ( Lay-up status) Out of Service at WRAP/T-Plant –(2) NDA Isotopic Passive Active Neutron (IPAN) Units (Drums only) –(2) NDA Gamma Emissions Assay (GEA) Units (Drums only) –(2) RTR Units (Drums only)* –WRAP Glove Boxes –T-Plant Repack Permacons *not recoverable CHPRC-02547

12 Hanford Waste Plan Large Boxes: ~ 7,173 m³ in Above-Ground Storage –Perma-Fix Northwest (PFNW): Capable of repacking ~ 5,000m³ 200g Pu gram Limit (exploring license options) Size restrictions for some boxes (size and weight) Transportation issues (most shipments would be via Federal Driver) On average, PFNW can process ~ 500m³/yr to 940m³/yr 174m³ scheduled by FY18 to meet TPA (172m³ of the 174m³ scheduled to be repacked by end of FY15) –Funding has come from RL- 13 efficiencies (21% reductions) –Funding is becoming less and less available (other priorities) Addressing container degradation on priority basis CHPRC-02547

13 TRU Program Issues Aging and degrading waste containers Protecting commercial viability in future for efficient repack actions Constraints on transporting waste to commercial sites for remedial actions Degrading Box Requiring Repack CHPRC-02547

14 TRU Program Issues Additional capability will be required to repack drums, SWBs, large boxes and RH-TRU containers that cannot be processed by existing or commercial capabilities Adding capability at Hanford for characterization and loading of SLB2s CBFO adding capability at Hanford for characterization and loading of RH-TRU waste Aging and Degrading Box Requiring Repack CHPRC-02547

15 TRU Program Issues (cont.) Time: –TPA conflicts for Hanford –RH Wastes highly challenging, driving large numbers of shipments –WIPP operational timelines conflict with ability to process and ship Funds: Priority is medium, funds to RL are potentially declining –Re-constitution of retrieval and certification programs costly –Efficiencies only go so far CHPRC-02547

16 TRU Program Opportunities Additional drum shipments to DOE-Idaho: –Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) could process all of the CH and RH –However, current TRUPACT II Authorized Methods for Payload Control (TRAMPAC) restrictions will not allow the transportation of drums with prohibited items; Hanford has minimal number of drums that have no prohibited items CHPRC-02547

17 Hanford D4 Activities Plutonium Finishing Plant Complex (PFP) demolition planned completion in September Estimated waste volumes: –~24,000 m 3 of LLW/MLLW between January 2015 through December 2017 (~21,000 m 3 from LLW rubble) –~2200 m 3 of TRU/TRUM between January 2015 through December 2017 Central Plateau D4 – Miscellaneous building removal. Estimated waste volumes: –~4200 m 3 of LLW/MLLW (including waste sites) between January 2015 through September K – Miscellaneous building removal. Estimated waste volumes: –~58,000 m 3 of LLW/MLLW (including waste site) between January 2015 through September 2018 CHPRC-02547

18 PFP Complex D4 Activities PFP Complex – Deactivation and eventual demolition of major process buildings is the most significant D4 activity on the site. –234-5Z – Main building (Dash 5) –236-Z – Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) –242-Z – Waste Treatment and Americium Facility; includes McCluskey Room –291-Z – Ventilation building and stack 2015 Slab on grade CHPRC-02547

19 PFP Complex D4 Activities PFP slated to be slab- on-grade in Remaining work includes: –Size-reduction of gloveboxes and demo- prep for gloveboxes to be picked during demo –236-Z: Removal of last remaining pencil tanks –234-5Z: Removal of E4 ventilation and filter boxes Employee size reducing WT-3 glove box in 242-Z Employees in the duct level separate, bag and remove sections of E4 ventilation duct. CHPRC-02547

20 Questions CHPRC-02547