Each member will evaluate their contribution to the overall group project as well as their peers in the group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Advertisements

The dos and don’ts. 1. Be sure to put the title of the text somewhere on the page where the reader will notice it. 2. Pull out 2 or more significant quotes.
GHSWT WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, ARE FIVE PARAGRAPH ESSAYS REWARDED OR PENALIZED? I HAVE HEARD BOTH STATEMENTS. In scoring student essays, raters.
COURSE PREVIEW Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator:
The New NIH Review System: Reviewer’s perspective Liz Madigan, FPB School of Nursing.
Improving Student Performance on the ACT. Who are we? Henry Clay High School is an urban school in Lexington, Kentucky Enrollment is approximately 2,160.
World Health Statistics. Life Expectancy* The following charts are based on Disability Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE) for which the World Health Organization.
Bus 411 DAY 27. Timeline (tick-tock) May 1  Take home final available  Due May 3PM May 5  Team 2 Case 22 Yellow Roadway Corp.  Round four case.
Peer Evaluations. Attendance- Does the team member attend group meetings? Is advance warning of non-attendance given? Is the member late to meetings?
Grouping Students for Instruction Scattergram Approach The Scattergram Approach is most useful when you want to consider 2 different measures in making.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Survey Implementation Learning Objectives  Create a survey in Microsoft Publisher  Analyze survey data  Make charts based on data in Excel or PowerPoint.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
1 Set the TargetsGo After the TargetsClose the Deal review strategy review goals determine current position determine gaps to be filled Kick-Off Meeting.
Decision Making Matrix
1 Integration Process Implementation & Timeline By Functional Area.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Let’s get started on the C&M Group Project!!! 1.Type your first AND last name 2.Type your Teacher’s name (**Fill in your partner(s) information here as.
J IGSAW L EARNING Cooperative Learning Project. Team T ogether E veryone A ccomplishes M ore.
DO NOW: HOW COULD YOU FIND THE VOLUME OF A ROCK? October 10, 2013 Left side page.
Case Study Assignment MTT Certification Exam. Graded on four-point scale Purpose – extent to which response addresses the components of the assignment.
Electronic Notetaking Take your notes directly into the slide. Each slide reflects a different point or idea. You can copy and paste, or put the ideas.
Aim #3.1: How do we factor quadratics? What is a quadratic equation?
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
Program Design BUILDING A HOUSE. Steps to Designing a Program 1. Define the Output 2. Develop the logic to get that output 3. Write the program.
John Doe and Jane Doe Chemistry Mr. Coleman.  This slide should contain the biographical information of your scientist. ◦ Picture ◦ Date and place of.
End-of-Year Review Self Assessment Process May 2014.
9 th Annual Performance Report Scorecard AGENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig Henry Wray Remarks Hon. Jim Cooper AwardsHon.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting August 10, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Force Meeting: August 10, 2010.
1 EMS/Fire Department Consolidation Treatment of Pension and Service Under the Police/Fire, CSRS, and 401(a) Plans.
Literature Circles Mrs. K Prescott. What are they? -Small, temporary discussion groups of students who have chosen to read the same book. -Meet regularly.
Bus 411 DAY 25. Agenda Course Evaluations AirTran Airways Student choice of Last Case  Team 1 Home Depot  Team 2 Harrah's T  Team 3 Liz Claiborne Team.
Bus 411 DAY 25. Agenda USA Truck Student choice of Last Case  Team 1 Home Depot  Team 2 Harrah's T  Team 3 Liz Claiborne Team work Send me your presentation.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THIS TEMPLATE Congratulations on presenting at the Summit! If you wish, please use this template for your presentation.  The slides.
T Project Review RoadMappers I2 Iteration
Bus 411 DAY 27. Agenda Grades for 3 rd case  3 B’s  Feed back on next slide Home Depot Peer Evaluations sent  Due Friday, May 9:30 AM Team work.
When you click the link from the diocesan website page, the page below should appear: This button puts the Prezi in full screen mode If you touch any of.
Strand Report: Team# Strand #. Strand I - TEACHING for LEARNING Strand II – LEADERSHIP Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING Strand IV – SCHOOL.
CREATE A POWERPOINT MUST CONTAIN AT LEAST 8SLIDES INCLUDE ALL KEY CONCEPTS /lo_ _CH10_ pdf.
CORE KARES Lesson Plan Sept. 21, 2015
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
Week 14: Festivals of the World
Readiness Consultations
Bus 411 Day 23 Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall.
TIRE BALANCING.
How Marketing Relates to the Production of stuff Marketing fills the “Gap” between producer and consumer Page 6.
Collaboration Assignments French II
Evaluating RFP’s Presented by:
EVALUATOR TRAINING.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Evaluating Ecological Benefits
Team Project Showcase Presentation: 15 to 20 minutes Peer evaluation
Work Portfolio Applying for a Job.
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Finally! Utilizing Student Involvement to Prepare for Final Exams
Final Project Presentation
Bus 411 Day 22 Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall.
NUR 425 Decision Making in Clinical Practice
Converting between fractions, decimals and percentages.
Rubric for Group Activity or Group Project
Balance Scale Addition
Group Member Evaluation Form
Welcome to the Validation Wizard Tutorial - Part 2 -
Bus 411 DAY 21.
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Standards Based Grading
Can you put the symbols in?
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Recap from year 8: How many different factorised forms can you find?
Presentation transcript:

Each member will evaluate their contribution to the overall group project as well as their peers in the group

Instructions  Print final page (slide 4) and follow instructions on slide 3 for filling it out.  Group average should not exceed 4 (but it can be less than 4) A score of 5 should be extremely rare. If you give 5 to one, someone needs a 3 to balance it. Conversely, if you give a 3, this does not require giving someone a 4 or 5. All may have done their duty (4) with one slacker (3 or less). Your group average can be under 4, just not over it.

Rank each member by the following scale: 1. Non-contributor. Who was this person anyway? 2. Minimal contributor. Contributed very little. Parasitic dependence on the others in the group to do most of the work 3. Partial contributor. Made minor contributions to the group's success, but overall were still parasitic, needing others to pull them through. 4. Full Contributor: Pulled their weight fully. May also have helped fill minor gaps left by those ranked Overachiever: Pulled their weight plus filled major gaps left by members rated 1-3. If you cannot supply an opinion, put N/A instead

GreekEGWGreekEGW