WebPA Peer assessment for group work Peter Henderson Chemistry School of Natural & Computing Sciences.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Assessment and feedback for economics students: without drowning... Peter Smith University of Southampton Associate, Economics Network.

Advertisements

Use of peer assessment in an MSc course MSc in Sexually Transmitted Infections & HIV- Basic Science module Assessment: 70% end of module essay, 30% peer.

23 June 2009 Assessing Project Based Learning in Groups Peter Willmot.

Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course

Karen & Gayle Introduction “ Breastfeeding is increasingly recognized as a health policy priority. To achieve real change in breastfeeding rates,

Facilitating peer and self- assessment Paul Chin University of Hull.

Dr. Cath Jones and Alice Lau Putting Assessment at the Heart of Learning – The Story at The University of Glamorgan.

5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.

They have the training… Why can ’ t they do the job?

Working in Groups Name of presenter. Aims of the session Recognise how groups form and function Identify the inter-personal skills developed through.

The A, B, C’s of Developing A Successful Program Delta Nu Chapter Retreat October 29, 2005 Presented by Dwayne J. Scott.

ENABLING HIGH QUALITY TEACHING AND LEARNING FOR LARGE CLASSES Kirti Garg, Vasudeva Varma International Institute of Information technology, Hyderabad.

Peer assessment of group work using WebPA Neil Gordon Symposium on the Benefits of eLearning Technologies University of Manchester, in conjunction with.

© Loughborough University 2009 Peer Moderation of Group work A hands on workshop Enabling every team member to recognise individual contributions to group.

Education in a Changing Environment, September Students engaging in online peer review: seen from a national or international perspective Janice.

OPEN UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITI TERBUKA MALAYSIA 1 The conduct of Science Practical for Working adults in an Open and Distance (ODL) setting T. Santhanadass.

Internet Supported Distance Learning Brian Mulligan IT Sligo, September 2003.

Professional Skills Development

ACCESS TO SKILLS ASC TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1. WELCOME TO A UNIQUE LEARNING OPPORTUNITY... You have been invited by the Pharmacy Guild SA to participate.

Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Late & Missed Assignments.

 E-learning forum Thursday 12 th May Introductions Daniel Clark University Learning Technologist Louise.

Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,

Professor Norah Jones and Alice Lau Putting Assessment at the Heart of Learning – The Story at The University of Glamorgan.

Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.

Getting runs on the board with student group work The affordances of Online Peer Evaluation tools.

Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.

Tracking Online Student Engagement Presented by Kimberly Webster eLearning Instructional Coach Ottawa-Carleton District School Board.

Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.

21 February 2013 eLearning Forum Showcase: Interactive online assessment tools Dr Barbie Panther School of Applied Sciences and Engineering.

Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge EEET July 11, 2009.

Learning from students: Using Peer Mark as part of an online research portfolio Dr Cath Jones Head of Research Informed Teaching Catherine Naamani – Head.

Initial Professional Development Working towards Chartered status

Software Engineering CS3003 Lecture 1 Introduction to the module Dr Tracy Hall.

Let’s Look at... Assessing Group Performance 1. Performance Groups Material for this section largely adapted from: “Assessing group work” © Copyright.

Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.

A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,

Peer Assessment COMP3120 – Managing Software Development.

The use of Web-PA as a formative peer assessment instrument for team working Tom Joyce, Nuala Davis* and Clare Hopkins School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering.

©Dr I M Bradley Doing the project and other things.

Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.

© ABSL Power Solutions 2007 © STM Quality Limited STM Quality Limited Brainstorming TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT Brainstorming.

Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.

Representation training Example presentation slides

Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.

Development of a Web-Based Groupwork Assessment Tool Groupwork and Assessment Methods Demonstration of Software Discussion Hannah Whaley David Walker

© Loughborough University 2010 Enabling every team member to recognise individual contributions to group work Nicola Wilkinson Loughborough, 23 March 2010.

Team Rewards The Peer Evaluation Process. Your rewards Assessed by instructor Assessed by your team peers.

Engage | Develop | Growwww.synergita.comEngage | Develop | Grow Synergita – 360° Feedback Management Bringing performance management - Closer to your people.

Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.

3 rd International Nursing & Midwifery Conference National University of Ireland, Galway April 4 th & 5 th 2011.

Learning Technology Development. edgehill.ac.uk/ls David Callaghan September 2013 “How I engaged my students” One tutor’s experience that produced outstanding.

Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.

You can see some interest in what you are learning. You show some interest in things outside school. A lot of what happens in school interests you. You.

 Spring 2014 MCED 3430 Kelly Chaney.  Shared Group Grade o The group submits one product and all group members receive the same grade, regardless of.

L5 Computing Team Project Final Presentation Guidelines.

Big Idea The team is the cornerstone of the learning organization

Assessing Young Learners

Institute for Learning Innovation and Development

Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge

Cambridge Upper Secondary Science Competition

PERFORMANCE SKILLS Putting on the Ritz.

Bronze Silver Gold Reflective learners: Are curious Talk about success

Bell Work: 8/16/17 Science Tools lab.

Bell Work: 8/16/17 Science Tools lab.

Teaching Science for Understanding

Curriculum Selection Process

Peer learning and Peer assessment

GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS

Enhancing Learning in Practice

Teacher Report Card Grade 5/6 2011/12

Presentation transcript:

WebPA Peer assessment for group work Peter Henderson Chemistry School of Natural & Computing Sciences

Peer Assessment Encourages: Reflection Critical evaluation of your work and of others Peer/Self assessment Taking responsibility for own learning

Graduate Attributes

Peer Assessment Increases awareness of: Criteria Assessment procedure – assessing other people is not easy! Improved feedback Reduced workload?

Group lab work CM3033 – physical chemistry Conductivity experiment Strong, weak, & unknown electrolytes Conductometric titrations Decide on method and work distribution Submit group report

WebPA is an open source online peer assessment tool that enables every team member to recognise individual contributions to group work

By using WebPA to peer assess group work, each student received an adjusted mark

How it works On-line survey time-keeping & preparedness contribution – lab & report problem solving safe lab working Care in taking measurements Students mark peers & themselves Normalise marks Weighting factor

Using WebPA Import students from MyAberdeen Create question form Lickert scale Share from 100%

Using WebPA Create assessment(s) Weighting (50%) Non-completion penalty Date criteria reminders

Problems? Student engagement /fears Non-submission Absent students Multiple deadlines – multiple assessments Mark in %

Thoughts It works! Relatively easy CAD / eLearning support Can spend more time marking report & giving detailed feedback Students like it

Next time… Better introduction to students Allay fears, introduce Graduate Attributes Student generated questions? What do students think are important? 100% weighting? Non-completion penalty?

Thank you for listening Questions?