May 18, 2012. MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives Present overview & contrast different models of case management: broker, clinical, strengths based clinical Identify roles of engagement & collaboration.
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
The Child and Family Services Review: An Agenda for Change Kathy Yurchisin Krista Hudson Kentucky CFSR Stakeholders Advisory Group.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Tribal & State Partnership Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Katie A: From Compliance to Transformation CMHACY: May 14, 2015 Sylvia Deporto, MS Lynn Dolce, MFT Bonnie Friedman, LCSW Jennifer Clancy, MSW.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Enhanced Case Management: Moving Beyond Service Brokering to Care Collaboration Unit I.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
MiTEAM Practice Model Introduction:
Engagement. Ask yourself the hard questions…  How can we better involve families, youth and caregivers in case planning?  How can we better empower.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Continuous Quality Improvement CQI One Way to Grow and Sustain Change.
533: Building a Trauma-Informed Culture in Child Welfare.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO MEET SKILL NEEDS & ENHANCE TRANSFER CLIMATE The Ohio Child Welfare Training Program.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
INSTRUCTIONAL POWER POINT MITEAM FOCUS GROUP.  Limit it to a productive size group of a maximum 25.  Make sure it is a diverse representation of those.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Office of Children's Services
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Presentation transcript:

May 18, 2012

MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that focus on the safety, well-being and permanency of children and their families.* It aligns with the agency’s mission and principles and incorporates the following competencies: Teaming, Engagement, Assessment, and Mentoring. *National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement: An Introduction to the Practice Model Framework.

Why MiTEAM? When families, children, youth and caregivers are engaged and involved in case planning, they understand their roles and are more empowered and motivated to make long lasting positive changes.

Michigan’s Outcome Data Absence of Recurrence of Maltreatment [Standard: 94.6% or more]: 91.7% (NCANDS Safety Data). Absence of Child Abuse and /or Neglect in Foster Care [Standard: 99.68% or more]: 99.06% (NCANDS Safety Data). Timeliness and Permanency of Reunification [standard: or higher]: (AFCARS). 48% of cases reviewed adequately addressed needs of children, parents & foster parents (CFSR Well-Being Data). 46% of cases reviewed made diligent efforts to involve parents and/or children in case planning process. (CFSR Well-Being Data).

Additional Issues that Led to this Change Initiative Incorporated into the PIP. Part of MSA from Children’s Rights Lawsuit “Dwayne B. vs. Granholm”. Dire need for consistency in child welfare practice throughout Michigan.

Indiana Data after Practice Model Implementation There was an increase of children placed in their own home (22.77% to 29.70% ) and children placed in a relative’s home (15.38% to 25.10%). Indiana experienced a decrease in foster home placements (44.74% to 36.60%) and residential care placements (12.58% to 6.90%). Indiana increased the absence of repeat maltreatment to 90.14%, increased permanency to 956, decrease length of child in out of home placement to 399, increased children placed locally to 71.77%, increase child visitations 21.5%, increased siblings placed together to 70.64%, decreased rate of removal to substantiated assessments to 30.28% and decreased number of placement moves to 2.73.

MiTEAM MiTEAM has 4 key competencies which all child welfare staff will utilize when working internally and with children, families, tribes, stakeholders, community partners: Teaming Engagement Assessment Mentoring

Teaming will be utilized to engage families, children and caregivers in case planning, identify family strengths and needed supports, services and resources to achieve positive outcomes. Teaming will also be utilized to support child welfare staff in their day to day work. Some Key Elements of Teaming: Families are empowered to take the lead (setting agenda, selecting participants and meeting location). Staff, Foster Parents and Relatives serving as mentors. Case plans are made with a team and the responsibility of plan development is not with the case manager.

A series of intentional interventions that work together in an integrated way to promote safety, wellbeing and permanency for children, youth and families. Some Interventions Include: Solution focused interviewing Active listening Asking for parent, child and caregiver input Listen for needs interests, and concerns Assist family members in identifying connections and strengths

Family-centered assessment skills and tools that combine good case practice, reliable tools and in-depth family input to produce successful outcomes for children and families. Assessment Tools: Safety Assessment (CPS) Strength & Needs Risk Assessment (CPS) Family Assessment of Needs (CPS/FC) Child Assessment of Needs (CPS/ FC) Reunification Assessment (FC) Safety Assessment (FC) Parenting Time Compliance (FC) CPS & FC Decision Making Trees

Concurrent Permanency Planning Permanency Plan A and Plan B Diligent Relative Searches Frontloading Services Full Disclosure with families and caregivers Increased parental visitation

Concurrent Permanency Planning: Parental Visitation * Ages 0 to 2 years of age: 3 visits per week * Ages 3 to 5 years of age: 2 visits per week * Ages 6 years and up: 1 visit per week

Partnership between managers, staff, caregivers, parents and children that guides and empowers others in personal or professional growth to achieve positive outcomes. Mentoring Opportunities: Worker child visits Worker parent visits Worker caregiver visits Parent child visits Caregiver supervising parent child visits Supervisor worker consultation Supervisor shadowing Peer Coaching

Inputs Public and Private Child Welfare Directors, Managers, Supervisors, Facilitators and front-line staff MiTEAM Manager & Analysts FC Review Board Child Welfare Workforce Dev. Tribal Representation FC & CPS Program Office Youth, Parents and Caregivers CQI, BCAL, BCW, CFSR & Field Operations Family Preservation Casey Family Programs American Public Human Service Association Steering Committee Sponsor Group Actions Steering Committee meets monthly TA from Casey & APHSA Practice Model (T.E.A.M. & CPP) Practice Model incorporated into new worker training Public and Private Director presentations Local Focus Groups Pre-Training Conference Calls (management and facilitators) Train managers, supervisors and facilitators Management and Facilitators train frontline staff Policy changes Development of Supervision Tools & TA Practice Model Observation Tools Conference calls w/ Liaisons, Facilitators & Supervisors (DHS & PAFC) Ongoing TA, Supplemental Training & Support Outputs Steering Committee involved in development of model and planning of implementation Counties identify barriers & solutions DHS & PAFC Child Welfare staff trained Revision of model materials Implementation of model statewide Implementation supported through Observations, Coaching, Mentoring, TA, training, CQI, BCAL and CFRS process Initial Outcomes Trained and skilled workforce Supportive supervision Transparent management FTM’s held for all triggers and routinely for case planning Increase in visits for children age 0-5 Relative search forms completed Plan A and Plan B developed w/in 120 days Services front loaded w/in 30 days Intermediate Outcomes Parents and youth are involved in case planning. Parents, youth and caregivers needs are met. Children are achieving permanence timely. Results Children experience safety, permanency and well-being. Results

How will we measure results? Increased scores on CFSR, AFCARS & NCANDS MiTEAM TA Process Parents, Youth and Caregiver Interviews Staff Surveys Better results in CQI Reviews

Implementation Benefits When families feel valued and respected they are more willing to work with child welfare staff, thus increasing the chances for successful intervention. Expands options to maintain family connections. Improves the quality and focus of visits. Enhances the fit between family, youth and caregiver needs and service. Skilled, supported staff. Staff retention. New supervision one-on-one case review tool w/ more qualitative measures. Increased collaboration internally and externally.

Link to MiTEAM Newsletter & Materials Click on MiTEAM link on below web page and you can access MiTEAM Materials & Newsletter. Tracie A. Kress, MiTEAM Departmental Manager (517)