Principles of Effective Evaluation Prof Keithia Wilson Academic Leader Student Success & Retention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Margaret Macleod Keithia Wilson Griffith University
Advertisements

Developing the Teaching Portfolio Carol Tresolini, Ph. D
Earth Science in secondary schools in England & Wales Teacher attitudes and levels of teaching.
Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
Student Lifecycle Strategy: Applied to the First Year Experience
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
Teaching with Simulation: Creating a Faculty Workshop Valerie Herbert, MSN, RN, CNE Tracey Arno, BSN, RN.
Measurement. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Measurement Objectives  Describe the importance of measurement  Describe the Kirkpatrick model of training.
A Matter of Degrees Promising Practices for Community College Student Success.
DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS ABOVE THE GUIDELINE SHOWN DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT OR GRAPHICS BELOW THE GUIDELINE SHOWN TO EDIT GRAPHICS IN THE MASTER.
Education Studies Degrees and Employability A HEFCE / ESCalate project by Julie Anderson & Helena Mitchell.
THE CBA ASSESSMENT CULTURE SURVEY The most important reason for the emphasis on assessment in the college is to meet AACSB and CSU requirements.
Being A Nurse Planner: What Does It Mean? Part I: Overview of the Role
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Programming 1 Feedback Session. The unit has improved my understanding of programming. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
+ Teaching psychological research methods through a pragmatic and programmatic approach. Patrick Rosenkranz, Amy Fielden, Efstathia Tzemou.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
The London Metropolitan University Writing Centre: An overview of teaching and research Savita Bakhshi School of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences,
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
Psychology students’ experiences of peer tutoring in academic writing European Congress of Psychology, Oslo, July 2009 Kathy Harrington, Savita Bakhshi.
Peer Assisted Learning (PAL)
Aspiring Eagle Scholars Program: A Model for Success North Carolina Central University 10/24/07.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Report on Semester 1, 2012 PASS Trial and Proposal for 2013 Prepared by Chris Ma’auga, PASS Coordinator. Assistance from Caitriona Cameron and Alison Lister.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
BUILDING BLOCKS OF A SUCCESSFUL SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION PROGRAM TWU Regional Supplemental Instruction Conference May 1, 2015 Bev Carlsen-Landy, PhD.
Academic Skills Student Success Advisors Workshop Monday, 14 th January 2013.
Getting Started in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Bill Buskist Auburn University September 2014.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Evaluation and Case Study Review Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
CEBP Learning Institute Fall 2009 Evaluation Report A collaborative Partnership between Indiana Department of Corrections & Indiana University November.
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Lessons Learned.  Transformations campaign  Develop strategic plan  External review team proposes internal residential program  construct.
Facilitating Commencing Student Success across the Lifecycle: Strategic Student Orientation Prof Keithia Wilson Academic Leader Student Success & Retention.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Kimberly Gargiulo, Coordinator of Assessment Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
From Transition to Transformation: students shaping their experience and their institutions. Dr Marco Angelini, UCL Transition Manager 13 September 2011,
INTRODUCTION TO STUDY SKILLS. What are Study Skills?  Study skills are approaches applied to learning. They are considered essential for acquiring good.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: That students do not.
College of Computing & Informatics Educational Initiatives for Undergraduate Programs AAAT Meeting September 11, 2014 Audrey Rorrer.
Peer Observations Dr Andy Wilson UK Staff Development Advisor.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
EFYE 2015 Peer Mentoring as a Way to Support Students Thrive.
Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) Using Clicker Technology Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication,
1 A BEST PRACTICE OF TEACHING AMONGST UNIVERSITY LECTURES University of Oviedo PROF. SAMUEL FERNÁNDEZ.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Teaching Portfolios TA Training Session. What is a Teaching Portfolio?  Three types used in academia  The academic portfolio  The teaching portfolio.
Dr. Dawn Person Chieh-hsing Chou (Jessie) Spring 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Tools and techniques to measuring the impact of youth work (Caroline Redpath and Martin Mc Mullan – YouthAction NI)
Logic Model: “Xtreme Reading” South Johnston High School.
ACUI/EBI Assessments Users’ Meeting. Educational Benchmarking, Inc. Number of National Assessments for Higher Education: 65 Number of Colleges/Universities:
Leading Learning at Coleg Gwent. Frank Coffield Only Teachers can change Teaching (Geoff Petty 2009)
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
+ S573: Education of Information Users Week Assess and Invest: Faculty Feedback on Library Tutorials (Appelt & Pendell, 2010) Assessment of services.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
The Effect of Faculty Presence on Small-group Learning and Group Dynamics in a Family Medicine Clerkship Miriam Hoffman, MD; Joanne Wilkinson, MD; John.
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Taia L.C. Reid, Assistant Director of the Peer Educator Program
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Peer Assisted Learning
Optional Module 6—Scholarly Project
Goal Setting and Motivation
Presentation transcript:

Principles of Effective Evaluation Prof Keithia Wilson Academic Leader Student Success & Retention

Importance of Evaluation Results in evidence-based practice Results in evidence-based practice Helps us to identify the most effective & strategic interventions (make a difference or add value) Helps us to identify the most effective & strategic interventions (make a difference or add value) Leads to sustainable & enjoyable practice Leads to sustainable & enjoyable practice Provides accountability to School & Group leadership Provides accountability to School & Group leadership Contributes to scholarship of the FYE Contributes to scholarship of the FYE

Kirkpatrick (1994) Model of Evaluation - Overview 4 levels of outcome evaluation – 1. Level 1 – Reaction 2. Level 2 – Learning 3. Level 3 – Behaviour 4. Level 4 – Results

Level 1 - Reaction Measures participant’s reactions to the training program, including:  reactions to the overall program (outcomes) e.g., * “To what extent did you find the Orientation program useful?” * “To what extent did you find the Orientation program useful?”  reactions to specific components of the program (processes) e.g., * What aspects of Orientation did you MOST APPRECIATE and found USEFUL? * What aspects of Orientation did you MOST APPRECIATE and found USEFUL? * What aspects of Orientation did you LEAST APPRECIATE and feel is MOST IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT? * What aspects of Orientation did you LEAST APPRECIATE and feel is MOST IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT?

Level 1 - Reaction Important to include closed-ended items including rating scales e.g., Important to include closed-ended items including rating scales e.g., How effective was the Orientation program overall in helping you to make a transition to university? How effective was the Orientation program overall in helping you to make a transition to university? not at all effective very effective not at all effective very effective How useful was the initial information session on the predictors of success in first year? How useful was the initial information session on the predictors of success in first year? not at all useful very useful not at all useful very useful As well as open-ended items As well as open-ended items What else would you have liked included in the Orientation program today? What else would you have liked included in the Orientation program today?

Level 1 - Reaction Some FYE examples – Survey questions on Orientation (retrospective student survey) Survey questions on Orientation (retrospective student survey) School specific Orientation Program evaluation at the end of O-Day & the Common Time (ongoing Orientation Program) – student surveys, focus groups School specific Orientation Program evaluation at the end of O-Day & the Common Time (ongoing Orientation Program) – student surveys, focus groups Peer Mentoring Program final evaluation by mentors & mentees Peer Mentoring Program final evaluation by mentors & mentees

Level 2 - Learning Measures what participants have learned from involvement in the program What is measured needs to relate to what was covered in the program viz. learning objectives What is measured needs to relate to what was covered in the program viz. learning objectives Typically covers knowledge, skills, or attitudes Typically covers knowledge, skills, or attitudes Needs to include both rating scales & open-ended questions Needs to include both rating scales & open-ended questions Can include self-report & tests of actual knowledge Can include self-report & tests of actual knowledge

Level 2 - Learning Some examples – 1. Student self-report * I feel confident that I know what to do to be successful academically * I feel confident that I know what to do to be successful academically this semester this semester not at all confident very confident not at all confident very confident * What have you learned about the transitions you will need to make as * What have you learned about the transitions you will need to make as a commencing student in order to be successful? a commencing student in order to be successful? 2. Student knowledge 2. Student knowledge * I know the name of my First Year Advisor yes no (circle one) * I know the name of my First Year Advisor yes no (circle one) * I know the difference between a lecture and a tutorial (circle one) * I know the difference between a lecture and a tutorial (circle one) Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree

Level 2 - Learning Some FYE examples – Survey data evaluates learning outcomes in terms of knowledge & attitudes (e.g., knowing where to go to get help; perceptions of good teaching) Survey data evaluates learning outcomes in terms of knowledge & attitudes (e.g., knowing where to go to get help; perceptions of good teaching) Outcome evaluation for Peer Mentees (What are your 3 most important learnings from your participation in the Peer Mentoring Program?) Outcome evaluation for Peer Mentees (What are your 3 most important learnings from your participation in the Peer Mentoring Program?) First-Assessment-First-Feedback amber alert intervention (What have you learned as a result of your participation?) First-Assessment-First-Feedback amber alert intervention (What have you learned as a result of your participation?)

Level 3 - Behaviour Measures the transfer of knowledge, skills & attitudes from the training context to in vivo or real-life contexts (the classroom & study). Evaluate both before & after the program if practical Evaluate both before & after the program if practical Use survey, focus groups, interviews with students, mentors, staff (convenors, sessionals) Use survey, focus groups, interviews with students, mentors, staff (convenors, sessionals) Survey (Did you attend Orientation? How much time are you spending on study?) Survey (Did you attend Orientation? How much time are you spending on study?)

Level 3 - Behaviour Some FYE examples – survey data survey data Attendance at E-Day, O-Day & Common Time/ASP Program Attendance at E-Day, O-Day & Common Time/ASP Program Attendance at lectures & tutes Attendance at lectures & tutes Assessment submission rates in courses Assessment submission rates in courses

Level 4 - Results Measures “return-on-investment”, or the extent to which the program has produced results. Some FYE examples include – Hard student outcomes such as - Hard student outcomes such as - * pass rates in courses for assessment items * pass rates in courses for assessment items * GPA in semester 1, 2 & FY overall * GPA in semester 1, 2 & FY overall * student retention into year 2 * student retention into year 2 Soft student outcomes such as – Soft student outcomes such as – * student satisfaction * student satisfaction

Evaluation Key question – What difference do our FYO&E interventions (e.g., Orientation, Peer Mentoring, Attendance, First Assessment Intervention etc.) make overall? Program/Intervention  1 Reactions  2 Learning  3 Behaviour  4 Overall Productivity/Result Program/Intervention  Feel  Know  Do  what is the result or difference overall?