Djole Hinic Danielle Stokes Achievement and Behavior Data for Elementary Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Advertisements

Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
The Evolution of the Virginia School Report Card Board of Education School & Division Accountability Committee February 25, 2015.
Academic Planning! 7 th and 8 th grades February 24, 2015.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
By Meredith Hawkins Deborah Fajuyigbe Robert McArdle.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Suffolk Public Schools School Board August 9, 2012.
By Anthony Truzzolino and Kate Maher.  A human being is not attaining his full heights until he is educated. Horace Mann Horace Mann  If a nation expects.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Driver’s Education and Health Board of Education Meeting November 18, 2014 Lisa Kotowski 1.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
Introduction to 8 th Graders Individual Graduation Plan and the Search for Number.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
Virginia Alternate Assessment Program Standard Setting Richmond, Virginia September 18-21, 2001.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 18, 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Academic Planning! Thomas Jefferson Middle School Academic Planning Night February 4, 2014.
Mr. Rickie Hopkins, Principal Ms. Treena Leecost, Assistant Principal Mr. William Reese, Assistant Principal Thompson Middle School January 12, 2012.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Ms. April Hawkins, Principal Mr. Zeno Hines, Assistant Principal Mr. William McGee, Assistant Principal Ms. Angela Mosley, Assistant Principal Armstrong.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Evergreen Elementary School
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.
AYP and Report Card.
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

Djole Hinic Danielle Stokes Achievement and Behavior Data for Elementary Schools

Background- How do states compare? 4 th Grade Reading8 th Grade Reading 4 th Grade Math8 th Grade Math

Graduation from Middle School

Definitions Fully Accredited A combined pass rate of at least 75 percent on English tests in grades is required for full accreditation at the elementary school level, and for other schools with students in these grades. Elementary schools also must achieve a pass rate of at least 70 percent in mathematics and in grade 5 science and grade 5 history, and pass rates of at least 50 percent in grade 3 science and grade 3 history Adequate Yearly Progress - determines how every public school and school district in the country is performing academically shtml#ratings

Adequate Yearly Progress Successful progress 1) at least 95 % of all students are tested for reading and math 2) at least 95 % of all students meet the minimum annual target for meeting expectations 3) at least 95 % of all students meet the minimum annual target for attendance Unsuccessful progress 1) schools that do not meet AYP for two consecutive years are placed in "School Improvement Status" and must offer alternative school attendance opportunities to students within their schools 2) schools do not make AYP for three consecutive years, they must offer both alternative school attendance opportunities and opportunities for students to increase their learning outside of school time 3) schools miss AYP for a fourth consecutive year, they are designated as being in "Corrective Action" and must choose among strategies outlined by NCLB 4) year of missing AYP results in a restructuring planning year when the school is shut down, and then a sixth year of missing AYP requires that the restructuring plan be implemented

Definitions Standard of Learning (SOL) Tests The Standards of Learning (SOL) describe the commonwealth's expectations for student learning and achievement in grades K-12 in English, mathematics, science, history/social science, technology, the fine arts, foreign language, health and physical education, and driver education. SOL assessments measure student achievement in English, mathematics, science and history/social science. Students are assessed in English and mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the conclusion of certain high school-level courses. SOL tests in science and history are administered in grades 3, 5 and 8 and at the end of high school-level courses in these subjects. Some students may take tests at other grade levels based on the school’s curriculum.

VA and Standardized Testing “The national test uses a common set of metrics for students in all states and sets a high bar for student achievement. States' expectations and standardized tests vary greatly. Compared to the national test, Virginia sets a dramatically lower bar for student achievement.” Low High

Overby Sheppard Achievement Data Percent of students passing SOL's Grade 3-5 English90 Grade 3 History71 Grade 3 Science87 Mathematics86 History86 Science88 Adequate Yearly Progress Title ITitle I - School Wide Program School AYP 2011Made AYP School AYP 2010 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2009 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2008 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2007 StatusMade AYP 2010 English ImprovementNot in Improvement Division AYP Status 2011Did Not Make AYP Division Improvement 2011Not in Improvement 2010 Math ImprovementNot in Improvement Richmond Times Dispatch Data Center 2011 VA Public Schools Test Scores

Mary Munford Achievement Data Percent of students passing SOL's Grade 3-5 English96 Grade 3 History87 Grade 3 Science94 Mathematics98 History96 Science98 Adequate Yearly Progress Title INot Title I School AYP 2011Made AYP School AYP 2010 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2009 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2008 StatusMade AYP School AYP 2007 StatusMade AYP 2010 English ImprovementNot in Improvement Division AYP Status 2011Did Not Make AYP Division Improvement 2011Not in Improvement 2010 Math ImprovementNot in Improvement Richmond Times Dispatch Data Center 2011 VA Public Schools Test Scores

J.E.B. Stuart Elem. Achievement Data

How many students passed state standardized tests? Education Nation Scorecard for Schools

Overby Sheppard School Behavior Stats Offense Category Weapons Offenses20* Offenses Against Student40* Offenses Against Staff40* Other Offenses Against Persons82* Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses00* Property Offenses20* Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses3279* Technology Offenses00* All Other Offenses01* VDOE:

Mary Munford Behavior Stats Offense Category Weapons Offenses10* Offenses Against Student31* Offenses Against Staff122* Other Offenses Against Persons00* Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses00* Property Offenses30* Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses610* Technology Offenses00* All Other Offenses00*

J.E.B. Stuart Behavior Stats Offense Category Weapons Offenses64* Offenses Against Student32* Offenses Against Staff93* Other Offenses Against Persons7999* Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses00* Property Offenses31* Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses163219* Technology Offenses20* All Other Offenses16*