Using Physics to Help Assess Hurricane Risk Kerry Emanuel Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Limitations of a strictly actuarial approach
Total Number of United States Landfall Events, by Category,
U.S. Hurricane Damage, , Adjusted for Inflation, Wealth, and Population
Summary of U.S. Hurricane Damage Statistics: >50% of all normalized damage caused by top 8 events, all category 3, 4 and 5 >90% of all damage caused by storms of category 3 and greater Category 3,4 and 5 events are only 13% of total landfalling events; only 30 since 1870 Landfalling storm statistics are inadequate for assessing hurricane risk
Additional Problem: Nonstationarity of climate
Atlantic Sea Surface Temperatures and Storm Max Power Dissipation (Smoothed with a filter) Scaled Temperature Power Dissipation Index (PDI) Years included: Data Sources: NOAA/TPC, UKMO/HADSST1
Bringing Physics and Math to Bear
Physics of Mature Hurricanes
Energy Production
Theoretical Upper Bound on Hurricane Maximum Wind Speed: POTENTIAL INTENSITY Air-sea enthalpy disequilibrium Surface temperature Outflow temperature Ratio of exchange coefficients of enthalpy and momentum
Annual Maximum Potential Intensity (m/s)
Numerical Simulation of Hurricanes
The Problem The hurricane eyewall is a region of strong frontogenesis, attaining scales of ~ 1 km or less At the same time, the storm’s circulation extends to ~1000 km and is embedded in much larger scale flows
Typhoon Megi 10/17/ GMT
Eyewall Undergoes Frontal Collapse Will always challenge spatial resolution of numerical models High resolution required for numerical convergence Proper formulation of 3-D turbulence critical for adequate simulation of eyewall
Histograms of Tropical Cyclone Intensity as Simulated by a Global Model with 50 km grid point spacing. (Courtesy Isaac Held, GFDL) Category 3 Global Models do not simulate the storms that cause destruction! Observed Modeled
Numerical convergence in an axisymmetric, nonhydrostatic model (Rotunno and Emanuel, 1987)
How to deal with this? Option 1: Brute force and obstinacy Option 1: Brute force and obstinacy
Multiply nested grids
Nested-grid domains
How to deal with this? Option 1: Brute force and obstinacy Option 2: Applied math and modest resources Option 2: Applied math and modest resources
Time-dependent, axisymmetric model phrased in R space Hydrostatic and gradient balance above PBL Moist adiabatic lapse rates on M surfaces above PBL Boundary layer quasi-equilibrium convection Deformation-based radial diffusion
Model behavior: Maximum wind speed
Application to Real-Time Hurricane Intensity Forecasting Must add ocean model Must account for atmospheric wind shear
Ocean columns integrated only Along predicted storm track. Predicted storm center SST anomaly used for input to ALL atmospheric points.
Comparing Fixed to Interactive SST: Model with Fixed Ocean Temperature Model including Ocean Interaction
Hindcast of Katrina
How Can We Use This Model to Help Assess Hurricane Risk in Current and Future Climates?
Risk Assessment Approach: Step 1: Seed each ocean basin with a very large number of weak, randomly located cyclones Step 2: Cyclones are assumed to move with the large scale atmospheric flow in which they are embedded, plus a correction for beta drift Step 3: Run the CHIPS model for each cyclone, and note how many achieve at least tropical storm strength Step 4: Using the small fraction of surviving events, determine storm statistics. Details: Emanuel et al., Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 2008
Synthetic Track Generation: Generation of Synthetic Wind Time Series Postulate that TCs move with vertically averaged environmental flow plus a “beta drift” correction Approximate “vertically averaged” by weighted mean of 850 and 250 hPa flow
Synthetic wind time series Monthly mean, variances and co-variances from re-analysis or global climate model data Synthetic time series constrained to have the correct monthly mean, variance, co-variances and an power series
250 hPa zonal wind modeled as Fourier series in time with random phase: where T is a time scale corresponding to the period of the lowest frequency wave in the series, N is the total number of waves retained, and is, for each n, a random number between 0 and 1.
Example:
The time series of other flow components: or where each F i has a different random phase, and A satisfies where COV is the symmetric matrix containing the variances and covariances of the flow components. Solved by Cholesky decomposition.
Track: Empirically determined constants:
Risk Assessment Approach: Step 1: Seed each ocean basin with a very large number of weak, randomly located cyclones Step 2: Cyclones are assumed to move with the large scale atmospheric flow in which they are embedded, plus a correction for beta drift Step 3: Run the CHIPS model for each cyclone, and note how many achieve at least tropical storm strength Step 4: Using the small fraction of surviving events, determine storm statistics. Details: Emanuel et al., Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 2008
Comparison of Random Seeding Genesis Locations with Observations
Example: 50 Synthetic Tracks
6-hour zonal displacements in region bounded by 10 o and 30 o N latitude, and 80 o and 30 o W longitude, using only post-1970 hurricane data
Calibration Absolute genesis frequency calibrated to globe during the period Absolute genesis frequency calibrated to globe during the period
Genesis rates Atlantic Eastern North Pacific Western North Pacific North Indian Ocean Southern Hemisphere
Captures effects of regional climate phenomena (e.g. ENSO, AMM)
Seasonal Cycles Atlantic
Cumulative Distribution of Storm Lifetime Peak Wind Speed, with Sample of 1755Synthetic Tracks Cumulative Distribution of Storm Lifetime Peak Wind Speed, with Sample of 1755 Synthetic Tracks 95% confidence bounds
3000 Tracks within 100 km of Miami 95% confidence bounds
Return Periods
Sample Storm Wind Swath
Simulated vs. Observed Power Dissipation Trends,
Last 20 years of 20 th century simulations 2. Years of IPCC Scenario A1b (CO 2 stabilized at 720 ppm) 1. Last 20 years of 20 th century simulations 2. Years of IPCC Scenario A1b (CO 2 stabilized at 720 ppm) Compare two simulations each from 7 IPCC models:
IPCC Emissions Scenarios This study
Basin-Wide Percentage Change in Power Dissipation
Basin-Wide Percentage Change in Storm Frequency
7 Model Consensus Change in Storm Frequency
Explicit (blue dots) and downscaled (red dots) genesis points for June- October for Control (top) and Global Warming (bottom) experiments using the 14-km resolution NICAM model. Collaborative work with K. Oouchi.
Coupling large hurricane event sets to surge models (with Ning Lin) Couple synthetic tropical cyclone events (Emanuel et al., BAMS, 2008) to surge models – SLOSH – ADCIRC (fine mesh) – ADCIRC (coarse mesh) Generate probability distributions of surge at desired locations
5000 synthetic storm tracks under current climate. (Red portion of each track is used in surge analysis.)
Tracks of 18 “most dangerous” storms for the Battery, under the current (left) and A1B (right) climate, respectively
SLOSH mesh for the New York area (Jelesnianski et al., 1992)
Surge Return Periods for The Battery, New York
Example: Intense event in future climate downscaled from CNRM model
ADCIRC Mesh
Peak Surge at each point along Florida west coast
Return levels for Tampa, including three cases : control (black), A1B (blue), A1B with 1.1ro and 1.21 rm (red)
Summary: History too short and inaccurate to deduce real risk from tropical cyclones History too short and inaccurate to deduce real risk from tropical cyclones Global (and most regional) models are far too coarse to simulate reasonably intense tropical cyclones Global (and most regional) models are far too coarse to simulate reasonably intense tropical cyclones Globally and regionally simulated tropical cyclones are not coupled to the ocean Globally and regionally simulated tropical cyclones are not coupled to the ocean
We have developed a technique for downscaling global models or reanalysis data sets, using a very high resolution, coupled TC model phrased in angular momentum coordinates We have developed a technique for downscaling global models or reanalysis data sets, using a very high resolution, coupled TC model phrased in angular momentum coordinates Model shows skill in capturing spatial and seasonal variability of TCs, has an excellent intensity spectrum, and captures well known climate phenomena such as ENSO and the effects of warming over the past few decades Model shows skill in capturing spatial and seasonal variability of TCs, has an excellent intensity spectrum, and captures well known climate phenomena such as ENSO and the effects of warming over the past few decades
Event Set for ASP Projects Must have and be able to use MATLAB Go to Download and read Readme_matlab_scripts.pdf Download the two zip files Current event set is for the Atlantic basin; by tomorrow morning I will post an event set for the U.S. east and Gulf coasts.
Ocean Component : ((Schade, L.R., 1997: A physical interpreatation of SST-feedback. Preprints of the 22 nd Conf. on Hurr. Trop. Meteor., Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, pgs ) Mixing by bulk-Richardson number closure Mixed-layer current driven by hurricane model surface wind
Couple to Storm Surge Model (SLOSH) Ning Lin Courtesy of Ning Lin
Surge map for single event
Histogram of the SLOSH-model simulated storm surge at the Battery for 7555 synthetic tracks that pass within 200 km of the Battery site.
Surge Return Periods, New York City
Genesis Distributions
Why does frequency decrease? Critical control parameter in CHIPS: Entropy difference between boundary layer and middle troposphere increases with temperature at constant relative humidity
Change in Frequency when T held constant in
Probability Density by Storm Lifetime Peak Wind Speed, Explicit and Downscaled Events
Change in Power Dissipation with Global Warming
Analysis of satellite-derived tropical cyclone lifetime-maximum wind speeds Box plots by year. Trend lines are shown for the median, 0.75 quantile, and 1.5 times the interquartile range Trends in global satellite-derived tropical cyclone maximum wind speeds by quantile, from 0.1 to 0.9 in increments of 0.1. Elsner, Kossin, and Jagger, Nature, 2008