Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Building Capacity as a Presenter Presenter Skills November.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 1 Class 3 October.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Assessment.  Understand why we need to assess  The role of assessment in teaching. Lecture’s objective.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Paraphrases and Wait Time Learning Focused Conversations April.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
NC FALCON Training in the use and design of Formative Assessment.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
CCSS-M and Classroom Practice: Reflecting Conversation DECEMBER 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Using Tape Diagrams Multiplicative Structures- Comparison Problems
Using Tape Diagrams and Variables to Develop Algebra Skills
APA Format Tuesday July 8, 2014.
Number Talks: Subtraction Strategies
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Equality and Relational Thinking: Abstracting from Computation Part 1
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, July 7, 2014
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Project & Syllabus.
Number Talks: Building Fluency with Division
Developing Linear Thinking & Extending to a Ruler
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Ratio Reasoning in 6th Grade The Road to Proportional Reasoning
Equality Project Part A Observations
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Number Talks: An Instructional Strategy used to Create a Classroom Culture of Listening, Sharing and Flexible Thinking Core Mathematics Partnership.
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
K-6 Geometry and Geometric Measurement : Tying it All Up
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Our Leadership Journey
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Keys to Quality Classroom Assessment: Sound Design Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Targets and Success Criteria Learning Target: Reflect on formative assessment principles and evaluate your own assessment system.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee In September… We reviewed:  different types of learning targets.  writing clear and understandable learning targets in student friendly language. As we dig into assessment, do we know how to make connections between learning targets and assessments?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Vignettes on Formative Assessment

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Vignettes Purpose: to deepen our understanding of formative assessment and recognize formative assessment strategies in classroom practice.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Vignette Set B These vignettes illustrate extended examples of formative assessment practices and the interconnectedness of the various attributes. They should not be viewed as a complete description of formative assessment. It’s about how several strategies appear across vignettes. As individuals: Read vignette. Identify the formative assessment strategies. Individually record strategies on paper. As a group: Justify how classroom scenarios connect to Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. (5 minutes max per vignette) Repeat process

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reflections ….. Think a moment about the vignette discussion and in your notebook make a list of any formative assessment strategies that you would like to build into your classroom assessment system.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking to Our Classroom Practice Graffiti Chart What ideas do you want to build into your own classroom assessment system?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee So, What is Formative Assessment?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning Take a look at the back of your binders. Which strategies do you currently use? Where am I going? Where am I now? How can I close the gap? Are the strategies for the teacher or the student?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The Word “assess” Comes from the Latin verb ‘assidere’ meaning “to sit with”. In assessment one is supposed to sit with the learner. This implies it is something we do with and for students and not to students (Green, 1998)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reflecting on Chapter 4 Now that you have discussed these vignette’s in relation to Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning, it is time to connect this back to your classroom practice. Take out your homework. Switch papers: Read and comment on one assessment idea. Consider, how will you enrich your own assessment system?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Big Ideas Graffiti Chart How will you enrich your own assessment system?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Targets and Success Criteria Learning Target: Reflect on formative assessment principles and evaluate your own assessment system.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Homework First: Read Chapter 9 pages Second: Looking ahead …… Choose the unit you will be teaching in November. Read three lessons and write learning targets for these lessons. Targets will be discussed in small groups. Consider: Type of target, student friendly language, embedded math idea not a math activity