Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
Advertisements

What “Counts” as Evidence of Student Learning in Program Assessment?
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
The Academic Assessment Process
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.
Guide to Evidence for WASC Accreditation Dr. Robert Gabriner City College of San Francisco Student Learning Outcomes Workshop Strand 3.
Learning Outcomes at the University of North Alabama Dr. Andrew L. Luna Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
Preparing for ABET Accreditation: Meeting Criteria 2, 3 & 4 October 12, 2006 Melissa Canady Wargo, Director Office of Assessment.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Academic Assessment Accountability: Are we what we say we are? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
The Basics of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment SACSCOC Summer Institute July 20, 2015 handout for this session is in the online program Timothy S.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). SACS Principles of Accreditation Integrity Quality Enhancement.
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Guide to Evidence for WASC Accreditation Dr. Robert Gabriner City College of San Francisco Student Learning Outcomes.
Student Learning Outcomes and SACSCOC 1.  Classroom assessment ◦ Grades ◦ Student evaluation of class/course  Course assessment –????  Academic program.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Understanding Assessment The Basics Office for Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.
Learning Outcomesas part of the Assessment Cycle Kirsten Ogden Faculty Assessment Coach Pasadena City College 2014.
DEFINING AND REFINING LEARNING OUTCOMES UK Office of Assessment.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Andrew Swan What are Student Learning Outcomes?  Education reform in the 1990s pushed for more sophisticated goals.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #2: Writing SLOs Office of Academic Planning & Accountability Institutional Effectiveness Moderator: Dr. Cathy.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
What are students able to demonstrate upon completion of a course? (Not about what instructors provide) Use specific and simple action verbs. Example:
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Effective Outcomes Assessment
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Opportunities to Enhance Quality at EKU
Presentation transcript:

Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University

Introduction SFASU is preparing for reaffirmation of accreditation in 2011 The accrediting body is the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Accreditation serves two major purposes: –to assure quality of programs –to assist in the improvement of programs.

SACS accreditation standards have changed since last visit in Changes include –Assessment of learning outcomes –Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) –Submitted electronically –Reviewed off-site

Overview Institutional Effectiveness as defined by SACS Student Learning Outcomes and accreditation Learning Outcomes: Guidelines Timeline for development

Institutional Effectiveness Institutional Effectiveness is the extent to which an institution achieves its mission and goals. The demonstration of institutional effectiveness is a critically important component of the SACS accreditation process. Institutional effectiveness involves the entire university community.

Institutional Effectiveness SACS Principles of Accreditation Core Requirements 2.5 The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide, research-based planning and evaluation processes that include –a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; –results that show continuing improvement in institutional quality; and –data that documents that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.

Institutional Effectiveness SACS Principles of Accreditation Comprehensive Standard The institution identifies expected outcomes for: –educational programs (including student learning outcomes for educational programs) and its administrative and educational support services; –assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and –provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

Institutional Effectiveness SACS Principles of Accreditation Programs 3.4 Educational Program Standards for All Educational Programs : (Includes all on-campus, off-campus and distance learning programs) The institution demonstrates that each educational program for which academic credit is awarded is –approved by the faculty and the administration, and –establishes and evaluates program and learning outcomes.

Institutional Effectiveness The focus of Institutional Effectiveness has changed from Instructor-focused Teaching To Student-focused Learning

Student Learning Outcomes What should an SFASU graduate in _______ know and be able to do? Do they know it? How do I know? How does this information help improve the quality of my program at SFASU?

Student Learning Outcomes SFASU faculty have a critical role in the Institutional Effectiveness process through: Identification of desired learning outcomes for programs and courses. Development of appropriate assessments to document learning. Review of assessment data to identify the extent of student learning. Implementation of appropriate changes to improve the quality of student learning at SFASU.

Student Learning Outcomes What are Student Learning Outcomes? (SLOs) Statements that specify what learners will know, be able to do or be able to demonstrate when they complete or participate in a program/activity/course/project. Outcomes are expressed as knowledge, skills, attitudes or values.

Student Learning Outcomes Outcomes are: –Measurable or observable, –Manageable, and –Meaningful

Student Learning Outcomes Outcomes focus on the end result of your program –How do you know the students have learned what you want them to learn? –What does it look like? –How will you identify it?

Student Learning Outcomes Learning outcomes relate to the mission of SFASU, the mission and goals of your college and/or your department or program. Learning outcomes define what the graduate should know and be able to do at the end of your program.

Student Learning Outcomes Use simple, specific action verbs to describe what the students are expected to demonstrate upon completion of your program. –Action verbs result in overt behavior that can be observed and measured. –Avoid verbs that are unclear and call for behavior that cannot be observed or measured.

Student Learning Outcomes Action verbs –Analyze, apply, compare, create, estimate, demonstrate, illustrate (see Bloom’s Taxonomy) Verbs to avoid –Appreciate, understand, learn, know, become familiar with –Avoid compound outcomes

Student Learning Outcomes Examples 1.Students will appreciate the benefits of exercise. 2.Students will value exercise as a stress reduction tool. 3.Students will be able to explain how exercise affects stress.

Student Learning Outcomes Evaluate the learning outcomes with these questions Can it be measured? Is learning being demonstrated?

Student Learning Outcomes Examples Too general and hard to measure –Students will appreciate the benefits of exercise. General and hard to measure –Students will value exercise as a stress reduction tool. Specific and easy to measure –Students will be able to explain how exercise affects stress.

Student Learning Outcomes Evaluate your learning outcomes with these questions Can it be measured? Is learning being demonstrated?

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment of Learning Outcomes A variety of appropriate methods are used The selected assessment measures the extent the outcome has been achieved Assessment is meaningful Assessment guides program changes to improve quality of the program

Student Learning Outcomes Appropriate measures of Learning Outcomes include: Direct Measures (all students) –Capstone projects/senior projects –Samples of student work –Project-embedded assessment –Observations of student behavior (internships) –Performance on a case study/problem –Pre-and post-tests

Student Learning Outcomes Appropriate measures of Learning Outcomes: Indirect Measures (sample) –Alumni, employer, student surveys –Focus groups –Job placement statistics –Exit interviews with graduates

Student Learning Outcomes Common problems with assessment reports reviewed by SACS Using grades, final exam scores or student GPAs as a criteria for success. These indicators do not provide sufficient information to guide program improvement.

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines 1.Identify 5-8 student learning outcomes for your program to serve as benchmark assessments for completion of your program 2.Write outcomes that are Measurable, Manageable, Meaningful 3.Identify 2 appropriate assessment strategies for each learning outcome (at least one direct) 4.Develop a scoring guide/rubric 5.Identify the criteria for success 6.Identify the course/s where assessment will occur

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines Program Assessment answers these questions: What should an SFASU graduate in know and be able to do at the end of the program that they could not do before? Do they know it? How do I know? How does this information help improve the quality of this program at SFASU?

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines SACS does not mandate a particular method of demonstrating institutional effectiveness for accreditation.

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines Each institution is expected to determine institutional effectiveness by implementing an assessment plan which is broad based; derived from the institution’s purpose and goals; uses a variety of assessment methods, and demonstrates the use of results for the improvement of both academic programs and administrative support units.

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines February, March –Identify program learning outcomes –Identify appropriate assessments –Determine success standards –Identify course/s to administer assessments April –Submit document to Department Chair for review –Submit to Dean for review

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines May 2 –Dean submits all program reports to Provost Office Fall 2008 –Begin development of course learning outcomes to support program learning goals –Develop course matrix –Program assessment begins

Learning Outcomes: Guidelines Spring 2009 –First assessment cycle complete –Data review and analysis reports compiled Fall 2009 –Assessment loop continues

Institutional Effectiveness Successful documentation of Institutional Effectiveness involves the entire university. Institutional Effectiveness is an on-going process.

Thank you for all you do to improve Institutional Effectiveness at SFASU