1 CREZ COMMUNICATIONS Presented by American Electric Power Telecommunications Engineering Matt WilliamsDon Demand Columbus, OHTulsa, OK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Communications and Networking
Advertisements

M A Wajid Tanveer Infrastructure M A Wajid Tanveer
1 Smart Grid Vision Electric Grid Modernization Steering Committee Grid Facing Technology Subcommittee January 14, 2013.
Orion Telecom Networks Inc Slide 1 STM-1 63 E1 (Optical / Electrical) SDH Add-Drop Multiplexer Updated: Dec, 2010Orion Telecom Networks Inc
High Level Telecom Architecture
Eighth Edition by William Stallings
Optical communications & networking - an Overview
Presents The Silver Family An Integrated Approach to Processors, Data Communication and Head End Integration.
Chapter 4 Circuit-Switching Networks
Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) Fall Semester, School of Computer Science & Engineering, Seoul National University. Professor Yanghee Choi Student.
1 TDC 363 Local Area Networks Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN)
Computers Are Your Future © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Communication Links Communication Link = Physical connection or Physical Medium Types: Wire Pair or Twisted Pair Coaxial Cable Fiber Optics Bandwidth,
Networks “Each time you use the telephone you use the world’s largest computer network – the telephone system”
Electrical Systems Electrical Engineering in Railways –Rolling Stock –Communications & Control –Signalling –LV Installations in Stations and Buildings.
Orion Telecom Networks Inc E1 Automatic Protection Switching Solution (1+1 E1 Redundancy Switch) Updated : November, 2005 Slide , Avenue of.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Overview of Data Communications and Networking UNIT I UNIT I.
PRESENTATION ON SUBSTATION DESIGN
Computer Communication & Networks
A PROJECT REPORT ON DIGITAL LOOP CARRIER (DLC) Under the Guidance of MR. A.B. SINGH SUBMITTED BY: PALASH GUPTA NIDHI VERMA A.N. RAMANI P. ANUPAMA LUKESHWARI.
Smart Grid Research Consortium Conference Communications: Technologies Systems Future Trends Dr Rick Russell.
Asis AdvancedTCA Class What is a Backplane? A backplane is an electronic circuit board Sometimes called PCB (Printed Circuit Board) containing circuitry.
THE ELECTRIC SUB STATION
Communications & Networks
Network Design Essentials
IT in Business Enterprise and Personal Communications Networks Lecture – 07.
Identifying SLC 500™ System Components. SLC 500 System Options  The SLC 500 line of processors comprises both fixed and modular processor styles.:
Section 3 TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION US Bulk Power Transmission System Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Components New T& D Technologies This product.
Data Communication. 2 Data Communications Data communication system components: Message Message Information (data) to be communicated. Sender Sender Device.
Module 5, Unit A Vocabulary Review Game. 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Presented by: Sanjib Kumar Nayak Technical Seminar Presentation SYNCHRONOUS DIGITAL HIERARCHY Presented.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary April NERC lessons learned published in April 2015 Two NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in April 2015 LL
Chapter 6 Wide Area Networking Concepts, Architectures, & Services.
1 Provider Bridging design for UNM Campus - CPBN.
Jump Starting ITS Deployment in Los Angeles County using Wireless Communications Lessons Learned.
Intorduction to Lumentis
Chapter 6 Wide Area Networking Concepts, Architectures, & Services.
Local Area Network Daniel Shin CS 147, Section 3 November 18, 2008.
IEEE &
Intro to Network Design
Proprietary and Confidential © Copyright Alvarion Ltd. Optimized 4G Smart Grid Connectivity Eedo Lifshitz Director, Business Development.
What is Bandwidth on Demand ? Bandwidth on Demand (BoD) is based on a technology that employs a new way of managing and controlling SONET-based equipment.
Convergence Technology. Ch 01 Telecom Overview  Define communications and telecommunications  Components of a communications system  Difference between.
® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved 1 ® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved ADTRAN & Smart Grid January 21, 2010 Kevin Morgan Director, Product Marketing.
Copyright © SEL 2010 Advancements in Transmission Line Protection and Fault Location Brian Smyth Lead Product Engineer.
Utility Engineers, PC.  Generation  Transmission  Distribution.
Networking Topology 1.BUS Topology 2.RING Topology 3.STAR Topology
. Large internetworks can consist of the following three distinct components:  Campus networks, which consist of locally connected users in a building.
Steady State Analysis Of A Microgrid Connected To A Power System
NERC Lessons Learned Summary LLs Published in September 2015.
Distribution Systems-General
MIT requirements from the TSO perspective MIDDLEWARE IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY (MIT) for increased resilience of Interdependent Critical Infrastructure ROME,
CONTENTS: 1.Abstract. 2.Objective. 3.Block diagram. 4.Methodology. 5.Advantages and Disadvantages. 6.Applications. 7.Conclusion.
Computers Are Your Future © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Component 4: Introduction to Information and Computer Science Unit 7: Networks & Networking Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Introduction to Networks Mr. Grimming. Types of Networks Wide Area Network (WAN) Cover large geographic area Nodes connected by coaxial cable, microwave.
1/14/10ERCOT ROS / CREZ OGRR1 Why is CREZ Unique? 15 GW of intermittent generation when ERCOT load is less than 30 GW 5000 miles of 345 kV circuits with.
Qwest Communications Disaster Preparedness Overview 2003.
STATUS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND O&M PRACTICES IN ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY OF SERBIA (EPS) Danilo Lalović, Senior Engineer for Telecommunications.
STUDY OF ELEMENTS OF A 220/132/33KV SUBSTATION
Sub Station.
Featrues of Compputer Networks
Utility Needs and Smart Grid for Major Storm Events
the CERN Electrical network protection system
Presented by Radha Gummuluri ECE-E 641 Fiber Optic Communications
Exelon’s Leased Circuit Retirement Program
Flexible Transport Networks
Fiber Optic Communication By
Optical communications & networking - an Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 CREZ COMMUNICATIONS Presented by American Electric Power Telecommunications Engineering Matt WilliamsDon Demand Columbus, OHTulsa, OK

2 AEP OPGW Network The AEP Telecom Engineering offices in Columbus, OH and Tulsa, OK are responsible for supporting a 3,000 mile fiber optic cable network covering 11 states. Approximately 920 miles of this network is comprised of Optical Ground Wire (OPGW) on various AEP 765kV, 345kV, 138kV and 69kV Transmission lines. 7 State AEP East Region Fiber Network4 State AEP West Region Fiber Network

3 Installing OPGW for Communications  Benefits  40+ year life expectancy when installed & maintained properly.  Less susceptible to outages relative to other cable types such as ADSS on T-Line, Distribution poles or underground construction.  Eliminates clearance and Right-Of-Way issues since it occupies the static wire position on a Transmission Line.  Low installation cost on new T-Line construction.  Owned fiber systems are a critical component in the mix of technologies to provide highly reliable and secure communications systems. Other systems include microwave and leased circuits.  The inclusion of OPGW fiber cable on new and modified lines will continue to add route diversity as the transmission system grows.  Disadvantages  Repairs can require a T-Line outage to replace a damaged section which could result in an extended fiber outage. Diverse OPGW routes, the use of diverse technologies, and disaster preparedness can alleviate this operational concern.

4  Cost  Approximately $10K/mile incremental cost difference for new line construction or to install OPGW with a line reconductoring project. $5K is for the cost difference of OPGW versus traditional static wire and the other $5K covers the increased cost of OPGW tower hardware and the Material & Labor for fiber splicing (which assumes a splice every 3 miles). T-Line crew installation labor is assumed to be the same for OPGW as static wire.  To retrofit an existing line (replace static wire with OPGW) the cost is between $50K - $70K per mile and must be coordinated with scheduled line outages. Installing OPGW for Communications

5 Advantages of installing SONET Rings  Benefits  SONET multiplexers are designed to be redundant and self-healing by their integrated ring switching architecture.  SONET rings installed on diversely routed fiber cables will provide complete redundancy and eliminates the concern of having a single point of failure in a communications network.  Without diverse cable routing a single fiber cut can interrupt all fiber based communications on a single Transmission Line.  Lower level SONET (OC-3/155Mb/s) can be extended via microwave communications and serve as a diverse route for critical locations.  SONET deploys higher capacity communication networks that are scalable to accommodate bandwidth growth and reliable to support critical station to station to head end communications. OC-3 (155Mb/s) to OC-12 (622Mb/s) to OC48 (2.5Gb/s).  Other station communications requirements such as SCADA, Station Data Repository, Synchrophasors, Smart-grid, video surveillance, voice and Ethernet/WAN communications as well as other regional business critical communications (mobile radio, corporate data, etc.) can all be supported and transported by SONET based networks.

6 Utility Grade SONET Multiplexers  Key Features of a Utility Grade SONET Multiplexer  Compliant with all ANSI/IEEE C37.90 specifications.  Enhanced protection switching (<3ms) for critical applications such as P&C Teleprotection signals when compared to Carrier grade SONET equipment (<60ms).  Some provide direct access to DS0 channel level in order to provide direct interface connections to relays (via C37.94 or RS-232/422), DTT XMT and RCV equipment and contact I/O devices.  Most Carrier grade SONET equipment offers granularity down to the DS1 level (24 DS0 multiplexed signal).  Power supplies capable of using 48VDC or 130VDC directly from the station battery (Carrier grade equipment operates at -48VDC).  Windows based Network Management System (NMS) with alarm engine, remote alarming and diagnostics.  Interoperability with foreign SONET equipment at the OC-3, OC-12 or OC48 levels to pass NMS information and circuits through other vendors equipment chassis.

7 Advantages of installing SONET Rings  Cost The cost of a utility grade SONET multiplexer is between $20K and $25K per node. Typically one node is installed at each site but depending on the ring architecture, fiber cable topology and redundancy requirements there may be situations where more than one node is required per site (station control house). While a comparable Carrier grade SONET multiplexer may provide the same capacity at less cost - The following differences must be taken into consideration:  Substation hardening requirements (ANSI C37.90 compliant)  SONET Protection Switching for critical applications (3ms vs. 60ms)  DC Power Plant  Additional channel bank equipment to provide DS0 circuits such as 56K data, voice or other low speed drops.  C37.94 optical relay interfaces and direct contact inputs for DTT.

8 Redundancy Requirement  Protection system shall be designed for loss of  AC Current Source  AC Voltage Source  Protective Relay  Communication Channel  DC Circuitry  Auxiliary Trip Relay  Breaker Trip Coil  Station DC Source “ Transmission protection systems shall provide redundancy such that no single protection system component failure would prevent the interconnected transmission systems from meeting the system performance requirements “ - NERC

9 CREZ : Competitive Renewable Energy Zone r

10 SONET Ring Architecture for CREZ Network Dual high-speed relay protection scheme based on diverse OPGW routes and redundant optical fiber communication (SONET ring) system. 87L1 87L2 SONET MUX Self-healing SONET Ring SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX Relay System#1 connected directly over OPGW fiber on protected line One side of SONET ring connected over OPGW fiber on protected line Other side of SONET ring connected via OPGW fiber on other lines to provide a diverse path Relay System#2 connected to SONET ring 345kV line with OPGW C37.94 Interface between relays and SONET MUX

11 SONET Ring Latency 87L2 relay signal travels both directions around the SONET ring in a working/protection configuration. Propagation delay incurred in optical fiber is 8us/mile and ~26us switching & mapping delay in passing through each SONET multiplexer. 87L2 SONET MUX SONET MUX 26us 87L2 signal travels down one side of SONET ring (short path) 3,728us Total propagation delay via long path (assume 440 mile path) 212us Total propagation delay via short path (20 miles path) ,516us (3.516ms) Latency differential during a SONET ring switch 87L2 signal also travels down the other side of SONET ring (long path) SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX SONET MUX 26us 480us 60 mi. 480us 60 mi. 560us 70 mi. 320us 40 mi. 160us 20 mi. 600us 75 mi. 480us 60 mi. 600us 75 mi.

12 SONET Ring Non-Relay Communications Circuits can be sent in both directions around the SONET ring in a working/protection configuration. SCADA OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET OC-3 SONET RADIO OC-3 SONET RADIO VOICE SCADA HEAD END OC-12 SONET LOCAL TOWER SITE TRANS OPERATIONS CENTER OC-12 SONET CORP OFFICE OC-3 VOICE FIELD OFFICE VLAN1 VLAN2 VLAN1 VLAN2 VIDEO

13 Discussion Questions? Comments?