Revision of the South African Pavement Design Method Louw Kannemeyer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
Advertisements

LOW VOLUME ROAD DESIGN EMPIRICAL APPROACH.
Implementation of Darwin – ME Chris Wagner, PE July 26-29, 2010 Kansas City, MO.
COnstruction with Unbound Road AGgregates in Europe.
Design and Construction Guidelines for Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements Lev Khazanovich, UM John Harvey, UCD Joe Mahoney, UW September 12, 2007.
HMA permanent deformation study: Progress report to the RPF 7 May 2008 Erik Denneman.
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Behavior of Asphalt Binder and Asphalt Concrete
HMA Design (Surface) The surface course is the layer in contact with traffic loads and normally contains the highest quality materials. It provides characteristics.
Recruitment of the New LTPP SPS-10: Warm Mix Asphalt Experiment Gabe Cimini LTPP NCRSC Project Manager.
Innovations in HMA Performance Testing John D’Angelo D’Angelo Consulting, LLC Canadian User Producer Group for Asphalt.
Development and Application of the Asphalt Mix Performance Tester Ramon Bonaquist, Ph.D., P.E Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC.
Recalibration of the Asphalt Layer Coefficient Dr. David H. Timm, P.E. Mrs. Kendra Peters-Davis.
Kentrack Kentrack is a computer program designed to analyze a railroad track segment as a structure Uses Bousinessq’s Elastic Theory Uses Burmister’s.
Full-Depth Reclamation Using a Cement Slurry Spreader Attached to a Ready Mixed Concrete Truck W. Spencer Guthrie, Ph.D., Associate Professor Charles A.
USAGE AND ADVANTAGES OF GEOSYNTHETICS IN CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS
‘Characterisation of Granular Materials Rut Resistance’ Austroads project TT1819 Pavement Technology Program Andrew Papacostas (VicRoads) Austroads Project.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LTD Pavement Research
Concrete and Concrete Pavements Research Group. Meet the research team… 3 PhD Students 4 MS Students 1 Undergrad.
MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Pavement Analysis and Design
SANRAL Overload Damage Quantification Louw Kannemeyer.
APAM Annual Paving Conference April 21-22, 2015 Mt. Pleasant, MI Michael Eacker, MDOT Justin Schenkel, MDOT.
PERFORMANCE MODELS Lecture 16. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability.
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guideline RPF Feedback : K Jenkins May 2006.
Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guideline Project Initiated By: Gautrans Sabita.
Interim Guidelines: The Design and Use of Foamed Bitumen Treated Bases Fenella Long Road Pavements Forum November 2001.
KENTRACK 4.0: A Railway Structural Design Program -- Tutorial
Jerry G. Rose, PE University of Kentucky Department of Civil Engineering REES 3: Module 3-D REES 2014.
Ultra Thin Continuously Reinforced Concrete - Modelling &Testing under APT Louw Kannemeyer (SANRAL) Bryan Perrie (C&CI) Pieter Strauss (Consultant) Louw.
Perpetual Pavement Design Perpetual Pavement Open House Ashton, Iowa October 5, 2005.
Extending Asphalt Pavement Life Using Thin Whitetopping Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University.
Road Pavements Forum Structural Design Working Group Revision of the South African Flexible Pavement Design Method 7 November 2006 Pretoria H L Theyse.
Technical Recommendations for Highways No 12 TRH 12
AAPA 2011 Study Tour – Improving Pavement Performance #1 Improving Pavement Performance Part 1 V2.
Terence Milne South African Road Pavement Forum 13 & 14 November 2002 Conference Report Back: ICAP – 22 AUGUST 2002 COPENHAGEN AFRICON.
Static Pushover Analysis
RSA Design Guidelines for hot-mix asphalt TRH3/HMA Workshop June 2001.
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
THE WAY FORWARD or WHO SAID RESEARCH WAS EASY ?. Relationship between variables  x Y = (say) roughness after 5 years Poor Good Expectation for acceptable.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA CVE 409 HIGHWAY ENGINEERING.
In Situ Stabilization of Pavement Base Courses Roads Pavement Forum Thursday, May 17, 2001.
CSIR-UCB research programme Road Pavements Forum 14 November 2001.
Linear Buckling Analysis
Interim Guidelines: The Design and Use of Foamed Bitumen Treated Materials Kim Jenkins, Dave Collings Hechter Theyse, Fenella Long Road Pavements Forum.
AAPA 2011 Pre-CAPSA’11 Study Tour - Topic Brief Introduction of Australian Pavement Design.
G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 1 GAUTRANS APT ELZBIETA SADZIK MAY 2002.
PROGRESS OVERVIEW: COLTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS TMH AND TRH DOCUMENTS OTHER DOCUMENTS.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Superpave Mixture and Aggregate Expert Task Group Las Vegas, Nevada 16 – 18 September 2003.
AAPA 2011 Study Tour – Improving Pavement Performance #1 Improving Pavement Performance Part 1.
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt and Flexible Pavement Design: the MEPDG Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Arkansas.
SP2Support WP 2.1Track bed quality assessment Task Numerical modelling of poor quality sites First phase report on the modelling of poor.
MODULE 1-2 Introduction to HMA Pavements. Learning Objectives Describe the types of (HMA) pavements Identify the role of each pavement layer Discuss key.
Pavement Research Advisory Committee (PRAC) 13 th Meeting of the RPF 8 May 2007.
CSIR Pavement Design Task Group Feedback RPF meeting 23 November 2005.
HDM-4: Pavement Deterioration Modeling and Road User Effects
An Overview of the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester.
Asphalt Technology Course
At Auburn University National Center for Asphalt Technology Accelerated Pavement Testing Facilities “APT”
Overview of dTIMS Input, Analysis and Reporting HTC INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT LTD.
Phase I Experiment 4 Different pavement structures, 8 sections Compare
Transportation Engineering-II
Outline Phase I Literature Review and Synthesis
Introduction to Pavement Design
AASHTOWare Pavement-ME Design Software: Materials Library
Pavement Structural Analysis
2019 Pavement Workshop May 21-23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Revision of the South African Pavement Design Method Louw Kannemeyer

Slide 2 Aka GODZILLA

Slide 3 Historical overview – SAMDM development Origin of Current SAMDM – Damage Models Fatigue of asphalt concrete wearing courses Freeme – 1970s Fatigue of asphalt concrete base layers including temperature Published data – 1970s to 1980s FoS permanent deformation for unbound material Maree – 1970s to 1980s Effective fatigue and crushing failure for cement stabilized layers de Beer – 1980s Vertical strain criteria for subgrade Dorman and Metcalf – 1965 New Tire Technology Increased Tire Pressure

Slide 4 SAMDM - Current status Past implementation exposed all the weaknesses of the method Users became disillusioned with the method Counter-intuitive and inadmissible results Extreme sensitivity of the method to input Inconsistent input Resilient response (FWD, MDD, Laboratory) Strength parameters Statements made that ME-design is not possible Too many unexplained effects (chaos) Design can only be based on past performance (LTPP, rehabilitation investigation, etc.)

Slide 5 R&D Dream #1: Close Gap Between Reality and Theory Adjust the Theory to Predict Reality Theory Reality Rut Terminal rut Roughness Terminal IRI Extent of fatigue Time

Slide 6 R&D Dream #2: Levelling the Playing Field Overall system just as good as Weakest Link

Slide 7 R&D Dream #3: Single “Tool” – Different User/Risk Levels Young professional Seasoned professional Design Specialist Design scenario: Routine and preliminary design Low risk Low design experience Known materials – default input Conventional material classification Design scenario: Important design Medium risk Seasoned professional designer Project specific input Design scenario: Very important design, high risk Special investigations Specialist designer Unusual materials Project specific input User Design application

Slide 8 Research and Development (R&D) Framework Pavement Design Task Group Established May 2005 Series of meetings during July and August 2005 R&D framework submitted in November 2005 Characteristics of new pavement design method R&D topics Demand analysis (Traffic and environment) Material resilient response models Pavement resilient response models Damage models Probabilistic and recursive schemes Each R&D topic have a number of identified R&D needs Each R&D need translated into one or more project briefs to address the need – November 2006

Slide 9 Project Objectives Overall objective To develop a design method that is Accurate (agree with reality) Impartial in terms of pavement type selection Unbound (Crushed stone, natural gravel) Stabilised (Cement, Foamed-bitumen, Emulsified-bitumen) HMA Concrete (not included in flexible pavement design R&D process) Project structured according to immediate, short, medium and long-term objectives and deliverables Achievement of immediate, short, medium and long-term objectives subject to availability of resources

Slide 10 Time-frame for R&D process Immediate12 to 18 months Short-term 3 to 5 years (1.5 to 3 years) Medium-term 5 to 8 years (3 to 5 years) Long-term 8 to 12 years >5 Years

Slide 11 R&D Process Project funding and contracts Funding organisations will sponsor projects of interest to them Contract between service provider and project client Project management Phase 1 – Develop Detailed Project Briefs - Done Phase 2 - Inception Phase (In Progress – 27 th June 2007) Investigate available solutions Finalize project methodology Finalize cost and resource allocation Phase 3 – Delivery of immediate, short, medium deliverables (Anticipated Start Date – November 2007)

Slide 12 R&D Process (continued) Overarching integration level project Integration of output from various ME-design related projects Integration of performance based information system with ME- design components in a single design method Delivery mechanisms Website for tracking progress on R&D process and sharing general information Any content (documents and software) developed as part of the project available for use on the project website Immediate, short, medium and long-term output User-manual with an overview of the method Detail technical documents on individual components Technical guidelines, test protocols and method specifications

Temperature Moisture content Density Grading Atterberg limits Binder content Binder properties Geometry PB/2006/A-2 Other? PB/2006/A-1 Grading PB/2006/B-1b PB/2006/B-1a PB/2006/B-1c UCS Stress and strain at break Time/previous loading HMA Unbound Stabilized PB/2006/B-4 PB/2006/A-3 PB/2006/A-4 PB/2006/C-1 PB/2006/C-3 PB/2006/C-4 PB/2006/C-5 Resilient response models Damage models PB/2006/D-1 HMA Unbound PB/2006/D-2 Other? Stabilized PB/2006/D-3 Subgrade PB/2006/D-2 PB/2006/E-3 Computer solution PB/2006/E-1 and PB/2006/E-2 PB/2006/B-2 and PB/2006/B-3 PB/2006/C-2 PB/2006/B-4

Slide 15 ImmediateShort-termMedium-term PB/2006/A-1 Tyre loading and contact stress information system  Information system shell with available data PB/2006/A-4 Effects of vehicle dynamics on traffic input for pavement design  Forward modelling of dynamic axle load spectra  Backward modelling of static axle load spectra PB/2006/A-3 Traffic survey and design traffic calculation guidelines  A contact stress and traffic survey strategy for southern Africa  Dynamic error adjustment  Revision of guidelines and method specifications`  Ongoing population of information system PB/2006/A-2 Traffic volume and axle load information system  Information system shell with available data: Data filters Bias adjustment Random (dynamic effect) error adjustment  Ongoing population of information system PB/2006/C-1 PB/2006/ILP Integration level project  Guidelines and method specs for contact stress and traffic surveys  TMH 8 & TRH 16  Training material

Slide 16 ImmediateShort-termMedium-term PB/2006/C-3 PB/2006/B-4  Calibrated models for an extended range of materials A design input information system for road-building materials  Updated refusal density models  Calibrated resilient response models PB/2006/B-3  Guidelines Material testing, interpretation of results and deriving design input PB/2006/B-1a Resilient response models for unbound material  Static model = f (D, MC, σ)  Dynamic model = f (D, MC, σ)  Test protocols and model calibration procedures  Ongoing model calibration  Link to engineering parameters  Long-term changes PB/2006/B-1b Resilient response models for HMA material  Static model = f (T, mix)  Dynamic model = f (T, mix)  Test protocols and model calibration procedures  Ongoing model calibration  Long-term changes  Link to engineering parameters  Resilient response master curves PB/2006/B-1c Resilient response models for stabilised material  Tri-axial or flexural testing?  Static model = f (mix)  Dynamic model = f (mix)  Test protocols and model calibration procedures  Ongoing model calibration  Long-term changes  Link to engineering parameters PB/2006/B-2 Agreement between resilient modulus results from different tests  Guidelines for deflection bowl utilisation  Fundamental principles of different tests  Static and dynamic back-calculation  Agreement between test methods PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

Slide 17 ImmediateShort-termMedium-term PB/2006/C-1 Improved modelling of non-uniform contact stress distribution  Closed form solution for circular, non- uniform 3D contact stress  Finite element (FE) solution for irregular shape, non-uniform 3D contact stress PB/2006/C-2 A benchmark of stress and strain in a variety of pavements  1 st order system for measuring T, σ, , , p suc  Benchmark set of T,σ, , , p suc  Wireless intelligent aggregate  Additional T, σ, , , p suc PB/2006/C-3 Modelling vertical and horizontal variation in pavement response related to the temperature and stress dependency of materials  Closed form solution Temp. gradient in AC Dens. and MC gradient in unbound Effective stress in unbound Stress dependency in unbound  FE solution 3D variation in temp. dens. MC and stress condition Thermally coupled analysis Effective stress in unbound PB/2006/C-4 Improved modelling of geometric non-linearity  Closed form solution with layer slip  FE solution with cracks  FE solution Perfect plasticity Dynamic response analysis  Closed form visco-elastic solution PB/2006/C-5 Improved modelling of material non-linearity and dynamic pavement response  FE solution Visco-elasto-plastic PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

Slide 18 ImmediateShort-termMedium-term PB/2006/D-3 Improved damage models for stabilized material  Final recommendation on appropriate damage models;  Accelerated curing procedures for simulating short and long-term aging;  Test protocols for yield strength, plastic strain and flexibility testing;  The effect of long-term changes on the yield strength, flexibility and plastic deformation resistance;  Recalibration of the effective fatigue damage model for cement-treated material.  Yield strength, plastic strain and flexibility models calibrated for a comprehensive range of stabilized materials at different stabilizer contents and different stages of curing PB/2006/D-1 Improved damage models for bituminous materials  Fatigue damage models based on overseas research  Plastic strain predictive models  Test protocols and damage model calibration procedures for bituminous material  PMS based damage distributions and expected life for surface seals and non-structural thin layer bituminous surfacings  SA based fatigue and plastic strain damage models for HMA surfacing and base courses  Mechanistic damage models for seals and non-structural thin layer bituminous surfacings PB/2006/D-2 Improved plastic strain and shear damage models for unbound material  A subgrade permanent deformation damage model  Calibrated yield strength and plastic strain damage models for unbound structural layers  Test protocols and model calibration procedures for unbound material  Ongoing calibration of yield strength and plastic strain damage models  Continuous damage models for non-linear recursive analysis  Yield strength and damage models related to engineering parameters PB/2006/B-3 PB/2006/B-4 PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

Slide 19 ImmediateShort-termMedium-term PB/2006/E-2 Guidelines on the collection and interpretation of statistical data  Guidelines for collecting sufficiently large data samples and method specifications for statistical analysis and interpretation of the input data for new and rehabilitation design;  Training material on the content of the above documents. PB/2006/ILP Integration level project PB/2006/E-1 Actual spatial and time variation of field variables, engineering parameters and the environment  Information system shell for Spatial and time variation of field variables and engineering parameters Spatial and time variation of environmental variables  Ongoing population of information systems  Models relating pavement conditions to environmental variables PB/2006/E-3 Design risk analysis and pavement performance simulation  Probabilistic simulation on design traffic and bearing capacity estimation to calculate design risk.  Linear recursive simulation for time-based modeling of pavement performance  Non-linear recursive simulation for time-based modeling of pavement performance