Bold Changes A Collaborative, Outcomes-Based Approach to RA Training Presented by Dawn M. Snyder Oregon State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Planning for the Revised Curriculum at Key Stage 3.
Overview Tuning Defined Tuning in the US The Tuning Process Benefits of Tuning Why Tuning is Different.
Victory begins with right perspective.. Objectives: At the end of the session, the participants should be able to:  define technical assistance (TA);
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
Preparing New A.P.S. Workers for the Field The Supervisor as Trainer.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
LIFEPATH East Tennessee State University College of Public Health Tennessee.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Experiential Learning Level III: Developing and Adapting Curricula to Integrate Experiential Learning Advanced Training Power Point by: Martin H. Smith.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
ASCA 3.0 vs. ASCA 2.0 What are the changes between the 2nd and 3rd editions of the ASCA National Model? A Brief Synopsis Gregg Curtis, PhD School Counseling.
1 Oregon Content Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd November 6, 2007.
Departmental Program Review completed December 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Understanding by Design
Welcome MAT Cohort Special Methods of Instruction I Summer 2012 GRAD 210 Dr. Bowles, Instructor.
Khazar University Lyudmila Sotova Bishkek, April 21.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Burden/Byrd Methods for Effective Teaching: Meeting the Needs of All Students, 6/e USING.
Making the Pieces Fit with Course Outcomes College Student Success Instructor Training August 2011.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Timberlane Regional School District
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
The Center Collaborators:. Focusing on: Ecosystem Health Climate Change and the Ocean The Land-Sea Interaction Fisheries and Ocean Education.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
Making the Pieces Fit with Course Outcomes College Student Success Instructor Training August 2011.
The Academy Experience: A Plan for Integrated Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Karen Kaemmerling Director of Training and Professional Development ELCC, April 2010.
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
ESL Program Retreat Marconi 2009 “Moving Forward Together” ESL Program Retreat Marconi Conference Center, Marin February 27-28, 2009 “Moving Forward Together”
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
LSAC Academic Assistance Training Workshop June 13 – 16, 2012 OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT – THE BASICS Janet W. Fisher Suffolk University Law School.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
You can replace this text with art Goal Setting Process for the Verona Public Schools Board of Education Facilitated by: Charlene Peterson, NJSBA Field.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
Prior Learning Assessment and the Transformative Process for Adult Learners A UMUC Pathway for Competency Based Education 2012 National Institute on the.
Child Welfare in Ontario: Implementing a Collaborative Intervention Model for Child Protection Services Finding the Key to Success Phase II September 2006.
(Re)Designing Your Earth-Related Course for Improved Student Learning NAGT Traveling Workshops Program University of Washington - Tacoma 23 October 2015.
How it applies to the management of AIVRS Programs
Jen LaMaster, Assistant Principal Brebeuf Jesuit Preparatory School.
EARLY LEARNING & KINDERGARTEN STANDARDS ALIGNMENT: A CLEAR PATH TO SUCCESS THROUGH ALIGNED STANDARDS August 18, 2015.
Curriculum Design & Review Process.  Understand the basic principles and elements of the Curriculum Design & Review Process (CDRP).  Using a CDRP framework,
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Training, Development & Performance Management Requirements, Tools and Best Practices.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Quality Assurance on School Direct Routes Phil Duggan Liverpool John Moores University.
Post University. INSTITUTION: Post University, Waterbury,CT NAMES of Team members: Dylan Clyne, Maura Bozeman and Randal Streck VISION – Our departmental.
Phase 1 Day 1 Session 6 School working groups. What new ideas do you want to explore? What will learning and schools be like in your future? What would.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.
December 7, 2015 COMPETENCY BASED EDUCATION: A NEW APPROACH TO ACCELERATION.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Academic Support Tuition project Phase 2
Professional Development
Presentation transcript:

Bold Changes A Collaborative, Outcomes-Based Approach to RA Training Presented by Dawn M. Snyder Oregon State University

Overview of the Session Context and why we decided to change training Outcome development process Implementation What we learned Question and answer

Why we decided to change training Context Our experiences as resident directors The blessing and the curse of having recently received your master’s degree Embracing the moment

Outcome development process Starting point Laying the foundation Assessment Curriculum/content development process

Starting Point Three basic questions for learning outcome and curricula development and assessment. What do you want students to learn or be able to do? (Learning Outcomes) How will you know they have learned what you wanted them to learn? (Assessment) How can they best learn these things or learn how to do these things? (Curricular/Content Development) These questions need to be asked in this order

Laying the foundation University, divisional, and departmental mission, vision, and goals ACUHO-I standards RA learning outcomes and EBI data Resident Director competency document from UMass-Amherst Interaction Model outcomes Academic Success and Engagement Community Responsibility Respect Identity Leadership

Assessment RA competency tool Self-evaluation Formal evaluation by supervisor EBI data Outgoing formal and informal evaluation

Curriculum and content development Wiggins and McTighe’s Backward Design Model Brainstorming essential information, activities, and presenters for each outcome Themes Gap analysis All sessions mapped back to at least one learning outcome, often more

Implementation Collaborative Developed communication, helping, and confrontation skills workshops Worked with people outside our unit and department Used outcomes and content themes to format schedule Learning styles

What we learned Things don’t go as planned and change is hard Communicating expectations to partners and presenters is a key part of success RA were very receptive to new approach Focus, focus, focus

Any questions?