TPC Meeting | April 16-17, 2013Garmin International | Olathe, KS H. Regulatory Review - Part/CS 23 Reorganization Rulemaking - Part/CS 27 & 29 Certification Process Study

Part-23 Reorganization  Recognizes That Rules Must be Tailored to Product Characteristics to Maximize Safety Benefits  A single level of safety and certitude are not applicable across all aircraft and operations  Striking the right balance between risk and certification requirements is critical to enabling new safety technology

Small Airplane Revitalization Act of 2013  Directs FAA to Enact Spirit of Part 23 Reorganization ARC by December 31 st 2015  H.R Passed in July to 0 Vote  S.1072 Moving Through Senate

Federal Aviation Administration 4 U.S. Aviation Fatal Accident Rates Annual Average from 2005 through 2009 Safety Continuum – Future of Part 27 & 29 Discussion March 5, 2013 PHOTO BY: Oscar Perez/Casa Grande Dispatch

Federal Aviation Administration Society’s Safety Expectations – Circa Society’s Demand for Safe Outcomes Commercial General Aviation Absolute Safety Zero Risk No Operations Societally Accepted Risk (1940s) Safety Continuum – Future of Part 27 & 29 Discussion March 5, 2013 PHOTO: Public Domain

Federal Aviation Administration Society’s Safety Expectations – 2013 Continuously Advancing… 6 Absolute Safety Zero Risk No Operations Societally Accepted Risk (2013) Society’s Demand for Safe Outcomes Safety Continuum – Future of Part 27 & 29 Discussion March 5, 2013 RC UAS

Federal Aviation Administration Society’s Safety Expectations – 2018 Continuously Advancing… 7 Absolute Safety Zero Risk No Operations Societally Accepted Risk (2018) Society’s Demand for Safe Outcomes Safety Continuum – Future of Part 27 & 29 Discussion March 5, 2013 UAS RC

Federal Aviation Administration Applying the Safety Continuum System Safety 8 Safety Continuum – Future of Part 27 & 29 Discussion March 5, 2013 Optimal certification rigor is key to advancing safety Too little rigor  safety escapes Too much rigor  innovative safety enhancements don’t reach the fleet FIGURE: FAA System Safety Handbook Angle of Attack Indicators PHOTO: Alpha Systems AOA Seatbelt Airbags PHOTO: AmSafe Emergency Auto Land Systems PHOTO: Vertical Power Inc. Carbon Monoxide Detectors PHOTO: CO Guardian LLC Ballistic Recovery Parachutes PHOTO: BRS Aerospace

Systems & Equipment Technical Solutions that meet standards Test specifications Specific compliance methods Powerplant: Engine Installation Technical Solutions that meet standards Test specifications Specific compliance methods Structures: Design Loads & Conditions Technical Solutions that meet standards Test specifications Specific compliance methods Structures General Technical Solutions that meet standards Test specifications Specific compliance methods Separating Safety Requirements from Methods of Compliance Current CS 23 New CS 23 High-level requirements. (safety driven) NO technical solutions prescribed No tiers or categories International Aviation Community EASA Reorganise technical requirements in design standards documents. Flight Characteristics, Performance, & Operating Limits Technical Solutions that meet standards Test specifications Specific compliance methods Extract intent of rule and rewrite into new high level rule. EASA Acceptance EASA Acceptance Detailed Design Standards - Tiered where it makes sense - Contains detailed compliance requirements - Current CS/Part 23 used as a starting basis

Timelines of Change EASA CS23 Process 2014 JAN FEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC 2015 JAN MARAPRMAYJUNJULFEBAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC NPA OCTNOVDECSEP Begin RMT.0498 FAA P23 Process Preliminary Cost Benefit Rulemaking Action Plan Leadership & Legal Review NPRM Internal Rulemaking Begins ASTM GA Standards Process Jacksonville Face-to-Face Wichita Face-to-Face Toronto Face-to-Face TBD Face-to-Face Volume 1.0 Standards Published Ballot 1-1 Ballot 1-2 Ballot 1-3 Ballot 1-4

CS-23 Reorganisation  Revision of Current CS-23 to Match Part 23 Amdt. 62 (RMT.0039)  Revision of Next CS-23 to Harmonize w/FAA Reorganization Rulemaking (RMT.0498)  Start Rulemaking Q  NPA Q  Decision Q2 2016

ASTM F44 General Aviation Aircraft  Development and Maintenance of Internationally Accepted Standards for General Aviation Aircraft.  186 International Members  Regulators  Aviation Manufacturers  Operating Groups  20 New Standards Under Development

Draft GA Design Standards  F44.10 General  Elements of AW  AW Design  Guide for Formatting Standards  F44.20 Flight  Characteristics, Performance, & Operating Limits  ICA placeholder  F44.30 Structures  Structures General  Design Loads & Conditions  Aeroelasticity  Emergency Conditions & Occupation Safety  Structural Durability  Design and Construction  ICA  F44.40 Powerplant  Engine Installation  Fuel Systems  Control and Indication  Propellers  Hazard Mitigation  Electric Propulsion  F44.50 Systems & Equipment  Systems & Equipment  F44.91 Terminology  Terminology

Timelines of Change EASA CS23 Process 2014 JAN FEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC 2015 JAN MARAPRMAYJUNJULFEBAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC NPA OCTNOVDECSEP Begin RMT.0498 FAA P23 Process Preliminary Cost Benefit Rulemaking Action Plan Leadership & Legal Review NPRM Internal Rulemaking Begins ASTM GA Standards Process Jacksonville Face-to-Face Wichita Face-to-Face Toronto Face-to-Face TBD Face-to-Face Volume 1.0 Standards Published Ballot 1-1 Ballot 1-2 Ballot 1-3 Ballot 1-4

Meeting Schedule  October th 2013 – Jacksonville, USA  February th 2014 – Wichita, USA  May 6-8 th 2014 – Toronto, CA  October 2014 – TBD?  April th 2015 – Friedrichshafen, DE  October 2015 – New Orleans, USA  April 2016 – Beijing, CN

Join ASTM F44 Gregory Bowles – Chair of ASTM F44 Director, European Regulatory Affairs & Engineering GAMA Brussels │ Rue de la Science 14 B-1040 Brussels, Belgium +32 (0)

FAA Review of Part 27 & 29  FAA Planning 3-Activities:  “Safety Update” - Birdstrike, Crashworthiness Seats, Crashworthiness Fuel Tanks  “Regulatory Philosophy Review” – Examine 7.000lbs. Dividing Line  “Rotorcraft Displays” - Regulation Pertaining to Warnings, Cautions and Advisories

FAA Review of Part 27 & 29  Week of October 7 th, EASA to Formally Answer FAA on Rotorcraft Reform Participation –  EASA Does Not Believe CS-27&29 Reform is Necessary  EASA will Participate if FAA Goes Forward w/Reform  Technical Involvement & Leadership to Assure Review is Beneficial to Global Rotorcraft Industry  Needed: GAMA Meeting of Rotorcraft Industry ASAP to Discuss Increased Representation & Coordination