RDA - MARC Name: Huldah Raubenheimer Job Title: Cataloguer: University of the Free State Tel: 051 401 2511.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
Advertisements

Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Serials/Integrating Resources Charlene Chou March 18 th,
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP JANUARY 29, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY RDA Toolkit, Basic Cataloging.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
MARC 101 for Non-Catalogers Colorado Horizon Users Group Meeting Philip S. Miller Library Castle Rock, CO May 29, 2007.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... Library of Congress RDA Seminar, University of Florence, May 29-June 2, 2011.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
LC reference staff briefing Nov. 30, 2010 Judy Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Joy Anhalt Richard Stewart Reaching Forward May 6, 2011.
5: Describing Carriers and Content 1.Content type 2.Media type 3.Carrier type 4.Extent 5.Describing content 6.Other content attributes 5-1.
LSTA Digital Imaging Grants Presentation Projects Workshop September 13, 2002 Wendy Sistrunk Music Catalog Librarian University of Missouri—Kansas City.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
Fixed Fields Information Session 29 February 2012 Andrew Gloe Map Acquisitions & Cataloguing Team Australian Collections Management & Preservation Branch.
RDA for Print Materials 5 June 2013 Vicki Sipe. Resource Description and Access Timeline Tested and analyzed during Implemented March 31, 2013.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
Continuing Resources: Serials RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 3, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY.
RDA: eResources Name:Mandy Noble Job Title:Senior Librarian Tel: Your institution's logo.
Module 5 Key differences from AACR2 Recording Data Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
Highlights from recent MARC changes Sally McCallum Library of Congress.
Developing Databases and Selecting an Appropriate Library System.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Serials Cataloging with RDA. What is a serial? A resource issued in successive parts usually bearing numbering that has no predetermined conclusion (e.g.,
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Update MARC Change Summary Sally McCallum RDA Update Forum June 23, 2012 Library of Congress.
RDA: Benefits and opportunities Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Presented at the CIG Standards Forum,
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
RDA: an introduction Gordon Dunsire Presented to the Workshop on Conceptual Modelling for Archives, Libraries and Museums Jan 2010, National Gallery,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Presenter: Tito Wawire US Embassy, Library of Congress.
Strengthening Hybrid RDA/AACR2 Bibliographic Records La Donna Riddle Weber – November 2015.
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
An information retrieval system may include 3 categories of information:  Factual  Bibliographical  Institutional  Exchange and sharing of these categories.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
MARC Tags to BIBFRAME Vocabulary: a new view of metadata Sally McCallum Library of Congress ALA - January 2014.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
Theory, Tools, History: A Brief Introduction August 17, 2016.
Recording Identifiers for Manifestations
RDA Terminology Changes -and- Record Display Comparisons
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

RDA - MARC Name: Huldah Raubenheimer Job Title: Cataloguer: University of the Free State Tel:

Outline & Objectives AACR2 – MARC21 – RDA RDA MARC21 How will RDA change MARC? Proposed new codes MAP: MARC – RDA Proposed new fields Summary Conclusion

AACR2 – MARC21 - RDA AACR2 and MARC 21 are two different “standards” designed for two different purposes. AACR2 is the world’s most used content standard for bibliographic description and access. MARC 21 is largely an encoding standard. MARC 21 is only one possible schema for encoding records created using RDA, but it will also be possible to encode records created using RDA in other schemas, such as Dublin Core. RDA is being developed only as a content standard rather than an encoding standard. RDA will contain guidelines for choosing and recording data to include in bibliographic and authority records.

RDA A content standard A set of guidelines Focused on user tasks (Search, Identify, Select & Obtain)‏ An online product (with possible print “derivatives”)‏ An international standard An effort to make library catalog part of the Web environment Maybe used with encoding schemas such as MARC or Dublin Core An attempt to improve the way we describe relationships

Rick Block on MARC: Unlike some of his colleagues, he believes the MARC record has a future. He points out the example that Columbia has invested a great deal in it, even in its electronic displays. “We have millions of records in MARC,” says Block, “so I don’t think it will go away” Library Journal Nov. 15, 2008

MARC 21 MARC – MAchine-Readable Cataloging Mechanism by which computers exchange use interpret bibliographic information data elements Foundation of most library catalogs MARC – USMARC (1980’s) – MARC21 (1990’s)‏

How will RDA change MARC? RDA/MARC Working Group is to propose changes to MARC21 to accommodate encoding RDA data MARC is only one possible encoding schema for RDA RDA include mappings to MARC (appendix D)‏

Richness of MARC MARC – approximately 2000 elements Approximately 200 fields Approximately 1800 subfields The MARC richness/complexity is not fully exploited yet

Proposed new codes Additions to some 007 and 008 code lists For example: Non-projected graphic 007/01 (special material designation)‏ k – computer card in electronic resources d – disc type unspecified in electronic resources e – disc cartridge, type unspecified in electronic resources Non-projected graphic 007/04 (primary support material)‏ v – leather n – vellum i – plastic Music 008/20 (format of music)‏ h – chorus score i – condensed score j – performer-conductor part

MAP: MARC – RDA (1)‏ 245 Title statement |a Title |b Remainder of title |c Statement of responsibility, etc. |f Inclusive dates |g Bulk dates |h Medium |k Form |n Number of part/section of a work |p Name of part/section of a work |s Version Title proper Parallel title Other title information Parallel other title information Statement of responsibility relating to title N/A Title proper N/A

MAP: MARC – RDA (2)‏ 300 Physical description |a Extent |b Other physical details |c Dimensions |e Accompanying material |f Type of unit |g Size of unit 3.4 Extent 3.6 Base material 3.7 Applied material 3.8 Mount 3.9 Production method 3.11 Layout 3.14 Polarity 3.15 Reduction ratio 3.16 Sound characteristics 7.15 Illustrative content 7.17 Colour content 7.18 Sound content 3.5 Dimensions 3.12 Book format 27.1 Related manifestation N/A 3.5 Dimensions

MAP: MARC – RDA (3)‏ 500 General note |a General note …… 3.6 Base material 3.7 Applied material 3.8 Mount 3.9 Production method Layout 3.12 Book format Polarity 3.15 Reduction ratio 3.16 Sound characteristics Illustrative content Colour

100 – Author Entry under the first author regardless of the number of authors Only under an author who shares the responsibility for the whole work, not the first work in the collection The compiler continue to be the main entry for compilations such as bibliographies and indexes The relationship of an author to the first title in under that authors name in an OPAC hit list may differ from the relationship – prefer not to use relator code

110 – Corporate body as main entry Treaties are entered under the first country mentioned, regardless of number or alphabetical order

130 – Uniform title as main entry Spell out O.T. and N.T. e.g. 130|aBible|pGenesis|lEnglish|f |aBible|pOld Testament|lHebrew…

2xx Use square brackets only for information not found in the item, regardless of source within the item. Brackets do not carry across subfields; bracket each date element separately

245 - Title 245 – record all authors given in prime source in 245|c In older records the title is the main entry – there’s no 100 field. RDA change: use the first author mentioned as 100. Do not supply [sic] after errors. Only use brackets for information from outside the resource. |h[GMD]:

246 Alternate title Alternate title which represents the whole work: |a Parallel title |a Cover title |a Added title page title |i At head of title:|aPhrase at head of title

250 – Edition statement Transcribe rather than abbreviate, e.g. 250 |aSecond edition.

260 - Imprint Transcribe jurisdiction as found, using abbreviations only if abbreviated in the source. Transcribe publishers as found, do not shorten or omit publishers’ names.

300 - Collation Insert ISBN punctuation if lacking Do not use abbreviations – spell out the pages, volumes, illustrations, but “cm.” is considered a symbol therefore not an abbreviation; “hr” is also still used for duration. e.g. 3 volumes:|billustrated. ;|c28 cm. Use patron familiar terms for e.g. CD, CD-ROM, DVD, DVD-ROM and VHS.

4XX 440 – obsolete change to and cut and paste into – Transcribe |v terms and numbers as found on item

5XX Notes are free form – ISBD punctuation does not apply. 505 Take advantage of the fact that 505 is repeating – do it for each volume or named major part

700 Trace all authors as opposed to only 2 nd and 3 rd. Relator codes will be deleted on export of the item because the relationship of an author’s name in the OPAC hitlist may differ from the relationship to subsequent title’s

830 – Series Transcribe |v terms and numbers as found on item

Proposed new fields and subfields RDA introduces three new fields of description to replace General Material Designators (GMD)‏ Content – RDA core element Media type – RDA optional element Carrier – RDA core element

Content, media type and carrier (1)‏ New fields: 336 (content type)‏ 337 (media type) replace GMD 338 (carrier type) (i.e. 245|h)‏ New subfields : (various fields)|d or |f or |u – relationship designators –

Content, media type and carrier (2)‏ Examples: Content: still image, text, notated music… Media type: audio, projected, unmediated… Carrier: microfiche audio disc, online resource…. Terms vs code: Content:still image – [sti]text = [txt] Media type:audio = [a]unmediated = [u] Carrier:microfisce = [me]audio disc = [ad]

Using MARC Content type: 336 (R)‏ 336##|aperformed music|2rdacontent 336##|atwo-dimensional moving image|2rdacontent 336##|atext|2rdacontent Media type: 337 (R) remember media type is optional in RDA 337##|aaudio|2rdamedia 337##|avideo|2rdameida|liner notes 337##|aunmediated|2rdamedia Carrier: 338 (R)‏ 338##|aaudio disc|2rdacarrier 338##|avideo disc|2rdacarrier 338##|asheet|2rdacarrier

Using MARC |aAbrahamsen, Hans,|d |aStratifications ; Nacht und Trompeten ; Concerto for piano and orchestra ; recompositions /|c Hans Abraham. GMD replaced by: Content type – performed music media type – audio carrier type – audio disc 1|aperformed music|2rda content 2|aaudio|2rda media 3|aaudio disc|2rda carrier

Summary Many changes were approved at MARBI in January 2009 and will be listed on the online version of MARC A few more will be discussed at MARBI in July 2009 More subfields for 033 and 518 Encoding Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI’s) to link to registries of controlled values MARC 21 update no. 10 will be officially published later this year

Conclusion Library of Congress: online MARC21 as official We can start creating RDA records after the official publication of MARC21 update 10. The data elements should be available on our systems. Should start communities of practice. Experimentation: Record creation process/workflows Display Compatibility of data derived form a digital source

References conference+2009+presentation+materialshttp://tsig.wikispaces.com/Pre- conference+2009+presentation+materials

Blogs to follow

Challenges are what make life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful. -Joshua J. Marine