2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Surdex Team 2005 NAIP Post Season Summary 6 December, 2005 Ron Hoffmann, President Craig Molander, SVP Business Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Obstruction Surveys and Airport Airspace Analysis
Advertisements

Testing Relational Database
2008 NAIP Orthoimagery Update Chris Cialek MN Land Management Information Center May 7, 2008.
REQUIRING A SPATIAL REFERENCE THE: NEED FOR RECTIFICATION.
The Farm Service Agencys National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) Presentation for the U. S. Geological Survey Eastern Region Geography State Cooperators.
OPSM 639, C. Akkan Project Closure Conditions for project closure. –Normal –Premature: early completion due to some parts of the project being eliminated.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
Software Measurement and Process Improvement
ESA SSA SWE element status and near future plans 7th European Space Weather Week November, Brugge, Belgium Juha-Pekka Luntama Space Weather.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 South-Western. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 System Design and Implementation System Design and.
Implementation/Acceptance Testing / 1 Implementation and Acceptance Testing Physical Implementation Criteria: 1. Data availability 2. Data reliability.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
NAIP POST-SEASON MEETING December 6, 2005 ACQUISITION TEAM MEMBERS Contractor:# Planes Great Lakes Aerial – OH1 – PA31 Navajo Woolpert – OH2 – Cessna.
How the Change Control Process Affects Project Quality
Imagery for Supporting FSA Farm Programs Review FSA Requirements for Imagery Identify and Evaluate Possible Alternatives Recommend Plan of Action Objectives.
USDA Farm Service Agency National Agricultural Imagery Program Presented by Dan Janes, GIS Specialist North Dakota State Office.
Geospatial Concepts for Executives April 11, 2007 Shirley Hall GIS Program Manager USDA-FSA Geospatial Information Systems in the Farm Service Agency.
A erial S ervices I nc. Team 2008 NAIP Post Season Summary 19 November 2008 Kirk Fisher, VP, CFO, Director of Flight Operations Coral Schneberger, CP,
NIROPS Update: Phoenix System and IR Operations in 2012.
Shirley Hall GIS Program Manager Farm Service Agency Homeland Infrastructure Foundation – Level Data (HIFLD) Working Group Meeting.
CS4723 Software Validation and Quality Assurance Lecture 15 Advanced Topics Test Plans and Management.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
Farm Service Agency National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Pecora Conference November 13, 2002 Denver, Colorado Kent Williams, USDA FSA Aerial Photography.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
2005 NRI Photography Report Dorsey Plunk National Cartography and Geospatial Center Fort Worth, Texas.
Requirements Engineering CSE-305 Requirements Engineering Process Tasks Lecture-5.
Advanced Ortho Image Processing IGIC Advanced Ortho Image Processing Outline ■About Surdex ■Digital Acquisition Trends ■Image Processing ■Image.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. Outline Project Scheduling.
National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes USDA Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah December 4-6, 2006 Kent Williams NAIP Program.
Welcome and Introductions Calendar Overview Acquisition Status Final Product Specs Final Ortho Status – with Kucera DAT Process – with IntraSearch Feedback.
FSA State Office NAIP Training Kent Williams Cindy Sessions David Davis Brian Vanderbilt June 15, 2006.
Aerial Services Inc. Brief Overview of NAIP 2005 Participation.
December 2, 2008 Salt Lake City, Utah W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial Photography Field Office USDA Imagery Planning & Coordination.
National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) National States Geographic Information Council September 15, 2003 Nashville, Tennessee W. Geoffrey Gabbott,
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
Generic GFE Implementation Toolset for Prime Contractors -IUID Guidance- –Initial population of Government Furnished Equipment Data into the IUID Registry.
2007 NAIP Request for Information USDA Planning & Coordination Meeting John Mootz USDA-FSA-APFO December 7, 2006.
> The Geospatial Experts 2005 NAIP Post Season Meeting Lessons Learned Jaymes Pardue, Senior Account Manager Paul Currie, Project Manager December 06,
Managing Contractors & Survey Data Presented by Bruce Carter.
Harris.com Alex Murray | DCIS Benefits Lead DCIT Brief Data Comm Benefits & Metrics Alignment with DC Program, NIWG, & NAC.
11/19/20081 NAIP 2008: Issues and Enhancements Zack Adkins NAIP 2008 Post Mortem November 19, 2008.
Wisconsin Aerial Imagery Ted Koch, Wisconsin State Cartographer’s Office WLIA 2005 Annual Conference February 24 th, 2005 Wisconsin Aerial Imagery
2005 NAIP Survey Brian Vanderbilt X240
Small Area Aerial Photography Contract December 5 - 9, 2005 Salt Lake City, Utah Geoff Gabbott, Sherry Holyoak, Jacque LaCroix USDA, FSA, Aerial Photography.
Fees and Services John Curran President and CEO. Situation Fee Structure Review Panel completed and discharged – Final Fee Structure Review Report released.
North West Group.  Team resources:  7 Cessna Conquest’s  9 ADS40-II SH52 sensors  Used 2008 season (Peak):  7 Conquests  7 ADS40’s  EarthData and.
USDA - FSA Aerial Photography Field Office NAIP 2005 Dec 6, 2005 Christopher Maika Triathlon Ltd. Sales Director, Mapping MDA GSI (Geospatial Services.
National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP Contract Overview May , 2006 NDOP Steering Committee Meeting Syracuse, New York W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting.
Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.
Operational and Postimplementation
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
2005 Program Highlights 151,658 quarter quads under contract 151,658 quarter quads under contract 83% acquired within flying season83% acquired within.
FSA Geospatial Support Kevin Clarke USDA-FSA-APFO USDA Planning Meeting Dec 11-13, 2007.
2006 Index Scanning Project Photo, Line, and Spot Indexes Brian Vanderbilt GIS Specialist USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office
SPP Presentation. Recommendation Status Update Ty Mitchell Entergy Stakeholders Meeting August 22, 2006 Houston, TX.
Romilos Restaurant Pedro Gonzalez. Introduction  Family owned Italian/Greek Restaurant  Restaurant is located in Severna Park, MD  Robinson Crossing.
National Agriculture Imagery Program 2006 NAIP Contract Plans December 5, 2005 USDA NAIP Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting.
© 2006, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc. Privileged and confidential information. Distribution or copying prohibited unless approved in writing NAIP.
12/12/ NAIP Post-Mortem Review John Mootz.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
U.S. Dept of Agriculture 1-m Orthophotography 2008 NAIP Post-Mortem Meeting 19 November 2008 Peter Briere Senior Program Manager, 3001 contact: ;
CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach Stacen Tyskiewicz WECC CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016.
DHS Health Care Services Study: Potential Coverage Strategies for the Non-Disabled Population Michael Bailit Bailit Health Purchasing, LLC March 18, 2004.
Simplifying Travel How We Manufacture Time, Increase Productivity and Reduce Costs An educational presentation on why businesses and individuals use private.
CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach
Global Sourcing Home Contacts:
Organizational Aspects of Multi-Agency Imagery and LiDAR Programs
Presentation transcript:

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Surdex Team 2005 NAIP Post Season Summary 6 December, 2005 Ron Hoffmann, President Craig Molander, SVP Business Development John Boeding, SVP Production/Operations Tim Bohn, NAIP/NRI Project Manager

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Team Project Areas 7 complete states – all natural color, film acquisition Additional state (Indiana) for PhotoScience team – processing only (aerotriangulation  CCM production) Flight line miles: ~166,000 DOQQs: 41,982 (including Indiana) Counties: 656 (including Indiana)

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Team Members Surdex Corporation – prime contractor, all production Keystone Aerial Surveys – flying and scanning Great Lakes Aerial Surveys – flying Horizons – flying Tim Tyler Surveying and Mapping – flying

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Aerial Photography 11 Aircraft (5 companies) – 8 pistons, 3 turbines  GE/MJ Harden unable to participate as planned – equipment problems with leased aircraft >96% efficiency (<4% rejections)

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Photography Performance Granted early start in Nebraska Over-ran only Wisconsin (3 days) Flew over 80% of total days

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Timeline Analysis From production databases, the following dates were tracked for analysis:  Acquisition of photography  Image scanning (through QC)  Aerotriangulation blocks (“AT blocks”)  DOQQ/ortho generation  Balancing (OrthoVista, “ovistas”)  Shipment of CCMs Note: little, if any, time difference between AT blocks and ortho generation (aerotriangulation actually initiates ortho scripts)

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Oklahoma Timeline

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Oregon Timeline

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Timeline Analysis

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Overall Performance Primary indicator is “time delay” relating acquisition of photography to shipment of CCM Most critical to end-users performing Compliance Measure of production performance Time delay = days from last exposure acquired in a county until shipment of the CCM

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Overall Performance

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Overall Performance

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Time Delays by Project Area

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Total Effort – Normalized

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Normalized Differences

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Observations Time from acquisition to completion of scanning is single largest time difference  If flying goes smoothly, scanning will lag Scanning through completion of AT blocks/orthos next largest  Often related to “fractionated” areas where flying is incomplete – must wait until there is enough to work with

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary New Implementations Continuing investment in the enhancement of flight and production databases:  Development undertaken before and during project  More items and metrics tracked than in previous years  More queries and reports created in response to production requirements  Daily posting of standard status reports  Real-time status queries

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary New Implementations Scanned imagery saved at 12 bits/pixel – took remapping to 8 bpp out of the hands of the image scanner software Colorimetry handled using look-up tables for groups of exposures (eg: a mission) Dodging, colorimetry, remapping (12  8bpp) performed in a single step Less setup time required Less subjectivity by scanning technician More consistent colorimetry and tone balance

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary New Implementations Automated prediction of smearing and occlusions in DOQQs due to rugged terrain (eg: Oregon)  Ray trace algorithm using photo geometry and DEM  Occlusions and “grazing slopes” detected  Independent of orthorectification  Results contained in database  Pixel masks/shape files created for assessment  Eliminated need for specific QC Initial CCMs delivered with only “touch-up” for extremely bad areas (not affect agricultural areas) DOQQs/CCMS revised before final deliveries (using areas from adjoining DOQQs/orthos)

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary New Implementations Established standard schedule for full-time Surdex pilots  15 days in field, followed by  5 days off  Back-up crews work 5-day stints Less fatigue on aircrews Better for the “home front” – known schedules Aircraft maintenance performed during most crew exchanges Nearly all required aircraft inspections performed in- house

2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Recommendations Increase percentage of initial payment (60% - 70%) to accommodate increasing cost of acquisition (fuel…) If more stringent specifications are adopted, consider initial CCM delivery at less stringent specifications to avoid lengthening delivery schedules If sample products are used, suggest using raw imagery to ensure approval timeframe does not interfere with product delivery Request ’05 survey results prior to beginning of ’06 work to ensure user issues are addressed Examine use of MG3 compression – which is proprietary, time-consuming, error-prone