FAST (Femoral Artery Stenting Trial) Final Results Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENDEAVOR IV Acronym: ENDEAVOR IV. Lead investigator: Dr Martin Leon from Columbia University, New York Source: Transcatheter cardiovascular Therapeutics,
Advertisements

M.Unverdorben; ACC March 2008 Martin Unverdorben Rotenburg/Fulda, Germany and Richmond, VA, USA Clinical Research Institute, Center for Cardiovascular.
DEFINITIVE AR - Acute Outcomes -
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
Zilver PTX Trial Bhagat K. Reddy, MD, FACC
Superficial Femoral Artery Stents - Bare, Covered, or Drug-Coated – “The Data and The HYPE” Dennis F. Bandyk, MD Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery.
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators Professor of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute, Asan.
M.Unverdorben; TCT Problem The treatment of stenoses of small coronary arteries (SVD) and of restenoses after stent deployment (ISR) still show.
Chaim Lotan MD, Yaron Almagor MD, Karel Kuiper MD, M.J. Suttorp MD, William Wijns MD The SICTO Study CYPHER TM Sirolimus-eluting stent in Chronic Total.
Wires, balloons, drug-eluting devices, ect.
As presented by Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC Principal Investigator Thoraxcentre - Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands PISCES Paclitaxel.
Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology LINC 2014 DEFINITIVE AR Severe Ca++ Arm 30-Day Results Gunnar Tepe, MD On behalf.
Is There Still a Controversy About Stent Type for TASC C&D Lesions
1 Percutaneous Below-The-Knee Stent Implantation Among 468 Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: Pooled Analysis And Comparison Of Drug-Eluting Versus.
DES-BTK: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared to Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Infrapopliteal.
SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT NEOINTIMAL PROLIFERATION AS COMPARED TO BARE METAL STENTS IN DISEASED SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFTS: 6-month IVUS.
TAXUS ATLAS Trial Presented at The EuroPCR meeting Paris, France May 2006 Presented by Dr. Mark Turco TAXUS ATLAS 9-Month Results: Evaluation of TAXUS.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
12-Month Analysis Barry T. Katzen MD, FACR, FACC Founder and Medical Director Baptist Cardiac & Vascular Institute.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions – Balloon Angioplasty versus primary Stenting: A prospective, multi-centre, randomised.
Prospective, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent versus Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis.
: PROFI : A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Proximal Balloon Occlusion vs. Filter Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting Klaudija.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
DES-BTK: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (SES) Compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMS) in Patients with.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug- Eluting Stent Restenosis PEPCAD-DES.
UpdateDEB Lesions Learned from the Trials and Daily Clinical Practice Ralf Langhoff, MD Center for Vascular Medicine Berlin-Wilmersdorf St. Gertrauden.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Vascular Surgery – Director: prof. Coppi Silingardi R. Veronesi J. Gennai S.
FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital,
FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital,
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Heparin-Bonded Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Pilot Trial of Cryoplasty or Conventional Balloon.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting.
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
4EVER results Koen Deloose, MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose
INFRATIBIAL INTERVENTIONS Current Results with DES
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
Heavily calcified SFA lesions do not avoid the use of 4 F systems
Stent Graft for the Treatment of ISR:
TAXUS II: Slow Release Formula An International, Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded Trial of TAXUSTM NIRxTM SR Stent Presented at TCT 2002.
Angiographic Features of Atherosclerotic Superficial Femoral Artery Disease in Diabetics and Non-diabetics Presenting with Claudication Atif Mohammad,
Current Results of Drug Coated Balloons for Infrapopliteal Disease
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
Modern treatment of SFA
The Role of Interventional Treatment for The Failing Grafts
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
Insights from the IMPERIAL and MAJESTIC SFA Studies
Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease
Are we using fewer Covered Stents for SFA Occlusive Disease?
Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Non Stress/Benestent Disease
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
TAXUS II: Moderate Release Formula An International, Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded Trial of TAXUSTM NIRxTM MR Stent Presented at TCT 2002.
REALITY: 8 month results
First clinical trial of nitinol self-expanding everolimus-eluting stent implantation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease  Johannes Lammer, MD, Marc.
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-term Outcomes in the
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
Presentation transcript:

FAST (Femoral Artery Stenting Trial) Final Results Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof. Schofer, Prof. Mathey & Partners Hamburg, Germany Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof. Schofer, Prof. Mathey & Partners Hamburg, Germany

Institution Investigators Enrollment Berlin, Germany H. Steinkamp 60 Bad Krozingen, Germany T. Zeller 57 Hamburg, Germany H. Krankenberg 39 Leipzig, Germany D. Scheinert 28 Berlin, Germany K.L. Schulte 18 Tübingen, Germany G. Tepe 4 Vienna, Austria E. Minar 14 Bonheiden, Belgium P. Peeters 13 Dendermonde, Belgium M. Bosiers 5 Mirano, Italy B. Reimers 4 Bern, Switzerland F. Mahler 3 Institution Investigators Enrollment Berlin, Germany H. Steinkamp 60 Bad Krozingen, Germany T. Zeller 57 Hamburg, Germany H. Krankenberg 39 Leipzig, Germany D. Scheinert 28 Berlin, Germany K.L. Schulte 18 Tübingen, Germany G. Tepe 4 Vienna, Austria E. Minar 14 Bonheiden, Belgium P. Peeters 13 Dendermonde, Belgium M. Bosiers 5 Mirano, Italy B. Reimers 4 Bern, Switzerland F. Mahler 3 FAST Participating Centers

FAST Purpose To assess the efficacy of nitinol stent implantation (Bard ® Luminexx ® 3 Vascular Stent [C.R. Bard, Inc.]) vs. stand-alone balloon angioplasty (PTA) in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease : Binary restenosis (>50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound) at 12 months Primary Endpoint: Binary restenosis (>50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound) at 12 months To assess the efficacy of nitinol stent implantation (Bard ® Luminexx ® 3 Vascular Stent [C.R. Bard, Inc.]) vs. stand-alone balloon angioplasty (PTA) in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease : Binary restenosis (>50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound) at 12 months Primary Endpoint: Binary restenosis (>50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound) at 12 months The The Bard ® Luminexx ® 3 Vascular Stent is not available in the U.S.

FAST Hypothesis Assumptions: 12-month restenosis rate in the PTA arm: 45% 12-month restenosis rate in the nitinol stent arm: 25% (relative reduction by 44%) To establish this difference (45% vs. 25%) with statistical significance (2-sided  error of 0.05, 80% power) and assuming a 15% drop-out rate, a total of 244 patients (122 per arm) would be required. Assumptions: 12-month restenosis rate in the PTA arm: 45% 12-month restenosis rate in the nitinol stent arm: 25% (relative reduction by 44%) To establish this difference (45% vs. 25%) with statistical significance (2-sided  error of 0.05, 80% power) and assuming a 15% drop-out rate, a total of 244 patients (122 per arm) would be required.

FAST Key Inclusion Criteria Clinical: Rutherford classification ≥ 2 Angiographic: Single de novo SFA lesion ≥ 1 cm from origin Target lesion length 1–10 cm (visual estimate) Target lesion stenosis 70–100% (visual estimate) Popliteal artery patent At least one infrapopliteal artery patent (for distal run-off) Clinical: Rutherford classification ≥ 2 Angiographic: Single de novo SFA lesion ≥ 1 cm from origin Target lesion length 1–10 cm (visual estimate) Target lesion stenosis 70–100% (visual estimate) Popliteal artery patent At least one infrapopliteal artery patent (for distal run-off)

FAST Trial Profile 244 Patients PTA (n = 121) R Intention-to-Treat Analysis PTA (n = 108) Stent (n = 136) Crossover (n = 13 [11%]) On-Treatment Analysis Luminexx® 3 (C.R. Bard) Stent (n = 123) 12/03–3/05:

FAST Lesion Characteristics Lesion length (visual estimate) p = Prevalence of stenoses vs. total occlusions % stenosis of non-occluded lesions p = 0.133

FAST 12-Month Results Binary Restenosis (1 ry End Point) p = 0.554p = /10132/10134/9037/112

0.70 ( ) 0.94 ( ) 0.53 ( ) FAST 12-Month Results – ITT Impact of treatment modality on 12-month restenosis in patient/lesion subgroups Women Men Normal cholesterol Hyperlipidemia Smoker (ex/current) Hypertension Nondiabetics Diabetics baseline Total baseline Lesion length ≤50mm Lesion length >50mm No distal vessel occluded ≥1 distal vessels occluded Stent betterPTA better 1.52 ( ) 0.59 ( ) 0.43 ( ) 1.00 ( ) 0.97 ( ) 0.52 ( ) 0.48 ( ) 0.84 ( ) 0.51 ( ) 0.73 ( ) 0.73 ( ) 0.93 ( ) 0.50 ( ) OR (95% CI) No calcification Calcification

FAST Difference in Restenosis 12 Months Absolute reduction in restenosis rate (RR) con- ferred by stenting in selected patient subgroups -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% RR [Stent] – RR [PTA] MenWomenDiabeticsSmokers Total Occlusions Mod./sev. Calcification ≥1 dist. ves. occluded RR [PTA]43.4% (76)24.0% (25)38.7% (31)40.3% (72)45.5% (22)44.4% (45)36.1% (36) RR [Stent]31.2% (61)32.5% (40)23.1% (39)26.2% (65)29.7% (37)29.6% (44)22.0% (41) Point estimate with 95% CI -15.6% -12.3% +8.5% -14.1% -15.7% -14.9% -14.2%

FAST 12-Month Results – ITT Stent fractures X-ray in 83/101 stent patients in whom restenosis was 12 months 10 stent fractures Stent fractures X-ray in 83/101 stent patients in whom restenosis was 12 months 10 stent fractures p = 0.719

FAST 12-Month Results Target Lesion Revascularizations p = 0.479p = /11517/11419/10219/127 –19%

FAST 12 Month Results – ITT Absolute walking distance and ankle-brachial index at rest in patients who were able to undergo treadmill testing at both baseline and 12-month follow-up p=0.936p=0.089p= p=0.007p=0.386p= FAST 12 Month Results – ITT

Absolute walking distance in patients who were able to undergo treadmill testing at both baseline and 12-month follow-up FAST 12 Month Results – ITT p=0.936p=0.089p= FAST 12 Month Results – ITT *medians and interquartile ranges

FAST 12 Month Results – ITT Change in Rutherford Category from baseline to 12 months in patients who were able to undergo treadmill testing at both baseline and 12-month follow-up *negative numbers denote improvement

FAST 12 Month Results – OT Change in Rutherford Category from baseline to 12 months in patients who were able to undergo treadmill testing at both baseline and 12-month follow-up *negative numbers denote improvement

FAST Conclusions The Femoral Artery Stenting Trial failed to demonstrate the hypothesized difference in 12- month restenosis between Luminexx ® nitinol stenting and stand-alone PTA in the treatment of patients with short superficial femoral artery lesions. However, stent implantation was associated with a tendency towards markedly lower restenosis rates in a wide variety of patient subgroups. Prospective randomized trials in specific patient cohorts, such as diabetics, patients with total occlusions, or patients with impaired distal run- off, are warranted. The Femoral Artery Stenting Trial failed to demonstrate the hypothesized difference in 12- month restenosis between Luminexx ® nitinol stenting and stand-alone PTA in the treatment of patients with short superficial femoral artery lesions. However, stent implantation was associated with a tendency towards markedly lower restenosis rates in a wide variety of patient subgroups. Prospective randomized trials in specific patient cohorts, such as diabetics, patients with total occlusions, or patients with impaired distal run- off, are warranted.