Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Navy Publication Hierarchy Joint, Multi-Service, Allied, Multinational Pubs Review Authorities Navy Pub Revision Process Joint Pub Revision Process Joint Doctrine Development Tool (JDDT) Collection Requirements Management (CRM)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Navy Publication Hierarchy NWP NTTP NTRP FXP - fleet exercise publications NTRP – Navy tactical reference publication TACMEMO FXP

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Other Tactical Pubs JP Joint Pubs MTTP Multi-Service Pubs (ALSA), FM, NTTP, AFTTP, MCWP ATP Allied Pubs MTP Multinational Pubs

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Navy Review Authorities PRA Primary Review Authority Develops, reviews, maintains & approves NTTPs, NTRP & FXPs NWDC maintains & approves NWPs CRA Coordinating Review Authority Assists PRA in developing, reviewing & evaluating NTTPs, NTRPs & FXPs TCO Technical Cognizance Office Pub sponsor, provides technical assistance including funds & manpower CC Contributing Command Review Pub for technical accuracy & technical content

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Navy Pub Revision Process PD Program Directive Message issued by NWDC for development of new pub or revision to an existing pub Purpose & scope of the pub Assigns review authorities Chapter outline Lists existing Pubs impacted by the NTTP Development milestones & administrative procedures First & final draft Review authorities submit CRM

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process RFF Request for Feedback Joint Staff asks a host of general & specific questions about the utility of the pub & how to improve it SMEs in the warfare area with broad knowledge of related pubs GQ6 What sections of JP 3-02 are redundant, either internally or with other JPs; e.g., JPs 3-02.1, Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation Operations; and should be deleted or consolidated within JP 3-02 or with other JPs? Be specific; provide text and location. SQ4 Have the steps in the amphibious planning process changed? If so, what steps need to be added, deleted, or changed? Be specific; provide references and LO/LI text where needed. PD Program Directive Similar to Navy PD First & final draft Review authorities submit CRM

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d) JDDT Joint Doctrine Development Tool Automates the process for comment matrix creation & adjudication NIPR - .mil CAC-enabled access only Login to https://jddt.js.mil/ “unregistered user” / “returning user” Use JDDT Comment Key for TTGL review (i.e. TTGL4MAY12) PROs Automated comment correlation No need to download documents CONs Limited capability to search entire document Cumbersome to operate

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Joint Pub Revision Process (Cont’d)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Collection Requirements Management (CRM)

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Collection Requirements Management (CRM) Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Collection Requirements Management (CRM) Type C – Critical (Contentious issue that will cause non-concurrence with the publication) M – Major (Incorrect material that may cause non-concurrence with publication) S – Substantive (Faulty incorrect material) A – Administrative (grammar, punctuation, style, etc.) Page Decimal format (page 1-2 = 1.02; page IV-56 = 4.56) 0 – General Comments 0.xx - Preface, TOC, Executive Summary (Page i = 0.01, Page XI = 0.11) 1.xx – Chapter I 2.xx – Chapter II x.xx – Chapter x, etc. 51.xx – Appendix A 52.xx – Appendix B 52.01.xx - Annex A to Appendix B 99.xx – Glossary

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Collection Requirements Management (Cont’d) Paragraph List the paragraph in which the comment is located Use the entire paragraph/subparagraph; i.e. 1.b.(3)(k) or 3.2.1.1 Line The line on the designated page that pertains to the comment Use decimal form for multiple lines; 27-30 = 27.30 Comment General comment applies to the entire Pub or throughout the Pub example: Change all references to CV (or CV/CVN) to CVN Specific comments using line-out/underline format Copy sentence from the pub & paste to the CRM Line-out undesired information Underline suggested replacement information

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Collection Requirements Management (Cont’d) Examples Change: There are four three operational TLAM variants referenced in this publication. Add: The F/A-18 is a carrier capable twin-engine aircraft with maximum speeds above MACH 1.5 at 50,000 feet. Delete: The intent of this NTTP is to demonstrate that there are common tactics & procedures used by each of the principle warfare commanders (PWCs) and their coordinators. Rational Provide concise, objective explanation of the rationale for the comment Use references if available PRA will either accept - A, reject - R or accept with modification - M

Doctrine Development &TTP Publication Review Questions?