Team Phoenix March 15, 2006. Project Goal Our team will develop an air vehicle that will not only navigate a course autonomously while providing real.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSE 424 Final Presentation Team Members: Edward Andert Shang Wang Michael Vetrano Thomas Barry Roger Dolan Eric Barber Sponsor: Aviral Shrivastava.
Advertisements

Project Title Here IEEE UCSD Overview Robo-Magellan is a robotics competition emphasizing autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance over varied, outdoor.
Company Presentation.
Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
By: Evan Olson and Vishal Doshi. Introduction Autonomous Vehicles allow expanded capabilities over manned data collection Relatively low cost, versatile.
MicroCART Micro processor C ontrolled A erial R obotics T eam Abstract MicroCART is a group of EE/CprE students tasked with developing an autonomous helicopter.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
MASKS © 2004 Invitation to 3D vision Lecture 11 Vision-based Landing of an Unmanned Air Vehicle.
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
M & M EE 296 Final Presentation Spring 2004 Presentation Overview Team Member Introduction Project Overview Overall Design Description Final Project.
Image Processing of Video on Unmanned Aircraft Video processing on-board Unmanned Aircraft Aims to develop image acquisition, processing and transmission.
Micromouse Spring 2006 K A L The Pied Pipers. The Pied Pipers: Joanne – Programming Ken – Hardware Alyssa – Hardware Introduction of Team and Roles.
Simulating A Satellite CSGC Mission Operations Team Cameron HatcherJames Burkert Brandon BobianAleks Jarosz.
ODOS The Office of the Dean of Students. Projects Interactive Campus Map Global Positioning System - Device for the Visually Impaired Adjustable Table.
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Team Hollot By: Cory Brett Jonathan Katon Thomas Pavlu Haiyan Xu NavFocus Midway Design Review.
Μ - CART Microprocessor – Controlled Aerial Robotics Team (Ongo03) An Ongoing Senior Design Project Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa.
Embedded Microcomputer Systems Andrew Karpenko 1 Prepared for Technical Presentation February 25 th, 2011.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos, Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior,
Automated Ball Striker Joseph Black David Caloccia Gina Rophael Paul Savickas.
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
1.  The Autonomous Helicopter Navigation System 2010 is focused on developing a helicopter system capable of autonomous control, navigation and localising.
Sponsored by: Air Force Research Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base FAMU-FSU College of Engineering.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Landing a UAV on a Runway Using Image Registration Andrew Miller, Don Harper, Mubarak Shah University of Central Florida ICRA 2008.
Motivation Collision Avoidance – Inefficient airspace utilization – Increased air traffic workload – Use of obsolete technologies 2.
Vision-based Landing of an Unmanned Air Vehicle
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
Time and Monetary Budgets Repair ExpenseCost Autopilot Replacement$2,500 RX Antenna Replacement$55 Camera Lens Replacement$78 Camera Replacement$190 Total.
3-Point Bending Device to Measure Transmural Strains for Multilayer Soft Tissue Composite Week 1 Weekly Report Jennifer Olson Sarah Rivest Brian Schmidtberg.
Hardware Overview Autopilot Control Board- Serves as common platform for other components and has autopilot code and flight plans Battery- Powers the.
EE/CS 480 Fall University of Portland School of Engineering Project Osprey RC-VTOL Team Aaron Duane Jesse Fledderjohann Hilary Henderson Chris Hope.
Senior Design 1 Team Bull Trout Project: Elevator Navigating Robot Team –Kelly Kofoed –Nate Whitmore –Shane Moser –Zach Uhles University of Portland School.
Autonomous Air & Ground Surveillance Unit Objectives, Preliminary Specifications, and Option Analysis.
Submitted by: Giorgio Tabarani, Christian Galinski Supervised by: Amir Geva CIS and ISL Laboratory, Technion.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
VERTIGO 2 Validation Review Presentation April 6, 2005.
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 4 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition Navigation Michael Lebson - James McLane - Image Processing Hamad Al Salem.
By: Eric Backman Advisor: Dr. Malinowski.  Introduction  Goals  Project Overview and Changes  Work Completed  Updated Schedule.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition Navigation Michael Lebson - James McLane - Image Processing Hamad Al Salem.
Hardware Overview Autopilot Control Board- Serves as common platform for other components and has autopilot code and flight plans Battery- Powers the board.
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
Final Design Presentation AUVSI 2013 Student Unmanned Air Systems Competition Team 6: Autonomous Ariel Vehicle Robert Woodruff Matthew Yasensky Cristopher.
Roaming Security Robot Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.
FUFO project Final report.
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland Project Description: The X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions project is developing.
Underwater Network Localization Patrick Lazar, Tausif Shaikh, Johanna Thomas, Kaleel Mahmood University of Connecticut Department of Electrical Engineering.
Rajeev Rai Bhatia 2K7-MRCE-ME-040. Team: Rajeev R Bhatia Tushar Chugh Adeel Kidwai Mentor: Prof. M.S. Giri.
Final Year Project. Project Title Kalman Tracking For Image Processing Applications.
Design Review #2-Spring ‘13 Team 6: Autonomous Ariel Vehicle AUVSI 2013 Student Unmanned Air Systems Competition Ken Anderson, Arielle Duen, Eric Milo,
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 5 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
Final Semester 2 Presentation: April 24, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
Ted Hench Electronics. Our goals  Meet minimum contest guidelines with ability to expand  Stay within budget Balance the capability of our team with.
Interim Design Review AUVSI 2013 Student Unmanned Air Systems Competition Team 6: Autonomous Ariel Vehicle Robert Woodruff Matthew Yasensky Cristopher.
Auto-Park for Social Robots By Team Daedalus. Requirements for FVE Functional Receive commands from user via smartphone app Share data with other cars.
Software Narrative Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
End of Semester 1 Presentation: November 28, 2007.
Preliminary Design Review Group A3: HMS “Bloodhound” Matt Morris Matt Prygoski Jay Slaggert Fred Thwaites Dan Zibton Thursday, April 10, 2008.
Aaron Swenson Samuel Farnsworth Derek Stewart Craig Call.
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland X-pilot flight testing X-pilot groundstation demonstrating waypoint navigation.
PAX River Competition UK Aerial Robotics Team University of Kentucky.
UAV Vision Landing Motivation Data Gathered Research Plan Background
Jeff Kubascik Matt Rockey Joe Trefilek Paul Scheffler
EET2530 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Vision Tracking System
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 10  Spring 2008
Quanser Robotic Product Line 2015
Presentation transcript:

Team Phoenix March 15, 2006

Project Goal Our team will develop an air vehicle that will not only navigate a course autonomously while providing real time video footage, but will also allow us to win the UAV class competition on April 11, 2006.

Presentation Overview Status and Direction –Airframe –Autopilot –Navigation –Vision –User Interface Plan of Action

Airframe Recent Accomplishments –Lots of mechanical, electrical repairs –Successful testing Obstacles Encountered –Keeping hardware charged –Aerodynamics vs. structural integrity –Weather –Two faulty speed controls

Direction Testing, Testing, Testing Autopilot control loops Vision transmission Functional takeoff and landing using navigation system Maintain consistency in pre-flight preparation

Autopilot Status Report We successfully outsourced our jobs through the acquisition of new software by our superiors. Through repeated testing, we will continue to update the gains that allow the processor to properly perform navigation commands.

Navigation Only task path planning –Works well, but untested in the air Dynamic no-fly zones are “final” hurdle –“By hand” solution: no software integration Due March 22 nd –Integrated solution: planner pings VC Due April 1 st

Vision Objectives Accomplished: Implemented Feature Tracking both in Aviones and using the frame grabber. Used cvMatchTemplate with the CV_TM_COEFF method (accounts for changes in brightness of the image— works better) Implemented a Kalman Filter-like bias towards either the original image or the previous frame depending on the closer match Voltage regulator and connectors soldered to allow the camera to be powered by the UAV battery. Began code for GPS estimation

Direction Setbacks: –Camera transmitter never worked To Do: –Finish GPS estimation code (March 17) –Implement TCP/IP connection with Procerus virtual cockpit (March 24) –Mount camera on the plane with Airframe (ASAP- depending on transmitter)

GUI: Changing Gears Current Focus No longer replacing Virtual Cockpit Communicate with Virtual Cockpit (Telemetry, GPS) Communicate GPS estimation with Vision for target location Upload New Waypoints to Virtual Cockpit Display

Direction Determine which option: Learn TCP/IP syntax for QT Learn GUI for Visual Studios, and use Procerus code

Plan of Action Flights at least 3x per week Use extensive testing to modify airframe, autopilot gains, navigation algorithm, and vision code to enhance performance Implement workable GUI to simplify UAV performance

Conclusion Project Setbacks Subgroup Integration Questions