Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY10 Annual Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee December 6, 2010.
Advertisements

Davidson County General Sessions Mental Health Court Justice A. A
1 Implementation of HB 1736 September 1, OVERVIEW H.B. 1736, enacted during the 81 st Legislative Session, provided the following support for.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY11 Annual Report.
Reentry Division Update To: Reentry Task Force April 20, 2010.
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Senate Criminal Justice Committee October 7, 2009 Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections.
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
1 Florida Department of Corrections Presentations to the Senate Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations December 13, 2007.
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
Probation Reporting Contact Center (PRCC)
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
1 Link Out Making Better Connections Annie Trainor Program Manager Link Out / Konnect
Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force. Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force Members Judge Sharon Keller, Presiding Judge, Texas Court of Criminal.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
REGIONAL REENTRY CONFERENCE JULY , 2013 PARENTING SENTENCING ALTERNATIVE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6639.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY12 Annual Report.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Pre-Sentence Investigation Proposal Purpose: To gather and provide information to the Courts and to other Criminal Justice stakeholders that will aid at.
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
State of CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division Major Initiatives Update Presented to the Criminal Justice Policy Advisory Commission September.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Basic Supervision Funding We will receive the following amounts in basic supervision: FY 2008 FY 2009 $105,744,392 $107,326,403 Currently we are receiving.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Higher Education and Second Chances Center for Community Alternatives, Justice Strategies.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Early Release Schemes in Hong Kong Mr. Kenneth LEUNG Principal Officer Hong Kong Correctional Services Department.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY13 Annual Report.
Corrections Chapter Twelve Reading
PRESENTATION ON CORRECTIONAL MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL-2010 Policy overview.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Educational training on Voting Rights for people currently or previously involved in the criminal justice system.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Chapter 11 Criminal Justice
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
California State Association of Counties
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Stuart Jenkins, Division Director
SMI Determination Form Clinical Guide
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Chapter 11 – Criminal Justice
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Washington State Three Strikes Law
Assertive community treatment webinar
Department of Children and Families
The United States has the highest incarceration rates of
Presentation transcript:

Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY10 Annual Report Texas Department of Criminal Justice Reentry and Integration Division

Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) provides for the early parole review and release of certain categories of offenders who are mentally ill, mentally retarded, elderly, terminally ill, long term care or physically handicapped. The purpose of MRIS is to release offenders, who pose minimal public safety risk, from incarceration to more cost effective alternatives. 1 Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony.

MRIS Data Comparison (by fiscal year) 2 There were a total of 102 MRIS approvals during FY10. Of those, 80 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 22 were State Jail confinees approved by sentencing Judges. **Includes ineligible referrals with no qualifying medical condition

MRIS Offender Data 3 MRIS Referrals1443* Individual Offenders Referred1050 Presentations for MRIS consideration457** Individual Offenders Presented405 * Includes multiple referrals for 263 individual offenders ** Includes multiple presentations for 46 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration

MRIS FY10 Referral Status 4 ELIGIBLE REFERRALSINELIGIBLE REFERRALS Presented to Board/Judge for consideration 362 * Parole Approved48 Clinical Criteria Not Met556 3G / Not Long Term Care or Terminal Illness13 Pending response from unit medical provider at close of FY1012Not an Offender (SAFPF / ISF)7 Sex Offender; Not Persistent Vegetative State or Organic Brain Syndrome254Pending Discharge7 Offender referred to unit medical provider94Death Row1 Deceased prior to presentation for MRIS consideration59 Pending Presentation to Board/Judge at close of FY1016 Active Detainer / Not Legal US Citizen10 Refused MRIS / Discharged Sentence4 Total Eligible1367Total Ineligible76 Total Referrals ** * Includes multiple presentations for 46 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration ** Includes multiple referrals for 263 individual offenders Note: Clinical Criteria Not Met may include offenders who were previously presented and denied MRIS with next review indicating no change in offenders condition.

5 Unit Direct % of Total Referrals 40% 44% 30% 44% * Includes multiple referrals for 263 individual offenders

6 * A total of 102 offenders were approved during FY10. Of those, 101 of those cases were referred and presented for consideration during FY10 and one was pending decision from presentation in FY09.. MRIS Referrals for FY10 Approved by Source

MRIS FY10 Presented for MRIS Consideration by Diagnosis 7 * Includes multiple presentations for 46 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration

MRIS Approval Rates by Diagnosis (Comparison by fiscal year) 8 There were a total of 102 MRIS approvals during FY10. Of those, 80 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 22 were State Jail Confinees approved by sentencing Judges.

Status of FY10 Presentations 9 Reflects status of approved cases as of 08/31/2010 A total of 102 offenders were approved during FY10. Of those, 101 of those cases were referred and presented for consideration during FY10 and one was pending decision from presentation in FY09. The following reflects the status of all cases presented for vote during FY10. FY10 TOTALSCIDState Jail Presented FY10:457*43126 Approved Consideration denied317 Denied MRIS28235 Deceased pending decision88 MRIS cancelled due to improvement in condition22 Pending decision at close of FY1011 * Includes multiple presentations of 46 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration

Status of FY10 Approved Cases 10 Reflects status of approved cases as of 08/31/2010 A total of 102 offenders were approved during FY10. Of those, 101 of those cases were referred and presented for consideration during FY10 and one was pending decision from presentation in FY09. FY10 TOTALSCIDState Jail Approved Released Deceased pending release17161 Vote withdrawn651 Pending release at close of FY1055 Deceased in voting process on day of approval 33 Received regular parole vote same day and released to regular caseload 11 Refused MRIS11

11 FY10 Offender Deaths Sex Offender – Did not meet criteria as set for by House Bill Deceased after receipt of MRIS medical summary and during processing of case for presentation to Board of Pardons and Paroles / Presiding Judge 31 MRIS Approved – Deceased pending release15 Deceased within 48 hours of receipt of MRIS medical summary15 Not eligible (Parole Approved / Pending Discharge / ISF / SAFPF)13 Deceased after referral – prior to receipt of MRIS medical summary12 MRIS Consideration Denied / Denied MRIS11 No significant change in condition since prior denial – Not presented for vote7 Deceased pending decision6 Deceased in voting process on day of Approval2 Medical Summary indicated Clinical Criteria Not Met2 Deceased pending disposition of ICE detainer1 During FY10 a total of 421 offender deaths were reported to TCOOMMI by TDCJ Health Services Division. This number includes offenders who were not eligible for MRIS (i.e., death row, ISF, SAFPF), those who died as the result of suicide, unit incident, sudden death (i.e., cardiac arrest), etc. Of those reported offenders, 211 had been referred for MRIS one or more times during their incarceration. Of those, 159 received referrals during FY10. The following reflects status of the FY10 referrals.

Current Status of Offenders Released on MRIS Since the programs inception on December 1, 1991, 1356 offenders have been released, seven of whom have released twice for a total of 1363 actual releases. The following chart depicts current status of each offender released. 12