Formal Observation 2 per year (due by February 7 th & May 6th) Email all teacher formals (write up only) in a zip file to Melissa Kaplan, Ron Bauer, and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

“Data Walk” Faculty Orientation

Advertisements

What’s new? What’s accepted? What’s the easiest way to do this? Tutorial created by Devin Arms, 2013.

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.

. This training does NOT replace the requirement of reading the 2013 DCCM and TELPAS manual.

Peninsula School District

PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D. How to Look for Evidence in the Different Domains.

Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.

TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach

PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 PRELIMINARY VISIT DAYS Wednesday 1st October Wednesday 8 th October 8 WEEK BLOCK.

ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.

3 (+) Target Objectives: Instructional Growth Objective: (propose one focus element from Standard 1, 2 or 3) Professional Growth Objective: (propose any.

CAPS : ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP V.R.KARSHAN.

Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.

Differentiated Supervision

PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.

Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT

Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.

South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Peer coaching is a strategy where one or more teachers form a partnership with one another for the purpose of observing, recording, and providing feedback.

Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.

From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.

MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS

Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.

 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.

Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.

Framework In Action: Theory into Practice

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part A: Observation Data for the Summative Rating.

PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 VISIT DAY Wednesday 7th October WEEK BLOCK SCHOOL EXPERIENCE 1 (SE1) Monday.

STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.

EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.

Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.

GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.

292 Debriefing Please be sure to sign in. Blue Docs Use a #2 pencil.

BASELINE EDGE DOVER SHERBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 2013.

 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.

New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.

 Teacher completes Step #1: Lesson Plan in advance and sends to evaluator two days in advance of planning conference  Teacher and Evaluator meet to discuss.

One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.

Avon Grove School District October 2009

North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process

University Supervisors

Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.

Teacher Evaluation Process

CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010

PoHi TLE information.

Our Partnership: Who’s Who!

Creating an Observation

September 6, 2017 Block.

Teacher Evaluation Process

When do Administrators collect evidence?

TDES for Paras Paras are not required to do Growth Plans

Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process

TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.

Evaluation Information

TCH 216 University High School Clinical Experience Orientation

Implementation data will continue to be collected

Introduction to TDES for Recalled Teachers

Presentation transcript:

Formal Observation 2 per year (due by February 7 th & May 6th) all teacher formals (write up only) in a zip file to Melissa Kaplan, Ron Bauer, and Nicole Scott by due date Completed by Assistant Director or Director –Director must be the final sign off Use Teacher Formal Observation Evidence Tool form to collect evidence from classroom visit, and the Teacher Feedback Form to provide teachers with written feedback.

Formal Observation Process Prior to Pre-Conference: Collect teacher lesson plan and record evidence for Domain 1 on Teacher Formal Observation Evidence Tool. Pre-Conference (30 minutes): Discuss lesson plan, and gather and record evidence from Domain 1. Observation (at least 45 minutes): Uses Teacher Formal Observation Evidence Tool to observe for Domains 2, 3, and 4. Post Conference (45 minutes): Completed within three school days of classroom observation, discuss findings from evidence gathering, present and sign Formal Observation Feedback form.

Informal Observations Complete 6 additional informal evaluations for each teacher by May 4. Use the Classroom Check-In Sheet to observe for any single domain at a time Informal observations last minutes Keep one copy of Classroom Check-In and make a copy for teacher

Additional Notes Total yearly time commitment = 8 hours/teacher Keep all copies in a teacher file You may add additional steps to the process –e.g. self-evaluation, written reflection on feedback, peer observations Complete first set of informal observations on Domain 2 by first Directors’ Breakfast