Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Advertisements

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
1 Strategic Planning Workshops February 23, 2007.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
ASSESSMENT Research, Marketing, and Publications Residential Life Kevin Hytten and Audrey Place.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
APR Improvement Plans April 2014 Lindsey McDonnell Director of Certification Curriculum National Association for Athletics Compliance.
DIT STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010 Dr Rachel O Connor Mark Russell Campus Life & Student Retention Office DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Summary of SOS Responses Genesee Community College Fall 2006 PAD Week Presentation Assessment Luncheon August 23, 2006.
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
1. 2 Environmental Scan Red Rocks Community College VPI Office Overview and Update August 2013.
Student Satisfaction Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, LLC. Permission is required to reproduce information. Adult.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Getting the data off the shelf Jimmy Davis, Ph.D. Vice Provost Kimberly Thornbury, Ph.D. Dean of Students Union University.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Centennial Elementary School Parent Opinion Inventory 1 Ocean City Public Schools Parent Opinion Inventory Summary Analysis November 2007 Prepared by the.
Union Elementary School “Soaring Above and Beyond”
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Arts and Sciences. Refine the Pre-Majors Staff the North Campus.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
1 Board Meeting Data Presentation August 25, 2009.
Using the Retention Data Center as a DeVry Student Success Coach Presented by Annette Herring and Beth Richter Noel-Levitz.
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System August 7, 2014.
Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.
* Number before each statement is the item number in the survey. Number with “S” prefix in parentheses indicates the scale the statement is under. Institutional.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Charts: Identified Challenges Department of Institutional Research.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
Student Priorities Survey Results
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research

Topics ΔThe Survey Instrument ΔAdministration of the Survey ΔResponses ΔFindings ΔNext Steps ΔResources

The Leichert Scale (1 – 7) ΔImportance / Satisfaction Δ1 = Not At All Δ2 = Not Very Δ3 = Somewhat Not Δ4 = Don’t Know / Neutral Δ5 = Somewhat Δ6 = Important / Satisfied Δ7 = Very

The Survey Instrument ΔTwo Year Community College Form A ΔFocused on 12 Areas of Emphasis including ΔStudent Services ΔInstruction ΔCampus Environment

Administration of the Survey ΔSurvey ran from Feb. 15 th to Mar. 14 th Δ invitation sent to each student with a MyCR account ΔSecondary sent to any personal addresses provided ΔTwo reminders sent to non- responding students

Responses Δ831 Students Responded Δ11% Response Rate ΔNoel-Levitz expects a 10-20% Response Rate

Respondent Summary: Location/Load

Comparison to CR Population: Location/Load

Respondent Summary: Gender/Ethnicity

Comparison to CR Population: Gender/Ethnicity

80 Questions 80 Questions Top 40 Prioritize by Average Importance Most Important to Least Important Rank by Average Satisfaction Highest Satisfaction to Low Satisfaction Bottom 25% ImportanceSatisfaction In a nut shell… Top 25%

In a nut shell… Top 40 Top 25% Bottom 25% Strength Challenge = = + + ImportanceSatisfaction

In a nut shell… GAP Score =ImportanceSatisfaction- GoodNot as good Median GAP Score =.79

CR vs. National Satisfaction

Higher than National Average 3The quality of instruction in the vocational/technical programs is excellent. 5The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 6My academic advisor is approachable. 7Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 12My academic advisor helps me set goals to work toward. 18The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent. 20Financial aid counselors are helpful. 28It is an enjoyable experience to be a student on this campus. 29Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 31The campus is safe and secure for all students.

Higher than National Average 36Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 40My academic advisor is knowledgeable about the transfer requirements of other schools. 41Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 43Class change (drop/add) policies are reasonable. 48Counseling staff care about students as individuals. 58Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their fields. 61Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours. 63I seldom get the "run-around" when seeking information on this campus. 66Program requirements are clear and reasonable. 70I am able to experience intellectual growth here.

Lower than National Average 8Classes are scheduled at times that are convenient for me. 32My academic advisor is knowledgeable about my program requirements. 34Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 42The equipment in the lab facilities is kept up to date. 65Students are notified early in the term if they are doing poorly in a class 69There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus.

Identified Strengths 14Library resources and services are adequate. 18The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent. 28It is an enjoyable experience to be a student on this campus. 31The campus is safe and secure for all students. 36Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 41Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 43Class change (drop/add) policies are reasonable.

Identified Strengths 58Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their fields. 61Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours. 70I am able to experience intellectual growth here. 71The effort required of my courses is what I expected. 73I am able to effectively manage my study time and complete assignments on time. 80I attend CR in order to complete a 2-year degree, transfer to a 4-year institution, or achieve a certificate

Identified Challenges 7Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 8Classes are scheduled at times that are convenient for me. 12My academic advisor helps me set goals to work toward. 13Financial aid awards are announced to students in time to be helpful in college planning. 20Financial aid counselors are helpful. 32My academic advisor is knowledgeable about my program requirements. 34Computer labs are adequate and accessible.

Identified Challenges 40My academic advisor is knowledgeable about the transfer requirements of other schools. 42The equipment in the lab facilities is kept up to date. 52This school does whatever it can to help me reach my educational goals. 65Students are notified early in the term if they are doing poorly in a class. 69There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus. 77Courses are offered at the locations that best fit my needs. 79Classrooms and classroom equipment are kept up-to-date and in good repair.

Overall Satisfaction

Next Steps (recommended by Noel-Levitz) § Identify an Action Team § Review Data by Target Groups § Demographic Variables § Focus Groups? § Qualitative Data § Address Specific Items/Areas § Involve more Students and Campus Personnel

Response Plan - Strengths § Share the Results § Use with recruiting materials § Incorporate Results in Public Relations Plans § Use departments doing well as models

Response Plan - Weaknesses § Identify no more than 3-5 for any given academic year § Next steps and timelines § Areas that can be fixed with appropriate information § Short-term/quick response items § Long-term strategic plan

Survey Again ΔAnnually or Bi-annually ΔInform of changes implemented ΔIdentify areas that have seen improvement ΔIdentify areas that have not seen improvement

Resources: Charts Location FT / PT Importance Scores in Background Satisfaction Scores in Foreground

Resources: Survey Questions

Resources: Auto Filter Top 40 Spreadsheet ΔAllows User to Filter by Any Factor ΔShows Differences from Average Satisfaction

Eureka vs. Overall

Communicating the Data: Student Services Mtg. 6/11/10

Survey Results can be found at… ΔEnrollment Management Page ΔIR Survey Page

For more information ΔZachary DeLoach ΔAD106A ΔX4268