DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abstract Mechanical Inspection and Survey Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project The Survey and Alignment Group is often the first and last to work with the Storage.
Advertisements

Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Alexander Temnykh Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning November 12, Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
SCU Measurements at LBNL
Status Update on Mechanical Prototype in Rome November 6,
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Undulator Alignment Strategy – April 20, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS FAC 1 Undulator Alignment Strategy Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
LCLS Prototype Undulator Design LCLS Prototype Undulator Design Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
1 Zachary Wolf 1 Undulator Tuning Status June 9, 2009 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
Robert Ruland MMF Layout, Workflow October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Layout, Workflow Robert Ruland Magnetic Measurements Facility.
April 16, 2007 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Physics Issues 1 Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS.
Zack Wolf Undulator Bench October 14, Undulator Bench Requirements Zack Wolf SLAC.
XFD – XF Engineering Group November 15-th, 2004LCLS Undulator Final Design Review1 Undulator for the LCLS project – from the prototype to the full scale.
Zachary Wolf LCLS Undulator October 30, LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim.
Zack Wolf Undulator Magnetic April 11, 2006 LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements Zack Wolf, Scott Anderson, Ralph Colon,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Zack Wolf BFW Fiducialization October 20, Beam Finder Wire (BFW) Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Dean Walters, James.
Setup of laser tracker on DX side NOTE: X axis along M1s centers, towards SX Z axis along M1-M2 centers, towards M2.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
LINEAR MEASUREMENT.
STATUS of the final PACMAN bench integration PACMAN meeting 11/06/2015 Hélène Mainaud Durand.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole update 1 st December 2010 Mechanical Engineering status N. Collomb1.
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
SR NSLS prototype magnets. Dipoles 90 mm aperture dipole Pole Ends will be matched to achieve the magnetic field quality ( )
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group Interface Workshops for ESS Warm-Linac: ISrc - LEBT.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment, and Electrical QA Feb 2-4, 2016 Dan Cheng J. DiMarco, C. Hernikl, D. Humphries, S. Myers, X. Wang MQXFA Magnet Fiducialization.
Prototype Review 04-Sept Different side-closeout to allow petal end-insertion concept…self- guided… Only backup from last review in July…
Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures,
Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.
Design and Measurement Results for the Permanent Magnet Undulators for the Linac Coherent Light Source Facility II D. Arbelaez BeMa2014, 01/02/2014.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
Clive Field, Reggie Rogers, Venkat Srinivasan Undulator Week: BFW Card Status Update 01/23/ BFW Card - Physics Requirements.
ESS DTL: Prototyping M.Comunian - F. Grespan – P. Mereu Lund– 10/04/2013F.Grespan.
QXF Coil working group 2/11/16 Dan Cheng J. DiMarco, C. Hernikl, D. Humphries, S. Myers, X. Wang MQXFA Coil Fiducialization Proposal.
Clive Field, Venkat Srinivasan Undulator Week: BFW Card Status Update 04/30/ BFW Card Status on behalf of: Keith Caban.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
Magnetic Measurements At SLAC
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Status of SPARC Undulator
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN
Magnetic Measurements For The LCLS Undulator System
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Relaxing Quads Roll Alignment tolerance
Magnetic Measurements and Alignment at SLAC Robert Ruland & Zack Wolf
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
Undulator Tuning Status
LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization
Beam Finder Wire (BFW) Status
LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements
Magnetic measurements at ambient temperature on the MQXFBP1
Presentation transcript:

DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese

2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m in X and <+50  m in Y. ParameterAssembled UndulatorQuadrant K> (Slot 33) > (± 1  ) Phase error R.M.S.<10°< 3° First field Integrals < 40  Tm (40 G-cm)< 10  Tm (10 G-cm) Second field Integrals < 50  Tm 2 (5000 G-cm 2 )< 10  Tm 2 (1000 G-cm 2 ) The undulator can not be tuned when assembled. Each magnet array was tuned individually then mounted on a quadrant actuator plate.

3 Tuning procedure outline 1. Initial magnet alignment using CMM to ±50  m from the beam axis. 2. Tuning with iterations based on virtual shimming(re-positioning the magnets w.r.t. magnetic axis). Round 1: -Tune trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data. -Measure K - Check magnet positions on CMM. Round 2: - Correct magnet positions to be within ±50  m from the beam line. - Continue tuning trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data. - Set K-value as close as possible to the average from Round 1. - Check magnet positions at CMM. Round 3: - Correct magnet positions to be within ±50  m from the beam line. - Do final adjustments to trajectories, phase errors, and K. - Check magnet positions at CMM. Round 4(if necessary)….

4 CMM measurements 1.Measure dowel pin holes on the bottom. Transfer x – axis on the side of the plate. 2. Scan along the curve surface on each magnet, fit circle of 3.2mm radius, for each magnet find x & y coordinates of the circle center. 3. Find deviations of magnet centers from the beam line in x and y. Dowel pin holes Set screw for X- adjustments Shim for Y- adjustments Beam axis Y X

5 Set-up on measurement bench Alignment table Thermistors Hall probe Granite block 6 threaded inserts 2 dowel pin holes Micrometer

6 Alignment to the bench (X & yaw) 1.Do Hall probe scan in X at each pole location 2.Truncate data ± 3mm from center 3.Fit parabola, find center 4.Fit a straight line through all pole centers, find x and yaw, correct yaw if necessary.

7 Alignment to the bench (Y) Bottom of the magnet array bottom to beam line = mm (1.758”) Fiducialization fixture Sight level Granite block Find center of fiducialization fixture with the Hall probe Measure difference in height between the fixture and the granite by optical tools Set Hall probe Y using bench vertical stage Δ Y = 30μm  ΔB/B  1%

8 Trajectories (#3) I1Y = -351µTm I2Y = -281µTm 2 I1X = +738 µTm I2X = +479µTm 2 I1Y = +5µTm I2Y = +5µTm 2 I1X = +1 µTm I2X = -8 µTm 2

9 Phase Errors (#3) R.M.S = 40 deg. R.M.S = 2 deg. After tuning the trajectories the R.M.S. phase error goes down to 10  15 deg. The rest is tuned out by virtual shimming.

10 Tuning results (ΔK/K  +7%)

11 Final CMM Measurement results Maximum deviation from center line is: -69  m in X and +37  m in Y

12 Issues for 3.2m device A special fixture is required to allow a quick accurate quadrant set-up on the measurement bench, magnets facing up. The Hall probe has to be set at the same height for all quadrants with accuracy better than 10  m. Optical tools to be replaced by micrometers or Keyence sensor. Larger screws for magnet X adjustment. A provision to mount a micrometer to control magnet motion. Since vacuum chamber has no fins, magnet alignment tolerance in X direction could be ±100μm. It will reduce number of iterations.

13 Current Status 5mm ID, 6.3mm OD copper tube Hall probes 1.2 m long G-10 rod Measurement system for the 1m long prototype is in place and ready. First measurements done to check the system. Relative roll angles and displacements are measured for X and Y probes. Prototype mechanical and controls’ issues to be solved before measurements continue. stage Retro-reflector

14 Conclusion Tuning procedure has been developed for DELTA quadrants. Four quadrants have been successfully tuned to tolerances in 12 days (3 days/quadrant). Simulations show that the assembled device should meet the tolerances. Measurements system for assembled prototype is in place and it’s functionality tested. Magnetic measurements are in progress.

Back-up slides

Field superposition, Linear Vertical

Field superposition, Linear Horizontal

Field superposition, Circular left