General Education Assessment Process Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ExCEL August Institute ExCEL After School High School Credit Recovery
Advertisements

Student success is the first priority. Institutional Online General Education Assessment Model Presenters Maggie Tymms, Associate Director Ashley Caron,
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
What “Counts” as Evidence of Student Learning in Program Assessment?
Writing Effective Assessment Plans. Why Assessment Plans? Facilitates periodic, not episodic assessment of student learning and program outcomes Serves.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
FAIR Best Paper: Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers May 2010 Association of Institutional.
Using Institutional Effectiveness to Build a Culture of Performance Improvement 2007 SACS-COC Annual Meeting Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Professional Development Day October 2009 Data Matters! Finding and Accessing Information at SPC.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Improved Performance and Critical Thinking in Economics Students Using Current Event Journaling Sahar Bahmani, Ph.D. WI Teaching Fellow INTRODUCTION.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers April 2009 Florida Association of Community Colleges.
Frameworks for South Dakota Schools.  Provide basic information on South Dakota’s Capstone Experiences.  Discuss how Capstone Experiences fit into South.
The Development and Implementation of an Institutional-based Online General Education Assessment Model October 2011 Association of Florida Colleges Institutional.
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008.
Student success is the first priority. Increasing Student Response Rates Presenters  Magaly Tymms, Associate Director, Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Florida Association of Institutional Research 2008 Annual Conference Beyond Compliance…Using a Model of Comprehensive Academic Program Review to Improve.
Using Institutional Effectiveness to Build a Culture of Performance Improvement 2007 SACS-COC Annual Meeting Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Beyond Compliance…Using a Model of Comprehensive Academic Program Review to Improve.
Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Florida Association of Institutional Research 2011 Annual Conference The Evolution of the Comprehensive Academic Program Review - Three Years After Inception.
Graduate Student Academic Services (GSAS) would like to present An introduction to GradPath.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
INTRODUCTION TO ONLINE FACILITATION- DAY TWO Anna N Perry.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Graduate Student Academic Services would like to present
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Administration Procedures and Policies
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
COED SLO Reporting.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
The Heart of Student Success
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Fort Valley State University
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Presentation transcript:

General Education Assessment Process Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment 2010

July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment2 Institutional Effectiveness “Institutional Effectiveness is the integrated, systematic, explicit, and documented processes of measuring performance against the SPC mission for purposes of continuous improvement of academic programs, administrative services, and educational services offered by the college.” “Closing the Loop”

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment3 Institutional Effectiveness  Why do we assess?  To see how well we are doing  To confirm what we already know  To share our progress with others  To see where we can improve and change  In some cases to demonstrate what does not work

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment4 Institutional Effectiveness  Evaluation and Assessment are about ‘Choices, Direction, Focus…Quality Improvement’

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment5 1. Establish Goals 2. Define Goals 3. Design & Implement Program 4. Design & Conduct Assessments 5. Evaluate Assessment Findings 6. Use Results for Performance Improvement Performance Improvement

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment6 Performance Improvement  From Compliance to Performance Improvement

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment7 Assessment Philosophy  Now Looking at the ‘Big Picture’  Assessment focus is on CHANGE through Quality Improvement; Use of multiple assessment methods  Faculty-driven assessment process; AEA serves in consultant capacity  Focus on critical MLOs with fewer more focused action plan items  Improve access and awareness of assessment information  Integrated timing of assessments (3-year cycle) Assessments ReviewsSurveys GenGen EdEd

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment8 Assessment Philosophy Academic Program Viability Report (APVR) distributed yearly APAR CAPR

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment9 Academic Assessments  Direct Measures  Internally Developed General Education  Externally Developed General Education (e.g., MAPP)  AAS/AS Academic Program Assessment Report (APAR)  BAS/BS Program Assessment  Comprehensive Academic Program Review (CAPR)  Indirect measures  Entering Student Survey  Enrolled Student Survey  Graduating Student Survey  Recent Alumni Survey  Employer Survey  Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment10 Academic Assessment Report  Introduction w/ use of past results  Major Learning Outcomes – program specific  Assessment methodology  Criteria for success  Summary of assessment findings  Discussion & analysis  Action plan & time table  Budgetary & planning implications

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment11 Ed Outcomes Website - Public Access 

2010 Ed Outcomes Website July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment12

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment13 Online General Education Assessment  ANGEL administration  Students identified at 45 credit hour mark  Uploaded students into ANGEL  Initial student contact via  Second student contact - paper mail  Final student contact via  Scores Transferred from ANGEL to PeopleSoft

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment14 Invitation Letter Congratulations! You have successfully completed 45 or more credit hours including St. Petersburg College and transfer credits, and have been selected to participate in the General Education Assessment. The purpose of this General Education Assessment is to evaluate the quality of our general education curriculum and identify areas for performance improvement. Your results and those of fellow classmates will assist us in improving the general education courses and ensuring that we will meet the needs of current and future students. To complete the assessment, go to your course list in ANGEL. A new course link has been added to your list of courses. It is entitled 420 General Education Outcomes Assessment. Within that course link is a single assessment entitled,General Education Outcomes Assessment General Education Outcomes Assessment, Form Please complete this assessment before July 2nd. Upon accessing the assessment, you may receive a ‘Security Warning’ message asking if you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered securely. Please note that the correct response to the Security Warning message is to select ‘NO’. You may use a calculator, and we suggest that you have scratch paper available when taking the assessment. On average the assessment takes about forty minutes to complete. You will be given a ninety-minute time limit to complete the assessment. The ninety minute time limit starts when you select ‘Begin Assessment’, so it must be completed in one sitting. Thank you in advance for your participation in this critically important college endeavor. Anne M. Cooper, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, Academic and Student Affairs

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment15 General Education Assessment Angel Course list

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment16 General Education Assessment

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment17 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) General Education Outcomes Assessment 1.Why has this course been added to my ANGEL page? This course is listed on your ANGEL page because you have been selected to participate in the General Education Assessment due to your successful completion of 45 or more credit hours of combined SPC and transfer credits. 2.What is the purpose of this assessment? The purpose of the General Education Assessment is to evaluate the quality of our general education curriculum. The aggregate results of this assessment will assist in improving our general education courses, as part of the College’s commitment to continuous improvement. The assessment also satisfies our obligation to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), our accrediting entity which ensures the high quality of the degree you will receive upon graduation. 3.Why do I have to take the assessment if a portion of my total credits are transfer credits? Students who have completed a total of 45 credits including SPC and transfer credits were selected. Your results and those of other SPC students will assist us in improving the general education courses and ensuring that we meet the needs of our students.

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment18 Frequently Asked Questions 4.Why do I have to take the assessment if I am pursuing a degree in a specific discipline? As per our agreement with our accreditation body, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, students across all disciplines are required to take a specified number of general education courses as part of their degree requirement. As a result, all students, regardless of discipline, who have completed 45 credits were selected to participate in the General Educational Assessment. Your results and those of other SPC students will assist us in improving the general education courses and ensuring that we meet the needs of our students. 5.What is the deadline for completing this assessment? The assessment will be available on your ANGEL course until one week before the end of the current term. 6.How long does it take to complete the assessment? On average the assessment takes about 40 minutes to complete. You will be given a ninety-minute time limit. 7.May I use a calculator? You may use a calculator, and we suggest that you have scratch paper available when taking the assessment. 8.I opened the assessment but closed it without completing it. May I complete the assessment at a later time? Yes, you may access and complete the assessment at a later time as long as you do not select ‘Begin Assessment’. Once you select the option to begin the assessment you must complete and submit it within ninety minutes.

2010 Frequently Asked Questions 9.How do I know if I passed the assessment? The score you receive on the assessment is a percentage of your correct responses, however there is no pass or fail associated with the score. The results of the assessment are only used to assist us in improving the general education courses. 10.Why am I unable to listen to the audio file needed to answer the related item(s) in the assessment? This issue may be the result of an older version of the Flash Player installed on your computer. Older Flash Player versions may have a compatibility issue with the current version of ANGEL that we are using at the College. If you are taking the assessment and have the issue, you may ignore that item(s) on the assessment. 11.How should I respond to the ‘Security Warning’ message: ‘Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered securely?’ The correct response to the Security Warning message is to select ‘NO’. 12.Will the results of this assessment affect my grades? The results of this assessment will remain confidential, and will not affect your course grades or overall grade point average. Your results will be combined with those of other SPC students to assist us in improving the general education curriculum. 13.Who should I contact with additional questions? If you have any additional questions regarding this assessment, please contact the department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment at , or July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment19

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment20 Is this assessment required? The purpose of the General Education Assessment is to evaluate the quality of our general education curriculum. The results of this assessment will assist in improving our general education courses, as part of the Colleges’ commitment to continuous improvement. In addition to using the aggregate assessment results for quality improvement proposes, the assessment also satisfies our obligation to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). This is extremely important for the institution and for our students. For without accreditation, the diploma that you will receive when you graduate would not be as meaningful for future pursuits. The results of this assessment will remain confidential, and will not affect your course grades or overall grade point average. Your results will be combined with those of other SPC students to assist us in improving the general education curriculum. Although completion of this assessment is not a graduation requirement, it is of great importance to SPC and to our students.

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment21 Next Steps  Collect next sets of items from Deans this term  Complete forms two and three (prior to) Fall term  Complete programming for multiple forms using groups

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment22 Future Direction  Improve assessment instruments and ensure validity and reliability  When possible, embed direct measures within the classroom  Review assessments for validity and internal reliability  Ensure that assessment model aligns with MLO/Goal  Communicate assessment results (Provosts, Deans/Programs Directors, and Faculty)  Create awareness of Ed Outcome site access  Improve accessibility to survey outcome reports and research briefs

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment23 Future Direction  Ultimate goal is to provide Provosts (Deans) and Program Directors ‘timely’, ‘relevant’ ‘accurate’, and ‘interpretable’ information regarding their programs and their performance outcomes  Multi-measure ‘Dashboard’ style reports (Business Intelligence/Performance Measurement)

2010 July 2010 Academic Effectiveness and Assessment24 Questions?

General Education Assessment Process Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment 2010