Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 Aug 23, 2009 Introduction To Jet Reconstruction In ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B. List, ETH Zürich Page 1 Report from H1: PRC Open Session, H1: Status and Prospects Benno List Institute for Particle Physics, ETH Zürich.
Advertisements

Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Missing E T Reconstruction in the ATLAS Calorimeter Calor 2006, Chicago June 5th - 9th, 2006 For the ATLAS Jet/E T Miss Group Ambreesh Gupta, University.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
1 physics reaction of interest (parton level) lost soft tracks due to magnetic field added tracks from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event added tracks.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Discovery of Long-Lived The LHC Bryan Smith West Coast Theory Network University of California, Irvine 4 th May 2007 Work with Jonathan Feng,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS Slide 1 Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona.
Detector Understanding with First LHC Data DESY, Hamburg, 29 June – 3 July 2009 Introduction To Jet & Missing Transverse Energy Reconstruction at LHC Peter.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Jet Energy Scale [Lecture 23, May 04, 2009]
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Brief Introduction to Missing Transverse Energy Reconstruction at LHC Peter.
Frederik Rühr, KIP Heidelberg ATLAS Jets: Measurements, Calibration and Studies Frederik Rühr, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Heidelberg Universität Heidelberg.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
QCD Studies in ATLAS Martin Siebel (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration XIII Lomonosov Conference, Moscow,
1 Introduction to Dijet Resonance Search Exercise John Paul Chou, Eva Halkiadakis, Robert Harris, Kalanand Mishra and Jason St. John CMS Data Analysis.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.
Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
1 P. Loch U of Arizona July 22, 2011 Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction and jet physics at the LHC (Part II) What Are Jets? The experimentalist’s.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 New Approaches to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction D. W. Miller SLAC ATLAS.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Jet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) on behalf.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
QCD Prospects for ATLAS Rainer Stamen Universität Mainz On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration QCD 06 Montpellier, July 3rd 2006.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
P ERFORMANCE AND V ALIDATION OF J ET C ALIBRATION IN ATLAS Paola Giovannini MPP ATLAS-HEC group.
KIT High Pt Jet Studies with CMS On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Andreas Oehler University of Karlsruhe (KIT) DIS 2009 XVII International Workshop on.
Elena Bruna Yale University
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , 2009 Aug 23, 2009 Introduction To Jet Reconstruction In ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 My Road To LHC Started with calorimeter construction for H1/HERA ( )… Started with calorimeter construction for H1/HERA ( )… The “hardware years”… The “hardware years”… …then Deep Inelastic Scattering with H1 ( , ) …then Deep Inelastic Scattering with H1 ( , ) Electron, hadron, and jet reconstruction and calibration in a non-compensating calorimeter Electron, hadron, and jet reconstruction and calibration in a non-compensating calorimeter Have always been attracted by complex response! Have always been attracted by complex response! Experimental sensitivities to jet properties Experimental sensitivities to jet properties We did not call it sub-structure then! We did not call it sub-structure then! Forward hadronic energy flow and jet production Forward hadronic energy flow and jet production E.g., DGLAP vs BFKL evolution at low Bjorken- x E.g., DGLAP vs BFKL evolution at low Bjorken- x …with a short stop at DZero/Tevatron (1992)… …with a short stop at DZero/Tevatron (1992)… Calorimeter response to minimum bias Calorimeter response to minimum bias Mostly detector oriented noise, alignment and beam position studies Mostly detector oriented noise, alignment and beam position studies …and at GEM/SSC ( )… …and at GEM/SSC ( )… Design and response evaluation of the forward calorimeter Design and response evaluation of the forward calorimeter Detector prototyping and test beams Detector prototyping and test beams …and a long tenure in ATLAS/LHC (since 1995) …and a long tenure in ATLAS/LHC (since 1995) Design and response evaluation of the forward calorimeter Design and response evaluation of the forward calorimeter Yes, it is the same design as for GEM Yes, it is the same design as for GEM Forward calorimeter detector construction management Forward calorimeter detector construction management My “Microsoft years” My “Microsoft years” Focus on preparation for physics at LHC (since 2002) Focus on preparation for physics at LHC (since 2002) Initial interest jet physics and QCD… Initial interest jet physics and QCD… Some leadership Some leadership Calorimeter software coordination Calorimeter software coordination Jet and missing Et reconstruction performance coordination Jet and missing Et reconstruction performance coordination

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Change of composition Change of composition Radiation and decay inside detector volume Radiation and decay inside detector volume “Randomization” of original particle content “Randomization” of original particle content Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Charged particles bend in solenoid field Charged particles bend in solenoid field Attenuation changes energy Attenuation changes energy Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Distribute energy spatially Distribute energy spatially Lateral particle shower overlap Lateral particle shower overlap 100 MeV 10 GeV 1 GeV Image of Jet in the Detector

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Change of composition Change of composition Radiation and decay inside detector volume Radiation and decay inside detector volume “Randomization” of original particle content “Randomization” of original particle content Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Charged particles bend in solenoid field Charged particles bend in solenoid field Attenuation changes energy Attenuation changes energy Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Distribute energy spatially Distribute energy spatially Lateral particle shower overlap Lateral particle shower overlap 100 MeV 10 GeV 1 GeV Image of Jet in the Detector

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Change of composition Change of composition Radiation and decay inside detector volume Radiation and decay inside detector volume “Randomization” of original particle content “Randomization” of original particle content Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Charged particles bend in solenoid field Charged particles bend in solenoid field Attenuation changes energy Attenuation changes energy Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Distribute energy spatially Distribute energy spatially Lateral particle shower overlap Lateral particle shower overlap 100 MeV 10 GeV 1 GeV Image of Jet in the Detector

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Change of composition Change of composition Radiation and decay inside detector volume Radiation and decay inside detector volume “Randomization” of original particle content “Randomization” of original particle content Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Charged particles bend in solenoid field Charged particles bend in solenoid field Attenuation changes energy Attenuation changes energy Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Distribute energy spatially Distribute energy spatially Lateral particle shower overlap Lateral particle shower overlap 100 MeV 10 GeV 1 GeV Image of Jet in the Detector

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Change of composition Change of composition Radiation and decay inside detector volume Radiation and decay inside detector volume “Randomization” of original particle content “Randomization” of original particle content Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Defocusing changes shape in lab frame Charged particles bend in solenoid field Charged particles bend in solenoid field Attenuation changes energy Attenuation changes energy Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Total loss of soft charged particles in magnetic field Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Partial and total energy loss of charged and neutral particles in inactive upstream material Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Hadronic and electromagnetic cacades in calorimeters Distribute energy spatially Distribute energy spatially Lateral particle shower overlap Lateral particle shower overlap 100 MeV 10 GeV 1 GeV Image of Jet in the Detector

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Jet Reconstruction Task Jet Reconstruction Challenges physics reaction of interest (interaction or parton level) added particles from underlying event added particles from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency added particles from underlying event added particles from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency longitudinal energy leakage detector signal inefficiencies (dead channels, HV…) noise from (off- and in-time) pile-up electronic noise calo signal definition (noise suppression etc.) dead material losses (front, cracks, transitions…) detector response characteristics (e/h ≠ 1) jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency lost soft tracks due to magnetic field longitudinal energy leakage detector signal inefficiencies (dead channels, HV…) noise from (off- and in-time) pile-up electronic noise calo signal definition (noise suppression etc.) dead material losses (front, cracks, transitions…) detector response characteristics (e/h ≠ 1) jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency lost soft tracks due to magnetic field Experiment (“Nature”)

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 ATLAS Jet Reconstruction Move to better motivated jet algorithms Move to better motivated jet algorithms ATLAS uses FastJet and SISCone libraries ATLAS uses FastJet and SISCone libraries Common implementation theory/CMS/ATLAS Common implementation theory/CMS/ATLAS Narrow (0.4) AntiKt jets preferred for initial physics Narrow (0.4) AntiKt jets preferred for initial physics Most regularly shaped Most regularly shaped More straight forward handle on extra energy from pile-up (?) More straight forward handle on extra energy from pile-up (?) Legacy (ATLAS) seeded fixed cone still available Legacy (ATLAS) seeded fixed cone still available Usefulness basically limited to LO final states Usefulness basically limited to LO final states Fast algorithm ok for trigger and event filter Fast algorithm ok for trigger and event filter Factorized reconstruction Factorized reconstruction Attempt to use calorimeter signal definitions to address most detector specific issues Attempt to use calorimeter signal definitions to address most detector specific issues Use towers and clusters Use towers and clusters Calibrations and corrections determined independently Calibrations and corrections determined independently Distinguish carefully between relative and absolute corrections by least interdependency Distinguish carefully between relative and absolute corrections by least interdependency Jet energy scale evolution Limit to factorization introduced by calorimeter Limit to factorization introduced by calorimeter E.g. detector couples response and fragmentation – corrections often only possible on average More details on Thursday! More details on Thursday!

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 First Data Jet Calibration Priorities (plots from CERN-OPEN ) Need flat jet response rather quickly Need flat jet response rather quickly Basis for first physics analyses Basis for first physics analyses E.g., inclusive jet cross-section E.g., inclusive jet cross-section Systematics can dominate total error already at pb -1 Systematics can dominate total error already at pb -1 Depending on final state, kinematic range considered, fiducial cuts,… Depending on final state, kinematic range considered, fiducial cuts,… Requires understanding of hadronic response Requires understanding of hadronic response Minimum bias Minimum bias Single charged hadron response of calorimeter Single charged hadron response of calorimeter Pile-up with tracks and clusters Pile-up with tracks and clusters Di-jets Di-jets Underlying event with tracks and clusters Underlying event with tracks and clusters Direction dependent response corrections Direction dependent response corrections Prompt photons Prompt photons Absolute scale by balancing, missing Et projection fraction, etc. Absolute scale by balancing, missing Et projection fraction, etc. Initial focus on simple approaches Initial focus on simple approaches Least number of algorithms Least number of algorithms Least numerical complexity Least numerical complexity Realistic systematic error evaluation Realistic systematic error evaluation Conservative ok for first data! Conservative ok for first data! But also try new or alternative approaches! But also try new or alternative approaches!

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Initial Jet Calibration Scheme optional data driven MC

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Beyond First Physics Initial tasks focus on jet energy scale (JES) errors Initial tasks focus on jet energy scale (JES) errors Binds most of the manpower today Binds most of the manpower today Rather wide spectrum of signal and calibration choices Rather wide spectrum of signal and calibration choices But did not want to make hard decisions based on MC alone! But did not want to make hard decisions based on MC alone! Future activity more focused on jet features Future activity more focused on jet features Jet-by-jet corrections to reduced fluctuations of JES Jet-by-jet corrections to reduced fluctuations of JES Attempt to unfold residual fragmentation dependencies Attempt to unfold residual fragmentation dependencies Useful observables include jet shapes Useful observables include jet shapes Jet-by-jet pile-up suppression Jet-by-jet pile-up suppression Qualitative change from initial run scenarios Qualitative change from initial run scenarios Pile-up signal history (= noise in ATLAS) depends on instantaneous luminosity and bunch crossing frequency Large source of signal fluctuations affects all jet final states Large source of signal fluctuations affects all jet final states Experimental resolution for jet masses and substructure Experimental resolution for jet masses and substructure Discovery tool for heavy particle decays Discovery tool for heavy particle decays E.g., fully hadronic decay of boosted top (“3 in 1”) Experimentally challenging but not impossible Experimentally challenging but not impossible (more on Wednesday & Thursday)

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Statistically independent of hard scattering Statistically independent of hard scattering Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Noise has coherent character Noise has coherent character Cell signals linked through past shower developments Cell signals linked through past shower developments E t ~ 58 GeV E t ~ 81 GeV without pile-up Pile-Up Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60: ,2008

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Statistically independent of hard scattering Statistically independent of hard scattering Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Noise has coherent character Noise has coherent character Cell signals linked through past shower developments Cell signals linked through past shower developments E t ~ 58 GeV E t ~ 81 GeV with design luminosity pile-up Pile-Up Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60: ,2008

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Multiple interactions between partons in other protons in the same bunch crossing Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Consequence of high rate (luminosity) and high proton-proton total cross- section (~75 mb) Statistically independent of hard scattering Statistically independent of hard scattering Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Similar models used for soft physics as in underlying event Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Signal times slower (ATLAS) than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Noise has coherent character Noise has coherent character Cell signals linked through past shower developments Cell signals linked through past shower developments Pile-Up Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60: ,2008

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 ATLAS Status ATLAS is up and running ATLAS is up and running Used the LHC delay for continued sub-detector commissioning and repair Used the LHC delay for continued sub-detector commissioning and repair Cosmics for long term signal stability estimates and detector timing and alignment Cosmics for long term signal stability estimates and detector timing and alignment Understanding of calorimeter noise with random (“empty”) events Understanding of calorimeter noise with random (“empty”) events Millions of cosmics recorded Millions of cosmics recorded Test of computing chain Test of computing chain Re-reconstruction of cosmics trains ATLAS world wide computing Re-reconstruction of cosmics trains ATLAS world wide computing Some initial impressions for jets and missing Et Some initial impressions for jets and missing Et Noise contributions to missing Et reconstruction in random events Noise contributions to missing Et reconstruction in random events Calorimeter signal definition evaluation Calorimeter signal definition evaluation Jets in cosmics Jets in cosmics Helps develop in-time background suppression strategies Helps develop in-time background suppression strategies

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Cosmics In ATLAS Single cosmic muons traversing the experiment help understanding mostly timing and detector sensitivities

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Cosmic Showers In ATLAS Cosmic showers hitting the detector help understanding fake jet rates from this background in collision physics

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Understanding Cosmics

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Understanding Noise The scalar missing Et sum is a very powerful diagnostic variable in random events (stability with time, noise suppression, major detector faults…)

Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , P. Loch U of Arizona Aug 23, 2009 Conclusion & Outlook ATLAS is ready for collisions ATLAS is ready for collisions The detector is operating since ~1 year The detector is operating since ~1 year Major faults detected in 2008 are repaired Major faults detected in 2008 are repaired Calorimeter noise is well understood Calorimeter noise is well understood Response to cosmics can be simulated reasonably well Response to cosmics can be simulated reasonably well First algorithms for suppression of cosmic background available First algorithms for suppression of cosmic background available New studies with overlaying simulated signal events with real cosmics underway New studies with overlaying simulated signal events with real cosmics underway More on ATLAS this week More on ATLAS this week Wednesday Wednesday Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction in new physics (informal) Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction in new physics (informal) Jet masses, shapes, topologies, missing Et in ATLAS,… Thursday Thursday Talk on “Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS” Talk on “Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS” More details on calorimeter signals, algorithms, performance expectations, jet shapes,…