Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896. Background Activists in Louisiana were looking for a person to help them challenge the Separate Car Act in Louisiana. The act.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the U.S.A. concerning racial segregation.
Advertisements

Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896.
By Bri Dickerson, Gillian Mendez, Kaitlyn Strada, & Stephanie Dellavia
Learning Target 2/10 I can analyze how Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education represented a change in interpretation of basic civil rights based.
1896 During the later part of Reconstruction, Southern State legislatures started enforcing more Jim Crow laws to legally make African Americans more.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896 “ Separate But Equal ” Power point created by Robert L. Martinez Primary Content: The Americans.
Everything You Need To Know About Plessy v. Ferguson To Succeed In APUSH
Legal Background of Civil Rights. Equal Protection Clause 14 th Amendment of the Constitution (1868)  “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall.
Segregation and Discrimination
RECONSTRUCTION ERA US HISTORY A THEME # 2 President Andrew Johnson Homer Plessy.
Famous Civil Rights Cases and Events. Plessy vs. Ferguson Case 1892, Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in the "White" car of the East Louisiana Railroad.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Journal: What might you think of when you hear the phrase “separate but equal”?
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Dred Scott v. Sanford Shaylah Rice And Taylor Farris Shaylah Rice And Taylor Farris.
Brown V. Board of Education
Legal Background of Civil Rights. Have your “Legal Background of the Civil Rights Movement” on your desk – we will go over it today.
“Separate But Equal” The Brown v. Board of Education decision.
Vocabulary. Policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals.
Social & Political Problems of African Americans Gilded Age Unit 2 Lesson 3.
Mr. Homburg American Studies
Plessy V. Ferguson U.S. 537 Cassidy Osborne.
Plessy v. Ferguson Big Papi Vinny. In 1892, Homer Plessy took a seat in the “whites only” car of a train and refused to move. He was arrested, and convicted.
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
Educational Equity EDN 200. Today’s Plan Next Assignment: Your Article on School Funding Reflection Cards Separate but Equal? School: The Struggle for.
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
Plessy V. Ferguson 1892 Homer Plessy 1/8 black, looked white Under state law he is black Bought train ticket and tried to sit in white section Arrested.
The Civil Rights Movement
4. Plessy vs. Ferguson.   SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson and judge the extent to which it set back Civil Rights efforts.
 Reconstruction Amendments:  13 th Amendment ▪ Abolished slavery  14 th Amendment ▪ Granted citizenship, equal protection  15 th Amendment ▪ Suffrage.
Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896 Angelina Uzueta, Emily Trevino, Elias Ybarra.
Plessy v. Ferguson. Background O Louisiana railways were to “provide equal but separate accommodations for the white & colored races” O Homer Plessy decided.
Plessy v. Ferguson (state of Louisiana) Unit 7 – The Times They Are A- Changin’
Plessy VS Ferguson Alexis, Chloe, Juan, and Katana.
Plessy VS. Ferguson (1896) Mor, Yuval P.3. Facts of the Case When Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act, legally segregating common carriers in 1892,
ECONOMIC MYSTERY WHY NOT LEAVE? Before the Civil War (pre-1861), African Americans had been slaves in the South for generations. They had to stay where.
16.3 SEGREGATION AND DISCRIMINATION Objective: Understand the persistence of racism in America in late 1800’s early 1900’s.
By: Kelsey Byers, Ethan Carter, Micah Hault Plessy vs. Ferguson.
MY black history report DEANDRE B.. Freedom riders The first Freedom Ride took place on May 4, 1961 when seven blacks and six whites left Washington,
CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE US FROM THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TO THE 1940S.
PRE-CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. REVIEW Define civil rights Where do civil rights originate? In a democracy, what is the most important civil right? Define.
 The Civil Rights Movement.  - Students will evaluate the EVENTS LEADING UP TO Plessy vs. Ferguson supreme court case and how it created “Separate but.
CIVIL RIGHTS Background Informaiton. 13th Amendment "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party.
13 th, 14 th, and 15 th Amendments SICK CATS VOMIT S=Slavery 13 th C=Citizenship 14 th V=Voting 15 th 13 LETTERS IN THE PHRASE.
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
The Civil War Amendments
Reconstruction and the End of the Civil War
Ali Lawson and Ethan Ealy
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) By Colton Baburich.
SS8H7b: Evaluate key political, social, and economic changes that occurred in Georgia between 1877 and b. Analyze how rights were denied to African.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Segregation.
Equal Protection & the 14th Amendment
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Journal 1-21 What does “Separate but equal” mean?
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) In 1890, the state of Louisiana passed the "Separate Car Act" Comité des Citoyens (Committee of Citizens) formed and decided.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896).
Overturned by the decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Other Important* Amendments
Critical Thinking Question
By: Isabella Armstrong and Brianna Dinch
Plessy v. Ferguson Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896.
Presentation transcript:

Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896

Background Activists in Louisiana were looking for a person to help them challenge the Separate Car Act in Louisiana. The act made blacks ride in separate train cars from whites. They found a man who was 1/8 black named, Homer Plessy, that could pass as a white man to challenge the constitutionality of the act. On June 7, 1892 Homer Plessy would make a trip on the East Louisiana Railroad. After buying his ticket and taking his seat he would tell the conductor of his race and refusal to switch cars. The penalty for sitting in the wrong car was either 20 days in jail or a $25 fine. He was then arrested and spent one night in jail and released in the morning on bond.

Court Case Plessy argued that the acts violated his 13 th and 14 th amendment rights. The judge was John Howard Ferguson, who had recently declared that train cars traveling in more than one state could not operate under the Separate Car Act. 13 th Amendment- Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. 14 th Amendment- No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Court rules in favor of the state, saying that the state has the power to segregate railroad cars operating solely in one state. Plessy appealed to the Louisiana supreme court. The decision by the lower court was upheld and so was the penalty.

Supreme Court Case Plessy appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in He argued that the ruling against him was unconstitutional because the acts violated his 13 th and 14 th amendment rights. The courts decision endorsed the idea of “separate but equal.” The shocking ruling was against Homer Plessy The ruling was 8-1 in favor of the state. Plessy would lose his right to be treated equally with whites in America.

Majority Opinion Horace Gray Melville W. Fuller David J. Brewer Henry B. Brown George Shiras, Jr. Edward D. White Rufus W. Peckham Stephen J. Field John M. Harlan Dissenting Opinion Dissenting Opinion

Justice Henry Brown wrote: That the Separate Car Act does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery. A statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races -- a distinction which is founded in the color of the two races, and which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color -- has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races...The object of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social equality, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. Justice John Harlan wrote: Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law...In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott case...The present decision, it may well be apprehended, will not only stimulate aggressions, more or less brutal and irritating, upon the admitted rights of colored citizens, but will encourage the belief that it is possible, by means of state enactments, to defeat the beneficent purposes which the people of the United States had in view when they adopted the recent amendments of the Constitution.

My Opinion Based on future events after the case in the U.S., I feel that the ruling given by the supreme court was wrong. Using the ruling, segregation would become an institution throughout the south. Almost all public facilities would adopt the “separate but equal” policies as a way to segregate African Americans from whites.

Questions?