CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
Engaging All Families with Parent Leaders
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Administrative Entry Plan
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Coaching Workshop.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
ATHEA BRUSIN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, BOISE SPRING 2013 Educational Leadership Portfolio.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
Rachelle Kuehl Assistant Principal Applicant Roanoke City Public Schools.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Child Development Parent Training Jessica Amezcua-Gallegos.
Competency Reflections Tawana Daniels Dr. Laura Henry EDUC 6331 Administrative Internship 2.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Colorado Department of Education
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching

Table of Contents State Board of Education Goals State Board of Education Goals NCLB NCLB CSDE, CALI, and School Improvement CSDE, CALI, and School Improvement Overview of Executive Coaching Overview of Executive Coaching Phase 1: Assessment and Reflection Phase 1: Assessment and Reflection Phase 2: Principal and Executive Coach Planning Phase 2: Principal and Executive Coach Planning Phase 3: Executive Coach Work Plan Development Phase 3: Executive Coach Work Plan Development Phase 4: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation Phase 4: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation

State Board of Education Goals: 1. Increase student achievement 2. Improve effective instruction 3. Achieve resource equity and equality of opportunity 4. Reduce racial, ethnic, and economic isolation 5. Encourage greater parental and community involvement in all public schools of the state

No Child Left Behind: Implement SEA requirements of sections 1116 & 1117 of NCLB Implement SEA requirements of sections 1116 & 1117 of NCLB Communicate and monitor district NCLB requirements Communicate and monitor district NCLB requirements Provide technical assistance regarding NCLB regulations Provide technical assistance regarding NCLB regulations

The Executive Coaching Model is a support component of the Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI) provided by the Connecticut State Department of Education (CSDE).

CSDE, CALI, and School Improvement: The purpose of CALI is to support continuous school improvement and is focused on building district capacity. The goal of CALI is to develop and offer a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school improvement and to accelerate the closing of Connecticut’s achievement gap.

CALI Partnerships: Stupski Foundation Stupski Foundation Center for Performance Assessment Center for Performance Assessment Regional Educational Service Centers Regional Educational Service Centers State Education Resource Center State Education Resource Center CT Association of Schools CT Association of Schools CT Association of Boards of Education CT Association of Boards of Education Center for School Change Center for School Change

Building State, District, and School Capacity: Provide assistance and guidance to districts on the formulation of district and school improvement plans with a focus on continuous improvement, accountability and results Provide assistance and guidance to districts on the formulation of district and school improvement plans with a focus on continuous improvement, accountability and results Conduct district organizational assessments and school status assessments; and Conduct district organizational assessments and school status assessments; and Provide executive coaching to principals and teachers in schools with greatest need. Provide executive coaching to principals and teachers in schools with greatest need.

Professional Development to Support Accountability for Student Learning: Build capacity through RESC/SERC alliance and district leadership to provide statewide professional development and on-site technical assistance; Build capacity through RESC/SERC alliance and district leadership to provide statewide professional development and on-site technical assistance; Coordinate and provide professional development and on-site technical assistance for Title I schools and districts identified as “in need of improvement”; and Coordinate and provide professional development and on-site technical assistance for Title I schools and districts identified as “in need of improvement”; and Develop a continuum of leadership development and support for aspirant, new, and veteran leaders. Develop a continuum of leadership development and support for aspirant, new, and veteran leaders.

Professional Development and Technical Assistance: Data-Driven Decision Making Data-Driven Decision Making Data Teams Data Teams Professional Learning Communities Professional Learning Communities Making Standards Work Making Standards Work Effective Teaching Strategies Effective Teaching Strategies Executive Coaching Executive Coaching District Improvement Planning District Improvement Planning

Overview of Executive Coaching: Focuses on improving principal’s leadership capacity, including problem - solving, communication, and target-setting, to positively impact student achievement Focuses on improving principal’s leadership capacity, including problem - solving, communication, and target-setting, to positively impact student achievement “…a process in which someone else, with expertise in the field, through directed discussions and guided activity, helps a colleague solve a problem, or do a task better than would otherwise have been the case.” Mumford, 1993

The purpose of CALI Executive Coaching is to support school leaders of low-performing schools to improve student achievement: Focus on learning and teaching; Focus on learning and teaching; Enhance existing knowledge and improve skills to increase competency and confidence in setting rigorous student achievement targets; Enhance existing knowledge and improve skills to increase competency and confidence in setting rigorous student achievement targets; Increase organizational effectiveness to support student learning; and Increase organizational effectiveness to support student learning; and Develop skills through personal and organizational self-reflection. Develop skills through personal and organizational self-reflection.

Executive Coaching is based upon the following precepts: The coaching relationship is based upon trust and permission; The coaching relationship is based upon trust and permission; The coach moves between instructional and facilitative coaching strategies based upon assessment of the principal’s needs and in pursuit of agreed-upon goals; The coach moves between instructional and facilitative coaching strategies based upon assessment of the principal’s needs and in pursuit of agreed-upon goals;

The coach’s fundamental commitment is to student academic success and the coach will appropriately guide the principal towards that end; The coach’s fundamental commitment is to student academic success and the coach will appropriately guide the principal towards that end; Connecticut Standards for Leaders are a framework for reflective self-assessment, setting objectives, and on-going formative assessment. Connecticut Standards for Leaders are a framework for reflective self-assessment, setting objectives, and on-going formative assessment.

CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE: Leadership Standards for Effective School Leaders* School Improvement is supported by an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by: QUADRANT 1  …VISION AND CULTURE………………………… Facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by the school community. 1.Develop a shared vision 2.Plan and implement activities around the vision 3.Develop school culture and ensure equity 4.Develop procedures to monitor achievement of goals SSL – I, IV, V, VI QUADRANT 2  …LEARNING AND TEACHING Advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. 1. Guide the instructional program 2. Guide professional growth of staff 3. Create and utilize accountability systems SSL – III, VII, VIII, IX QUADRANT 3  …ORGANIZATION AND …CLIMATE……… Ensuring management of the organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. 1. Ensure a safe school environment 2. Create an infrastructure to support an effective learning environment 3.Manage the school learning-support system 4.Monitor and evaluate the program and staff 5.Allocate resources to improve student learning and staff productivity SSL - XI QUADRANT 4  …SCHOOL - COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS Collaborating with families and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources. 1.Collaborate to incorporate the perspective of families and community members 2. Engage and coordinate support from agencies outside the school SSL – XII *Adapted from the CSDE Standards for School Leaders (SSL)

Executive Coaching improves performance and enhances the efficiency of school leaders. Focuses on and brings out potential of school leader Focuses on and brings out potential of school leader Increases job satisfaction Increases job satisfaction Provides support Provides support Lessens stress Lessens stress Allows for empowerment Allows for empowerment Provides methods for problem solving Creates ongoing feedback Develops conflict resolution skills Focuses on teamwork and positive reinforcement

Executive Coaching is implemented in four phases: Phase 1: Assessment and Reflection Phase 2: Principal and Executive Coach Planning Phase 3: Executive Coach Work Plan Phase 4: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation

Phase 1: Assessment and Reflection A. Superintendent/District Level Meeting 1. Set up initial communication with coach, principal, superintendent (or designee), and CSDE 2. Explain and discuss overall process

Phase 1: Assessment and Reflection (cont.) B. Coach and Principal Meeting 1. Coach and the School Principal discuss the self-reflection process 2. Coach and Principal review school data together 2. Coach and Principal review school data together C. Principal completes Reflection

Phase 2: Principal & Executive Coach Planning A. Coach and principal review school leader self-reflection and coach’s assessment B. Coach and principal discuss key focus areas C. Coach and principal mutually agree to focus on 2-3 objectives D. Coach and principal discuss coaching process (including expectations of participants, indicators of success, monitoring objectives, and assessing progress)

Phase 3: Executive Coach Work Plan Development A. Coach and principal identify action steps to achieve principal’s targeted objectives B. Coach completes Executive Coach Work Plan

Phase 4: Implementation, Monitoring, & Evaluation A. Implementation of Executive Work Plan B. Coach completes weekly journal log C. Coach completes Work Plan Quarterly Review Report D. Coach completes the final executive coaching report E. Evaluation of the Executive Coaching process