A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constructability Review
Advertisements

Construction Management. Players Owner – owns project upon completion of construction –Private – owner owns land and pays for construction of facility.
Acquisition Planning and Adequate Market Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Acquisition and Grants Office Oversight and Compliance.
Utility As-Built Information Value Awareness
Project Delivery Methods. Traditional Owner Design/ Design/Bid/Construction Selection Build Owner’s Vision Owner’s Vision Owner’s Vision Complete Design.
Planning for Program Delivery Presented By: Michael A. Haithcock, P.E. Assistant State Program Delivery Engineer October 27, 2009.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
1. Create a $5 Billion Ohio Competitiveness Program 10 year construction program dedicated entirely to addressing Ohio’s most pressing congestion, safety.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Site Preparation Lessons Learned Michael P. Bromfield, Construction Engineer Convention Facilities Advisory Committee Review.
Coordinating with Project Manager Cindy Kowalski, PMP Utility Coordinator, Parsons December 2013.
Activities CTC-415. Activity Consumes Time Usually consumes resources (cure time for concrete) Definable start and finish Assignable – V. important –
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
GANTT CHARTS & SCHEDULES Chris Hammond, P.E. Transportation Department Manager, United Consulting August 27, 2014.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks StructurePoint November 20, 2013.
CVE 1000 Construction Engineering The Project Delivery System Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
INDOT’s Scheduling / Project Management System (SPMS) Vision & Objectives for Next Generation SPMS Mike Jenkins, Indiana DOT Teresa Franklin, Info Tech,
Coordinating with Project Manager Cindy Kowalski, PMP Utility Coordinator, Parsons November 19, 2013.
Rapid Assessment A quick evaluation of a disaster/emergency impacted area.
Safety Project Request received by TDOT Safety Project Request sent to RSAR Coordinator Safety Planning Office completes Letter of Findings for internal.
Oncor Electric Delivery Oncor Electric Delivery Restructure An Engineering & Construction Perspective SWEDE Conference May 11, 2007 San Antonio Mark Burt.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
GANTT CHARTS & SCHEDULES Chris Hammond, P.E. Transportation Department Manager, United Consulting December 18, 2013.
Work Plan Development Aschalew Aberra Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT November 20, 2013.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
Utility & Rail Coordination in Project Development Jennifer McCleve Utilities & Rail Branch Manager.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification Deborah Porter Project Engineer/Utility Coordinator Clark Dietz, Inc.
Understanding Right of Way Process Dawn Haecker, Training & Technical Support Supervisor, INDOT Trent Newport, VP, CrossRoad Engineers.
Construction Cost Estimating Class #2: The Estimating Process Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT November 19, 2013.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Utility and Railroad Engineer, INDOT June 10, 2015.
CON 4003 CVE 4073/5073 Construction Cost Estimating Class #2: The Estimating Process Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
1 Accommodating Utilities in Highway Rights-of-Way Federal Agency Update IRWA/AI Conference Las Vegas, NV January 13, 2009.
Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks, P.E. American Structurepoint, Inc. December 19, 2013.
Project Development Process. ODOT’ PDP A project management and transportation decision-making tool. Developing the detail to the level necessary to make.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
Project Scoping. Project Scoping – learning objective Who should complete the Project Initiation Package (PIP)? How is PDP Path used in scoping? Task.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
OTC Pres: Bid & Award Phase 4 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Eryca McCartin, Office.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Performance Measurement 201: Measuring What Matters and Creating a Legacy (Please Note: Community Engagement 101 a prerequisite for this presentation.)
WEST VIRGINIA INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD PROGRAM West Virginia Economic Development Council January 27, 2016.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Coordinating with Project Managers Cassie Reiter, P.E., ENV SP Utility Coordinator/Project Manager CMT Engineers and Consultants June 2016.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Construction Review LaVon M. Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 21, 2016.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin VP of SUE Development Blood Hound.
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
LESSONS LEARNED NYP Design and Construction NYP BEST PRACTICES.
A Paradigm for Utility Coordination
105 Indiana Administrative Code Article 13
Utility Coordination: An Overview
Chapter 2 – Review ‘construction management’
Agreements & Cost Estimates
Presentation transcript:

A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads

INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing safety, mobility and economic growth INDOT Values: Respect Teamwork Accountability Excellence INDOT Mission & Values

Stewards of Public Trust $208 million spent on Utilities/Railroad since 2010 $300 million spent on preliminary engineering $350 million spent on right-of-way $3.4 billion in construction $8 million spent on UT related delay claims coded in Site Manager

Identifying the critical path? Stumbling blocks to success Right-of-way acquisition Utilities Environmental permitting Successful teams will identify and address the critical path!

New Paradigm for Utility Coordination The primary goal of utility coordination is to get the utilities out of the way of our road project. The primary objective is to proactively engage our partners so that maintenance of and improvements to the public infrastructures can be accomplished.

Current Approach  Survey  Notify utility companies  Establish right-of-way  Design the project to stage 2-3  Bring in the utility companies to finalize coordination  Construct the project

New Paradigm  Survey  Bring utility companies to the table  Avoid utility impacts whenever feasible  Establish a preliminary layout for right-of- way and placement for utilities  “Everyone knows where everyone goes!”  Establish reimbursable positions

New Paradigm Obtain a ballpark estimate Determine the team who will acquire right-of-way Establish the critical path for the project Build in contract whenever feasible Provide our Geo-Tech reports

New Paradigm Example

 Conduct constructability reviews at project specific intervals!  Complete design through tracings  Thoroughly review utility work plans, schedules, right-of-way status, and special provisions before letting  Construct the project  Maintain utility coordination efforts New Paradigm

Constructability Manual on website On the left navigation from the home page: Click “About INDOT” Then Click “Central Office” Then Click “Project Management” Or go directly to: New Paradigm

The facilities of American Electric Power (AEP) Distribution (also known as Indiana Michigan Power) exist within the project limits. The utility could begin to implement work plan 45 days after receipt of the notice to proceed. The utility will be able to complete its involvement with the contract when the contractor has completed staking and clearing the right-of-way in the location of Sta to Sta “S-3(2)-C” such that the utility may adjust its facilities. It is anticipated that the utility will take approximately 75 calendar days to adjust its facilities in such area. AEP Distribution will need 60 days to obtain materials and 45 days to schedule work crews. If questions arise, Mark Walls of the utility may be contacted at or Special Provision Example

Post-letting Utility Coordination Coordinator stays “on point” Advises CN and PM of all utility activities Manages schedule Adjust to field conditions Monitor cost overruns Issue acknowledgement of completed work plan and final bill reminder

Managing Risk Monitoring accurate placement Constructability reviews point out the “risk points” within right-of-way where we need to monitor placement during the utility relocations and our construction.  In-house  Consultant  Contractor

Managing Risk Monitoring accurate placement cont. Factors to consider when deciding how to manage risk: Project complexity (i.e., urban, rural, design- build) Project schedule and budget Number of utility relocations Phasing and timing of utility relocations Right-of-way space

Benefits to this Approach The utility is brought in as a partner All right-of-way needs are accounted for One presentation to the property owner The project team controls the schedule Control costs of right-of-way, design, utility relocations and construction Avoid costly delays and confusion Construction, Utilities, and Project Managers are in full partnership throughout

Questions? Contact information: INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads Kenny Franklin

Consultant Pre-Qualification Pre-qualified firm/certified individuals Pre-requisites to attend training 4 Years industry experience with 1 year of utility work Bachelors in Engineering + 2 years Training 2-4 days Testing Maximum of 2 per firm in initial trainings Training frequency to meet industry needs