ENUM ITU-T Status Update An SAIC Company Prepared For: ACA Industry Workshop March, 2003 Telcordia Contact: Gary Richenaker +1 973 829 4305

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENUM Overview – July The ENUM Objective Mapping PSTN addresses into the IP world ENUM allow any IP device to establish whether an E.164 telephone.
Advertisements

Implications of ENUM Geoff Huston Office of the CTO September 2002.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Issues and Solutions Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau International Telecommunication.
2001_03_28 SG A contribution– 1 Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A Ad Hoc Meeting on ENUM March 28th & 29th, 2001 ENUM CONTRIBUTION TITLE: ENUM.
SG-A Ad Hoc - ENUM Jordyn A. Buchanan Register.com February 12, 2001.
2/12/2001 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T
Support and Transparent Process for ENUM Designated Zone implementations for the USA Before the Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A AdHoc Meeting.
Saif Bin Ghelaita Director of Technologies & Standards TRA UAE
Carrier/Infrastructure ENUM Requirements draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01.
ENUM Trial Implementation and results ENUM Workshop ETSI HQ Sophia Antipolis, France February 2004.
AIMS Workshop Heidelberg, 9-11 March /20 A Telecom and IP Project from ETSI Gerald Meyer
1October 2004Richard Stastny Introduction to ENUM Domain Pulse Vienna, February 4th, 2005 Richard Stastny, ÖFEG* * The opinions expressed here may or may.
Working Group ENUM, Seminar Bratislava 16th of March 2005 Proposal on ENUM Trial in the Slovak Republic Vladimir Murin Research Institute Posts and Telecommunications,
International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,
UK ENUM Jay Daley, Nominet UK. ENUM explained Nominet and ENUM.
Current Activities ENUM Introduction in Korea KRNIC Contact: Sungwoo Shin e164.arpa
ENUM Chris Wong Converging Services Branch International Training Program 7 September 2006.
QUALITY OF SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMME Jaroslaw Ponder Coordinator, Europe Region 1.
August 13-14, 2002 Washington, DC Gary Richenaker Chair ENUM Forum
Management of the Internet
Understanding ENUM & Current Status Network Planning August 21, 2001
ENUM Primer November 4, 2004 Tom McGarry - NeuStar
1 IETF – ENUM US Government Briefing Richard Shockey IETF ENUM Work Group Chair Senior Technical Industry Liaison NeuStar, Inc Vermont Avenue N.W.
ENUM Trial Implementation in Korea Contact: Sungwoo Shin th IETF ENUM Working Group.
Document IPW-41 IP and Telecoms Interworking Workshop N umbering, Naming Addressing and Routing IETF EMUM WG Proposal International Telecommunication Union.
December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
ENUM? “ Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM or Enum, from TElephone NUmber Mapping) is a suite of protocols to unify the telephone numbering system E.164 with.
February 25, Infrastructure-ENUM Secure, Private, Next Generation Addressing Infrastructure Douglas J. Ranalli Founder, Chief Strategy Officer NetNumber,
Naming & Addressing ENUM, EPC, WINC overview JaeYoung Choi
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
PSTN – User ENUM – „Infrastructure ENUM“ An ETSI View Richard Stastny IETF60 San Diego.
VoIP and ENUM The Austrian Trial IETF #57 Vienna July 2003 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG/TELEKOM AUSTRIA, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna enum:
ENUM Update for voipeer BOF Richard Shockey ENUM co-chair IETF 63 Paris.
October 2005Bell Canada Network Planning 1 ENUM (tElephone NUmber Mapping) Update CSCN Chair Presentation to ISACC Information and Communications Technology.
International Telecommunication Union Global ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union.
Industry Canada 1 Bob Leafloor Colman Ho Peter Chau Industry Canada January 2003 (ENUM) T E lephone NU mber M apping.
Japan Registry Service Copyright © 2004 JPRS A Glance at ENUM AP* Retreat Feb. 22, 2004 Hiro HOTTA.
October 8, 2015 University of Tulsa - Center for Information Security Microsoft Windows 2000 DNS October 8, 2015.
©Stephen Kingham SIP Peering SIP Workshop APAN Taipei Taiwan 23rd Aug 2005 By Stephen Kingham
© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM VoIP, Portability, and the Evolution of Addressing LNPA & Future of Numbering Working.
1 ENUM’s Role in VoIP IP Telephony Conference & Expo Miami February 12, 2004 Sheri Jenkinson VeriSign Communication Services Product Manager - ENUM
Japan Registry Service Copyright © 2004 JPRS ENUM Activities in AP Region AP* Retreat Cairns, Australia Hiro HOTTA Japan Registry Service (JPRS)
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union ICANN.
IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224
ENUM Saleem M. Al Balooshi ITRC Meeting Riyadh, KSA 8 – 10 Feb 2004 Nic.ae E164.arpa.
The State of VoIP Peering Charles Studt Director of Product Management, VoEX.
6bone address registry proposal Bob Fink ESnet 17 July 2002 Yokohama.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Organizational Perspectives Swedish Administration Workshop on ENUM Stockholm,
Slide 1 Nicklas Beijar - TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability Nicklas Beijar
Patrik Fältström. ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM. Feb 8, 2002, Geneva Explanation of ENUM (RFC 2916) Patrik Fältström Area Director, Applications Area,
12/18/2000 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T
Rob Blokzijl. RIPE 61 Rome, November RIPE Réseaux IP Européens Rob Blokzijl RIPE Chairman
VoIP and ENUM Short Introduction AK-TK Workshop ÖFEG, March 11th, 2004 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna tel:
1 February 8th, 2002 ITU ENUM Tutorial Stanislas Bourgain Autorité de régulation des télécommunications Unité Internet Service Interconnexion et Nouvelles.
ENUM The Status of UK Implementation Tony Holmes BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing Chairman UK ENUM Group ITU February 2002.
Telecom Department TELECOMMUNICATIONSITRADIOPOST Status of ENUM in Sweden ITU-T Tutorial Workshop on ENUM 8 February 2002 Joakim Strålmark from.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,
Update on ITU-T ENUM Activities Steven D. Lind AT&T SG-A ENUM - Ad Hoc February 12, 2001.
Internet Naming Service: DNS* Chapter 5. The Name Space The name space is the structure of the DNS database –An inverted tree with the root node at the.
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Organizational Perspectives Richard Hill, for Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.
1 Introduction to ENUM Technical and operational aspects Marco Bernardi NeuStar, Inc
ENUM Tutorial ENUM Forum June 3, 2003 Steven D. Lind, AT&T GEN0075R0.
18 January 2006 Copenhagen ERO - TISPAN WG4 meeting
ENF/ERO ENUM Convergence Workshop Tony Holmes Chairman ETSI SPAN11 NAR BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing 9-10 January 2002 Standards.
IP Telephony (VoIP).
Preparation for World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly 2016
KR ENUM Trial Status Update
Global ENUM Implementation
Implementation of ENUM on telecommunication networks
ENUM Status of US Implementation
Presentation transcript:

ENUM ITU-T Status Update An SAIC Company Prepared For: ACA Industry Workshop March, 2003 Telcordia Contact: Gary Richenaker Copyright © 2003 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved

ITU-T Status 2003 – 2 What is ENUM?  ENUM is part of the convergence of Circuit Switched and Packet Networks –ENUM is defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and translates an E164 number into Internet Domain Names; RFC September 2000  ENUM is about new service creation –Allows the use of a traditional telephone number in the context of different communication media, e.g., , VoIP, and therefore could facilitate the penetration of new applications into the mass market easily  Defines the use of Domain Name System (DNS) resource records to find optional : – addresses –Voice over IP SIP / H.323 servers –Voice Mail servers –Fax Machines

ITU-T Status 2003 – 3 How ENUM Works  Transform the E.164 telephone number into an ENUM DNS name –Reverses the digits –Separate the digits with a “.” –Add the ENUM domain name at the end  Query the Domain Name System (DNS) using that name to retrieve the Naming Authority Pointer Record (NAPTR) records that are associated with the telephone number  Choose a service from the DNS NAPTR response on the various types of services (including order and preference) associated with the telephone number

ITU-T Status 2003 – 4 How ENUM Works  ENUM by itself has no value  Revenues will be driven by new value-added services and applications enabled by ENUM  End User –Simplicity  One number addressing eliminates need to remember multiple, complex addresses –Expanded connectivity  Calls to non-PSTN (i.e., IP) devices can be completed  Service Provider –New services revenues  PSTN-IP Telephony –Strategic  Expand reach into the Internet

ITU-T Status 2003 – 5 How ENUM Works  The ITU and the Internet Society (ISOC) are working on a ‘global- tree’ implementation of ENUM using a tiered architecture with a unique top level domain (TLD) that will provide for a competitive implementation  Why is a unique TLD used in ENUM? –I have phone number; –I can choose between a.com and b.com –I select b.com, and get the DNS domain  b.com. –Somebody wants to contact me –He/She knows my phone number only –How is he/she know that it is in b.com and not a.com I have my data?  This is why a unique root or a “Golden Tree” is important

ITU-T Status 2003 – 6 How ENUM Works  The ITU/ISOC ‘Global-Tree’ will be a top rooted, global DNS ENUM implementation  Member States would have the choice of opting in or out of this implementation  Each ITU Member State may administer their portion of E.164 resources mapped into DNS as they see fit  There will be other private and perhaps global competitive-tree’ implementations

ITU-T Status 2003 – 7 How ENUM Works  The ‘Global-Tree’ domain name space will be organized in three tiers  Tier-0 is managed internationally –The ITU-TSB would have administrative responsibility –RIPE-NCC would have operational responsibility –Countries would opt-in or opt-out at the Tier-0 level –The Tier-0 name server would have ‘NS’ records for the Tier-1 name servers of the opted-in countries  Tier 1 is to be managed nationally, and is the entity that that operates the Tier-1 ENUM service within a country or Region and has a pointer to the Tier 2 Entity for each served TN  Tier2 is the entity that stores a list of service specific internet addresses in the form of URI’s in a DNS resource record called NAPTR for each subscriber

ITU-T Status 2003 – 8 How ENUM Works Tier-0 Tier-1 Tier-2 Tier-1 Directs the DNS query to the customer’s Tier-2 providers. An NS record is provided for each subscriber’s telephone number * An NS record is an authoritative Name Server DNS record used to delegate to subordinates Stores a list of service specific internet addresses in the form of URI’s in a DNS resource record called NAPTR for each subscriber. Returns the full list of Internet addresses associated with the E.164 number being queried. Registry Registry Registry Provider International-RIPE-NCC and ITU-TSB National CC 61 CC 1

ITU-T Status 2003 – 9 ITU-T Status Update  What is the ITU? –A treaty organization founded in 1865 –Presently, a specialized agency within the United Nations system –Includes Member States, Sector Members and Associates –Governments and the private sector develop Recommendations to co-ordinate service, operational and technical requirements for global networks and services  Three major sectors of ITU –ITU-R (Radio-Communication) –ITU-T (Telecom Standardization) –ITU-D (Telecom Development)  Goal of the ITU-T –Representatives of the ITU Membership develop Recommendations for the various fields of telecommunications

ITU-T Status 2003 – 10 ITU-T Status Update  Background –ISOC requested that the ITU be involved in order to authenticate that the legitimate representative of the Member State (Country) applied for delegation of its E.164 Country Code into e164.arpa –ITU-T SG2 began developing a Recommendation that would govern the procedures for the Tier 0 administrative aspects of populating E.164 numbers into the common designated domain

ITU-T Status 2003 – 11 ITU-T Status Update  It wasn’t that easy: –Germany – Governance of the ENUM root zone should be international and politically and commercially neutral –China - Opposed the use of the TLD “.arpa” for ENUM implementation and proposed that another TLD that is under the unique responsibility of the ITU would be more suitable –France and Syria- Proposed that the TLD for the whole ENUM DNS be a TLD delegated to the ITU itself as the administrative responsible entity

ITU-T Status 2003 – 12 ITU-T Status Update  During the September 2001 meeting it was agreed to separate administrative control from operational control –The ITU would have administrative control –Tier 0 would have operational control – at present RIPE NCC  Administrative control is defined as the necessary procedures by which E.164 country codes would be registered at the Tier 0 level in the common designated ENUM domain under consideration in a transparent and administratively neutral manner  The ITU shall have the responsibility over the administration of E.164 country code resources in the ENUM proposal under consideration

ITU-T Status 2003 – 13 ITU-T Status Update  At a February 2002 meeting of experts a draft set of interim procedures for the delegation of geographic E.164 Country Codes were conditionally approved by the participants but needed to be formally approved at the May meeting of SG2  Therefore, there were no formal ITU procedures in place from the February 2002 meeting until the May meeting of SG2 –Only the RIPE-NCC procedures were in effect –With no procedures in place countries such as France, Germany and the US took proactive steps to “safeguard” the delegation of their countries codes during this period –However, those countries who did not protect their E.164 Country Code were in jeopardy of having their country code delegated to the first requestor

ITU-T Status 2003 – 14 ITU-T Status Update  At the May meeting of SG2, the participants reviewed the draft set of initial interim procedures developed by the experts group in February, made some editorial revisions, and then unanimously approved the procedures  In addition, the RIPE-NCC procedures were reviewed and some minor clarifications were requested  Consequently, with the approval of these interim procedures countries that now apply to RIPE-NCC for the delegation of their country code, will have that application authenticated by the ITU-TSB

ITU-T Status 2003 – 15 ITU-T Status Update  At SG2, it was also agreed that a legal instrument of agreement needed to be negotiated between the ITU-TSB/ITU and ISOC in accordance with the ITU’s procedures –The ITU Telecommunications Standardization Bureau (TSB) began discussions and exchanged letters with RIPE-NCC to establish working relationship and develop procedures that were aligned with one another  At the May meeting of SG2, a report of a visit between the TSB and RIPE-NCC was reported as well as a copy of all the documentation that had been exchanged –These letters and agreements form part of the requested legal instrument. Discussion is taking place with respect to issues not covered so far

ITU-T Status 2003 – 16 ITU-T Status Update  It was recognized that only interim procedures for the delegation of E.164 geographic country codes were approved and that assignees of Network Codes or Groups of Countries still did not have an approved delegation procedure  At an experts meeting in September 2002 a draft set of interim procedures for CC + ICs and CC + GIG was proposed  At the December meeting of SG2, the participants reviewed the draft set of interim procedures developed by the experts group in September, made some editorial revisions, and then unanimously approved the procedures –The code had been delegated on a special interim basis at the May 2002 SG2 meeting

ITU-T Status 2003 – 17 ITU-T Status Update  Although it has not been without issues on both sides, the ITU and its members and ISOC and its members have developed a working relationship and provided an aligned set of procedures that allow for countries to delegate their E.164 Country Code into e164.arpa  As a result of the discussions, both sides now have a better understanding of the issues of concern to their respective memberships  A copy of the interim procedures can be obtained at: –

ITU-T Status 2003 – 18 Tier 0 ENUM Delegations  Delegations in e164.arpa as of 15 Feb 2003 –31 Netherlands –36 Hungary –40 Romania –43 Austria –44 UK –46 Sweden –48 Poland –49 Germany –55 Brazil –86 China –246 Diego Garcia –247 Ascension –290 Saint Helena –971 UAE –878 10VISIONng