The « Mizan » Program The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Justice 6 DEC 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
Advertisements

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Central Database for Justice – E-File.  Central Information System  Criminal, Civil, Administrative & Misdemeanor procedures  Procedural acts & decisions.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Regional conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, February, Belgrad,Serbia Albania’s Challenges.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
I. Court Civil and Penal Case Management Informatics System (ICMIS), II. Courts Portal, III. Audio Registration of the Hearings Sections, IV. Documentation.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
Ali Rıza ÇAM Reporter Judge in Ministry of Justice, Turkey Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice TURKISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
“MEZAN” Case Management Program At Palestinian Courts.
LAND DISPUTES Arvydas Bagdonavičius Deputy Director Aidas Petrošius Spokeman
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
1 TOKYO STOCK EXCHANGE’s XBRL project AOSEF Market Data & Technology Collaboration Workshop 2007 Nov. Ver.1.0.
Kosovo (Under UNSCR 1244) Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 6, October 7 th, – Overview of the Criminal Justice System and.
DISCOVERY AND DIRECTIONS HEARINGS. Discovery Is a stage of the civil pre-trial process where each party has the opportunity to request documents and additional.
Erich Waldecker Federal Ministry of Finance, Austria FTA Taxpayer Services Sub-group Istanbul, October 2006.
Powered by. Motus is an integrated web-based and mobile software platform that supports field work management and execution, giving employees necessary.
Madaba First Instance Court Workshop on court activity management and the functioning of courts.
Structural reform of enforcement. Background Performance reviews Ministry of Justice - NAOE Reform of the administration of justice Framework.
DEVELOPMENT OF GOVERNANCE, JUSTICE AND SECURITY STATISTICS IN KENYA ROBERT C. B. BULUMA KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS First Meeting of Governance,
Indicators for Criminal Cases Management in Bulgaria Public Hearing: Improving Criminal Justice Systems in Europe: The Role of E-Tools and Performance.
Croatia Statistical Training Courts Session 8, January 18 th, – An Electronic Case Management System – Advanced use With funding from the European.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
P R O J E C T O H E R M E S HERMES PROJECT Restructuring Project On the Justice Statistical Information System.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 9, November Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – Publication of results,
European judicial systems: 2008 findings and regional analysis Commission Européenne pour l’efficacité de la Justice European Commission for the Efficiency.
1 Launch of Project for Information and Communication Technology Enablement of Indian Judiciary by Dr. Manmohan Singh Hon’ble Prime Minister of India October.
1 SLIDE PRESENTATION BUILDING ETHICAL INSTITUTIONS THE EXPERIENCE OF THE LAGOS STATE JUDICIARY Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, SAN.
Piotr Karlik Criminal Proceedings Chamber Adam Mickiewicz University.
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia 22-26, Nemanjina Street Belgrade
1 Legislative monitor Legislative footprint and use of legislation LJUBLJANA, 1 OCTOBER 2015 Transparency International Slovenia Supported [in part] by.
New Zealand Department for Courts Case Management System.
Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Implementation of the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention - Access to.
Montenegro Statistical Training Courts / Prosecution Session 7, February 4, 9.00 – An Electronic Case Management System With funding from the European.
INSTITUTIONALIZING GREEN JUDGES AND GREEN RULES OF PROCEDURE: INDONESIAN EFFORTS TAKDIR RAHMADI JUSTICE/A MEMBER OF THE WORKING GROUP OF THE CAPACITY BUILDING.
8.2 How Federal Courts Are Organized. US District Courts District Courts= federal courts where trials are held and lawsuits begin; 94 district courts.
Management System of Judicial Cases. Abstract The system A historical perspective A workflow Some figures The next steps 2.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Judge Marcin Sosiński Vice president of the district court in Wroclaw, Poland.
Monitoring of Judicial Reform Citizens’ view of the judicial system in Montenegro March 2016 Telephone survey The project "Monitoring of Judicial Reform"
National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal By Dr P V S Jagan Mohan Rao M Com, LL B, FCS, FCMA, Ph D, MCJ (Master of communication & Journalism)
REPUBLIC OF LATVIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Līga Daugaviete Senior Legal Adviser of Energy Division October 26, 2005 Customer Complaints and Dispute.
CHAPTER 18 QUESTIONS. Question #1 What is meant by “dual court system”? National judiciary and the state court systems existing in each of the 50 states.
Electronic Case Management System – Georgian Experience Dr. Kontantine Kublashvili.
Sarajevo, November 14, 2012 JUDr. Ivana Hrdlickova, Ph.D. The Reduction of Backlog cases The Experience of The Czech Republic.
POSSIBLE E-SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS IN LITHUANIA
Process between Cadastre and Land Register -
Washington D.C., March 23, 2017 Improving Quality and Reliability of Land Records: Germany’s Experience Dr. Nicola Hoischen, LL.M. (Cologne/Paris 1)
OF ESTABLISHED PERSONNEL
Croatia Statistical Training
Implementation of ECLI in Latvia
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
SPECIALISED E-SERVICES FOR MUNICIPALITIES
PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IN THESSALONIKI
CSM Management Model 2017.
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Justice
Document 3:12 (2011–2012) Published 5/31/2012
The Portuguese Judicial System The Judicial High Council
ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Lessons learned during the Country Analytical Report preparation
Judicial Powers of Case Management
Disciplinary liability of judges in Romania
Ana Bilić Andrijanić Head of the Improving Judicial Efficiency Project
Data collection and President's Dashboards
Presentation transcript:

The « Mizan » Program The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Justice 6 DEC 2014

The Program for court cases management: “Mizan” “Mizan” is an electronic program used to manage court cases and to follow the progress of all procedures from the moment a case is registered by the specialized office until the last phase reached in each case, including the notification to the parties, the printing and registering of the sessions (hearings) minutes − thus making it easier for the judges and the employees to deal with the cases and to follow their progress electronically, and accelerating the court procedures.

The Case Management Program The Prosecutor Program All types of courts Execution sections of legal cases Execution sections of criminal cases Juveniles’ courts The Prosecution services The Notary Program The Notification Program The Notary services The Baillifs section

The “Mizan” Program and its impact on simplifying the judicial work and increasing its efficiency

The “Mizan” Program has become the backbone of the work in courts. In fact, all the courts in the Kingdom, of all types and levels, rely completely on this program for all the operations of cases’ registration, correspondences and the daily procedures related to the work in courts. This has led to: Simplifying the procedures so that the employees can provide the required services in a short period of time − thus reducing waiting times for lawyers or court users in courts’ corridors (due to the manual search in the registers). Relying on the national identity numbers of the persons concerned when registering a case, through the connection with the database of the Civil Status Department and the Passports Department, to check the real identity of every person and guarantee its accuracy. Relying on the national numbers of the institutions and companies concerned when registering a case, through the connection with the Companies Control Department and the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

Standardizing all the notification documents created by the program in all types of courts and, in addition to that, ensuring an easy follow up and access to the results of the notification procedure, with all the required explanation. Guaranteeing the accuracy of any registered ownership certificate through the electronic connection with the Department of Lands and Survey. Enabling the judge / President of the court to follow the judges’ work in the daily sessions (hearings) through the judges’ workflow table bellow: The judges’ workflow table daily weeklyThe Judge Session minutesCase fileTransfer CanceledThe JudgmentDetermine a session PrintBring Situation of session determined Session’s date Session’s time Case Number Court Session’s type Session’s goal Situation of session Reason Original date Amman West Magistrates Legal Session Examination of the last decision determined Conciliation

The data of this program have become a main database that enables to produce the required statistics and reports, using the same program. In fact, some of the important reports that are produced periodically by the courts are prepared through this program, for example the report on the number of the pending (previous and current), the incoming and the resolved cases, in the court and for each judge. Ministry of Justice West Amman Magistrates Legal Detailed table of the cases and the judges Detailed table of the cases and the judges in West Amman Magistrates Legal from 01/01/2014 to 14/05/2014 Name of the judge Pending cases (previous) Incoming cases in a month Previously pending but currently resolved cases Cases distributed between the judges Cases distributed from the judges Incoming renewal Total Resolved Pending (current)

Relying on the data of this program, numerous reports and statistics can be produced to help the upper echelons of the Administration and the decision makers to take the right decisions, for example:  The number of registered cases in courts allows to know the quantity of papers and paper files needed every year by the courts;  The statistics of the judges’ workload allow to forecast new recruitments and transfers of the judges in courts;  Reports about the income and expenditure of the execution cases’ cashier allow to control the financial procedures and to follow them electronically through the Financial and Administrative Inspection Units in the Ministry.

In addition to that, this program enables to produce numerous reports on the problems concerning the judicial work which the courts (any court) face, and to take the necessary decisions based on the statistics contained in those reports, such as:  The period of time between the moment an appeal on the main case is lodged and the moment the case is registered and a number given by the court of appeal, since this period is considered as a part of the case’s lifecycle;  The period of time between the prosecutor’s decision to transfer the case to the court and its registration in the court;  The statistics on the cases’ lifecycle and the pending cases, to know the reason for delay and to take the right decision about them.

Ministry of Justice The court’s workflow table From: 01/01/2014to: 31/01/2014 The Court Pending cases (previous) Incoming cases Resolved cases Pending cases (current) Resolution ratio Total West Amman % 7%

Ministry of Justice Report of the pending, the incoming and the resolved cases by judges From: 01/01/2014 to: 31/01/2014 Name of the judge Pending cases (current) Incoming cases Resolved casesResolution ratio Site Sahab Name of the court Sahab Magistrates’ ,38% 26,19%

Ministry of Justice Table of the types of incoming cases by judge From: 01/01/2014 to: 31/01/2014 Name of the court Mafraq Magistrates Legal Name of the judge Type of the case Cases by type - Total Lease Compensation for material and moral prejudice Total of the cases by judge Financial bonds

Ministry of Justice Table of the Prosecutor’s investigation and execution cases From: 01/01/2014 to: 31/01/2014 Prosecutor’s investigation cases Prosecutor’s execution cases Court Incoming cases Resolved casesResolution ratio Incoming cases Resolved casesResolution ratio Amman East Total % %

Ministry of Justice The court’s workflow table From: 01/01/2014to: 31/01/2014 The Site The type of the court Pending cases (previous) Incoming cases Resolved cases Pending cases (current) Resolution ratio Resolution ratio Tota l Average lifecycle of resolved cases (days ) Average lifecycle of pending cases (days) West Amman Magistrates Legal Total %83% % 5% % % 66% % 133% % 10% % 99% % 29% % 73% % 13% First instance Legal Magistrates Penal First instance Penal misdemeanors First instance Penal crimes Case administration Prosecution Civil public lawyer Appeal Mediation Notary Prosecutor’s execution Execution

Challenges Quality of the data entry: the biggest challenge is the presence of some errors or lack of data input by users, which in turn leads to incorrect and inaccurate outputs. Thank you for your kind attention